Summary and future of medicine for hereditary angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal genetic disease for which there are currently nine FDA-approved drugs. This review summarizes drug treatments for HAE based on four therapeutic pathways: inhibiting the contact system, inhibiting bradykinin binding to B2 receptors, supplying missing C1 inhibitors, and inhibiting plasminogen conversion. The review generalizes the clinical use, pharmacological effects and mechanisms of HAE drugs, and it also discusses possible development directions and targets to enhance understanding of HAE and help researchers.

Plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with hereditary angioedema

Background

Over 40 years of use demonstrates that complement 1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate is effective and well tolerated for acute edema attacks and prophylaxis in patients with hereditary angioedema. OCTA-C1-INH is a new stable, virus-inactivated, nanofiltrated concentrate of C1-INH derived from human plasma.

Objective

We investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of new C1-INH in people with hereditary angioedema during an attack-free period.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, adults with hereditary angioedema type I/II received a single intravenous dose of 20 IU/kg C1-INH. Blood samples were taken ≤30 minutes before infusion, and 0, 0.25, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 120, 144, and 168 hours after infusion. The primary end point was assessing the pharmacokinetic parameters of C1-INH measured by C1-INH activity. Safety end points were also examined.

Results

Twenty patients received a single dose of 20 IU/kg new C1-INH with a mean (standard deviation) total dose of 1457.3 (356.51) IU. Mean (standard deviation) area under the curve normalized by dose was 51.6 (17.9) h∙IU/mL/IU, maximum blood concentration was 1.14 (0.989) IU/mL, incremental recovery was 0.0466 (0.051) (IU∙kg)/(IU∙mL), half-life was 0.598 (0.716) hours, and time to maximum concentration was 0.598 (0.716) hours. No thromboembolic events were recorded. No treatment-emergent adverse events were rated as severe/serious.

Conclusion

PK parameters of new C1-INH were in line with those reported for other C1-INH concentrates. New C1-INH demonstrated a favorable safety profile in patients with C1-INH deficiency. Further studies are warranted to determine the effectiveness and longer-term safety of new C1-INH.

Acquired and hereditary forms of recurrent angioedema: Update of treatment

The aim of treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is either treating acute attacks or preventing attacks by using prophylactic treatment. For treating acute attacks, plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, and a recombinant human C1-INH are available in Europe. In the United States, a plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate, a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, and a plasma kallikrein inhibitor were approved for the treatment of acute attacks. Fresh frozen plasma is also available for treating acute attacks. Short-term prophylactic treatment focuses on C1-INH and attenuated androgens. Long-term prophylactic treatments include attenuated androgens such as danazol, stanozolol, and oxandrolone, antifibrinolytics, and a plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate. Plasma-derived C1-INH and a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist are admitted for self-administration and home therapy. So the number of management options increased considerably within the last few years thus helping to diminish the burden of HAE.

Pharmacokinetics of plasma-derived C1-esterase inhibitor after subcutaneous versus intravenous administration in subjects with mild or moderate hereditary angioedema: the PASSION study

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease caused by C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency, characterized by periodic attacks of acute edema affecting subcutaneous (SC) tissues and mucous membranes. Human C1-INH concentrate given intravenously (IV) is effective and safe, but venous access may be difficult. We compared SC and IV administration of human pasteurized C1-INH concentrate with respect to pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety.

Study Design and Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Twenty-four subjects with mild or moderate HAE were randomly assigned during an attack-free interval to receive 1000 units of human pasteurized C1-INH concentrate IV or SC. Plasma levels of C1-INH activity and antigen, C4 antigen, cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen (clHK), and C1-INH antibodies were measured.

Results

The mean relative bioavailability of functional C1-INH after SC administration was 39.7%. Maximum C1-INH activity after SC administration occurred within 48 hours and persisted longer than after IV administration. C4 antigen levels increased and clHK levels decreased after IV and SC administration, indicating the pharmacodynamic action of C1-INH. The mean half-life of functional C1-INH was 62 hours after IV administration and 120 hours after SC administration (p = 0.0595). C1-INH concentrate was safe and well tolerated when administered via both routes. As expected, SC administration resulted in a higher incidence of injection site reactions, all of which were mild.

Conclusion

With a relative bioavailability of 39.7%, SC administration of human pasteurized C1-INH yields potentially clinically relevant and sustained plasma levels of C1-INH and is safe and well tolerated.

Preformed and de novo donor specific antibodies in visceral transplantation: long-term outcome with special reference to the liver

Despite improvement in early outcome, rejection particularly chronic allograft enteropathy continues to be a major barrier to long-term visceral engraftment. The potential role of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in 194 primary adult recipients. All underwent complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM) with pre- and posttransplant solid phase HLA-DSA assay in 156 (80%). Grafts were ABO-identical with random HLA-match. Liver was included in 71 (37%) allografts. Immunosuppression was tacrolimus-based with antilymphocyte recipient pretreatment in 150 (77%). CDC-XM was positive in 55 (28%). HLA-DSA was detectable before transplant in 49 (31%) recipients with 19 continuing to have circulating antibodies. Another 19 (18%) developed de novo DSA. Ninety percent of patients with preformed DSA harbored HLA Class-I whereas 74% of recipients with de novo antibodies had Class-II. Gender, age, ABO blood-type, cold ischemia, splenectomy and allograft type were significant DSA predictors. Preformed DSA significantly (p < 0.05) increased risk of acute rejection. Persistent and de novo HLA-DSA significantly (p < 0.001) increased risk of chronic rejection and associated graft loss. Inclusion of the liver was a significant predictor of better outcome (p = 0.004, HR = 0.347) with significant clearance of preformed antibodies (p = 0.04, OR = 56) and lower induction of de novo DSA (p = 0.07, OR = 24). Innovative multifaceted anti-DSA strategies are required to further improve long-term survival particularly of liver-free allografts.

Long-term survival, nutritional autonomy, and quality of life after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess long-term survival, graft function, and health-related quality of life (QOL) after visceral transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Despite continual improvement in early survival, the long-term therapeutic efficacy of visceral transplantation has yet to be defined.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 227 visceral allograft recipients who survived beyond the 5-year milestone. Clinical data were used to assess outcome including graft function and long-term survival predictors. The socioeconomic milestones and QOL measures were assessed by clinical evaluation, professional consultation, and validated QOL inventory.

RESULTS

Of 376 recipients, 227 survived beyond 5 years, with conditional survival of 75% at 10 years and 61% at 15 years. With a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 years, 177 (92 adults, 85 children) are alive, with 118 (67%) recipients 18 years or older. Nonfunctional social support and noninclusion of the liver in the visceral allograft are the most significant survival risk factors. Nutritional autonomy was achievable in 160 (90%) survivors, with current serum albumin level of 3.7 ± 0.5 gm/dL and body mass index of 25 ± 6 kg/m(2). Despite coexistence or development of neuropsychiatric disorders, most survivors were reintegrated to society with self-sustained socioeconomic status. In parallel, most of the psychological, emotional, and social QOL measures significantly (P < 0.05) improved after transplantation. Current morbidities with potential impact on global health included dysmotility (59%), hypertension (37%), osteoporosis (22%), and diabetes (11%), with significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence among adult recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

With new tactics to further improve long-term survival including social support measures, visceral transplantation has achieved excellent nutritional autonomy and good QOL.