Treatment of interstitial lung diseases associated with connective tissue diseases

Clinical features and prognosis of microscopic polyangiitis with usual interstitial pneumonia compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary involvement in microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) is common, little is known about the clinical features of MPA with interstitial pneumonia (MPA-IP).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the prevalence of microscopic polyangiitis associated usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)(MPA-UIP) and compare its clinical features and prognosis with those of MPA-non-UIP and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with MPA-IP were identified and divided into MPA-UIP patients and MPA-non-UIP patients. The clinical characteristics and survival of MPA-UIP patients were analysed and compared with those of MPA-non-UIP patients and 68 patients with IPF.

RESULTS

The results showed that 34/73 (47%) MPA-IP patients were classified as MPA-UIP patients. Compared with MPA-non-UIP patients, MPA-UIP patients tend to have longer duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis and usually have pulmonary involvement as the initial presentation. However, they were less likely to have proteinuria and/or hematuria. Compared with IPF patients, MPA-UIP patients usually had multisystem damage, positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies and elevated levels of nonspecific inflammatory markers. MPA-UIP death was concentrated mainly in the first 3 months after diagnosis and resulted in a higher early mortality compared with IPF.

CONCLUSION

UIP is the most frequent type of MPA-IP. These patients tend to have longer duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis and usually have pulmonary involvement as the first presentation. However, they are less likely to have proteinuria and/or hematuria. MPA patients with UIP can be differentiated from IPF patients through comprehensive analysis of clinical and laboratory findings.

Drug survival and the associated predictors in South Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tacrolimus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate the drug survival rate of tacrolimus (TAC) and analyze the potential predictors of this rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine care.

METHODS2018-01-16

In this retrospective longitudinal study, we enrolled 102 RA patients treated with TAC from April 2009 to January 2014 at a tertiary center in South Korea. The causes of TAC discontinuation were classified as lack of efficacy (LOE), adverse events (AEs), and others. The drug survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the predictors of this rate were identified by Cox-regression analyses.

RESULTS

TAC was discontinued in 27 of 102 RA patients (26.5%). The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year TAC continuation rates were 81.8%, 78.4%, 74.2%, and 69.1%, respectively and the median follow-up period from the start of TAC was 32.5 months. The number of TAC discontinuations due to LOE, AEs, and others were 15 (55.6%), 11 (40.7 %), and 1 (3.7%), respectively. The baseline high disease activity was a significant risk factor for TAC discontinuation after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 5.35; p = 0.019). In addition, underlying interstitial lung disease was significantly associated with TAC withdrawal due to AEs (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.06 to 11.46; p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, TAC showed a good overall survival rate in patients with RA in real clinical practice. This suggests that the long-term TAC therapy has a favorable efficacy and safety profile for treating RA.

[Interstitial lung disease associated with lung cancer treatment]

Interstitial lung disease is one of the most serious side effects caused by lung cancer treatment. Due to the complexity diagnosis and variability of the disease, it is often not diagnosied and treated in time, even endanger the patient's life and affect the patient's prognosis. The mechanism of interstitial pneumonia caused by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy is still not fully known. Therefore, it become a problem that how to early detection, diagnosis and treat the interstitial lung disease caused by lung cancer treatment and it should not be ignored in the future.

[Chronic critically ill patients from a pneumological perspective]

Epidemiological estimates predict an increase in patients with chronic lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma; therefore, increasing numbers of patients with preexisting lung diseases who require intensive care treatment are to be expected. These patients tend to have complex disease patterns and are difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation after intubation. It is not uncommon for these patients to need permanent mechanical ventilation after an acute illness. Also the question of limiting therapy, the need for treatment with a palliative objective and supervision of patients as well as their relatives at the end of life is a challenge for intensive care physicians when treating acutely ill patients with chronic pulmonary diseases.

A retrospective review of clinical features and treatment outcomes in steroid-resistant interstitial lung disease from polymyositis/dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

We reviewed our experience with immunosuppressive agents in patients with steroid-resistant Interstitial Lung Disease in the setting of Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis (PM/DM-ILD) to determine whether there were major differences in outcomes.

METHODS

We identified all patients treated for PM/DM-ILD and assessed cyclophosphamide (CYC), azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate (MMF) when used as first-line steroid sparing therapy for effects on pulmonary function variables, dyspnea and tolerance at six and twelve months.

RESULTS

Among 46 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 24 were treated with CYC, 13 with AZA and 9 with MMF. There were no baseline differences between the three treatment groups for any of the demographic or physiologic variables, dyspnea score, the presence of >30% fibrosis on CT, or the baseline steroid dose. At the six months assessment, the overall median change in FVC was 5.0% (25th, 75th percentile -3, 11.5%), corresponding to +.20 L (.09, 0.42 L) and the DLCO increased by 2.93% (-4, 9%), corresponding to 1 mm/ml/Hg (-.58, 2.3). The severity of dyspnea decreased substantially, prednisone dose could be reduced and no important difference in side effects was found in the whole group of patients. This effect was sustained after twelve months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PM/DM-ILD related, treatment with CYC, AZA or MMF was associated with stabilization of pulmonary physiology, improved dyspnea, and a reduction of steroid dose.

Connective Tissue Disease-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is commonly encountered in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). Besides the lung parenchyma, the airways, pulmonary vasculature and structures of the chest wall may all be involved, depending on the type of CTD. As a result of this so-called multi-compartment involvement, airflow limitation, pulmonary hypertension, vasculitis and extrapulmonary restriction can occur alongside fibro-inflammatory parenchymal abnormalities in CTD. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), poly-/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), Sjögren's syndrome (SjS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and undifferentiated (UCTD) as well as mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) can all be associated with the development of ILD. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is the most commonly observed histopathological pattern in CTD-ILD, but other patterns including usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), organizing pneumonia (OP), diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP) may occur. Although the majority of patients with CTD-ILD experience stable or slowly advancing ILD, a small yet significant group exhibits a more severe and progressive course. Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of immunomodulatory treatments have been conducted only in SSc-associated ILD. However, clinical experience suggests that a handful of immunosuppressive medications are potentially effective in a sizeable portion of patients with ILD caused by other CTDs. In this manuscript, we review the clinical characteristics and management of the most common CTD-ILDs.