Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Structural and Synthetic Aspects of Small Ring Oxa- and Aza-Heterocyclic Ring Systems as Antiviral Activities

Antiviral properties of different oxa- and aza-heterocycles are identified and properly correlated with their structural features and discussed in this review article. The primary objective is to explore the activity of such ring systems as antiviral agents, as well as their synthetic routes and biological significance. Eventually, the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the heterocyclic compounds, along with their salient characteristics are exhibited to build a suitable platform for medicinal chemists and biotechnologists. The synergistic conclusions are extremely important for the introduction of a newer tool for the future drug discovery program.

Overview of the development of HBV small molecule inhibitors

Like tuberculosis and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), hepatitis B is a globally recognized major public health threat. Although there are many small-molecule drugs for the treatment of hepatitis B, the approved drugs cannot eradicate the pathogenic culprit covalently closed circular DNA in patients, so the patients need long-term medication to control HBV amplification. Driven by a high unmet medical need, many pharmaceutical companies and research institutions have been engaged in the development of anti-HBV drugs to achieve a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B as soon as possible. This review summarizes the pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus and the research progress in the development of anti-HBV small molecule drugs, and introduces the cccDNA formation and transcription inhibitors and core inhibitors in detail, especially emphasizes the role of chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Furthermore, this review proposes three potential strategies for cccDNA eradication in the future. We believe this review will provide meaningful guidance to achieve a functional cure for viral hepatitis B in the future.

Biocatalytic routes to anti-viral agents and their synthetic intermediates

An assessment of biocatalytic strategies for the synthesis of anti-viral agents, offering guidelines for the development of sustainable production methods for a future COVID-19 remedy.

Management of antiviral drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B

Rescue antiviral treatment for patients with resistance to preexisting nucleos(t)ide analogues remains a clinical challenge. The correct choice of a first-line treatment of high potency and with a high genetic barrier to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and the emergence of drug resistance. The management of treatment failure and drug resistance requires a precise and accurate clinical and virologic monitoring. Combination treatment with antiviral drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of developing resistance to rescue drugs. To guarantee better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without a cross resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. Long-term surveillance for treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance should be continued to prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.

Comparison of the efficacy of Lamivudine plus adefovir versus entecavir in the treatment of Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus infection remains 1 of the major health threats worldwide. Currently, lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy or entecavir monotherapy is usually used for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there are few systematic comparisons between the efficacy of lamivudine plus adefovir and the efficacy of entecavir in the treatment of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this systematic study and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of lamivudine plus adefovir compared with entecavir for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant CHB.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, Web of Science, WANFANG database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, were screened to obtain citations from January 1990 to January 2012 in this study. Data analysis was done by using the Review Manager Software 5.1.

RESULTS

Eight studies were suitable for analysis. A total of 696 patients with lamivudine-resistant CHB were studied and grouped according to treatment: 341 patients in the entecavir group and 355 patients in the lamivudine plus adefovir group. The results found that the rates of undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels, alanine aminotransferase normalization, hepatitis B e antigen loss, and hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion were not significantly different between the lamivudine plus adefovir group and the entecavir group. Moreover, the rate of adverse reactions was also not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, virologic breakthrough for the patients with lamivudine resistance was higher in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine plus adefovir group.

CONCLUSIONS

For these CHB patients with lamivudine resistance, lamivudine plus adefovir was a better treatment option than entecavir alone.

HD-03/ES: A Herbal Medicine Inhibits Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Secretion in Transfected Human Hepatocarcinoma PLC/PRF/5 Cells

HD-03/ES is a herbal formulation used for the treatment of hepatitis B. However, the molecular mechanism involved in the antihepatitis B (HBV) activity of this drug has not been studied using in vitro models. The effect of HD-03/ES on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) secretion and its gene expression was studied in transfected human hepatocarcinoma PLC/PRF/5 cells. The anti-HBV activity was tested based on the inhibition of HBsAg secretion into the culture media, as detected by HBsAg-specific antibody-mediated enzyme assay (ELISA) at concentrations ranging from 125 to 1000 μg/mL. The effect of HD-03/ES on HBsAg gene expression was analyzed using semiquantitative multiplex RT-PCR by employing specific primers. The results showed that HD-03/ES suppressed HBsAg production with an IC₅₀ of 380 μg/mL in PLC/PRF/5 cells for a period of 24 h. HD-03/ES downregulated HBsAg gene expression in PLC/PRF/5 cells. In conclusion, HD-03/ES exhibits strong anti-HBV properties by inhibiting the secretion of hepatitis B surface antigen in PLC/PRF/5 cells, and this action is targeted at the transcription level. Thus, HD-03/ES could be beneficial in the treatment of acute and chronic hepatitis B infections.

Optimal management of chronic hepatitis B patients with treatment failure and antiviral drug resistance

The management of treatment failure in patients with chronic hepatitis B, remains a clinical concern. Incomplete viral suppression and the emergence of drug resistance are key determinants of treatment failure. The correct choice of a potent first-line therapy to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and drug resistance. Clinical studies have demonstrated that drugs with a high barrier to resistance have significantly lower rates of resistance compared with those with a low barrier to resistance. Management of treatment failure requires precise clinical and virological monitoring as well as early treatment intervention with appropriate noncross-resistant antivirals. Long-term surveillance of treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance is necessary in patients who have been sequentially treated with multiple antivirals. The identification of novel treatment targets remains a major research goal to improve the efficacy of current antiviral therapy through combination therapy regimens.

Anti-HBV agents derived from botanical origin

There are 350,000 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers all over the world. Chronic HBV infection is at a high risk of developing liver cirrhosis and hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC), and heavily threatened people's health. Two kinds of drugs approved by FDA for anti-HBV therapy are immunomodulators (interferon α, pegylated-interferon α) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, telbivudine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). These drugs have been proved to be far from being satisfactory due to their low specificity, side effects, and high rate of drug resistance. There is an urgent need to discover and develop novel effective anti-HBV drugs. With vast resources, various structures, diverse biological activities and action mechanisms, as well as abundant clinical experiences, botanical agents become a promising source of finding new anti-HBV drugs. This review summarizes the recent research and development of anti-HBV agents derived from botanical origin on their sources and active components, inhibitory effects and possible toxicities, as well as action targets and mechanisms, and also addresses the advantages and the existing shortcomings in the development of botanical inhibitors. This information may not only broaden the knowledge of anti-HBV therapy, and offer possible alternative or substitutive drugs for CHB patients, but also provides considerable information for developing new safe and effective anti-HBV drugs.

Management of treatment failure in chronic hepatitis B

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B remains a clinical challenge. The primary goal of therapy is to prevent liver disease progression. Because of the mechanism of viral persistence in infected hepatocytes, long-term antiviral therapy is needed in the majority of patients. Incomplete viral suppression and emergence of drug resistance is a major concern. The correct choice of a first-line potent therapy to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and drug resistance. Clinical studies have demonstrated that drugs with a high barrier to resistance, such as entecavir and tenofovir, have significantly lower rates of resistance when compared with those with a low barrier to resistance such as lamivudine, adefovir, or telbivudine. Management of treatment failure requires a precise clinical and accurate virologic monitoring as well as an early treatment intervention with appropriate complementary drugs with respect to their cross-resistance profile. Long-term surveillance for treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance is necessary for those patients who have been sequentially treated with multiple antivirals. Finally, the identification of novel treatment targets remains a major research challenge to improve the efficacy of current antiviral therapy.

Detection of hepatitis B virus genotype A3 and primary drug resistance mutations in African immigrants with chronic hepatitis B in Spain

BACKGROUND

Universal vaccination and antiviral therapy have reduced chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) in natives in the Western world. However, immigration from high HBV endemic areas continues to maintain a relatively stable prevalence of chronic hepatitis B in most developed countries.

METHODS

All foreigners attending a referral infectious diseases department in Madrid, Spain, from January 2007 to December 2008, were evaluated for serum HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). Positive cases underwent further virological characterization.

RESULTS

A total of 1718 foreigners were examined, of whom 1322 (77%) were sub-Saharan Africans. Serum HBsAg was positive in 121 (7%), HIV in 135 (7.9%) and hepatitis C virus antibodies in 212 (12.3%). HBV subgenotype A3, which so far had only been reported in people originating from Cameroon, was found in nearly half (14/29) of the tested specimens with detectable serum HBV-DNA. Interestingly, the lamivudine resistance mutation rtM204V was found in two Africans (6.9%), one infected with HBV-A3 and the other with HBV-E. Lack of prior exposure to antiviral therapy in these two patients was confirmed retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulation of uncommon HBV variants, including strains with primary drug resistance, may follow large immigrant flows from HBV endemic regions to Western countries. Close surveillance of this population is warranted, as early diagnosis and early antiviral therapy may reduce transmission and prevent clinical complications.

Drug resistance in antiviral therapy

The introduction of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy has seen the emergence of antiviral drug resistance, which has become the main factor limiting the long-term application of these antiviral agents for patients with chronic hepatitis B. The prevention of resistance requires the adoption of strategies that effectively control virus replication and exploit an understanding of the mechanisms and processes that drive the emergence of drug resistance, namely high replication rates, low fidelity of the hepatitis B virus rt/polymerase, selective pressure of the nucleos(t)ide analog, role of replication space (liver turnover), fitness of the mutant, and genetic barrier to the drug.

Virological, serological and biochemical outcomes through 3 years of entecavir treatment in nucleoside-naive Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has a high prevalence in China. Entecavir has shown superior efficacy over lamivudine in Chinese nucleoside-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients over 48 weeks, with continued clinical benefit to 96 weeks. The present study evaluates the long-term efficacy of entecavir in Chinese CHB patients who continued entecavir treatment for 144 weeks. Patients receiving either entecavir 0.5 mg/day (n = 258) or lamivudine 100 mg/day (n = 261) entered the initial 96-week randomized, double-blind, controlled efficacy study. Patients who did not achieve a consolidated response [HBV DNA <0.7 MEq/mL; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <1.25 x upper limit of normal; and if hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive at baseline, loss of HBeAg for ≥ 24 weeks] or who experienced viral breakthrough or relapse entered a 48-week entecavir rollover study. A total of 160 patients received continuous entecavir for 144 weeks; of these, 89% had undetectable serum HBV DNA, 86% showed ALT normalization, 20% reported HBeAg loss and 8% experienced HBeAg seroconversion. The cumulative rates of HBeAg loss and seroconversion were 36% and 27% at Week 144, respectively. The development of resistance was low, with three patients up to Week 96 and an additional two patients in Weeks 96-144 showing evidence of associated genotypic mutations. Entecavir was well tolerated. Adverse event rates were similar to those in lamivudine-treated patients, but patients receiving entecavir experienced fewer ALT flares. This study demonstrates that entecavir provides durable, long-term suppression of HBV DNA and ALT normalization in Chinese CHB patients, and is associated with low rates of emerging resistance. The results are consistent with the findings using entecavir globally and in Japan.

Frequent detection of hepatitis B virus variants associated with lamivudine resistance in treated South African patients infected chronically with different HBV genotypes

This retrospective study investigated and characterized the YMDD motif of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) reverse transcriptase (RT) gene, in sequential samples of 17 South African patients with chronic hepatitis B infection on lamivudine treatment. The profile of HBV genotypes as well as the genetic variability of pre-core (pre-C) and basal core promoter regions (BCP) were also determined in these patients. Mutations within the RT gene were determined by direct sequencing using SpectruMedix SCE 2410 genetic analyzer and INNO-LiPA HBV DR (Innogenetics), while the genetic variability of the pre-C/BCP and surface gene were determined by direct sequencing only. HBV genotypes were determined by analysis of the surface, core and RT genes using a web-based genotyping tool (NCBI). HBV DNA was quantified using Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor assay (Roche Diagnostics). Of the 17 patients, 13 (76.5%) carried YMDD mutations: 7 with rtM204I (2 HBeAg-positive and 5 HBeAg-negative) and 6 with rtM204V (4 HBeAg-positive and 2 HBeAg-negative). Of the 13 patients with resistant HBV strains, 8 (61.5%) carried genotype A, 3 (23%) genotype B, and 2 (15.3%) genotype C. Overall, only 5 of 13 (38%) patients with YMDD mutations experienced genotypic viral drug resistance and treatment failure. Of the 17 patients, 3 carried both pre-C (G1896A) and BCP (A1762T/G1764A) mutants, 1 pre-C only and 1 BCP only. This study demonstrated frequent detection of mutations associated with lamivudine-resistance in therapy-experienced South African patients infected chronically with different HBV genotypes, and confirmed that these mutations are not always accompanied by clinical relapse.

Efficacy of entecavir in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma-associated-related HBV reactivation: an analysis of 34 cases

AIM: The evaluate the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) in treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma-associated (NHL) chronic hepatitis B reactivation.

METHODS: Clinical data of NHL patients with HBV reactivation were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-four patients were assigned to 2 groups, of which, group A (n = 18) was treated with ETV 1.0 mg/d and group B (n = 16) was treated with ETV 0.5 mg/d. All patients were followed-up for 24 wk. Disease evolution, incidence of interrupting chemotherapy, mortality, liver function, adverse events and clinical outcome were closely monitored. Quantitative analysis of serum HBV-DNA using real-time PCR was performed at week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 after treatment respectively. Serum HBV marker was investigated at week 12 after anti-virus treatment.

RESULTS: After 24 weeks' therapy, the incidences of chemotherapy on schedule and interrupting chemotherapy between group A and group B showed statistically significant difference (χ² = 7.438, 4.636; P = 0.006, 0.031); while the hepatitis-related mortality rate and fatality rate between the two groups showed no significant difference. At week 2, the mean HBV DNA level decreased in both groups, lower in group A (t = 15.724, P = 0.000). At week 4, 8, 12, HBV DNA level continuously decreased, especially in group A. Serum ALT levels were markedly reduced in both groups, especially in group A. Each group had one case of adverse events.

CONCLUSION: ETV at a dose of 1.0 mg shows a good prospect in antiviral therapy for NHL-associated hepatitis B virus reactivation.

Genetic Variability of Hepatitis B virus and Response to Antiviral Therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health issue. Effective and individualized treatment of chronic hepatitis B to prevent progression to end-stage liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma is needed. HBV can be classified into eight genotypes (A–H) on the basis of genome sequence divergence. In addition, several naturally occurring HBV mutants have also been identified. The epidemiology of HBV genotypes and their implications for response to antiviral therapy have become increasingly recognized. Recent studies suggested that responses to standard interferon treatment in patients with genotype A or B are better than those with genotype C or D; however, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated interferon. The influence of dose and duration on interferon-based therapy remains to be clarified. In addition to genotype, naturally occurring mutations such as precore and core promoter mutations have also attracted much attention, because they have been shown to affect the disease progression of HBV-related chronic liver disease and possibly the response to antiviral therapy. Here, we review the differences in antiviral theraputic response among HBV genotypes and discuss the role of precore or core promoter mutations in response to antiviral therapy.

Economic implications of entecavir treatment in suppressing viral replication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in China from a perspective of the Chinese Social Security program

OBJECTIVES

Of estimated 112 million persons infected with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in China, 15% to 40% will eventually develop liver complications. Most patients do not actively seek antiviral agents for treatment due in part to lack of good understanding of the disease. Entecavir is a new therapeutic option for CHB patients and the purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of entecavir treatment in China, based on projected clinical benefits from its superior viral suppression efficacy.

METHODS

The analysis was based on the perspective of the Chinese Social Security program. Adjusted relative risks on the association between viral load (VL) and clinical end points (liver cirrhosis/hepatocellular carcinoma) were derived from a publication of a Taiwan CHB prospective cohort with 42,115 person-years of follow-up, and applied to patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial in China. In this trial, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (by polymerase chain reaction assay) was the key efficacy end point after 48 weeks of treatment with either entecavir or lamivudine monotherapy. Entecavir and lamivudine daily prices were assumed to be Renminbi Yuan (RMB) 40 and 16.71, respectively. Life expectancy tables were based on China vital statistics. Direct medical cost and utility scores for different phases of CHB were estimated from published China specific data, and costs were adjusted to 2006 values using the Chinese Consumer Price Index. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty on event distribution and treatment failure rates beyond the trial period.

RESULTS

A total of 519 subjects were enrolled in the study, comprising of 82% males, 87% HBeAg+, and a mean age of 30 years. Based on the efficacy measurement of the percentage of patients achieving HBV DNA <300 copies/ml at week 48, entecavir was superior to lamivudine (78.7% vs. 46.7%, respectively [P < 0.05]). In the base case, compared with lamivudine, 1 year of entecavir therapy gained 0.305 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at an incremental cost of 5368 RMB, with a 3% annual discount. Compared with lamivudine, using entecavir cost an incremental 17,590 RMB per QALY gained (95% CI 6333-56,407).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, entecavir is likely to be cost-effective in treating hepatitis B patients in China based on the World Health Organization's recommended maximum willingness to pay threshold.

Treatment paradigms on hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

The primary goal of treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is potent and durable suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. It results in biochemical and histological remission of CHB and is the prerequisite for the prevention of cirrhosis, its life-threatening complications and hepatocellular carcinoma. Responses that are durable after the cessation of treatment are referred to as sustained virological responses, whereas those persisting under therapy are referred to as treatment-maintained virological responses. Treatment paradigms of sustained virological response in HBeAg-negative CHB are practically restricted to conventional IFN-alpha and pegylated interferons (peg-IFNs), and are limited only to patients with compensated liver disease. Long-lasting maintained virological responses without HBV resistance in HBeAg-negative CHB are achievable by all approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir) in highly variable rates, depending on their potency, rapidity of virological response and genetic barrier to resistance. The maintenance of response under 5 years of adefovir treatment represents the most effective treatment paradigm for HBeAg-negative CHB, whereas such long-term data with entecavir and tenofovir monotherapy may become available in the near future. In patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants, the recommended treatment strategy is to add adefovir at the same time as continuing treatment with lamivudine. There are no treatment paradigms as yet of combination therapy from the very outset with two nucleoside analogues for use in treatment-naive patients.

Appropriate use of interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is not only a preventable but now treatable disease. Five drugs have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: standard interferon-alpha (IFN), pegylated IFN, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir. Among these agents, the responses to interferon therapy are invariably influenced by both host and viral factors. Therefore, understanding these factors is important for practicing hepatologists, and it may help design individualized medicine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. HBV genotypes affect the disease progression and outcomes of HBV-related chronic liver disease, as well as the response to antiviral treatments. Existing data indicate a better sustained response to standard IFN-alpha in HBeAg positive genotype B patients than genotype C patients, and in genotype A patients than genotype D patients. Nevertheless, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated IFN, and more studies are needed. As to HBV genetic polymorphisms, a recent study showed that an IFN sensitivity-determiningregion may not exist within the whole genome of HBV subgenotype Ba, and host factors as well as virus-host interactions may be more important than viral factors alone in determining the treatment outcomes with IFN. Regarding host genetic polymorphisms, single nucleotide polymorphisms within eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 and MxA promoter regions may be associated with the responsiveness to standard IFN-alpha treatment in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. In the foreseeable future, individualized chronic hepatitis B treatment algorithms should be tailored to host (immune status, ALT level and genomic polymorphisms), virus (HBeAg status, HBV DNA level, genotype, precore/basal core promoter mutants and pre-S deletion mutant) as well as liver disease status (hepatitis activity and fibrosis stage).

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: efficacy of current drugs and prospects for the future

Chronic hepatitis B is an important clinical problem often leading to severe complications. In this review, the results obtained in the last few years with the use of current drugs, such as interferon and nucleo(t)side analogues, are summarized and the problems of obtaining a sustained remission, which is only achieved in a small number of patients, are discussed. The new approaches, such as the use of combinations of drugs, to optimize long-term tolerable treatment are also considered.

Ribavirin and mycophenolic acid markedly potentiate the anti-hepatitis B virus activity of entecavir

MPA [the active metabolite of the immuno-suppressive agent CellCept] and ribavirin markedly potentiate the anti-HBV activity of the guanine-based nucleoside analogue entecavir (ETV) against both wild-type HBV and a lamivudine-resistant variant. Ribavirin (in its 5'-monophosphate form) and MPA are inhibitors of IMP-dehydrogenase and cause depletion of intracellular dGTP pools. The active triphosphorylated form of ETV may inhibit more efficiently the priming reaction, reverse transcription and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity of the HBV polymerase in the presence of reduced levels of dGTP. The potential for enhanced ETV activity is supported by the observation that exogenously added deoxyguanosine reversed the potentiating effect of ribavirin and MPA. Our observations may have important implications for those (liver) transplant recipients that receive MMF as part of their immunosuppressive regimen and who, because of a de novo or a persistent infection with HBV need antiviral therapy such as ETV. Further studies will need to be conducted to determine if combining ribavirin (a compound used for the treatment of HCV infections) with ETV could have an advantage for the treatment of HBV infections, in particular in patients co-infected with HCV.

New developments in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Significant progress has been made during the last 2 years in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Treatment decisions differ significantly depending on whether patients are HBeAg+ or HBeAg-, treatment-naive or nucleoside/nucleotide-resistant, and in early or advanced stages of liver disease. Courses of finite duration, aiming to achieve sustained off-therapy responses, are practically restricted to HBeAg+ patients with compensated chronic liver disease, whereas long-term therapy aiming to achieve maintained on-therapy remission is mostly applicable to HBeAg- individuals either with early or advanced liver disease. A course of finite duration with pegylated (PEG)-IFN-alpha-2a offers the highest probability of sustained off-therapy response in HBeAg+ individuals, as well as in some HBeAg- individuals. Long-term therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, both in HBeAg+ and HBeAg- CHB, has most favourable effects on patient outcome, provided that virological and biochemical remission is maintained without development of viral resistance. The best results are achievable with potent analogues suppressing serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to non-detectability by most sensitive techniques. The best 2-year resistance profile has hitherto been reported with entecavir monotherapy, and the best long-term resistance profile was seen with adefovir of 5-year duration. Adefovir is effective in most lamivudine (LAM)-resistant patients, but should be administered as an add-on rather than as a substitute for LAM. Combination therapies have entered the treatment arena of CHB by the side doors of LAM-resistance and of end-stage liver disease, and the most recent results suggest that treatment with combinations of two strong nucleosides/nucleotides with different resistance profiles may turn out to be the optimal first-line/first choice option in CHB.

Emerging therapeutics for chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a global health problem. Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) carry a significant risk to eventually develop cirrhotic liver disease. Recent therapeutic advances against CHB offer excellent potential for long-term suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication during antiviral therapy, and occasionally a durable remission off medication. Selection of appropriate patients for antiviral therapy depends on identification of HBV replication and an elevated alanine aminotransferase level or histologic liver injury. Pegylated interferon alpha offers potent immunomodulatory and antiviral activity with the potential for durability, but also with adverse effects and significant cost. The nucleoside or nucleotide analogs, lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir, suppress HBV replication and are extremely well-tolerated, but long-term or even lifelong therapy is required. Most experience has been gained with lamivudine, but viral resistance occurs frequently. Newer analogs appear to be relatively free of this problem. Approaches using a combination of agents have promise, but have yet to be proven superior to individual drugs alone.

Resistance of human hepatitis B virus to reverse transcriptase inhibitors: from genotypic to phenotypic testing

The treatment of HBV infected patients with analogues of nucleos(t)ides, including lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, has significantly increased the rate of anti-HBe seroconversion and therefore reduced the impact of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on liver disease. Altogether, these antivirals have offered novel options for the treatment of patients who did not respond to previous therapy with interferon alpha, the only available treatment against CHB until 1998. However, therapies using analogues of nucleos(t)ides have been confronted with viral resistances which are often associated to with worsening of liver disease. Drug resistance is conferred by the appearance of one or several mutations within the HBV polymerase gene. These mutations confer to the mutant viral population a phenotypic advantage over the wild-type pretherapeutic viral quasispecies, as they induce a reduction of drug susceptibility of mutant strains in vivo. This reduction of drug susceptibility can be as well measured in vitro, i.e in cell culture, using phenotypic assays. The detection of these mutations has become of crucial importance to better adapt clinical option to the virological status of the patient. Genotypic and more recently phenotypic assays have been developed and both assays can be used for drug resistance testing. Genotypic assay gives information about already characterized mutations associated with viral resistance, while phenotypic testing measures the overall drug susceptibility of patient-derived viral strains in cell culture. These assays are described and their potential use in the clinical setting is discussed.

Personal view: the management of chronic hepatitis B infection

There are two new nucleoside analogues available for the management of chronic hepatitis B, adefovir and entecavir, and several more in development. In addition, pegylated interferon has become available. Large-scale population studies have re-emphasized the significance of viral load in predicting a poor outcome over the longer term. These new developments have prompted a reassessment of the indications and objectives of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid, rather than alanine aminotransferase should be the prime indication for therapy. Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion can be achieved in 30-40% of treated patients whatever agent is used. However, it takes longer for nucleoside analogues to achieve the same seroconversion rates as interferon. In anti-HBe-positive disease long-term therapy is required for most patients because the relapse rate after withdrawal of therapy is very high, irrespective of the agent used. Viral resistance limits the use of lamivudine, and to a lesser extent adefovir. Resistance to entecavir has so far only been described in pre-existing lamivudine resistance. Although therapy with combinations of nucleoside analogues has not been investigated to any extent, this is the only way to reduce the emergence or resistance, and studies are urgently needed.

Therapeutic implications of hepatitis B virus genotypes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a global health problem. In addition to the implementation of universal hepatitis B vaccination, effective and individualized treatment of chronic hepatitis B to prevent progression into end-stage liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma is still needed. HBV has been designated eight genotypes (A-H) based on genome sequence divergence. The epidemiology of HBV genotypes and their implications on the responses to antiviral therapy have become increasingly recognized in both Asian and Western countries.

METHODS

Published data are thus reviewed.

RESULTS

Each genotype has its distinct geographical and ethnic distribution. Genotypes A and D occur frequently in Africa, Europe, and India, while genotypes B and C are prevalent in Asia. Genotype E is restricted to West Africa, and genotype F is found in Central and South America. The distribution of genotypes G and H is less clear. Accumulating evidence indicates a better sustained response to conventional interferon in patients with genotype B than those with C, and in patients with genotype A than those with D. In contrast, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated interferon. On the other hand, the therapeutic responses to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are comparable among patients with different HBV genotypes. The impact of HBV subgenotypes, mixed genotype infections, and recombinants of different genotypes on the response to antiviral treatments awaits further examinations.

CONCLUSION

Remarkable clinical and pathogenic differences do exist among HBV genotypes; however, researches on molecular and virologic mechanisms underlying the clinical phenotypes of different HBV genotypes are urgently needed.

Current treatment and future directions in the management of chronic hepatitis B viral infection

The World Health Organization places hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the top 10 causes of death worldwide. It is estimated that there are over 400 million carriers of HBV as well. At least 20% to 30% of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers will die of complications of chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and liver cancer. The serious consequences of end-stage liver disease and liver cancer occur in 30% of chronic carriers and confront patients and physicians throughout the world. Vaccination is the major form of treatment (prevention) that may eventually eliminate HBV worldwide. This article discusses the currently available treatments as well as evolving treatments for chronic HBV infection.

A review of entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND

Infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects two billion people worldwide, and an estimated 400 million people are chronically infected. Currently, FDA-approved regimens for the treatment of chronic HBV include interferon-alpha2b, peginterferon-alpha2a, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, and recently, entecavir.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and the clinical efficacy and safety of entecavir in the treatment of nucleoside-naĩve and nucleoside-resistant HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). SEARCH METHODOLOGY: Computerized searches of PubMed and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1985 to July 10, 2005, were performed with the search headings: entecavir, BMS-200475, and chronic hepatitis B.

FINDINGS

Entecavir, a new deoxyguanosine analog, represents a third agent within the nucleoside/nucleotide HBV polymerase inhibitor class with distinct advantages over lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil: it has a three-step mechanism of action, is the most potent inhibitor of HBV DNA polymerase, is not associated with any major adverse effects, and has a limited potential for resistance. In phase II and III clinical trials, entecavir was found to be superior to lamivudine for all primary endpoints evaluated in both nucleoside-naïve and lamivudine-resistant patients. Entecavir was effective in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative nucleoside-naïve patients. At this time, optimal duration of entecavir therapy is unknown.

CONCLUSION

Entecavir represents a new first- or second-line treatment option for patients chronically infected with HBV. Long-term efficacy and safety studies as well as studies of entecavir in combination with interferon products or other nucleoside/nucleotide analogs are eagerly awaited.

Susceptibility to antivirals of a human HBV strain with mutations conferring resistance to both lamivudine and adefovir

Mutations within the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase gene conferring drug-resistance are selected during prolonged lamivudine (3TC) or adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment. Because there is no other approved drug against HBV, treatments with 3TC or ADV are used either sequentially or in addition, depending on treatment response or failure. Considering the use of de novo or add-on 3TC+ADV bitherapy, we investigated the possibility of the emergence of an HBV strain harboring polymerase mutations conferring resistance to both 3TC (rtL180M+M204V) and ADV (rtN236T). We constructed the L180M+M204V+N236T mutant and determined its replication capacity and its susceptibility to different nucleos(t)ide analogs in transiently transfected hepatoma cell lines. The triple mutant replicates its genome in vitro, but less efficiently than either the wild-type (wt) HBV or L180M+M204V and N236T mutants. Phenotypic assays indicated that the L180M+M204V+N236T mutant is resistant to pyrimidine analogs (3TC, -FTC, beta-L-FD4C, L-FMAU). Compared with wt HBV, this mutant displays a 6-fold decreased susceptibility to ADV and entecavir and a 4-fold decreased susceptibility to tenofovir. Interferon alfa inhibited equally the replication of wt and L180M+M204V+N236T HBV. In conclusion, the combination of rtL180M+M204V and rtN236T mutations impairs HBV replication and confers resistance to both 3TC and ADV in vitro. These results suggest that the emergence of the triple mutant may be delayed and associated with viral resistance in patients treated with 3TC+ADV. However, other nucleos(t)ide analogs in development showed an antiviral activity against this multiresistant strain in vitro. This provides a rationale for the clinical evaluation of de novo combination therapies.