Tigecycline: a novel glycylcycline antibiotic

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for tigecycline-induced pancreatitis in a tertiary hospital: A retrospective study

AIMS

To analyse the clinical characteristics and risk factors for tigecycline-induced pancreatitis (TIP) and evaluate the safety and efficiency of tigecycline use in non-TIP.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted on adult and juvenile patients administered tigecycline for >3 days. The adults were classified as TIP, non-TIP (pancreatitis with other causes) and non-pancreatitis. Univariate analyses were performed to compare TIP and non-pancreatitis, and multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for TIP. The clinical characteristics of TIP, and the safety and efficiency of tigecycline use in non-TIP were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3910 patients (3823 adults and 87 juveniles) were enrolled. The adult patients comprised 21 TIP, 82 non-TIP and 3720 non-pancreatitis. The TIP prevalence was 0.56% in adults and 1.15% in juveniles. The mean time from tigecycline use to symptom onset was 7.2 days, and all cases were mild pancreatitis. The mean time from tigecycline withdrawal to symptom relief was 3.6 days. The multivariate analysis identified comorbid renal insufficiency as an independent risk factor for TIP (odds ratio = 3.032). Among the 82 non-TIP patients, 81.7% had severe pancreatitis and 47.6% had necrotizing pancreatitis. The modified computed tomography severity score after tigecycline use was similar to that before tigecycline use, but the pancreatic enzymes and infection indices were significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of TIP was low. Comorbid renal insufficiency was as an independent risk factor for TIP. Tigecycline is safe and efficient for treatment of pancreatitis, especially necrotizing pancreatitis, with intra-abdominal infection.

The Assessment of Anti-Melanoma Potential of Tigecycline-Cellular and Molecular Studies of Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis and Autophagy on Amelanotic and Melanotic Melanoma Cells

High mortality, aggressiveness, and the relatively low effectiveness of therapy make melanoma the most dangerous of skin cancers. Previously published studies presented the promising therapeutic potential of minocycline, doxycycline, and chlortetracycline on melanoma cells. This study aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of tigecycline, a third-generation tetracycline, on melanotic (COLO 829) and amelanotic (A375) melanoma cell lines. The obtained results showed that tigecycline, proportionally to the concentration and incubation time, efficiently inhibited proliferation of both types of melanoma cells. The effect was accompanied by the dysregulation of the cell cycle, the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, and a decrease in the reduced thiols and the levels of MITF and p44/42 MAPK. However, the ability to induce apoptosis was only found in COLO 829 melanoma cells. A375 cells appeared to be more resistant to the treatment with tigecycline. The drug did not induce apoptosis but caused an increase in LC3A/B protein levels-an autophagy marker. The observed differences in drug action on the tested cell lines also involved an increase in p21 and p16 protein levels in melanotic melanoma, which was related to cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase. The greater sensitivity of melanotic melanoma cells to the action of tigecycline suggests the possibility of considering the use of the drug in targeted therapy.

Clinical effectiveness of tigecycline in combination therapy against nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB in intensive care units: a retrospective multi-centre observational study

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline has in vitro bacteriostatic activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). However, the role of tigecycline in treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB remains controversial and clinical evidences are limited. We aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of tigecycline as part of the combination treatment of nosocomial CR-GNB pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This multi-centre cohort study retrospectively enrolled ICU-admitted patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB. Patients were categorized based on whether add-on tigecycline was used in combination with at least one anti-CR-GNB antibiotic. Clinical outcomes and all-cause mortality between patients with and without tigecycline were compared in the original and propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts. A subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the differences of clinical efficacies of add-on tigecycline treatment when combined with various anti-CR-GNB agents.

RESULTS

We analysed 395 patients with CR-GNB nosocomial pneumonia, of whom 148 received tigecycline and 247 did not. More than 80% of the enrolled patients were infected by CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). A trend of lower all-cause mortality on day 28 was noted in tigecycline group in the original cohort (27.7% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.088). In PS-matched cohort (102 patient pairs), patients with tigecycline had significantly lower clinical failure (46.1% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.017) and mortality rates (28.4% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001) on day 28. In multivariate analysis, tigecycline treatment was a protective factor against clinical failure (PS-matched cohort: aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.95) and all-cause mortality (original cohort: aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.99; PS-matched cohort: aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.74) at 28 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in subgroups of patients suggested significant clinical benefits of tigecycline when added to a colistin-included (log rank p value 0.005) and carbapenem-included (log rank p value 0.007) combination regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective observational study that included ICU-admitted patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by tigecycline-susceptible CR-GNB, mostly CRAB, tigecycline as part of a combination treatment regimen was associated with lower clinical failure and all-cause mortality rates.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless clear signs of infection (fever, elevated white blood count, elevated inflammatory markers and abnormal imaging) are present. Treatment is warranted only for true infections. In normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) the presence of indwelling medical devices (catheters, stents) should be considered when evaluating positive cultures. In the absence of such devices, the isolate represents an infection and should be treated. If an indwelling device is present and there are no signs of active infection, the device should be replaced if possible, and no treatment is required. If there are signs of an active infection the device should be removed or replaced, and treatment should be administered. Current treatments options and clinical data are limited. No agent or combination regimen has been shown to be superior to any other in randomized clinical trials. Ampicillin-sulbactam appears to have the best evidence for initial use. This is probably due to its ability to saturate penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3 when given in high dose. Tigecycline when used should be given in high dose as well. Polymyxins are a treatment option but are difficult to dose correctly and have significant side effects. Newer treatment options such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have potential; however, currently there are not enough data to support their use as single agents. Combination therapy appears to be the best treatment option and should always include high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam combined with another active agent such as high-dose tigecycline, polymyxins, etc. These infections require a high complexity of skill, and an infectious disease specialist should be involved in the management of these patients.

The Development of Third-Generation Tetracycline Antibiotics and New Perspectives

The tetracycline antibiotic class has acquired new valuable members due to the optimisation of the chemical structure. The first modern tetracycline introduced into therapy was tigecycline, followed by omadacycline, eravacycline, and sarecycline (the third generation). Structural and physicochemical key elements which led to the discovery of modern tetracyclines are approached. Thus, several chemical subgroups are distinguished, such as glycylcyclines, aminomethylcyclines, and fluorocyclines, which have excellent development potential. The antibacterial spectrum comprises several resistant bacteria, including those resistant to old tetracyclines. Sarecycline, a narrow-spectrum tetracycline, is notable for being very effective against Cutinebacterium acnes. The mechanism of antibacterial action from the perspective of the new compound is approached. Several severe bacterial infections are treated with tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline (with parenteral or oral formulations). In addition, sarecycline is very useful in treating acne vulgaris. Tetracyclines also have other non-antibiotic properties that require in-depth studies, such as the anti-inflammatory effect effect of sarecycline. The main side effects of modern tetracyclines are described in accordance with published clinical studies. Undoubtedly, this class of antibiotics continues to arouse the interest of researchers. As a result, new derivatives are developed and studied primarily for the antibiotic effect and other biological effects.

Rapid and Accurate Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination of tet(X)-Positive E. coli Using RNA Biomarkers

The emergence and prevalence of novel plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance genes, namely, tet(X) and their variants, pose a serious threat to public health worldwide. Rapid and accurate antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) that can simultaneously detect the genotype and phenotype of tet(X)-positive bacteria may contribute to the deployment of an effective antibiotic arsenal, mortality reduction, and a decrease in the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. However, current bacterial growth-based AST methods, such as broth microdilution, are time consuming and delay the prompt treatment of infectious diseases. Here, we developed a rapid RNA-based AST (RBAST) assay to effectively distinguish tet(X)-positive and -negative strains. RBAST works by detecting specific mRNA expression signatures in bacteria after short-term tigecycline exposure. As a proof of concept, a panel of clinical isolates was characterized successfully by using the RBAST method, with a 3-h assay time and 87.9% accuracy (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.8% to 96.6%). Altogether, our findings suggest that RNA signatures upon antibiotic exposure are promising biomarkers for the development of rapid AST, which could inform early antibiotic choices.

IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens are an increasing threat to global health. Tigecycline is one of the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of these complicated infections; however, the emergence of plasmid-encoded tigecycline resistance genes, namely, tet(X), severely diminishes its clinical efficacy. Currently, there is a lack of rapid and accurate antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for the detection of tet(X)-positive bacteria. In this study, we developed a rapid and robust RNA-based antibiotic susceptibility determination (RBAST) assay to effectively distinguish tet(X)-negative and -positive strains using specific RNA biomarkers in bacteria after tigecycline exposure. Using this RBAST method, we successfully characterized a set of clinical strains in 3 h. Our data indicate that the RBAST assay is useful for identifying tet(X)-positive Escherichia coli.

A case report of tigecycline induced acute pancreatitis in a renal transplant patient and review of the literature: Should we avoid tigecycline in patients on calcineurin inhibitors?

Tigecycline has been approved by the US (United States) Food and Drug Administration in a variety of complicated infections due to its broad-spectrum antibiotic activity. Following phase III trials, the product label was revised and acute pancreatitis was listed as an adverse effect. Its safety profile in special groups such as renal transplant patients is not exactly known. We report the first case of unintentional rechallenge of tigecycline induced pancreatitis in a renal transplant patient. Ten days following the renal transplantation, a 35-year-old patient presented to the clinic with acute rejection. He received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and pulse steroid treatments for rejection. Following the treatment, he developed perianal cellulitis and tigecycline was started. Nine days following initiation of tigecycline he received thrombectomy for his incidental cardiac thrombus. One day after thrombectomy, he developed acute pancreatitis (AP). Thrombectomy was suspected to be the cause of AP. During hospitalization for transplant rejection, tigecycline was re-started for a newly developed complicated abdominal infection. On the third day of the tigecycline re-treatment, he developed a second episode of AP. Following tigecycline withdrawal, his symptoms resolved and serum pancreatic enzymes returned to normal, thus AP was ultimately attributed to tigecycline. This lethal side effect should be kept in mind while treating severe infections in renal transplant recipients.

Immunomodulatory gene expression analysis in LPS-stimulated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes treated with antibiotics commonly used for multidrug-resistant strains

Conventional antibiotics used for the treatment of severe infections such as sepsis and septic shock confer immunomodulatory benefits. However, the growing problem of multidrug resistant infections has led to an increase in the administration of non-conventional last-resort antibiotics, including quinolones, aminoglycosides, and polypeptides, and the effects of these drugs on immunomodulatory gene expression in activated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) have not been reported. In this study, lipopolysaccharide-stimulated PMNs were incubated with piperacillin, rifampicin, fosfomycin (FOM), levofloxacin (LVFX), minocycline (MINO), colistin, tigecycline, or amikacin, and the mRNA expression levels of pattern recognition receptors (TLR2, TLR4, and CD14), inflammatory cytokines (TNFα and IL6), and chemokine receptors (IL8Rs and ITGAM) in these cells were quantitated using real-time qPCR. Many of the tested antibiotics altered the expression of the investigated cytokines. Notably, FOM, LVFX, and MINO significantly downregulated the expression of IL6, which is associated with pro- and anti-inflammatory defense mechanisms. Treatment of FOM and LVFX reduced IL-6 production as well as observed for IL6 gene expression. These findings indicated transcription and translation cooperation under the used experimental conditions. Therefore, our findings suggest that administration of these antibiotics suppresses the host anti-inflammatory response.

Omadacycline: A Novel Oral and Intravenous Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic Agent

Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic developed as a once-daily, intravenous and oral treatment for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Omadacycline, a derivative of minocycline, has a chemical structure similar to tigecycline with an alkylaminomethyl group replacing the glycylamido group at the C-9 position of the D-ring of the tetracycline core. Similar to other tetracyclines, omadacycline inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. Omadacycline possesses broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic, anaerobic, and atypical bacteria. Omadacycline remains active against bacterial isolates possessing common tetracycline resistance mechanisms such as efflux pumps (e.g., TetK) and ribosomal protection proteins (e.g., TetM) as well as in the presence of resistance mechanisms to other antibiotic classes. The pharmacokinetics of omadacycline are best described by a linear, three-compartment model following a zero-order intravenous infusion or first-order oral administration with transit compartments to account for delayed absorption. Omadacycline has a volume of distribution (V_d) ranging from 190 to 204 L, a terminal elimination half-life (t_½) of 13.5-17.1 h, total clearance (CL_T) of 8.8-10.6 L/h, and protein binding of 21.3% in healthy subjects. Oral bioavailability of omadacycline is estimated to be 34.5%. A single oral dose of 300 mg (bioequivalent to 100 mg IV) of omadacycline administered to fasted subjects achieved a maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of 0.5-0.6 mg/L and an area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC_0-∞) of 9.6-11.9 mg h/L. The free plasma area under concentration-time curve divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (i.e., fAUC_24h/MIC), has been established as the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of omadacycline antibacterial efficacy. Several animal models including neutropenic murine lung infection, thigh infection, and intraperitoneal challenge model have documented the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of omadacycline. A phase II clinical trial on complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) and three phase III clinical trials on ABSSSI and CABP demonstrated the safety and efficacy of omadacycline. The phase III trials, OASIS-1 (ABSSSI), OASIS-2 (ABSSSI), and OPTIC (CABP), established non-inferiority of omadacycline to linezolid (OASIS-1, OASIS-2) and moxifloxacin (OPTIC), respectively. Omadacycline is currently approved by the FDA for use in treatment of ABSSSI and CABP. Phase II clinical trials involving patients with acute cystitis and acute pyelonephritis are in progress. Mild, transient gastrointestinal events are the predominant adverse effects associated with use of omadacycline. Based on clinical trial data to date, the adverse effect profile of omadacycline is similar to studied comparators, linezolid and moxifloxacin. Unlike tigecycline and eravacycline, omadacycline has an oral formulation that allows for step-down therapy from the intravenous formulation, potentially facilitating earlier hospital discharge, outpatient therapy, and cost savings. Omadacycline has a potential role as part of an antimicrobial stewardship program in the treatment of patients with infections caused by antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistant Gram-positive [including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)] and Gram-negative pathogens.

Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Introduction and antibiotics

This is the first chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. This guideline is a revision of the recommendations published in 2010, taking into account recent substances and studies. As with previous revisions, the current situation of pathogen resistance and the results of new clinical trials are considered. The results are the present recommendations for parenteral calculated initial therapy of bacterial infections in adults. If several treatment options are mentioned, they are not always equivalent in their spectrum of microbiological activity. Therapeutic alternatives offer the opportunity to consider pathogen epidemiology, to avoid antibiotic intolerances or to escalate or de-escalate treatment in a manner suited to the situation. This article describes the different therapy options.

In Vitro Activity of Eravacycline against Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated in Clinical Laboratories Worldwide from 2013 to 2017

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Here, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline and comparator antimicrobial agents against a global collection of frequently encountered clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. The CLSI broth microdilution method was used to determine MIC data for isolates of Enterobacterales (n = 13,983), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 2,097), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,647), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 1,210) isolated primarily from respiratory, intra-abdominal, and urinary specimens by clinical laboratories in 36 countries from 2013 to 2017. Susceptibilities were interpreted using both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were defined by resistance to agents from ≥3 different antimicrobial classes. The MIC₉₀s ranged from 0.25 to 1 μg/ml for Enterobacteriaceae and were 1 μg/ml for A. baumannii and 2 μg/ml for S. maltophilia, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens Eravacycline's potency was up to 4-fold greater than that of tigecycline against genera/species of Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia The MIC₉₀s for five of six individual genera/species of Enterobacterales and A. baumannii were within 2-fold of the MIC₉₀s for their respective subsets of MDR isolates, while the MDR subpopulation of Klebsiella spp. demonstrated 4-fold higher MIC₉₀s. Eravacycline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the majority of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli, including MDR isolates, collected over a 5-year period. This study further underscores the potential benefit of eravacycline in the treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

Antibiotic Resistance and the MRSA Problem

Staphylococcus aureus is capable of becoming resistant to all classes of antibiotics clinically available and resistance can develop through de novo mutations in chromosomal genes or through acquisition of horizontally transferred resistance determinants. This review covers the most important antibiotics available for treatment of S. aureus infections and a special emphasis is dedicated to the current knowledge of the wide variety of resistance mechanisms that S. aureus employ to withstand antibiotics. Since resistance development has been inevitable for all currently available antibiotics, new therapies are continuously under development. Besides development of new small molecules affecting cell viability, alternative approaches including anti-virulence and bacteriophage therapeutics are being investigated and may become important tools to combat staphylococcal infections in the future.

Salvage tigecycline in high risk febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a prospective multicenter study

The purpose of this prospective, multi-center study was to examine the efficacy and safety of tigecycline as empirical treatment in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies who failed to respond to first-line antibiotics. A total of 125 patients with persistent fever (>72 h) despite first-line antibiotics received empirical treatment with tigecycline (loading dose of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg every 12 h). The use of other antimicrobial agents was not restricted. Treatment success rate was 68.0%. Subgroup analysis revealed a success rate of 73.1% in patients with pneumonia and 35.3% in patients with bacteremia. Toxicities were moderate with gastrointestinal symptoms being the main side effects. In conclusion, tigecycline-based antibacterial regimen was a justifiable empirical treatment in febrile neutropenic patients who failed to respond to first-line antibiotics except those with bacteremia. For patients with bacteremia, trials on higher-dose of tigecycline are needed.

In vitro activity of eravacycline against 2213 Gram-negative and 2424 Gram-positive bacterial pathogens isolated in Canadian hospital laboratories: CANWARD surveillance study 2014-2015

Gram-negative (n=2213) and Gram-positive (n=2424) pathogens isolated from patients in 13 Canadian hospitals in 2014 and 2015 were tested for in vitro susceptibility to eravacycline and comparators using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method. The concentration of eravacycline inhibiting 90% of isolates (MIC₉₀) ranged from 0.5 to 2μg/mL for 9 species of Enterobacteriaceae tested (n=2067). Eravacycline activity was largely unaffected by extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotypes in Escherichia coli (n=141) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=21). Eravacycline was active against Acinetobacter baumannii (n=28; MIC₉₀, 0.5μg/mL) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=118; MIC₉₀, 4μg/mL). Eravacycline MIC₉₀ for staphylococci (n=1653), enterococci (n=289), and streptococci (n=482) ranged from 0.12 to 0.25, 0.06 to 0.12, and 0.015 to 0.06μg/mL, respectively. Eravacycline's potency was equivalent to or 2- to 4-fold greater than tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci tested. Eravacycline demonstrates promising activity against recent clinical Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Over expression of AdeABC and AcrAB-TolC efflux systems confers tigecycline resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae

INTRODUCTION

Due to the wide use of tigecycline in the treatment of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, clinical resistance to tigecycline has increased in recent years. Here, we investigated the relationship between tigecycline resistance and the expression of efflux pumps.

METHODS

Clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae were consecutively collected from hospitalized patients in three hospitals. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tigecycline was determined using the broth microdilution method. Expression levels of efflux pump genes and regulators were examined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The correlations between tigecycline MICs and gene expression levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,026 A. baumannii and 725 K. pneumoniae strains were collected. Most strains were isolated from sputum. The tigecycline resistance rate was 13.4% in A. baumannii isolates and 6.5% in K. pneumoniae isolates. Overexpression of AdeABC and AcrAB-TolC efflux systems was observed found in clinical tigecycline-resistant isolates. The tigecycline MIC had a linear relationship with the adeB expression level in A. baumannii isolates, but not with the acrB expression level in K. pneumoniae isolates. There were significant linear trends in the overexpression of ramA as the tigecycline MIC increased in K. pneumoniae isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline resistance in A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae was strongly associated with the overexpression of efflux systems. More studies are needed to elucidate whether there are other regulators that affect the expression of adeB in A. baumannii and how ramA affects the expression of acrB in K. pneumoniae.

Review of Eravacycline, a Novel Fluorocycline Antibacterial Agent

Eravacycline is an investigational, synthetic fluorocycline antibacterial agent that is structurally similar to tigecycline with two modifications to the D-ring of its tetracycline core: a fluorine atom replaces the dimethylamine moiety at C-7 and a pyrrolidinoacetamido group replaces the 2-tertiary-butyl glycylamido at C-9. Like other tetracyclines, eravacycline inhibits bacterial protein synthesis through binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eravacycline is two- to fourfold more potent than tigecycline versus Gram-positive cocci and two- to eightfold more potent than tigecycline versus Gram-negative bacilli. Intravenous eravacycline demonstrates linear pharmacokinetics that have been described by a four-compartment model. Oral bioavailability of eravacycline is estimated at 28 % (range 26-32 %) and a single oral dose of 200 mg achieves a maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) of 0.23 ± 0.04 mg/L and 3.34 ± 1.11 mg·h/L, respectively. A population pharmacokinetic study of intravenous (IV) eravacycline demonstrated a mean steady-state volume of distribution (V ss) of 320 L or 4.2 L/kg, a mean terminal elimination half-life (t ½) of 48 h, and a mean total clearance (CL) of 13.5 L/h. In a neutropenic murine thigh infection model, the pharmacodynamic parameter that demonstrated the best correlation with antibacterial response was the ratio of area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24h/MIC). Several animal model studies including mouse systemic infection, thigh infection, lung infection, and pyelonephritis models have been published and demonstrated the in vivo efficacy of eravacycline. A phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eravacycline in the treatment of community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) has been published as well, and phase III clinical trials in cIAI and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) have been completed. The eravacycline phase III program, known as IGNITE (Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated with Eravacycline), investigated its safety and efficacy in cIAI (IGNITE 1) and cUTI (IGNITE 2). Eravacycline met the primary endpoint in IGNITE 1, while data analysis for IGNITE 2 is currently ongoing. Common adverse events reported in phase I-III studies included gastrointestinal effects such as nausea and vomiting. Eravacycline is a promising intravenous and oral fluorocycline that may offer an alternative treatment option for patients with serious infections, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Poor Central Nervous System Penetration of Tigecycline in a Patient with Sepsis and Ventriculitis Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae

Objective:

To report the use of tigecycline in a case of ventriculitis and concurrent bacteremia.

Case Summary:

A 57-year-old African American male with a ruptured brain aneurysm was admitted to the intensive care unit after surgical intervention and external ventricular drainage placement. His hospital course was complicated by myocardial infarction, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventriculitis, and sepsis, with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from multiple sites, including blood and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). The patient was treated with high doses of intravenous tigecycline and gentamicin along with intrathecal gentamicin. This combination eradicated infections outside the central nervous system (CNS) within 48 hours, but it took approximately 8 days for the CSF culture to become negative. Timed serum and CSF fluid samples were collected to determine CSF penetration of tigecycline on day 12 of therapy. CSF concentrations obtained 30 minutes after the dose and at the end of the dosing interval remained below the detectable limit of 0.05 μg/mL.

Discussion:

Although CSF tigecycline concentrations may not represent actual CNS tissue concentrations at the site of infection, the low CSF concentrations observed in our case may be responsible for the slow CSF clearance of infection. It was not clear whether gentamicin therapy alone, administered both intravenously and intrathecally, would have achieved the same outcome and cleared the infection from the CNS in this patient.

Conclusions:

Until additional clinical data are available, tigecycline should not be used for the management of MDR infections associated with the CNS.

Role of newer and re-emerging older agents in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Antimicrobial resistance has been identified by the World Health Organization as "one of the three greatest threats to human health." Gram negative bacteria in particular drive this alarming trend. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter species are of particular importance as they are associated with poor clinical outcomes and are common causes for a variety of infections including bacteremia, urinary tract infection, intra-abdominal infections and pneumonia. CRE are difficult to treat as carbapenem resistance is often accompanied by resistance to additional drug classes. For example, CRE may be extensively drug resistant or even pandrug resistant. Unfortunately, CRE infections have increased over the past 15 y while new and effective antibiotics have not kept pace. Recently, however, new agents have become available to help treat CRE infection, and several more are under development. This article reviews the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic issues around 4 emerging agents to treat CRE - ceftazidime-avibactam, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and minocycline. In addition, an overview of agents in the antibiotic pipeline - meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, and eravacycline is provided. More established agents, such as those in the polymyxin class and aminoglycoside class (other than the pipeline agent plazomicin), are not addressed here.

Newer antibiotics for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Peritonitis is a debilitating infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis typically has a lower response rate to antibiotics. In the past 15 years, newer antibiotics with activities against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria have been developed. In most circumstances, peritonitis due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci responds to vancomycin. If vancomycin cannot be used due to allergy and/or non-susceptibility, there is increasing evidence that linezolid and daptomycin are the drugs of choice. It is reasonable to start linezolid orally or intravenously, but subsequent dose reduction may be necessary in case of myelosuppression. Daptomycin can be given intravenously or intraperitoneally and has excellent anti-biofilm activity. Other treatment options for drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis include teicoplanin, tigecycline and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Teicoplanin is not available in some countries (e.g. the USA). Tigecycline can only be given intravenously. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is ineffective against Enterococcus faecalis and there is only low-quality evidence to support its efficacy in the treatment of peritonitis. Effective newer antibiotics against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are lacking. Polymyxins can be considered, but evidence on its efficacy is limited. In this review, we will discuss the potential use of newer antibiotics in the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis in PD patients.

Tigecycline Treatment for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are prevalent worldwide; they have few effective treatments and this jeopardizes public health. Clinicians often use tigecycline to combat CRE, but its clinical efficacy remains controversial. Therefore, to compare the efficacy and safety of tigecycline in treating CRE infections compared with that of other antimicrobial agents, and to evaluate whether combination therapy and high-dose regimens are beneficial, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed and Embase were searched for controlled trials or cohort studies reporting the efficacy and/or safety of tigecycline-based regimens to treat CRE infections. Statistical analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2.2. All meta-analyses were performed based on fixed- or random-effects model, and the I method was used to assess heterogeneity. Twenty-one controlled studies and 5 single-arm studies were included in this systematic review. With regard to the controlled studies, the tigecycline groups did not differ significantly from the control groups in terms of overall mortality (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-1.22; P = 0.73]), clinical response rate (OR = 0.58 [95% CI = 0.31-1.09; P = 0.09]), or microbiological response rate (OR = 0.46 [95% CI = 0.15-1.44; P = 0.18]). Subgroup analyses showed that 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients who received tigecycline combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (OR = 1.83 [95% CI = 1.07-3.12; P = 0.03]) and other antibiotic regimens (OR = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.39-0.88; P = 0.01]), respectively. In addition, high-dose tigecycline regimens differed significantly from standard dose schedules in terms of ICU mortality (OR = 12.48 [95% CI = 2.06-75.43; P = 0.006]). The results of the 5 single-arm studies corroborated the findings of the controlled studies. Our results indicated that the efficacy of tigecycline in treating CRE infections is similar to that of other antibiotics. Tigecycline combination therapy and high-dose regimens may be more effective than monotherapy and standard-dose regimens, respectively. Nonetheless, considering that the current available evidence is limited, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the comparative efficacy of tigecycline in treating CRE infections.

A 30-years review on pharmacokinetics of antibiotics: is the right time for pharmacogenetics?

Drug bioavailability may vary greatly amongst individuals, affecting both efficacy and toxicity: in humans, genetic variations account for a relevant proportion of such variability. In the last decade the use of pharmacogenetics in clinical practice, as a tool to individualize treatment, has shown a different degree of diffusion in various clinical fields.

In the field of infectious diseases, several studies identified a great number of associations between host genetic polymor-phisms and responses to antiretroviral therapy. For example, in patients treated with abacavir the screening for HLA-B*5701 before starting treatment is routine clinical practice and standard of care for all patients; efavirenz plasma levels are influenced by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) CYP2B6-516G> T (rs3745274). Regarding antibiotics, many studies investigated drug transporters involved in antibiotic bioavailability, especially for fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and antituberculars. To date, few data are available about pharmacogenetics of recently developed antibiotics such as tigecycline, daptomycin or linezolid. Considering the effect of SNPs in gene coding for proteins involved in antibiotics bioavailability, few data have been published.

Increasing knowledge in the field of antibiotic pharmacogenetics could be useful to explain the high drug inter-patients variability and to individualize therapy. In this paper we reported an overview of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of antibiotics to underline the importance of an integrated approach in choosing the right dosage in clinical practice.

Results of a Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Combination of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Tigecycline in High-Risk Hematologic Patients With Cancer With Febrile Neutropenia

Purpose

Empiric antibiotic monotherapy is considered the standard of treatment for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer, but this approach may be inadequate because of the increasing prevalence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria.

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, superiority trial, adult, febrile, high-risk neutropenic patients (FhrNPs) with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) with or without tigecycline (50 mg intravenously every 12 hours; loading dose 100 mg). The primary end point was resolution of febrile episode without modifications of the initial allocated treatment.

Results

Three hundred ninety FhrNPs were enrolled (combination/monotherapy, 187/203) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITTA). The ITTA revealed a successful outcome in 67.9% v 44.3% of patients who had received combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (127/187 v 90/203; absolute difference in risk (adr), 23.6%; 95% CI, 14% to 33%; P < .001). The combination regimen proved better than monotherapy in bacteremias (adr, 32.8%; 95% CI, 19% to 46%; P < .001) and in clinically documented infections (adr, 36%; 95% CI, 9% to 64%; P < .01). Mortality and number of adverse effects were limited and similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline is safe, well tolerated, and more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam alone in febrile, high-risk, neutropenic hematologic patients with cancer. In epidemiologic settings characterized by a high prevalence of infections because of MDR microorganisms, this combination could be considered as one of the first-line empiric antibiotic therapies.

Modulation of Bacterial Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps of the Major Facilitator Superfamily

Bacterial infections pose a serious public health concern, especially when an infectious disease has a multidrug resistant causative agent. Such multidrug resistant bacteria can compromise the clinical utility of major chemotherapeutic antimicrobial agents. Drug and multidrug resistant bacteria harbor several distinct molecular mechanisms for resistance. Bacterial antimicrobial agent efflux pumps represent a major mechanism of clinical resistance. The major facilitator superfamily (MFS) is one of the largest groups of solute transporters to date and includes a significant number of bacterial drug and multidrug efflux pumps. We review recent work on the modulation of multidrug efflux pumps, paying special attention to those transporters belonging primarily to the MFS.

Tigecycline For Skin Infection With SIRS In Immunocompromised Host

Tigecycline is the first agent in the new class of glycylcycline antibiotics.

It’s expanded broad spectrum of activity, with demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy against clinically important Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens include also anerobes and antibiotic-resistant isolates.

It is presented the case of a 54 years old man, recently diagnosed with HIV infection, that had high fever and skin abscesses. The laboratory investigations showed a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.

After 10 days of treatment with Tygacil, 100 mg at first, then 50 mg/12 hours, surgical incision and drainage, antiinflammatory and symptomatic treatment, the patient’s symptoms disappeared and we started also the antiretroviral therapy.

Tigecycline versus levofloxacin in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: an analysis of risk factors

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of tigecycline (TGC) versus levofloxacin (LEV) in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using pooled data and to perform exploratory analyses of risk factors associated with poor outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

Pooled analyses of 2 phase 3 studies in patients randomized to intravenous (IV) TGC (100 mg, then 50 mg q12h) or IV LEV (500 mg q24h or q12h). Clinical responses at test of cure visit for the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intention to treat populations were assessed for patients with risk factors including aged ≥65 years, prior antibiotic failure, bacteremia, multilobar disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, altered mental status, hypoxemia, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, white blood cell count >30 x 10(9)/L or <4 x 10(9)/L, CURB-65 score ≥2, Fine score category of III to V and at least 2 clinical instability criteria on physical examination.

RESULTS

In the CE population of 574 patients, overall cure rates were similar: TGC (253/282, 89.7%); LEV (252/292, 86.3%). For all but one risk factor, cure rates for TGC were similar to or higher than those for LEV. For individual risk factors, the greatest difference between treatment groups was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus (difference of 22.9 for TGC versus LEV; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 - 39.9).

CONCLUSIONS

TGC achieved cure rates similar to those of LEV in hospitalized patients with CAP. For patients with risk factors, TGC provided generally favorable clinical outcomes.

In vitro activity and durability of a combination of an antibiofilm and an antibiotic against vascular catheter colonization

Catheter-associated infections can cause severe complications and even death. Effective antimicrobial modification of catheters that can prevent device colonization has the potential of preventing clinical infection. We studied in vitro the antimicrobial activities of central venous catheters impregnated with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antibiofilm agent, and a broad-spectrum antibiotic against a range of important clinical pathogens. NAC-levofloxacin-impregnated (NACLEV) catheters were also evaluated for their antiadherence activity. NACLEV catheters produced the most active and durable antimicrobial effect against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates and significantly reduced colonization (P < 0.0001) by all tested pathogens compared to control catheters. These in vitro results suggest that this antimicrobial combination can potentially be used to combat catheter colonization and catheter-associated infection.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates from various clinical specimens

PURPOSE

Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonotic disease and still constitutes a major public health problem. In the study we claimed to identify Brucella species from clinical samples of patients with active brucellosis from Van region of Eastern Anatolia and to determine in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of these strains to commonly used anti-Brucella agents and a possible new alternative tigecycline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 56 Brucella isolates were enrolled the study and the identification of the isolates were based on conventional methods. In vitro activities of antimicrobials were evaluated by the E test method.

RESULTS

All isolates were identified as B. melitensis. MIC(90) values of doxycycline, streptomycin, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tigecycline were 0.064 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 2 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L and 0.094 mg/L, respectively. Tigecycline had low MIC(50) and MIC(90) values against all B. melitensis strains; the highest MIC observed was 0.25 μg/mL.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that tigecycline can be a therapeutic alternative option for the treatment of brucellosis.

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs.

Methods

In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes.

Results

One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P < 0.001), primarily due to gastrointestinal-related events, especially nausea (21.6% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001) and vomiting (12.4% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.005).

Conclusions

Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201

Determination of the pharmacodynamic activity of clinically achievable tigecycline serum concentrations against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, AmpC beta-lactamases and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems using an in vitro model

BACKGROUND

Escherichia coli harbouring extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC beta-lactamases and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems (CRS) are increasing worldwide. This study assessed the in vitro pharmacodynamic activity of tigecycline against E. coli with ESBLs, AmpCs and CRS.

METHODS

Nine E. coli isolates were studied, including three ESBL-producing isolates, three AmpC-producing isolates and three isolates demonstrating CRS (ertapenem MIC > or = 0.12 mg/L). The pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with organisms at 1 x 10(6) cfu/mL and tigecycline dosed once every 24 h to simulate the fC(max) (free peak serum concentration) and t(1/2) (serum half-life) obtained after standard dosing of 100 mg intravenously every 24 h (fC(max), 0.15 mg/L; t(1/2), 42 h). Samples were collected over 48 h.

RESULTS

For isolates with a tigecycline fAUC(24)/MIC of 2.0 (tigecycline MIC = 0.5 mg/L), tigecycline demonstrated bacteriostatic activity with < 1 log(10) reduction in bacterial growth compared with the initial inoculum at 12, 24 and 48 h. Against the two isolates for which the tigecycline fAUC(24)/MIC was 4.0 (tigecycline MIC = 0.25 mg/L), tigecycline demonstrated bacteriostatic activity with approximately 1.5 log(10) reduction in bacterial growth compared with the initial inoculum at 12, 24 and 48 h. Against the two isolates for which the tigecycline fAUC(24)/MIC was 8.0 (tigecycline MIC = 0.12 mg/L), tigecycline demonstrated bacteriostatic activity with approximately 2.0 log(10) reduction in bacterial growth compared with the initial inoculum at 12, 24 and 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline demonstrated approximately 1-2 log(10) killing against E. coli harbouring ESBLs, AmpC beta-lactamases and CRS when simulating clinically achievable serum concentrations, and represents a potential therapy for infections caused by these isolates.

Tigecycline use in cancer patients with serious infections: a report on 110 cases from a single institution

Tigecycline, the first in a new class of glycylcyclines, has been approved for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure and intraabdominal infections in adults. However, clinical data on its safety and effectiveness in cancer patients are lacking. We reviewed the records of all cancer patients treated with tigecycline for more than 48 hours between June 2005 and September 2006 at our institution and identified 110 consecutive cases (median age, 58 yr; range, 18-81 yr). We collected data on demographics, cancer type, tigecycline indication, microbiologic characteristics, side effects, and outcome. Sixty-four (58%) patients had hematologic malignancies; 27 patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Thirty-one (28%) patients had neutropenia, and 62 (56%) were in the intensive care unit at the start of therapy. Most patients (106 [96%]) received tigecycline as a second-line agent (after not responding to other broad-spectrum antibiotics), and 101 (92%) received it in combination with an antipseudomonal drug. The mean duration of therapy was 11 days (range, 3-35 d). Sixty-six (60%) patients received tigecycline for refractory pneumonia, 19 (17%) had bacteremia, 9 (8%) had intraabdominal infections, and 7 (6%) had complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Fifty (45%) patients had microbiologically documented infections, and the remaining patients had negative cultures at the start of therapy.An overall clinical response was noted in 70 (64%) patients. More clinical responses were seen in patients with bacteremia than in those with pneumonia (79% vs. 51%; p = 0.029). Patients with microbiologically documented infections had significantly higher clinical response rates than patients with non-microbiologically documented infections (73% vs. 55%; p = 0.047). Forty (36%) patients did not respond to treatment; 36 of these patients died of active infection during tigecycline therapy. Patients with pneumonia had a significantly higher mortality rate than patients with bacteremia (44% vs. 16%; p = 0.026). During the 60 days of follow-up from the date of clinical response, patients with pneumonia had significantly shorter survival durations than patients with other infections. Of the 42 patients who were not on antiemetics or ventilator support at the start of tigecycline therapy, 2 (5%) experienced mild nausea, and 1 (2%) experienced nausea and vomiting. Only 4 (4%) patients overall experienced diarrhea during tigecycline therapy, all of whose stools were negative for Clostridium difficile toxin. No serious adverse events related to tigecycline use were identified. The combination of tigecycline and an antipseudomonal drug may be appropriate for treating refractory infections and multidrug-resistant organisms in cancer patients, including hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Patients with refractory pneumonia had a relatively low clinical response rate in our study.

Tigecycline: in community-acquired pneumonia

Tigecycline is a first-in-class glycylcycline, broad-spectrum, intravenous antibacterial developed to overcome the two major mechanisms of tetracycline resistance (ribosomal protection and efflux). The drug has been in use since 2005 for complicated intra-abdominal infections, and complicated skin and soft tissue structure infections, but is currently being assessed in the US for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. In vitro, tigecycline had good activity against a range of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens implicated in CAP. Compared with other antibacterials, tigecycline has a prolonged post-antibiotic effect against key bacteria and a long serum elimination half-life in humans. The drug effectively penetrates lung tissue. The combined results of two well designed, phase III studies demonstrated that tigecycline 100 mg initially, followed by 50 mg every 12 hours for 7-14 days was not inferior to recommended dosages of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with CAP. Clinical cure rates were 89.7% versus 86.3% in the clinically evaluable population and 81.0% versus 79.7% in the clinical modified intent-to-treat population. Tigecycline was generally well tolerated in patients with CAP.

Ceftaroline: a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI), including those caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Ceftaroline has the ability to bind to penicillin-binding protein (PBP)2a, an MRSA-specific PBP that has low affinity for most other beta-lactam antibacterials. The high binding affinity of ceftaroline to PBP2a (median inhibitory concentration 0.90 microg/mL) correlates well with its low minimum inhibitory concentration for MRSA. Ceftaroline is active in vitro against Gram-positive cocci, including MRSA, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (not E. faecium). The broad-spectrum activity of ceftaroline includes many Gram-negative pathogens but does not extend to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing or AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae or most nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli. Ceftaroline demonstrates limited activity against anaerobes such as Bacteroides fragilis and non-fragilis Bacteroides spp. Limited data show that ceftaroline has a low propensity to select for resistant subpopulations. Ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug) is rapidly converted by plasma phosphatases to active ceftaroline. For multiple intravenous doses of 600 mg given over 1 h every 12 hours for 14 days, the maximum plasma concentration was 19.0 microg/mL and 21.0 microg/mL for first and last dose, respectively. Ceftaroline has a volume of distribution of 0.37 L/kg (28.3 L), low protein binding (<20%) and a serum half-life of 2.6 hours. No drug accumulation occurs with multiple doses and elimination occurs primarily through renal excretion (49.6%). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-50 mL/min); no adjustment is needed for mild renal impairment. Currently, limited clinical trial data are available for ceftaroline. A phase II study randomized 100 patients with cSSSI to intravenous ceftaroline 600 mg every 12 hours or intravenous vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours with or without intravenous aztreonam 1 g every 8 hours (standard therapy) for 7-14 days. Clinical cure rates were 96.7% for ceftaroline compared with 88.9% for standard therapy. Adverse events were similar between groups and generally mild in nature. In a phase III trial, 702 patients with cSSSI were randomized to ceftaroline 600 mg or vancomycin 1 g plus aztreonam 1 g, each administered intravenously every 12 hours for 5-14 days. Ceftaroline was noninferior to vancomycin plus aztreonam in treating cSSSI caused by both Gram-positive and -negative pathogens. Adverse event rates were similar between groups. Ceftaroline is well tolerated, which is consistent with the good safety and tolerability profile of the cephalosporin class. In summary, ceftaroline is a promising treatment for cSSSI and CAP, and has potential to be used as monotherapy for polymicrobial infections because of its broad-spectrum activity. Further clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline, and to define its role in patient care.

Acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline: case report and review of the literature

Tigecycline is a new broad-spectrum antibiotic. Nausea and vomiting are its most common side-effects. We describe here a case of severe acute pancreatitis related to tigecycline in order to highlight the possible occurrence of this adverse event and to remind clinicians to measure the lipase rate if in any doubt.

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline compared with vancomycin or linezolid for treatment of serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are causing serious nosocomial infections. Tigecycline was evaluated in hospitalized patients with MRSA or VRE infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized (3:1), double-blind, multicentre, Phase 3 study compared the safety and efficacy of tigecycline with vancomycin or linezolid in hospitalized patients with MRSA or VRE infection, respectively. Patients were treated for 7-28 days and the test-of-cure (TOC) assessment was made 12-37 days after the last dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response (cure, failure and indeterminate) in the co-primary, microbiologically evaluable (ME) and microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) populations at the TOC assessment.

RESULTS

For MRSA infection, clinical cure rates in the ME population (n = 117) were 81.4% (70 of 86 patients) with tigecycline and 83.9% (26 of 31 patients) with vancomycin. In the m-mITT population (n = 133), clinical cure occurred in 75 of 100 tigecycline-treated patients (75.0%) and in 27 of 33 vancomycin-treated patients (81.8%). In patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by MRSA, cure rates were similar with tigecycline or vancomycin (86.4% versus 86.9% in ME population; and 78.6% versus 87.0% in m-mITT population). In patients with MRSA infection, nausea or vomiting occurred more frequently with tigecycline than with vancomycin (41.0% versus 17.9%); most cases were mild, with only three patients discontinuing treatment. In patients with VRE (total enrollment, 15), 3 of 3 and 3 of 8 patients in the ME and m-mITT populations, respectively, were cured by tigecycline, compared with 2 of 3 patients in the ME and m-mITT populations treated with linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline is safe and effective in hospitalized patients with serious infection caused by MRSA. There were too few cases of VRE to draw any conclusions.

Doripenem: an expected arrival in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens

BACKGROUND

Potent new drugs against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, namely Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. and pan-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, which constitute an increasing medical threat, are almost absent from the future pharmaceutical pipeline.

OBJECTIVE

This drug evaluation focuses on the position of doripenem, a novel forthcoming carbapenem. Mechanisms of resistance and new drugs with anti-Gram-negative activity are also briefly reviewed.

METHODS

Literature search was performed for new carbapenems, new antibiotics, doripenem, metallo-beta-lactamase inhibitors, multidrug-resistant pathogens, antipseudomonal antibiotics and multidrug-resistant epidemiology.

RESULTS

Doripenem possesses a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative bacteria, similar to that of meropenem, while retaining the spectrum of imipenem against Gram-positive pathogens. Against P. aeruginosa, doripenem exhibits rapid bactericidal activity with 2 - 4-fold lower MIC values, compared to meropenem. Exploitation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic applications could offer a treatment opportunity against strains exhibiting borderline resistance to doripenem. Stability against numerous beta-lactamases, low adverse event potential and more potent in vitro antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and A. baumanni compared to the existing carbapenems, are its principal features.

Distribution of resistant gram-positive organisms across the census regions of the United States and in vitro activity of tigecycline, a new glycylcycline antimicrobial

BACKGROUND

Gram-positive isolates were collected from 76 medical centers within the 9 census regions across the United States.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.

RESULTS

Vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecium isolates varied from 45.5% (New England) to 85.3% (East South Central). The lowest concentrations at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC90) were for tigecycline (0.06-0.12 microg/mL) and for linezolid (2-4 microg/mL). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) varied from 27.4% (New England) to 62.4% (East South Central). All MRSA were susceptible to tigecycline, linezolid, and vancomycin. Penicillin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae ranged from 23.3% in the Pacific region to 54.5% in the East South Central region. Tigecycline, imipenem, levofloxacin, linezolid, and vancomycin all maintained MIC90 of < or =1 microg/mL against penicillin-nonsusceptible S pneumoniae in vitro, irrespective of region.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the variable rate of antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive organisms in the United States. Tigecycline may make a useful addition to the antimicrobial armamentarium.

Will longer antimicrobial patents improve global public health?

The problem of antimicrobial resistance has led some infectious disease experts and their professional societies to propose the use of transferable intellectual property rights (wildcard patents) and patent term extensions as methods to encourage antimicrobial research and development. We evaluate recent approvals of new antimicrobial classes and find that the number of new introductions is higher than previously suggested. More importantly, creating new patent rights is shown to be an inefficient and possibly counterproductive response to antimicrobial resistance. Wildcard patents would operate as a more than US$40 billion annual tax on heart disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and depression to inefficiently cross-subsidise antimicrobial research and development. Patent term extensions would likewise cost more than $5 billion per year, hinder access, and allocate resources inefficiently. Alternative uses for these funds are proposed, with greater potential positive effects on global public health. Additional public funding of antimicrobial research could be a more effective use of these funds. Conservation efforts to encourage the prudent use of antimicrobial drugs should be directly reimbursed. Patent owners should be compensated for both conservation efforts and valuable innovation.

Tigecycline for Treatment of Pneumonia and Empyema Caused by Carbapenemase-ProducingKlebsiella pneumoniae

Strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae that produce one of three possible carbapenemases--KPC--have recently been identified with increasing frequency among isolates recovered from patients residing along the East Coast of the United States, particularly within the New York City metropolitan region. These strains have exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, including carbapenem agents. We report a case of nosocomial pneumonia and empyema caused by a KPC-producing isolate of K. pneumoniae at a large midwestern U.S. tertiary care facility in which the patient was treated with tigecycline. Although the pneumonia was treated successfully, the empyema recurred in association with a treatment-emergent tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) increase from 0.75 to 2 microg/ml. Clinicians should be aware of the potential occurrence of this treatment-emergent MIC increase, especially in the setting of sustained tigecycline therapy. In addition, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae reinforces the importance of antibiotic stewardship and strict infection control practices.

Septischer Schock durch Vancomycin-resistente Enterokokken

Adequate antimicrobial therapy is of crucial importance for the survival of critically ill patients with severe nosocomial infections. Tigecycline is an important therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by multi-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). A large randomised study (patients with APACHE-II-score >30 excluded/mean APACHE-II-score 6) demonstrated that tigecycline is not inferior to imipenem/cilastatin for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. However, no case has been reported with microbiological eradication and clinical cure in a patient with septic shock due to peritonitis caused by VRE and treatment with tigecycline monotherapy. Clinical details of a patient suffering from postoperative peritonitis are presented. The patient developed severe septic shock after pancreatic surgery (multiple organ failure, APACHE-II-score 34). As the site of anastomotic leakage was very small and could not be exactly identified, irrigation-suction drains were placed followed by closed postoperative continuous lavage. The pathogen responsible was identified as a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, therefore monotherapy with tigecycline was started which resulted in microbiological response and clinical cure. Tigecycline is a new therapeutic option for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections and from an economic point of view financially rewarding when used as monotherapy.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of nosocomial infections. This organism shows a remarkable capacity to resist antibiotics, either intrinsically (because of constitutive expression of beta-lactamases and efflux pumps, combined with low permeability of the outer-membrane) or following acquisition of resistance genes (e.g., genes for beta-lactamases, or enzymes inactivating aminoglycosides or modifying their target), over-expression of efflux pumps, decreased expression of porins, or mutations in quinolone targets. Worryingly, these mechanisms are often present simultaneously, thereby conferring multiresistant phenotypes. Susceptibility testing is therefore crucial in clinical practice. Empirical treatment usually involves combination therapy, selected on the basis of known local epidemiology (usually a beta-lactam plus an aminoglycoside or a fluoroquinolone). However, therapy should be simplified as soon as possible, based on susceptibility data and the patient's clinical evolution. Alternative drugs (e.g., colistin) have proven useful against multiresistant strains, but innovative therapeutic options for the future remain scarce, while attempts to develop vaccines have been unsuccessful to date. Among broad-spectrum antibiotics in development, ceftobiprole, sitafloxacin and doripenem show interesting in-vitro activity, although the first two molecules have been evaluated in clinics only against Gram-positive organisms. Doripenem has received a fast track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Pump inhibitors are undergoing phase I trials in cystic fibrosis patients. Therefore, selecting appropriate antibiotics and optimising their use on the basis of pharmacodynamic concepts currently remains the best way of coping with pseudomonal infections.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A public health issue with economic consequences

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become endemic worldwide in hospitals, and community-associated MRSA is spreading into the community at large.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the current cost of MRSA in Canada and to assess the magnitude of this public health issue.

METHODS

An extensive review of the literature was conducted to gather epidemiology, health care resource utilization and cost data for MRSA in Canadian settings. The current MRSA burden was estimated using available cost data and the most recent epidemiology data.

RESULTS

The rate of MRSA in Canadian hospitals increased from 0.46 to 5.90 per 1000 admissions between 1995 and 2004, while community-associated MRSA continued to spread into the community. Patients harbouring MRSA required prolonged hospitalization (average 26 days of isolation per patient), special control measures, expensive treatments and extensive surveillance. Total cost per infected MRSA patient averaged $12,216, with hospitalization being the major cost driver (81%), followed by barrier precautions (13%), antimicrobial therapy (4%) and laboratory investigations (2%). The most recent epidemiological data, combined with available cost data, suggest that direct health care cost attributable to MRSA in Canada, including cost for management of MRSA-infected and-colonized patients and MRSA infrastructure, averaged $82 million in 2004 and could reach $129 million in 2010.

CONCLUSION

MRSA is a costly public health issue that needs to be tackled if the growing burden of this disease in Canadian hospitals and in the community is to be limited.

Antimicrobial therapy of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Antibiotic resistance among pneumococci, enterococci, and staphylococci has become increasingly important in recent decades. Clinicians should be familiar with the nuances of antibiotic susceptibility testing and interpretation in selecting antibiotics for these infections. The clinical significance of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae, and multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae is discussed. The clinical spectrum and therapeutic approach to Enterococcus faecalis (i.e., vancomycin-sensitive enterococci) and E faecium (i.e., vancomycin-resistant enterococci) are discussed. Differences in therapeutic approach between methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) infections are reviewed. Differences between in vitro susceptibility testing and in vivo effectiveness of antibiotics for hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) are described. Finally, the clinical features of infection and therapy of HA-MRSA and community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections are compared.

Antimicrobial treatment of sepsis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and death in hospitalized patients worldwide and one of the largest current challenges in critical care.

METHOD

Review of the pertinent English-language literature.

RESULTS

Treatment goals conventionally have included maintenance of systemic perfusion and eradication of sources of infection. Initial empiric antimicrobial regimen should be broad enough to cover all likely pathogens, as there is little margin for error in critically ill patients.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team, including the critical care physician, the microbiologist, the infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, and the clinical pharmacologist, is necessary for optimal patient outcome.