Barrett's esophagus: can biomarkers predict progression to malignancy?

The Protease Inhibitor Amprenavir Protects against Pepsin-Induced Esophageal Epithelial Barrier Disruption and Cancer-Associated Changes

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) significantly impacts patient quality of life and is a major risk factor for the development of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the standard-of-care for GERD and are among the most prescribed drugs in the world, but do not protect against nonacid components of reflux such as pepsin, or prevent reflux-associated carcinogenesis. We recently identified an HIV protease inhibitor amprenavir that inhibits pepsin and demonstrated the antireflux therapeutic potential of its prodrug fosamprenavir in a mouse model of laryngopharyngeal reflux. In this study, we assessed the capacity of amprenavir to protect against esophageal epithelial barrier disruption in vitro and related molecular events, E-cadherin cleavage, and matrix metalloproteinase induction, which are associated with GERD severity and esophageal cancer. Herein, weakly acidified pepsin (though not acid alone) caused cell dissociation accompanied by regulated intramembrane proteolysis of E-cadherin. Soluble E-cadherin responsive matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were transcriptionally upregulated 24 h post-treatment. Amprenavir, at serum concentrations achievable given the manufacturer-recommended dose of fosamprenavir, protected against pepsin-induced cell dissociation, E-cadherin cleavage, and MMP induction. These results support a potential therapeutic role for amprenavir in GERD recalcitrant to PPI therapy and for preventing GERD-associated neoplastic changes.

Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and analysis of genetic contributors

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with an increasing prevalence. GERD develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome typical and atypical symptoms and/or complications. Several risk factors of GERD have been identified and evaluated over the years, including a considerable amount of genetic factors. Multiple mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of GERD including: (1) motor abnormalities, such as impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting tone, transient LES relaxations, impaired esophageal acid clearance and delayed gastric emptying; and (2) anatomical factors, such as hiatal hernia and obesity. Genetic contribution seems to play a major role in GERD and GERD- related disorders development such Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Twin and family studies have revealed an about 31% heritability of the disease. Numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms in various genes like FOXF1, MHC, CCND1, anti-inflammatory cytokine and DNA repair genes have been strongly associated with increased GERD risk. GERD, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma share several genetic loci. Despite GERD polygenic basis, specific genetic loci such as rs10419226 on chromosome 19, rs2687201 on chromosome 3, rs10852151 on chromosome 15 and rs520525 on the paired related homeobox 1 gene have been mentioned as potential risk factors. Further investigation on the risk genes may elucidate their exact function and role and demonstrate new therapeutic approaches to this increasingly common disease.

Healthcare Cost of Over-Diagnosis of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Published reports have demonstrated that many Barrett's esophagus patients are over-diagnosed as low-grade dysplasia (BE-LGD). We performed an analysis of the surveillance and treatment costs associated with the over-diagnosis of BE-LGD.

METHODS

As the principal cost variables, we used endoscopic and histologic procedures performed during the recommended surveillance intervals for patients with BE-LGD, the national average Medicare reimbursement for the Current Procedural Terminology codes of the procedures performed, and a spreadsheet-based tool we created to determine the overall healthcare cost associated with the over-diagnosis of BE-LGD in the US population.

RESULTS

The average excess cost (range) for every patient in the US who is over-diagnosed with BE-LGD is estimated to be $5557 ($3115 to $8072). The principal contributors to the excess cost of over-diagnosis of BE-LGD in these patients are: endoscopy ($2626 to $4639), pathologist biopsy review ($275 to $2185), and esophagogastroduodenoscopy-guided endoscopic ablation ($214 to $1249).

CONCLUSIONS

The healthcare cost of over-diagnosis of BE-LGD is significant. To reduce the overall healthcare cost impact of over-diagnosis of BE-LGD, strict adherence to the recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association, American College of Gastroenterology, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy that pathology review of all BE biopsy specimens be performed by a gastrointestinal pathologist is warranted.

Surgical and Molecular Pathology of Barrett Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) are predisposed to developing dysplasia and cancer. Adenocarcinoma, which is associated with BE, is the most common type of esophageal tumor and, typically, it has an aggressive clinical course and a high rate of mortality.

METHODS

The English-language literature relating to tumor epidemiology, etiology, and the pathogenesis of BE was reviewed and summarized.

RESULTS

The role of pathologists in the diagnosis and pitfalls associated with grading Barrett dysplasia is addressed. Current molecular testing for Barrett neoplasia, as well as testing methods currently in development, is discussed, focusing on relevant tests for diagnosing tumor types, determining prognosis, and assessing therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Grading is essential for developing appropriate treatment plans, follow-up visits, and therapeutic interventions for each patient. Familiarity with current molecular testing methods will help physicians correctly diagnose the disease and select the most appropriate therapy for each of their patients.

Progression of Barrett oesophagus: role of endoscopic and histological predictors

Barrett oesophagus is an important precursor lesion for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the modality most widely used to visualize and biopsy the oesophagus to establish a diagnosis. Additional clues are available at the time of endoscopy that can identify high-risk features known to increase the risk of progression to OAC, such as the length of the Barrett oesophagus segment, length of hiatal hernia and the presence of nodularity or visible endoscopic lesions in this segment. Until molecular biomarkers are identified and validated as adjunctive tools for risk stratification, knowledge of endoscopic features could complement dysplasia grading for risk stratification of patients with Barrett oesophagus and identify subgroups at risk of progression to OAC. This approach would, in turn, facilitate more rational tailoring of endoscopic surveillance. This Review summarizes the current role of endoscopic and histological factors involved in neoplastic progression of Barrett oesophagus to OAC, and provides an overview of the risk-prediction models that have utilized endoscopic and histological factors for risk stratification in patients with Barrett oesophagus.

Comparison of long non‑coding RNAs, microRNAs and messenger RNAs involved in initiation and progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Traditionally, cancer research has focused on protein‑coding genes, which are considered the principal effectors and regulators of tumorigenesis. Non‑coding RNAs, in particular microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs), have been widely reported to be important in the regulation of tumorigenesis and cancer development. However, to the best of our knowledge, investigation of the expression profiles of lncRNAs and a comparison of the involvement of lncRNAs, miRNAs and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in esophageal tumorigenesis and development have not previously been performed. In the current study, intrinsic associations among the expression profiles of lncRNAs, miRNAs and mRNAs from normal esophageal tissues and those from cancer tissues were investigated. Oligonucleotide microarrays were used to detect the expression profiles of the three types of RNA in the canceration processes of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues. It was demonstrated that the different RNAs exhibit associated patterns of expression among normal esophageal epithelium, low‑grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high‑grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), and carcinoma tissues, particularly in the critical period of canceration (HGIN to ESCC). Furthermore, the results indicated a high level of similarity in the potential function of lncRNAs, miRNAs and mRNAs in the processes of ESCC development. In the current study, a first generation atlas of lncRNA profiling and its association with miRNAs and mRNAs in the canceration processes of ESCC were presented.

Early diagnostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma--the current state of play

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the two most common types of esophageal cancer with alarming increase in incidence and very poor prognosis. Aiming to detect EAC early, currently high-risk patients are monitored using an endoscopic-biopsy approach. However, this approach is prone to sampling error and interobserver variability. Diagnostic tissue biomarkers related to genomic and cell-cycle abnormalities have shown promising results, although with current technology these tests are difficult to implement in the screening of high-risk patients for early neoplastic changes. Differential miRNA profiles and aberrant protein glycosylation in tissue samples have been reported to improve performance of existing tissue-based diagnostic biomarkers. In contrast to tissue biomarkers, circulating biomarkers are more amenable to population-screening strategies, due to the ease and low cost of testing. Studies have already shown altered circulating glycans and DNA methylation in BE/EAC, whereas disease-associated changes in circulating miRNA remain to be determined. Future research should focus on identification and validation of these circulating biomarkers in large-scale trials to develop in vitro diagnostic tools to screen population at risk for EAC development.

Frequent occurrence of mitochondrial DNA mutations in Barrett's metaplasia without the presence of dysplasia

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is one of the most common premalignant lesions and can progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). The numerous molecular events may play a role in the neoplastic transformation of Barrett’s mucosa such as the change of DNA ploidy, p53 mutation and alteration of adhesion molecules. However, the molecular mechanism of the progression of BE to EA remains unclear and most studies of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in BE have performed on BE with the presence of dysplasia.

Methods/Findings

Thus, the current study is to investigate new molecular events (Barrett’s esophageal tissue-specific-mtDNA alterations/instabilities) in mitochondrial genome and causative factors for their alterations using the corresponding adjacent normal mucosal tissue (NT) and tissue (BT) from 34 patients having Barrett’s metaplasia without the presence of dysplasia. Eighteen patients (53%) exhibited mtDNA mutations which were not found in adjacent NT. mtDNA copy number was about 3 times higher in BT than in adjacent NT. The activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme complexes in tissues from Barrett’s metaplasia without the presence of dysplasia was impaired. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in BT was significantly higher than those in corresponding samples.

Conclusion/Significance

High ROS level in BT may contribute to the development of mtDNA mutations, which may play a crucial role in disease progression and tumorigenesis in BE.

Acid reflux and oesophageal cancer

Barrett's metaplasia is one of the commonest premalignant lesions in the western world following colorectal adenomas. One in 50 of the adult population develops Barrett's as a consequence of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. The mucosal inflammation seen within patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux seems likely to drive the growth of the metaplastic mucosa and also help direct further oncological change, yet the molecular events that characterize the pathway from inflammation to metaplasia to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma are poorly understood. There is hope that understanding the role of oesophageal inflammation will provide important insight into the development of Barrett's metaplasia and oesophageal cancer. This chapter will discuss the inflammation seen within context of Barrett's oesophagus and also clinical trials which hope to address this common premalignant disease. There are several ongoing clinical trials which are aiming to provide data using anti-inflammatory therapies to tackle this important premalignant condition. There is new data presented which suggests that data from the aspirin esomeprazole chemoprevention trial (AspECT) may hold the clue to disease treatment and that the cytokine TNF-α seems to be a key signalling molecule in the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Specifically it appears that both epigenetic and inherited genetics cooperate to modulate the prognosis.

Molecular abnormalities in pediatric barrett esophagus: can we test for potential of neoplastic progression?

Barrett esophagus (BE) is a preneoplastic condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma and is a consequence of prolonged gastroesophageal reflux disease. The condition is mainly seen in adults and is thought to be a complex disease in which individual genetic predisposition interacts with environmental stimuli. The aim of our study was to investigate whether genetic biomarkers of potential disease progression are the same in the rare situation of pediatric BE, as described in adults. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes from Abbott Vysis Corporation on 4-micron sections taken from 48 paraffin-embedded sequential biopsies of 10 cases of BE. The 4 probe sets were specific for HER2 at 17q12/17 centromere/4 centromere, p16 at 9p21/9 centromere, TP53 at 17p13/17 centromere/6 centromere, and CCND1 at 11q13/11 centromere. The probe sets were validated on 10 cases of adult Barrett adenocarcinoma. Of the 10 cases, 6 biopsies in 5 cases were informative. Two had gain of HER2 detected in 1 biopsy each (1 also had gain of chromosome 17) and 4 separate cases showed p16 deletion in 1 biopsy of each (1 also had gain of chromosome 9). The genetic markers informative in 50% of our cases were also identified in adult patients with Barrett adenocarcinoma. The importance of this study is that even at the pediatric level, BE can show genetic changes associated with neoplastic progression.