1
|
Draper SJ, Cottingham MG, Gilbert SC. Utilizing poxviral vectored vaccines for antibody induction-progress and prospects. Vaccine 2013; 31:4223-30. [PMID: 23746455 PMCID: PMC7131268 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Poxviral vectors are now regarded as robust tools for B cell and antibody induction. Antibody responses can be induced against the vector as well as a transgene. Increasing application is seen in heterologous prime–boost immunization regimes. Effective veterinary poxviral vaccine products are now licensed. Promising results of antibody induction are being reported in human clinical trials.
Over the last decade, poxviral vectors emerged as a mainstay approach for the induction of T cell-mediated immunity by vaccination, and their suitability for human use has led to widespread clinical testing of candidate vectors against infectious intracellular pathogens and cancer. In contrast, poxviruses have been widely perceived in the vaccine field as a poor choice of vector for the induction of humoral immunity. However, a growing body of data, from both animal models and recent clinical trials, now suggests that these vectors can be successfully utilized to prime and boost B cells and effective antibody responses. Significant progress has been made in the context of heterologous prime–boost immunization regimes, whereby poxviruses are able to boost responses primed by other vectors, leading to the induction of high-titre antigen-specific antibody responses. In other cases, poxviral vectors have been shown to stimulate humoral immunity against both themselves and encoded transgenes, in particular viral surface proteins such as influenza haemagglutinin. In the veterinary field, recombinant poxviral vectors have made a significant impact with numerous vectors licensed for use against a variety of animal viruses. On-going studies continue to explore the potential of poxviral vectors to modulate qualitative aspects of the humoral response, as well as their amenability to adjuvantation seeking to improve quantitative antibody immunogenicity. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms of B cell induction by recombinant poxviruses remain poorly defined, and further work is necessary to help guide the rational optimization of future poxviral vaccine candidates aiming to induce antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J Draper
- The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minassian AM, Satti I, Poulton ID, Meyer J, Hill AVS, McShane H. A human challenge model for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:1035-42. [PMID: 22396610 PMCID: PMC3295601 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(See the editorial commentary by Dockrell, on pages 1029–31.) Background. There is currently no safe human challenge model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to enable proof-of-concept efficacy evaluation of candidate vaccines against tuberculosis. In vivo antimycobacterial immunity could be assessed using intradermal Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination as a surrogate for M. tuberculosis infection. Methods. Healthy BCG-naive and BCG-vaccinated volunteers were challenged with intradermal BCG. BCG load was quantified from skin biopsy specimens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture colony-forming units. Cellular infiltrate was isolated by suction blisters and examined by flow cytometry. Prechallenge immune readouts were correlated with BCG load after challenge. Results. In BCG-naive volunteers, live BCG was detected at the challenge site for up to 4 weeks and peaked at 2 weeks. Infiltration of mainly CD15+ neutrophils was observed in blister fluid. In previously BCG-vaccinated individuals, PCR analysis of skin biopsy specimens reflected a degree of mycobacterial immunity. There was no significant correlation between BCG load after challenge and mycobacterial-specific memory T cells measured before challenge by cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Conclusions. This novel experimental human challenge model provides a platform for the identification of correlates of antimycobacterial immunity and will greatly facilitate the rational down-selection of candidate tuberculosis vaccines. Further evaluation of this model with BCG and new vaccine candidates is warranted.
Collapse
|
4
|
Minassian AM, Rowland R, Beveridge NER, Poulton ID, Satti I, Harris S, Poyntz H, Hamill M, Griffiths K, Sander CR, Ambrozak DR, Price DA, Hill BJ, Casazza JP, Douek DC, Koup RA, Roederer M, Winston A, Ross J, Sherrard J, Rooney G, Williams N, Lawrie AM, Fletcher HA, Pathan AA, McShane H. A Phase I study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of MVA85A, a candidate TB vaccine, in HIV-infected adults. BMJ Open 2011; 1:e000223. [PMID: 22102640 PMCID: PMC3221299 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Control of the tuberculosis (TB) epidemic is a global health priority and one that is likely to be achieved only through vaccination. The critical overlap with the HIV epidemic requires any effective TB vaccine regimen to be safe in individuals who are infected with HIV. The objectives of this clinical trial were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a leading candidate TB vaccine, MVA85A, in healthy, HIV-infected adults. Design This was an open-label Phase I trial, performed in 20 healthy HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naïve subjects. Two different doses of MVA85A were each evaluated as a single immunisation in 10 subjects, with 24 weeks of follow-up. The safety of MVA85A was assessed by clinical and laboratory markers, including regular CD4 counts and HIV RNA load measurements. Vaccine immunogenicity was assessed by ex vivo interferon γ (IFN-γ) ELISpot assays and flow-cytometric analysis. Results MVA85A was safe in subjects with HIV infection, with an adverse-event profile comparable with historical data from previous trials in HIV-uninfected subjects. There were no clinically significant vaccine-related changes in CD4 count or HIV RNA load in any subjects, and no evidence from qPCR analyses to indicate that MVA85A vaccination leads to widespread preferential infection of vaccine-induced CD4 T cell populations. Both doses of MVA85A induced an antigen-specific IFN-γ response that was durable for 24 weeks, although of a lesser magnitude compared with historical data from HIV-uninfected subjects. The functional quality of the vaccine-induced T cell response in HIV-infected subjects was remarkably comparable with that observed in healthy HIV-uninfected controls, but less durable. Conclusion MVA85A is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults infected with HIV. Further safety and efficacy evaluation of this candidate vaccine in TB- and HIV-endemic areas is merited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Iman Satti
- The Jenner Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Hazel Poyntz
- The Jenner Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - David R Ambrozak
- Immunology Laboratory, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - David A Price
- Human Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Biochemistry, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Brenna J Hill
- Human Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph P Casazza
- Immunology Laboratory, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel C Douek
- Human Immunology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard A Koup
- Immunology Laboratory, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mario Roederer
- Immuno-Technology Section, Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alan Winston
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Ross
- Selly Oak Hospital, Selly Oak, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jackie Sherrard
- Genito-urinary Medicine Department, Churchill Hospital, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Guy Rooney
- Great Western Hospital, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
| | - Nicola Williams
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Ansar A Pathan
- The Jenner Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Infection, Immunity and Disease Mechanisms, Biosciences, School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Helen McShane
- The Jenner Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
- Genito-urinary Medicine Department, Churchill Hospital, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|