Salvage radiotherapy after initial cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review of the literature

The treatment of local prostate cancer recurrence after cryotherapy is challenging since the optimal management is unknown. We collected the available evidence to date to better define the risk and benefit of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after cryotherapy failure for localized prostate cancer. This review confirms the feasibility of SRT in terms of biochemical control and late toxicity rate. However, the absence of comparative trials or prospective studies, coupled with the heterogeneity of patients treated and the variations in treatments delivered across the analyzed studies, highlights the need for cautious consideration when opting for salvage radiotherapy. Therefore, we highly recommend the inclusion of patients in dedicated clinical trials to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Real-Time and Delayed Imaging of Tissue and Effects of Prostate Tissue Ablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prostate ablation is increasingly being utilized for the management of localized prostate cancer. There are several energy modalities with varying mechanism of actions which are currently used for prostate ablation. Prostate ablations, whether focal or whole gland, are performed under ultrasound and/or MRI guidance for appropriate treatment plan execution and monitoring. A familiarity with different intraoperative imaging findings and expected tissue response to these ablative modalities is paramount. In this review, we discuss the intraoperative, early, and delayed imaging findings in prostate from the effects of prostate ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The monitoring of ablation both during and after the therapy became increasingly important due to the precise targeting of the target tissue. Recent findings suggest that real-time imaging techniques such as MRI or ultrasound can provide anatomical and functional information, allowing for precise ablation of the targeted tissue and increasing the effectiveness and precision of prostate cancer treatment. While intraprocedural imaging findings are variable, the follow-up imaging demonstrates similar findings across various energy modalities. MRI and ultrasound are two of the frequently used imaging techniques for intraoperative monitoring and temperature mapping of important surrounding structures. Follow-up imaging can provide valuable information about ablated tissue, including the success of the ablation, presence of residual cancer or recurrence after the ablation. It is critical and helpful to understand the imaging findings during the procedure and at different follow-up time periods to evaluate the procedure and its outcome.

Minimally invasive magnetic resonance image-guided prostate interventions

Whole gland prostate cancer treatment, i.e. radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, is highly effective but also comes with a significant impact on quality of life and possible overtreatment in males with low to intermediate risk disease. Minimal-invasive treatment strategies are emerging techniques. Different sources of energy are used to aim for targeted treatment in order to reduce treatment-related complications and morbidity. Imaging plays an important role in targeting and monitoring of treatment approaches preserving parts of the prostatic tissue. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is widely used during image-guided interventions due to the multiplanar and real-time anatomical imaging while providing an improved treatment accuracy. This review evaluates the available image-guided prostate cancer treatment options using MRI or magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS)-fusion guided imaging. The discussed minimal invasive image-guided prostate interventions may be considered as safe and feasible partial gland ablation in patients with (recurrent) prostate cancer. However, most studies focusing on minimally invasive prostate cancer treatments only report early stages of research and subsequent high-level evidence is still needed. Ensuring a safe and appropriate utilization in patients that will benefit the most, and applied by physicians with relevant training, has become the main challenge in minimally invasive prostate cancer treatments.

Focal therapy for localized cancer: a patent review

INTRODUCTION

Conventional cancer treatments such as radical surgery and systemic therapy targeting the organ or organ system might have side effects because of damage to the surrounding tissue. For this reason, there is a need for new instruments that focally treat cancer.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the patent literature on minimally and noninvasive focal therapy instruments to treat localized cancer. The medical section of the Google Patents database was scanned, and 128 patents on focal therapy instruments published in the last two decades (2000-2021) were retrieved and classified. The classification is based on the treatment target (cancer cell or network of cancer cells), treatment purpose (destroy the cancerous structure or disable its function), and treatment means (energy, matter, or a combination of both).

EXPERT OPINION

We found patents describing instruments for all groups, except for the instruments that destroy a cancer cell network structure by applying matter (e.g. particles) to the network. The description of the different treatment types may serve as a source of inspiration for new focal therapy instruments to treat localized cancer.

Active Versus Passive Thaw Following Percutaneous Cryoablation of Pulmonary Tumors: Effect on Incidence, Grade, and Onset of Hemoptysis

Background: Hemoptysis is common following percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of pulmonary tumors. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a final active thaw on the incidence, grade, and onset of hemoptysis following percutaneous cryoablation of pulmonary tumors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 consecutive CT-guided cryoablation sessions targeting 95 pulmonary tumors in 47 patients from 2017 to 2020. The final thaw of a triple-freeze protocol was active (electrical, helium-free) in 27/60 sessions (45%, active group) and passive in 33/60 sessions (55%, passive group). Incidence, onset, and management of hemoptysis were recorded using prospectively collected data. Hemoptysis, pneumothorax, and hemothorax within 30 days post ablation were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE). Volume of immediate post-treatment changes on CT was quantified using semi-automated segmentation. Outcomes were compared between groups using generalized estimating equation models. A parsimonious multivariable model for hemoptysis incidence was developed using purposeful selection of predefined covariates followed by bootstrap resampling. Local tumor control was compared between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and logrank testing. Results: Hemoptysis occurred following 26/60 (43%) sessions and was self-limited (Grade 1) in 22/26 (85%). The incidence of hemoptysis was lower in the active than passive group (64% vs 19%, respectively; p=.002). The odds of hemoptysis adjusted for immediate post-treatment changes were 92% lower in the active group (OR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02-0.37], p=.004). The odds of hemoptysis greater than Grade 1 were 79% lower in the active group (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07-0.64], p=.006). In the active group, the onset of hemoptysis was significantly delayed (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61-0.91], p=.005). Pneumothorax (p=.60), hemothorax (p=.84), and local tumor control (p=.77) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Active thaw following the final freeze reduces the incidence and grade of hemoptysis and delays the onset of hemoptysis following percutaneous cryoablation of pulmonary tumors without adversely affecting other procedural complications and local tumor control. Clinical Impact: Active thaw following the final freeze improves the safety profile of triple-freeze cryoablation of pulmonary tumors by reducing the incidence and grade of hemoptysis and by delaying the onset of hemoptysis beyond the immediate recovery period.

Cytoreductive treatment strategies for de novo metastatic prostate cancer

In the past decade, a revolution in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer has occurred with the advent of novel hormonal agents and life-prolonging chemotherapy regimens in combination with standard androgen-deprivation therapy. Notwithstanding, the use of systemic therapy alone can result in a castrate-resistant state; therefore, increasing focus is being placed on the additional survival benefits that could potentially be achieved with local cytoreductive and/or metastasis-directed therapies. Local treatment of the primary tumour with the established modalities of radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy has been explored in this context, and the use of novel minimally invasive ablative therapies has been proposed. In addition, evidence of the potential clinical benefits of metastasis-directed therapy with ionizing radiation (primarily stereotactic ablative radiotherapy) is accumulating. Herein, we summarize the pathobiological rationale for local cytoreduction and the potentially systemic immunological responses to radiotherapy and ablative therapies in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We also discuss the current evidence base for a cytoreductive strategy, including metastasis-directed therapy, in the current era of sequential multimodal therapy incorporating novel treatments. Finally, we outline further research questions relating to this complex and evolving treatment landscape.

The challenging landscape of medical device approval in localized prostate cancer

Findings of research using modern multiparametric MRI have provided clinicians with reliable targets for guiding prostate biopsy sampling and directing targeted therapy, often termed focal therapy, to specific areas of the prostate. This emerging shift in treatment strategy from a whole-gland approach to a lesion-specific or region-specific approach requires novel medical devices. The rules regulating the approval and clinical use of such new devices often differ between the USA and Europe, and these differences can affect the treatments that patients receive. Current regulatory pathways for approval of various image-guided biopsy and focal therapy devices intended to be used in patients with prostate cancer are discussed in detail. Finally, we offer some perspective on the current status of research in the field, and propose a potential roadmap towards the establishment of timely, safe and standardized criteria for optimal evaluation of novel image-guided devices for treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer.