mRNA vaccination in breast cancer: current progress and future direction

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination has proven to be highly successful in combating Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has recently sparked tremendous interest. This technology has been a popular topic of research over the past decade and is viewed as a promising treatment strategy for cancer immunotherapy. However, despite being the most prevalent malignant disease for women worldwide, breast cancer patients have limited access to immunotherapy benefits. mRNA vaccination has the potential to convert cold breast cancer into hot and expand the responders. Effective mRNA vaccine design for in vivo function requires consideration of vaccine targets, mRNA structures, transport vectors, and injection routes. This review provides an overview of pre-clinical and clinical data on various mRNA vaccination platforms used for breast cancer treatment and discusses potential approaches to combine appropriate vaccination platforms or other immunotherapies to improve mRNA vaccine therapy efficacy for breast cancer.

Surface-engineered nanoparticles in cancer immune response and immunotherapy: Current status and future prospects

Cancer immunotherapy is a therapeutic strategy to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis by intervening in the immune response process. Strategies applied to cancer immunotherapy mainly include blocking immune checkpoints, adoptive transfer of engineered immune cells, cytokine therapy, cancer vaccines, and oncolytic virus infection. However, many factors, such as off-target side effects, immunosuppressive cell infiltration and/or upregulation of immune checkpoint expression, cancer cell heterogeneity, and lack of antigen presentation, affect the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy on cancer. To improve the efficacy of targeted immunotherapy and reduce off-target effects, over the past two decades, nanoparticle delivery platforms have been increasingly used in tumor immunotherapy. However, nanoparticles are still subject to biological barriers and biodistribution challenges, which limit their overall clinical potential. This has prompted a series of engineered nanoparticles to overcome specific obstacles and transfer the accumulation of payloads to tumor-infiltrating immune cells. In recent years, new techniques and chemical methods have been employed to modify or functionalize the surfaces of nanoparticles. This review discusses the recent progress of surface-engineered nanoparticles in inducing tumor immune responses and immunotherapy, as well as future directions for the development of next-generation nanomedicines.

Recent Advancements in Liposome-Targeting Strategies for the Treatment of Gliomas: A Systematic Review

Malignant tumors represent some of the most intractable diseases that endanger human health. A glioma is a tumor of the central nervous system that is characterized by severe invasiveness, blurred boundaries between the tumor and surrounding normal tissue, difficult surgical removal, and high recurrence. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and multidrug resistance (MDR) are important factors that contribute to the lack of efficacy of chemotherapy in treating gliomas. A liposome is a biofilm-like drug delivery system with a unique phospholipid bilayer that exhibits high affinities with human tissues/organs (e.g., BBB). After more than five decades of development, classical and engineered liposomes consist of four distinct generations, each with different characteristics: (i) traditional liposomes, (ii) stealth liposomes, (iii) targeting liposomes, and (iv) biomimetic liposomes, which offer a promising approach to promote drugs across the BBB and to reverse MDR. Here, we review the history, preparatory methods, and physicochemical properties of liposomes. Furthermore, we discuss the mechanisms by which liposomes have assisted in the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas, including drug transport across the BBB, inhibition of efflux transporters, reversal of MDR, and induction of immune responses. Finally, we highlight ongoing and future clinical trials and applications toward further developing and testing the efficacies of liposomes in treating gliomas.

Immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: from targeted molecules to resistance patterns

Immunotherapies are now considered as a pillar of non-small-cell lung cancer treatment. The main targets of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, aiming at restoring antitumor immunity. Despite durable responses observed in some patients, all patients do not benefit from the treatment and almost all responders ultimately relapse after some time. In this review, we discuss the biomarkers that could be used to predict response to ICI, the current indications of ICI in non-small-cell lung cancer, the mechanisms inducing tumor-cell intrinsic or extrinsic resistance to ICI and finally, the potential treatment response monitoring.

Combination Immunotherapy of MUC1 mRNA Nano-vaccine and CTLA-4 Blockade Effectively Inhibits Growth of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which constitutes 10%-20% of all breast cancers, is associated with aggressive progression, a high rate of metastasis, and poor prognosis. The treatment of patients with TNBC remains a great clinical challenge. Preclinical reports support the combination immunotherapy of cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint blockades in non-immunogenic tumors. In this study, we constructed nanoparticles (NPs) to deliver an mRNA vaccine encoding tumor antigen MUC1 to dendritic cells (DCs) in lymph nodes to activate and expand tumor-specific T cells. An anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) monoclonal antibody was combined with the mRNA vaccine to enhance the anti-tumor benefits. In vivo studies demonstrated that the NP-based mRNA vaccine, targeted to mannose receptors on DCs, could successfully express tumor antigen in the DCs of the lymph node; that the NP vaccine could induce a strong, antigen-specific, in vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against TNBC 4T1 cells; and that combination immunotherapy of the vaccine and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody could significantly enhance anti-tumor immune response compared to the vaccine or monoclonal antibody alone. These data support both the NP as a carrier for delivery of mRNA vaccine and a potential combination immunotherapy of the NP-based mRNA vaccine and the CTLA-4 inhibitor for TNBC.

Mucins in lung cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications

Aberrant expression of mucins is associated with cancer development and metastasis. An overexpression of few mucins contributes to oncogenesis by enhancing cancer cell growth and providing constitutive survival signals. This review focuses on the importance of mucins both in the normal bronchial epithelial cells and the malignant tumors of the lung and their contribution in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer patients. During lung cancer progression, mucins either alone or through their interaction with many receptor tyrosine kinases mediate cell signals for growth and survival of cancer cells. Also, stage-specific expression of certain mucins, like MUC1, is associated with poor prognosis from lung cancer. Thus, mucins are emerging as attractive targets for developing novel therapeutic approaches for lung cancer. Several strategies targeting mucin expression and function are currently being investigated to control lung cancer progression.

Targeted Immunotherapy Designed to Treat MUC1-Expressing Solid Tumour

Several approaches to antigen-specific immunotherapy of cancer antigen-specific immunotherapy of cancer have been tested clinically. In this chapter, we will describe studies done with the antigen MUC1. Tested MUC1 therapeutic vaccines include the following: monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for MUC1; synthetic and recombinant polypeptides from the protein sequence of MUC1; dendritic cells carrying MUC1; RNA and DNA vaccinations; and recombinant viruses carrying the MUC1 DNA sequence. Chemotherapy of cancer aims to be toxic to the cancer cells with manageable side effects to the patient. In contrast, antigen-specific immunotherapy of cancer aims to treat the patient, such that the patient is then able to control and eventually eliminate their cancer cells. It is therefore important to know the immune status of each cancer patient prior to therapy.

Liposome-like Nanostructures for Drug Delivery

Liposomes are a class of well-established drug carriers that have found numerous therapeutic applications. The success of liposomes, together with recent advancements in nanotechnology, has motivated the development of various novel liposome-like nanostructures with improved drug delivery performance. These nanostructures can be categorized into five major varieties, namely: (1) polymer-stabilized liposomes, (2) nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes, (3) core-shell lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles, (4) natural membrane-derived vesicles, and (5) natural membrane coated nanoparticles. They have received significant attention and have become popular drug delivery platforms. Herein, we discuss the unique strengths of these liposome-like platforms in drug delivery, with a particular emphasis on how liposome-inspired novel designs have led to improved therapeutic efficacy, and review recent progress made by each platform in advancing healthcare.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines: the latest advancement in targeted therapy

Therapeutic cancer vaccines represent an emerging therapeutic modality that may play a more prominent role in cancer treatment in the future. Therapeutic cancer vaccines are designed to generate a targeted, immune-mediated antitumor response. There are 2 main types of therapeutic vaccines: patient-specific (generated either from a patient's own cells or tumor) and patient- nonspecific, where a peptide- or vector-based vaccine induces an immune response in vivo against specific tumor-associated antigens. Studies are currently underway to investigate methods to enhance vaccine strategies, including combinations with standard anticancer therapies or immune-modulating agents. Cancer vaccines are usually well tolerated, with minimal toxicity compared with chemotherapy. This review summarizes selected therapeutic cancer vaccines in late clinical development.

LICC: L-BLP25 in patients with colorectal carcinoma after curative resection of hepatic metastases: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational, double-blinded phase II trial

Background

15-20% of all patients initially diagnosed with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease and surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment available. Current 5-year survival following R0-resection of liver metastases is 28-39%, but recurrence eventually occurs in up to 70%. To date, adjuvant chemotherapy has not improved clinical outcomes significantly. The primary objective of the ongoing LICC trial (L-BLP25 In Colorectal Cancer) is to determine whether L-BLP25, an active cancer immunotherapy, extends recurrence-free survival (RFS) time over placebo in colorectal cancer patients following R0/R1 resection of hepatic metastases. L-BLP25 targets MUC1 glycoprotein, which is highly expressed in hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. In a phase IIB trial, L-BLP25 has shown acceptable tolerability and a trend towards longer survival in patients with stage IIIB locoregional NSCLC.

Methods/Design

This is a multinational, phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a sample size of 159 patients from 20 centers in 3 countries. Patients with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma limited to liver metastases are included. Following curative-intent complete resection of the primary tumor and of all synchronous/metachronous metastases, eligible patients are randomized 2:1 to receive either L-BLP25 or placebo. Those allocated to L-BLP25 receive a single dose of 300 mg/m² cyclophosphamide (CP) 3 days before first L-BLP25 dose, then primary treatment with s.c. L-BLP25 930 μg once weekly for 8 weeks, followed by s.c. L-BLP25 930 μg maintenance doses at 6-week (years 1&2) and 12-week (year 3) intervals unless recurrence occurs. In the control arm, CP is replaced by saline solution and L-BLP25 by placebo. Primary endpoint is the comparison of recurrence-free survival (RFS) time between groups. Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS) time, safety, tolerability, RFS/OS in MUC-1 positive cancers. Exploratory immune response analyses are planned. The primary endpoint will be assessed in Q3 2016. Follow-up will end Q3 2017. Interim analyses are not planned.

Discussion

The design and implementation of such a vaccination study in colorectal cancer is feasible. The study will provide recurrence-free and overall survival rates of groups in an unbiased fashion.

Trial Registration

EudraCT Number 2011-000218-20

Clinical development of liposome-based drugs: formulation, characterization, and therapeutic efficacy

Research on liposome formulations has progressed from that on conventional vesicles to new generation liposomes, such as cationic liposomes, temperature sensitive liposomes, and virosomes, by modulating the formulation techniques and lipid composition. Many research papers focus on the correlation of blood circulation time and drug accumulation in target tissues with physicochemical properties of liposomal formulations, including particle size, membrane lamellarity, surface charge, permeability, encapsulation volume, shelf time, and release rate. This review is mainly to compare the therapeutic effect of current clinically approved liposome-based drugs with free drugs, and to also determine the clinical effect via liposomal variations in lipid composition. Furthermore, the major preclinical and clinical data related to the principal liposomal formulations are also summarized.

Immunotherapy of lung adenocarcinoma patient with Peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: a case report

Immunotherapy with ex vivo generated dendritic cells (DCs) is reported to be of low toxicity and of diverse effectiveness in cancer treatment. The synthetic antigens are frequently used for immunotherapy especially for patients with stable disease after prior treatment. We described the effect of peptide-loaded DCs-based immunotherapy on patient with recurrent surgically resected adenocarcinoma with bronchoalveolar feature with co-existing of Takayasu arteritis and chronic hepatitis B. In January 2010, 61-year-old patient received subcutaneously four bi-weekly vaccinations of DCs loaded with MUC1 and MAGE-3 epitopes. Additionally, he received three bi-weekly booster vaccinations after 7 months from the first course of immunotherapy. Delayed-type hypersensitivity test was positive only for MAGE-3 antigen. The evidence expansion of MAGE-3-specific CD8(+) cells after first vaccination and after third vaccination during boosters injections was observed (from 0.08% before vaccination to 0.5% after first vaccination; from 0.05% before booster vaccination to 0.24% after third injection). Computed tomography scans performed after first course and after booster course of vaccination until April 2011 did not shown any presence of lung tumour or metastases. Based on clinical factors (no completed wedge-resection and recurrent character of cancer) as well as on the presence of the tumour-antigen-specific immunological response, we could speculated that immunotherapy prolonged disease free-survival in our patient. Over 16 months from first vaccination, the patient remains without symptoms of cancer.

Emerging cancer vaccines: the promise of genetic vectors

Therapeutic vaccination against cancer is an important approach which, when combined with other therapies, can improve long-term control of cancer. In fact, the induction of adaptive immune responses against Tumor Associated Antigens (TAAs) as well as innate immunity are important factors for tumor stabilization/eradication. A variety of immunization technologies have been explored in last decades and are currently under active evaluation, such as cell-based, protein, peptide and heat-shock protein-based cancer vaccines. Genetic vaccines are emerging as promising methodologies to elicit immune responses against a wide variety of antigens, including TAAs. Amongst these, Adenovirus (Ad)-based vectors show excellent immunogenicity profile and have achieved immunological proof of concept in humans. In vivo electroporation of plasmid DNA (DNA-EP) is also a desirable vaccine technology for cancer vaccines, as it is repeatable several times, a parameter required for the long-term maintenance of anti-tumor immunity. Recent findings show that combinations of different modalities of immunization (heterologous prime/boost) are able to induce superior immune reactions as compared to single-modality vaccines. In this review, we will discuss the challenges and requirements of emerging cancer vaccines, particularly focusing on the genetic cancer vaccines currently under active development and the promise shown by Ad and DNA-EP heterologous prime-boost.

Clinical investigations of Toll-like receptor agonists

BACKGROUND

Toll-like receptors (TLR) represent a family of surface molecules that function as primary sensors of the innate immune system to recognize microbial pathogens. Ligand binding to TLR results in activation of cellular signaling pathways that regulate expression of genes involved in inflammation and immunity.

OBJECTIVE

Use of synthetic TLR ligands (agonists) for treatment and prevention of infectious and neoplastic diseases.

METHODS

Review of literature about clinical investigations of agonists of TLR 4, 7, 8, and 9.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Imiquimod was the first TLR agonist approved for treatment of anogenital warts, actinic keratosis and superficial basal cell carcinoma in humans. Several other agonists of TLRs 4, 7, 8 and 9 were also shown to be effective for treatment of infections and cancers and, furthermore, were used as adjuvants for vaccination. Based on safety and efficacy of the TLR agonists used to date, applications are likely to increase in the future.