Evaluating the current surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

A novel preoperative predictive model of 90-day mortality after liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatectomy for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (diameter ≥10 cm) is characterized by high mortality. This study aimed to establish a preoperative model to evaluate the risk of postoperative 90-day mortality for huge HCC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 1,127 consecutive patients and prospectively enrolled 93 patients with huge HCC who underwent hepatectomy (training cohort, n=798; validation cohort, n=329; prospective cohort, n=93) in our institute. Based on independent preoperative predictors of 90-day mortality, we established a logistic regression model and visualized the model by nomogram.

Results

The 90-day mortality rates were 9.6%, 9.2%, and 10.9% in the training, validation, and prospective cohort. The α-fetoprotein (AFP) level, the prealbumin levels, and the presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were preoperative independent predictors of 90-day mortality. A logistic regression model, AFP-prealbumin-PVTT score (APP score), was subsequently established and showed good performance in predicting 90-day mortality (training cohort, AUC =0.87; validation cohort, AUC =0.91; prospective cohort, AUC =0.93). Using a cut-off of −1.96, the model could stratify patients into low risk (≤−1.96) and high risk (>−1.96) with different 90-day mortality rates (~30% vs. ~2%). Furthermore, the predictive performance for 90-day mortality and overall survival was significantly superior to the Child-Pugh score, the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.

Conclusions

The APP score can precisely predict postoperative 90-day mortality as well as long-term survival for patients with huge HCC, assisting physician selection of suitable candidates for liver resection and improving the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment.

Surgical outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection vs. open liver resection: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

Objective

Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection has the advantages of open and laparoscopic surgeries. There is still lack of comparison of surgical outcomes between hand-assistied laparoscopic liver resection (HALLR) and open liver resection (OLR). This study compared the surgical outcomes of the two approaches between well-matched patient cohorts.

Methods

Patients who received liver resection during January 2014 and October 2017 in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were included in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias between the two groups. Operation and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the well matched groups.

Results

During this period, 232 patients with a median age of 55.1 years old received OLR, while 49 patients with a median age of 54.7 years old received HALLR. Compared with HALLR group, OLR group has a higher proportion in male patients (190/232, 81.9% vs. 34/49, 69.4%, P=0.048) and lower albumin (43.2±4.5 vs. 44.8±3.7, P=0.020). After PSM, 49 patients from each group were included in the following analysis. Two groups were well balanced in their baseline characteristics, liver functions, preoperative treatments, abdominal surgery history, and surgical difficulty. None perioperative mortality was observed in both groups. Operation time and postoperative complications were similar in two groups (P=0.935, P=0.056). The HALLR group showed less bleeding amount (177.8±217.1 mL vs. 283.1±225.0 mL, P=0.003) and shorter postoperative stay period (6.9±2.2 d vs. 9.0±3.5 d, P=0.001).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe for liver resection, including some difficult cases. HALLR can provide better bleeding control and faster recovery after surgery.

Adjuvant pegylated interferon therapy improves the survival outcomes in patients with hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Surgical resection of HCC remains the mainstay treatment procedure. As a result of hepatitis viral infection, the postoperative survival outcome in patients with HCC is not satisfactory. Recently, studies have reported that due to its treatment effect on hepatitis infection, pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-based therapy could improve the survival outcome after the treatment of hepatitis-related HCC. However, the postoperative effect of this regimen on the survival outcomes in patients with hepatitis-related HCC remains debatable. The present study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of adjuvant Peg-IFN-based therapy on the survival outcomes in patients with hepatitis-related HCC after the curative treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies on the survival outcomes in patients with hepatitis-related HCC after a curative treatment with adjuvant Peg-IFN. PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until September 20, 2017. The retrieved studies were independently assessed by 2 reviewers, to identify the potentially eligible studies and extract data of interest. STATA software (Version 10.0, STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas) software was used for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The pooled results showed that adjuvant Peg-IFN-based therapy improved the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of patients with hepatitis-related HCC (3-year RFS, HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99, P = .04; P = .81 for heterogeneity; 5-year RFS, HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-0.99, P = .04; P = .84 for heterogeneity). For the 5-year overall survival (OS) outcomes of Peg-IFN therapy for hepatitis-related HCC after the curative treatment, the pooled results showed a significant difference between the 2 groups (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.97, P = .03; P = .99 for heterogeneity).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant Peg-IFN-based therapy could improve the RFS and OS outcomes in patients after curative treatment of hepatitis-related HCC, with no severe adverse effects.