Prolactinomas: diagnosis and treatment

Aggressive prolactinoma (Review)

Aggressive prolactinoma (APRL) is a subgroup of aggressive pituitary tumors (accounting for 10% of all hypophyseal neoplasia) which are defined by: invasion based on radiological and/or histological features, a higher proliferation profile when compared to typical adenomas and rapidly developing resistance to standard medication/protocols in addition to an increased risk of early recurrence. This is a narrative review focusing on APRL in terms of both presentation and management. Upon admission, the suggestive features may include increased serum prolactin with a large tumor diameter (mainly >4 cm), male sex, early age at diagnosis (<20 years), and genetic predisposition [multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP), succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) gene mutations]. Potential prognostic factors are indicated by assessment of E-cadherin, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) status. Furthermore, during management, APRL may be associated with dopamine agonist (DA) resistance (described in 10-20% of all prolactinomas), post-hypophysectomy relapse, mitotic count >2, Ki-67 proliferation index ≥3%, the need for radiotherapy, lack of response in terms of controlling prolactin levels and tumor growth despite multimodal therapy. However, none of these as an isolated element serves as a surrogate of APRL diagnosis. A fourth-line therapy is necessary with temozolomide, an oral alkylating chemotherapeutic agent, that may induce tumor reduction and serum prolactin reduction in 75% of cases but only 8% have a normalization of prolactin levels. Controversies surrounding the duration of therapy still exist; also regarding the fifth-line therapy, post-temozolomide intervention. Recent data suggest alternatives such as somatostatin analogues (pasireotide), checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (lapatinib), and mTOR inhibitors (everolimus). APRL represents a complex condition that is still challenging, and multimodal therapy is essential.

The Role of Dopamine Agonists in Pituitary Adenomas

Dopamine agonist therapy is the primary therapy for prolactin-secreting adenomas and usually results in normoprolactinemia, eugonadism, and tumor reduction. Cabergoline is superior to bromocriptine with regard to efficacy and tolerance. Withdrawal of cabergoline can be attempted in patients with normal prolactin levels on low doses of medication and evidence of radiographic tumor involution. Dopamine agonists have been used off label in patients with acromegaly, Cushing disease, and nonfunctioning adenomas. A trial of cabergoline monotherapy can be effective in patients with biochemically mild acromegaly. Cabergoline combination with somatostatin receptor ligands or pegvisomant improves insulin-like growth factor level 1 in majority of patients.

Paradoxical GH Increase During OGTT Is Associated With First-Generation Somatostatin Analog Responsiveness in Acromegaly

CONTEXT

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is considered the most useful method for diagnosing active acromegaly and for patient follow-up after neurosurgery. Despite its widespread use, only a few small studies have so far focused on patients' clinical features associated with different GH responsiveness to OGTT.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association between glucose-induced GH response and endocrine profiles, clinical manifestations, and response to therapy in a large cohort of patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS

According to GH response to OGTT, patients were grouped as paradoxical (GH-Par) or nonparadoxical (GH-NPar), and their clinical and pathological features were compared in terms of pituitary tumor size, invasiveness, biochemical profiles, and response to therapy.

RESULTS

The study concerned 496 patients with acromegaly. At diagnosis, those with GH-Par (n = 184) were older than those with GH-NPar (n = 312) (mean ± SD, 44.1 ± 13.7 years vs 40.5 ± 12.7 years; P < 0.01) and had smaller tumors (0.82 vs 1.57 cm3; P < 0.01) that less frequently invaded the cavernous sinus (15% vs 27%; P < 0.01). The GH-Par group also had a higher basal GH per volume ratio (14.3 vs 10.5 μg/L ⋅ cm3; P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of hyperprolactinemia (17% vs 30%; P < 0.01) than the GH-NPar group. Importantly, the GH-Par group had a higher rate of remission in response to somatostatin analogues (52% vs 26%; P < 0.01) and a more marked drop in IGF-1 and GH after 6 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data strongly suggest that serum GH responsiveness to oral glucose challenge reflects some important biological features of pituitary tumors and that the OGTT may have some prognostic value.

Microvascular morphometrics of the hypophysis and pituitary tumors: from bench to operating theatre

The idea that microvasculature might be a histopathological biomarker in the prognosis and treatment of tumors is garnering even more attention in the scientific community. The roles of neovascularity in tumor progression and metastasis, have become a hot-topic of investigation in cancer research. A number of methods of quantitatively analyzing pituitary adenoma microvasculature have been applied, and fractal analysis is emerging as a potential effective model for this aim. Additionally, new and more specific immunological techniques have been developed for the detection of microvessels. CD105 (Endoglin) has been proposed as a valuable antigen that marks only newly formed vessels, rather than the entire tumor microvascular system. The combination of different types of immunostaining techniques for the detection of microvessels in pituitary adenomas with fractal analysis as an objective and computer-aided technique to quantify and describe morphological aspects of microvessels has potential implications in future clinical and surgical applications. Tumor treatments, such as anti-angiogenic therapy, as well as intraoperative tools, stand to be enhanced by increasing advances in microvascular research. We here review the methods used for the quantitative analysis of microvessels of the pituitary in its physiopathological states, with the aim to show the pituitary adenoma as a model for the study of neoplastic angioarchitecture and the importance of the introduction of new techniques for the study of angiogenesis, with the relative scientific, medical and surgical implications.