Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: accuracy and discrepancies in a multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of fetal echocardiography in diagnosing congenital heart disease (CHD) at the fetal medicine units of three tertiary care centers.

METHODS

This was a multicenter cohort study of tertiary echocardiography referrals between 2002 and 2012. Prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were compared and the degree of agreement was classified as 'correct' (anatomy correct and the postnatal diagnosis led to a similar outcome as expected), 'discrepant' (anatomical discrepancies present but the severity and prognosis of the defect were diagnosed correctly) or 'no similarity' (the pre- and postnatal diagnoses differed completely).

RESULTS

We included 708 cases with CHD for which both prenatal and postnatal data were available. The prenatal diagnosis was correct in 82.1% of cases and discrepancies present were present in 9.9%; however, these did not result in a different outcome. In 8.1% there was no similarity between prenatal and postnatal diagnoses. Disagreement between pre- and postnatal diagnoses occurred significantly more frequently in cases that presented with a normal four-chamber view than in those with an abnormal four-chamber view (5.5% vs 1.9%). Incorrect identification of the outflow tracts and incorrect differentiation between unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect and hypoplastic left heart syndrome were relatively commonly encountered. In many cases with disagreement, trisomy 21, extracardiac anomaly or a high maternal body mass index was present.

CONCLUSIONS

The prenatal diagnosis and estimated prognosis of fetal echocardiography in our tertiary referral centers were appropriate in 92% of cases. Some types of CHD remain difficult to diagnose or rule-out prenatally, therefore awareness and education are of considerable importance. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sonographic predictors of surgery in fetal coarctation of the aorta

OBJECTIVES

Isolated fetal coarctation of the aorta (CoA) has high false-positive diagnostic rates by cardiologists in tertiary centers. Isthmal diameter Z-scores (I), ratio of isthmus to duct diameters (I:D), and visualization of CoA shelf (Shelf) and isthmal flow disturbance (Flow) distinguish hypoplastic from normal aortic arches in retrospective studies, but their ability to predict a need for perinatal surgery is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether these four sonographic features could differentiate prenatally cases which would require neonatal surgery in a prospective cohort diagnosed with CoA by a cardiologist.

METHODS

From 83 referrals with cardiac disproportion (January 2006 to August 2010), we identified 37 consecutive fetuses diagnosed with CoA. Measurements of I and I:D were made and the presence of Shelf or Flow recorded. Sensitivity, specificity and areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves, using previously reported limits of I < - 2 and I:D < 0.74, as well as Shelf and Flow were compared at first and final scan. Associations between surgery and predictors were compared using multivariable logistic regression and changes in measurements using ANCOVA.

RESULTS

Among the 37 fetuses, 30 (81.1%) required surgery and two with an initial diagnosis of CoA were revised to normal following isthmal growth, giving an 86% diagnostic accuracy at term. The median age at first scan was 22.4 (range. 16.6-7.0) weeks and the median number of scans per fetus was three (range, one to five). I < - 2 at final scan was the most powerful predictor (odds ratio, 3.6 (95% CI, 0.47-27.3)). Shelf was identified in 66% and Flow in 50% of fetuses with CoA.

CONCLUSION

Incorporation of these four sonographic parameters in the assessment of fetuses with suspected CoA at a tertiary center resulted in better diagnostic precision regarding which cases would require neonatal surgery than has been reported previously.