Esomeprazole: a proton pump inhibitor

Drug administration via feeding tubes-a procedure that carries risks: systematic identification of critical factors based on commonly administered drugs in a cohort of stroke patients

PURPOSE

Drug administration via feeding tubes is considered a process with many uncertainties. This review aimed to give a comprehensive overview of data available on feeding tube application and to carry out risk assessments for drug substances commonly administered to stroke patients.

METHODS

Drugs frequently administered via feeding tubes were identified through a retrospective analysis of discharge letters from a stroke unit. Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and stability properties of these drugs and data on drug-enteral nutrition interactions were systematically searched for in the European Pharmacopoeia, Hagers Handbook of Pharmaceutical Practice, Birchers clinical-pharmacological data compilation, and the Martindale Complete Drug Reference, as well as from databases including DrugBank, DrugDex, PubChem, Google Scholar, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Of the drugs most commonly administered via feeding tubes in the present stroke patient cohort, bisoprolol, candesartan, and ramipril could be considered the least critical due to their overall favourable properties. Acetylsalicylic acid, amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, omeprazole and esomeprazole, simvastatin, and torasemide pose risks based on pH or light-dependent instability or proposed food effects. The most critical drugs to be administered via feeding tubes are considered to be furosemide, levodopa, and levothyroxine as they show relevant instabilities under administration conditions and substantial food effects; the latter two even possess a narrow therapeutic index. However, little information is available on drug-tube and drug-formula interactions.

CONCLUSION

Feeding tube administration of medications turned out to be a highly complex process with several unmet risks. Therefore, investigations that systematically assess these risk factors using clinically relevant model systems are urgently needed.

The Gastroprotective Effects of Anisomeles indica against Ethanol-Induced Gastric Ulcer through the Induction of IκB-α and the Inhibition of NF-κB Expression

Anisomeles indica (L.) Kuntze is a traditional herb with multiple medicinal properties and with potential for preventing or treating various diseases. Acteoside, one of the active ingredients in A. indica, is prepared into commercially available products of A. indica HP813 powder. In this study, the gastroprotective effects of A. indica HP813 powder were evaluated. Wistar rats were treated with A. indica HP813 powder at doses of 0, 207.5, 415, and 830 mg/kg body weight for 28 days. Then, gastric ulcers were induced by the oral administration of 70% ethanol (10 mL/kg body weight) on day 28. The rats were sacrificed at the end of the trial, and stomach tissues were collected. These stomach tissues were then used for macroscopic, microscopic, and immunohistochemical analyses. The results indicated that the area of gastric ulcer was 48.61%, 35.30%, and 27.16% in the ethanol-induced group, 415 mg/kg A. indica HP813 powder group, and 830 mg/kg A. indica HP813 powder group, respectively. In addition, the lesion scores were 2.9, 2.4, and 2.3 in the ethanol-induced group, 415 mg/kg A. indica HP813 powder group, and 830 mg/kg A. indica HP813 powder group, respectively. The immunochemical staining of the gastric tissue revealed that A. indica HP813 powder reduced the expressions of TNF-α and NF-κB proteins in the gastric tissue, which had been induced by ethanol. Finally, A. indica HP813 powder protected the gastric ulcer from ethanol damage through IκB-α induction. The present results demonstrated that A. indica HP813 powder has protective effects against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer.

Efficacy and safety of a 14-day modified concomitant therapy for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

After three treatment failures, Helicobacter pylori infection is deemed refractory as antibiotic treatment options become significantly limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 14-day modified concomitant therapy for managing refractory H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Patients who had failed to respond to three or more rounds of H. pylori therapies were recruited for this study. They received a 14-day modified concomitant therapy, including esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and furazolidone 100 mg twice daily and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily. Demographic data, adverse events, and patient compliance were recorded. The presence of H. pylori was reevaluated 6 weeks following treatment. Eradication rate was assessed as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 59 participants received the 14-day modified concomitant therapy. In the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the eradication rate was 84.7% (50/59) and 89.3% (50/56), respectively. H. pylori was successfully isolated from 75.0% (12/16) of patients. The resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin was 91.7% (11/12), 58.3% (7/12), and 50.0% (6/12), respectively. Resistance to amoxicillin, furazolidone, or tetracycline was not observed. The frequency of adverse events was 35.6% (21/59), with no serious adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION

The 14-day modified concomitant therapy appears to be appropriate for refractory H. pylori infection and is particularly promising for the Chinese population. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to verify its efficacy, especially in the current environment of increasing antibiotic resistance.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Novel Dual Delayed-Release Formulation of Esomeprazole in Healthy Subjects

A novel dual delayed-release formulation (DR) of esomeprazole was developed to prolong the effect of esomeprazole inhibiting gastric acid secretion. This study investigated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of DR esomeprazole. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. Subjects were orally administered a single dose of 40- mg DR esomeprazole in fasted and fed states in each period. PK and PD characteristics evaluated through continuous 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring in fasted and fed states were compared between the 2 conditions. A total of 23 subjects completed the study and were included in the PK analysis. PD analysis was conducted in 21 subjects, excluding 2 subjects, because of inappropriate pH profiles. The systemic exposure of esomeprazole after a single dose of DR esomeprazole in the fed state decreased compared to that in the fasted state. However, the percentage decrease from baseline in integrated gastric acidity and the percentage of time at pH ≥4 were not significantly different between the 2 conditions. In conclusion, although the systemic exposure of esomeprazole decreased when DR esomeprazole was administered in the fed state compared to that in the fasted state, the degree of gastric acid secretion inhibition was not clinically different, regardless of food intake.

[Therapeutic Response to 20 mg of Esomeprazole Twice Daily in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-related Non-cardiac Chest Pain: An Open-Label Randomized Pilot Study]

Background/Aims

Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is defined as recurrent angina pectoris-like pain without evidence of coronary heart disease, and is usually related to esophageal diseases, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are important for diagnosis and treatment. Many studies have been conducted on the use of PPIs in patients with GERD-related NCCP. In contrast to standard-dose esomeprazole, the efficacy of half-dose esomeprazole twice daily (BD) has not been established. This study compared the efficacies of the two esomeprazole regimens in GERD-related NCCP.

Methods

In this prospective, open-label study, 37 participants with GERD-related NCCP were randomized to receive either 20 mg of esomeprazole BD (n=21) (esomeprazole BD group) or 40 mg once daily (n=16) (esomeprazole once daily [OD] group) for 4 weeks. In both groups, the chest pain score, which was calculated based on the frequency and severity, was evaluated before and 2 and 4 weeks after administering the medication.

Results

The chest pain score significantly improved in both groups (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with chest pain score improvement >50% was 7.7% higher in the esomeprazole BD group than in the esomeprazole OD group (95.2% vs. 87.5%), but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Esomeprazole BD was as effective as esomeprazole OD in improving GERD-related NCCP. Although statistically insignificant, the percentage of patients with >50% reduction in the chest pain score was higher in the esomeprazole BD group than in the esomeprazole OD group. Large-scale studies will be needed to assess these findings further.

Developing a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Method for Simultaneous Determination of Oxytetracycline, Tinidazole and Esomeprazole in Human Plasma

A high performance liquid chromatography method had been developed and validated for rapid simultaneous separation and determination of three anti-helicobacter drugs, oxytetracycline (OXY), tinidazole (TIN) and esomeprazole (ESM) in human plasma within 6 minutes. Drugs extraction method from plasma was based on protein precipitation technique. Separation was carried out on a Equisil BDS C18 column (5 μm, 150 × 4.60 mm) using a mobile phase of acetonitrile: 0.025 M KH2PO4 (25: 75, v/v) adjusted to pH 3.50 with ortho-phosphoric acid at ambient temperature. The flow rate was 1 mL/min and maximum absorption was measured using Diode Array (DAD) detector at 285 nm. The retention times of OXY, TIN and ESM were recorded to be 2.68, 3.52 and 5.17 minutes, respectively, indicating a shorter analysis time. Limits of detection were also reported to be 0.10, 0.07 and 0.04 μg/mL for OXY, TIN and ESM, respectively, showing a high degree of the method sensitivity. The method was then validated according to FDA guidelines for the determination of the drugs clinically in human plasma specially regarding pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies.

Gastric pH and Therapeutic Responses to Exsomeprazole in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: Potential Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Therapy for functional dyspepsia remains a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate esomeprazole (E) versus placebo (P) regarding (1) the effectiveness in providing relief of abdominal pain or discomfort during 16 weeks of therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia having moderate or severe symptoms; (2) the effects on gastric acid suppression and (3) the relationship between symptom relief and gastric pH.

METHODS

Enrolled patients were randomized to E (n = 38) or P (n = 35) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Outcomes were measured at four 4-week intervals. Drug dose titrated at each visit, based on relief of abdominal symptoms. The 24-hour gastric pH was monitored at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, 71% of E patients (40mg) reported satisfactory symptom relief versus 34% of P patients (P < 0.001). When the dose for nonresponders (NR) was titrated to 40mg twice daily, the E relief rate increased to 82% versus 56% in P group (P < 0.05). During the next 4 weeks, with dose decreased by half in responders, E response rate declined to 69% versus 48% in P group (P < 0.10). When the dose was increased for NR during the last 4 weeks, E rate increased to 83% versus 57% in P group (P < 0.05). At 4 and 8 weeks for E responders and NR, patients׳ pH >4 value increased significantly compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Though E 40mg once daily is superior to P, some patients benefit from 40mg twice daily; (2) E, 40mg once daily, profoundly inhibits gastric acid secretion; (3) intragastric pH monitoring before and after therapy may help address the relationship between symptomatic relief and gastric acid secretion and (4) some patients respond to monitored titrated placebo therapy.

Pharmacotherapy of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The role of pharmacotherapy in the management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is often equated with the medical management of acid hypersecretion. However, pharmacotherapy is also increasingly involved in the other management areas of these patients.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the role of pharmacotherapy in all aspects of the management of patients with ZES. Newer aspects are emphasized. This includes the difficulty of diagnosing ZES in patients taking proton pump inhibitors. Also covered is the role of pharmacotherapy in controlling acid hypersecretion and other hormonal hypersecretory states these patients may develop, including hyperparathyroidism in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and ZES; tumor localization; and the treatment of advanced metastatic disease. The last includes chemotherapy, liver-directed therapies, biotherapy (somatostatin/interferon), peptide radio-receptor therapy and molecular-targeted therapies including the use of mTor inhibitors (everolimus) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib).

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy is now involved in all aspects of the management of patients with ZES, with the result that ZES has progressed from being considered an entirely surgical disease initially to the present where medical treatment plays a major role in almost all aspects of the management of these patients.

Randomised clinical trial: twice daily esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg in Barrett's oesophagus for 1 year

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus is regarded as the most important risk factor for development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. According to current guidelines, treatment should be limited to symptomatic Barrett's oesophagus.

AIM

To evaluate the expression of Ki67, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and apoptosis in Barrett's oesophagus after 12 months of double-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy. The effectiveness of esomeprazole and pantoprazole was also compared.

METHODS

Seventy-seven nondysplastic Barrett's oesophagus patients underwent baseline upper endoscopy. Patients were then randomised into two groups: one group was allocated to receive esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. and the other group pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. for 12 months. A follow-up endoscopy was performed at the end of treatment. Sixty-five of 77 patients agreed to undergo oesophageal manometry and 24-h pH-metry. Barrett's oesophagus biopsies, obtained at baseline and after treatment, were analysed using immunohistochemistry to assess Ki67 and COX-2 expression; apoptosis was evaluated using TUNEL.

RESULTS

In the esomeprazole group, a significant decrease in Ki67 and COX-2 expression, as well as an increase in apoptosis, were observed (P < 0.05). By contrast, in the pantoprazole group Ki67, COX-2 and apoptosis did not vary significantly from baseline. By 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring, a normal acid exposure time was recorded in patients treated with esomeprazole, while those allocated to pantoprazole displayed abnormal acid exposure (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of Barrett's oesophagus patients with high-dose esomeprazole, but not pantoprazole, promoted a decrease in proliferative markers, concomitantly with a decrease in apoptotic cell death. Moreover, esomeprazole allowed a better oesophageal acid control than pantoprazole.

Nonpigmented fixed drug eruption induced by esomeprazole

A 56-year-old white woman developed a distinctive skin eruption over her mammary, lumbosacral, and pubic areas 2 weeks after the start of esomeprazole therapy for dyspeptic symptoms. Skin biopsy disclosed a spongiotic dermatitis with predominantly lymphocytic dermal infiltrate. Treatment with a tapering dose of corticosteroid and withdrawal of the suspected drug led to a rapid resolution of the eruption without residual dyschromia. Patch testing with esomeprazole 2% in petrolatum was negative at 48 and 72 hours but became positive on day 6. Oral-controlled provocation test induced the reappearance of the lesions over the mammary areas, confirming the putative involvement of this drug. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed as having a nonpigmented fixed drug eruption associated with esomeprazole. This compound is a proton-pump inhibitor developed as the S-isomer of omeprazole to improve its pharmacokinetic properties. Reports of cutaneous reactions to proton-pump inhibitors are quite common, but reports of such reactions to esomeprazole are rare, which demonstrates the need for higher clinical awareness and knowledge of reactions to these drugs.

Esomeprazole for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding

Peptic ulcer bleeding is the most common cause of acute bleeding in the upper GI tract. The incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding has slowly decreased and endoscopic treatment options have improved; nevertheless, it remains a very common condition with a 7-15% mortality. Acidic environments have a negative effect on hemostasis. Therefore, acid inhibitors have been applied in the adjuvant treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, both in preventing rebleeding and in treating the underlying cause. This requires profound acid suppressive therapy aiming for a rapid onset of effect and a persistent intragastric pH above 6. This can only be achieved by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, and the first PPI to consist of only the active isomer. A number of studies have compared esomeprazole with other PPIs, demonstrating a faster and more persistent increase in intragastric pH with the use of esomeprazole than with other agents. Continuous high-dose intravenous treatment with esomeprazole decreases rebleeding, surgery, transfusion rates and hospital days in peptic ulcer bleeding.

Effects of Nissen fundoplication on endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation is achieving increasing acceptance as a mode of eliminating Barrett's metaplasia and, thus, reducing the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. It is believed that reducing exposure of the esophageal epithelium to acid is essential to achieve long-term ablation of Barrett's esophagus. However, it is unclear whether use of proton pump inhibitors or antireflux operations are more effective to accomplish this goal.

METHODS

All patients who underwent endoscopic endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with the BARRx device (BARRx Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) were reviewed for date of initial ablation, length of Barrett's epithelium, presence or performance of Nissen fundoplication, all follow-up endoscopy and treatment, and posttreatment biopsy results. Patients were categorized by presence of Nissen fundoplication and presence of Barrett's metaplasia or dysplasia by biopsy at least 12 months following ablation and at last endoscopic follow-up. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients ablated, 47 had documented endoscopic follow-up at 12 months or longer following the ablation. Of these, 19 patients had Nissen fundoplication before, at the same time, or after ablation. Median length of Barrett's epithelium, with interquartile range (IQR), was 3 (2-12) cm in patients with fundoplication compared with 3 (2-7) cm without fundoplication (P = NS). Median follow-up was 15 (12-24) months in fundoplication patients compared with 12.5 (12-17) months without (P = NS). One of 19 patients with fundoplication had persistent or recurrent Barrett's epithelium, compared with 7 of 28 without fundoplication (P = 0.03). Of patients without fundoplication, those who had persistent or recurrent Barrett's had median Barrett's length of 10 cm (6-12 cm) compared with 3 cm (2-5 cm) in patients who had ablated Barrett's (P = 0.03). Follow-up length was similar in those with ablated epithelium, 15 months (12-19 months), compared with those with persistent or recurrent Barrett's, 12 months (12-13 months) (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had fundoplication in conjunction with endoluminal radiofrequency ablation were more likely to achieve durable ablation compared with patients who were treated with proton pump inhibitor therapy. It appears that patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus are at higher risk for persistent or recurrent Barrett's metaplasia. Consideration should be given for an antireflux operation in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus and planned endoluminal radiofrequency ablation.

Critical appraisal of a fixed combination of esomeprazole and low dose aspirin in risk reduction

Low dose aspirin (≤325 mg) is routinely used for primary and secondary prophylaxis of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The use of low dose aspirin is associated with two- to four-fold greater risk of symptomatic or complicated peptic ulcers. Risk factors associated with low dose aspirin induced gastrointestinal toxicity includes prior history of ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, concomitant use of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid or warfarin, dual antiplatelet therapy, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and advanced age. Esomeprazole, like other proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is very effective in decreasing the risk of aspirin induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Although evidence to support esomeprazole or other PPIs for primary prophylaxis in aspirin induced gastrointestinal toxicity is limited, its role in secondary prophylaxis is well established.