Paradoxical adverse effects of anti-TNF-alpha treatment: onset or exacerbation of cutaneous disorders

Adalimumab-Induced Paradoxical Psoriasis Treated with Biologics Targeting the IL-17/IL-23 Axis in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical psoriasis (PP) has been mainly described in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease or psoriasis vulgaris, while such data in the context of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are scarce. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the course of PP and the underlying HS upon switching from adalimumab to a biologic agent targeting the interleukin (IL)-17/IL-23 axis.

METHODS

The electronic medical database of the outpatient department for HS of a tertiary hospital for skin diseases was searched to identify patients with moderate-to-severe HS under treatment with adalimumab, who developed PP and were switched to biological therapy with an IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitor between February 2016 and January 2022. Disease assessment scores were evaluated at baseline, at time of PP development, as well as six and 12 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Among the 83 patients who received adalimumab for the treatment of HS between February 2016 and January 2022, 10 patients (12%) developed paradoxical psoriasiform skin reactions after a median time of seven (range, 2-48) months. There were four females (40%) and six males (60%) with a median age of 42.5 (range, 33-56) years. Five patients presented with plaque psoriasis and five with palmoplantar pustulosis, while four had intertriginous and three nail involvement. In most of the patients, HS responded well to adalimumab at onset of PP. Eight patients were changed to secukinumab, one to ustekinumab, and one to risankizumab. HS further improved in all but 2 patients, one receiving secukinumab and one receiving risankizumab. In addition, all patients achieved improvement of PP.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small number of patients, this study provides support that patients with adalimumab-induced PP may benefit from biologics targeting the IL-17/IL-23 axis. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal therapeutic strategy of the anti-TNFα-induced PP in the context of HS.

Paradoxical Hidradenitis Suppurativa during Biologic Therapy, an Emerging Challenge: A Systematic Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease usually occurring after puberty with painful, deep-seated, inflammatory lesions in the apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body. Although HS pathogenesis is still unproven, recent major research advantages have increased our knowledge of the mechanisms behind HS lesions. Particularly, follicular occlusion followed by follicular rupture has been shown to be crucial to HS development, leading to immune response activation, and resulting in typical clinical HS lesions. Moreover, an increased and imbalanced cytokine production, such as interleukin (IL) 17 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, may play a role in HS. In recent years, paradoxical adverse events have been described during treatment. Since the recent increased use of biologic treatments in HS, an increased number of paradoxical HS occurrences have been reported. In this review, we analyzed all current data on paradoxical HS triggered by biological drugs.

Ustekinumab for the treatment of paradoxical skin reactions and cutaneous manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases

Ustekinumab (STELARA), a human monoclonal antibody directed against IL-12 and IL-23, is FDA-approved to treat psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. Increasing recognition of paradoxical skin reactions induced by older biologic therapies used for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as, adalimumab and infliximab, has led to the investigation of ustekinumab for the treatment of the cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations of IBD. In addition, ustekinumab may show efficacy in treating paradoxical cutaneous reactions to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. A search of the Medline/PubMed database, with additional citations obtained from the references section of relevant articles, yielded 22 articles that were included in this review. Ustekinumab is a safe and effective option for treating the cutaneous manifestations of IBD, such as, metastatic Crohn's disease and pyoderma gangrenosum. It is also an effective treatment for TNF-α inhibitor-induced paradoxical skin reactions, such as, psoriasis that do not remit spontaneously or with conventional treatment. Additional studies should focus on the optimal dosing of ustekinumab for dermatologic conditions beyond psoriasis.

Paradoxical Skin Reaction to Certolizumab, an Overlap of Pyoderma Gangrenosum and Psoriasis in a Young Woman Treated for Ankylosing Spondylitis: Case Report with Literature Review

Introduction

Biologic agents form an indispensable part of modern therapeutic regimens for the treatment of severe inflammatory diseases, especially in the fields of rheumatology, dermatology and gastroenterology. They are favoured by both physicians and patients due to their high effectiveness, good patient tolerance and safety. However, interference in the regulation and dynamics of inflammatory cytokines can on occasion lead to an onset of a dermatological condition also known as paradoxical skin reaction. Here, we present a case of paradoxical skin reaction induced by certolizumab.

Case Report

A young woman with ankylosing spondylitis developed a severe and complex cutaneous reaction after 6 months of otherwise successful treatment with certolizumab. The diagnosis of a rare paradoxical cutaneous reaction post anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha treatment was based on overlapping features of pyoderma gangrenosum and palmoplantar pustular psoriasis. Alopecia developed and there was also nail involvement. Treatment proved to be challenging as the disease did not remit after the patient ceased treatment with certolizumab. The patient was started on a combination of secukinumab and methotrexate to control the symptoms, with a promising outcome.

Conclusion

Paradoxical skin reactions are an emerging clinical entity that require further research in order to establish risk factors and best personalized treatment.

Severe Attack of Henoch-Schönlein Purpura With Neurological Involvement During Adalimumab Treatment for Crohn's Disease

Tumour necrosis factor-α [TNF-α] inhibitors have revolutionised the management of chronic inflammatory conditions. A number of cutaneous adverse events have been reported with TNF inhibition, including vasculitis. Most reactions are mild and rarely warrant treatment withdrawal. Here we describe a patient with Crohn's disease treated with adalimumab in whom severe multivisceral Henoch-Schönlein purpura developed, including neurological involvement, requiring definitive TNF blocker withdrawal.

Paradoxical Skin Reactions to Biologics in Patients With Rheumatologic Disorders

Targeted immune-modulating treatment with biological agents has revolutionized the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatologic conditions. The efficacy and tolerability of biological agents, from the initial tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors to the new anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies, have dramatically changed the natural history of debilitating conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthropathies. The widening use of biologics across several rheumatologic diseases has been associated with a new class of adverse events, the so-called paradoxical reactions. These events are inflammatory immune-mediated tissue reactions, developing paradoxically during treatment of rheumatologic conditions with targeted biologics that are commonly used for treating the idiopathic counterparts of these drug-induced reactions. The skin is frequently involved, and, even if considered rare to uncommon, these cutaneous manifestations are an important cause of biologic agent discontinuation. TNF-α antagonist-induced psoriasis, which can manifest de novo or as exacerbation of a pre-existing form, is the prototypic and most frequent paradoxical skin reaction to biologics while other reactions, such as eczematous and lichenoid eruptions, hidradenitis suppurativa, pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet’s syndrome and granulomatous skin diseases, occur much more rarely. Management of these reactions consists of topical or systemic skin-directed therapies, depending on the severity and extension of the cutaneous picture, and it is generally associated with switching over to other disease-modifying regimens for treating the underlying rheumatologic condition. Here, we review in detail the current concepts and controversies on classification, pathogenesis and clinical management of this new class of cutaneous adverse events induced by biologics in rheumatologic patients.

Evaluation of intravitreal injection of pentoxifylline in experimental endotoxin-induced uveitis in rabbits

The objective of the present study was to investigate the clinical and histopathological effects of intravitreal injection of pentoxifylline (PTX) the management of an experimental model of uveitis. Fifty-two rabbits were divided randomly into six intravitreal treated groups as below: 1) Balanced salt solution (BSS), 2) Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (LPS) + BSS, 3) LPS + PTX 100 μg, 4) LPS + PTX 500 μg, 5) BSS + PTX 100 μg and 6) BSS + PTX 500 μg. Inflammation was evaluated by clinical examinations using slit lamp on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post injections and histopathological examinations were also performed at the end of the study. Clinical examinations demonstrated a statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 on day 5 and day 7. Moreover, the comparison of clinical severity scores of group 1 with groups 3, 4, 5 and 6, on third, fifth and seventh post-injection days showed statistically significant differences. The mean histopathological inflammation intensity score in groups 5 and 6 was significantly higher than group 1. The mean histopathological inflammation intensity score in groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 was significantly higher than group 2. Intravitreal injection of PTX in an experimental model of uveitis in rabbits not only does not reduce inflammation but also leads to inflammation when used alone or in combination with LPS.

Paradoxical Reactions to Biologic Therapy in Psoriasis: A Review of the Literature

Biologic drugs, which are molecules designed to act on specific immune system targets, have been shown to be very effective in treating various dermatological, rheumatological, and systemic diseases. As a group, they have an acceptable safety profile, but their use has been associated with the onset of both systemic and organ-specific inflammatory conditions. True paradoxical reactions are immune-mediated disorders that would usually respond to the biologic agent that causes them. There is still debate about whether certain other adverse reactions can be said to be paradoxical. The hypotheses proposed to explain the pathogenesis of such reactions include an imbalance in cytokine production, with an overproduction of IFN-α and altered lymphocyte recruitment and migration (mediated in part by CXCR3), and the production of autoantibodies. Some biologic therapies favor granulomatous reactions. While most of the paradoxical reactions reported have been associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors, cases associated with more recently introduced biologic therapies -such as ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab- are increasingly common. The study of paradoxical adverse events not only favors better management of these reactions in patients receiving biologic therapy, but also improves our knowledge of the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases and helps to identify potential therapeutic targets.

Paradoxical reactions under TNF-α blocking agents and other biological agents given for chronic immune-mediated diseases: an analytical and comprehensive overview

Paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) have been reported during biological treatment for chronic immune-mediated diseases. PAEs are defined as the occurrence during biological agent therapy of a pathological condition that usually responds to this class of drug. A wide range of PAEs have been reported including dermatological, intestinal and ophthalmic conditions, mainly with antitumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) agents. True PAEs include psoriasis, Crohn's disease and hidradenitis suppurativa. Other PAEs may be qualified as borderline and include uveitis, scleritis, sarcoidosis and other granulomatous diseases (granuloma annulare, interstitial granulomatous dermatitis), vasculitis, vitiligo and alopecia areata. Proposed hypotheses to explain these PAEs include an imbalance in cytokine production, the differential immunological properties between the monoclonal antibodies and TNF-α soluble receptor, an unopposed type I interferon production and a shift towards a Th1/Th2 profile. Data from registries suggest that the risk for paradoxical psoriasis is low and non-significant. We discuss management of these PAEs, which depends on the type and severity of the adverse events, pre-existing treated conditions and the possibility of alternative therapeutic options for the underlying disease. Paradoxical adverse events are not restricted to anti-TNF-α agents and close surveillance of new available biological drugs (anti-interleukin-17/23, anti-integrin) is warranted in order to detect the occurrence of new or as yet undescribed events.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS): An unrecognized paradoxical effect of biologic agents (BA) used in chronic inflammatory diseases

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) induced by biologic agents (BA) is scarcely reported.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients developing paradoxical HS under BA.

METHODS

This was a multicenter nationwide retrospective study asking physicians to report all cases of HS, confirmed by a dermatologist, occurring during treatment of an inflammatory disease by a BA.

RESULTS

We included 25 patients (15 inflammatory rheumatism, 9 Crohn's disease, 1 psoriasis) treated by 5 BA (adalimumab = 12, infliximab = 6, etanercept = 4, rituximab = 2, tocilizumab = 1). Median duration of BA exposure before HS onset was 12 (range 1-120) months. Patients were mostly Hurley stage I (n = 13) or II (n = 11). Simultaneously to HS or within 1 year, 11 patients developed additional inflammatory diseases, including paradoxical reactions (psoriasis = 9, Crohn's disease = 3, alopecia areata = 1, erythema elevatum diutinum = 1). Complete improvement of HS was more frequently obtained after BA discontinuation or switch (n = 6/10, 60%) rather than maintenance (n = 1/14, 7%). Reintroducing the same BA resulted in HS relapse in 3 of 3 patients.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective nature and lack of complete follow-up for some patients are limitations.

CONCLUSION

HS is a rare paradoxical adverse effect of BA, but fortuitous association cannot be excluded in some cases. We observed a trend toward better outcome when the BA was discontinued or switched.

Exacerbation of recalcitrant cutaneous sarcoidosis with adalimumab--a paradoxical effect? A case report

The paradoxical adverse effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonists have been described frequently as a result of the widespread use of these drugs. Among the TNF-alpha blocking agents, few reports exist relating the use of adalimumab in cutaneous sarcoidosis, although all of them show good results. More recently, sarcoidosis onsets have been reported with various TNF-alpha inhibitors. The current case is, to our knowledge, the first to describe the exacerbation of cutaneous lesions of sarcoidosis treated with adalimumab.

Clinical management of paradoxical psoriasiform reactions during TNF- α therapy

There have been reports of paradoxical induction or worsening of psoriasis during treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab). It has been hypothesized that an imbalance between TNF-α and interferon α might have a role in the etiology and pathogenesis of these reactions. Paradoxical psoriasiform reactions can be divided clinically into de novo psoriasis and exacerbation of preexisting psoriasis. The first, which is more common and more extensively described in the literature, occurs in patients without a history of psoriasis who are receiving TNF-α therapy for another inflammatory disorder. The second can occur with or without changes in the morphology of the lesions. In this article, we review the literature on the clinical and histologic features of paradoxical psoriasiform reactions, analyze their clinical course and treatment, and propose a clinical management model for use in routine practice.

The complexity of adverse side-effects to biological agents

Whereas adverse effects induced by xenobiotics are mainly linked to the pharmacological effect, the adverse side-effects induced by biological agents (BA) are often target-related and linked to the biological consequences of their action. Based on these differences, an original classification of the adverse effects has been proposed. Five types of adverse effects induced by BA are described (α, β, γ, δ, and ε). This classification provides a very useful scheme for a better understanding of these adverse effects. This approach should help to better characterize the pathogenic mechanisms involved and to optimize their management. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the specific risks related to this relatively new class of drugs. Close monitoring of these BA is therefore recommended.

Drug-induced uveitis

A number of medications have been associated with uveitis. This review highlights both well-established and recently reported systemic, topical, intraocular, and vaccine-associated causes of drug-induced uveitis, and assigns a quantitative score to each medication based upon criteria originally described by Naranjo and associates.

[Pustular psoriasis]

The pustular forms o f psoriasis make up a heterogeneous entity from a clinical point of view. However, the existence of clinically detectable aseptic pustular lesions is common to all these forms. How they are related to plaque psoriasis, also called psoriasis vulgaris, the most frequent form of psoriasis, and the genetic and molecular mechanisms recently updated in some forms, have renewed interest in these pustular forms, resulting in reconsideration of their place within cutaneous and systemic inflammatory diseases.

Heterogeneity of inflammatory and cytokine networks in chronic plaque psoriasis

The clinical features of psoriasis, characterized by sharply demarcated scaly erythematous plaques, are typically so distinctive that a diagnosis can easily be made on these grounds alone. However, there is great variability in treatment response between individual patients, and this may reflect heterogeneity of inflammatory networks driving the disease. In this study, whole-genome transcriptional profiling was used to characterize inflammatory and cytokine networks in 62 lesional skin samples obtained from patients with stable chronic plaque psoriasis. We were able to stratify lesions according to their inflammatory gene expression signatures, identifying those associated with strong (37% of patients), moderate (39%) and weak inflammatory infiltrates (24%). Additionally, we identified differences in cytokine signatures with heightened cytokine-response patterns in one sub-group of lesions (IL-13-strong; 50%) and attenuation of these patterns in a second sub-group (IL-13-weak; 50%). These sub-groups correlated with the composition of the inflammatory infiltrate, but were only weakly associated with increased risk allele frequency at some psoriasis susceptibility loci (e.g., REL, TRAF3IP2 and NOS2). Our findings highlight variable points in the inflammatory and cytokine networks known to drive chronic plaque psoriasis. Such heterogeneous aspects may shape clinical course and treatment responses, and can provide avenues for development of personalized treatments.