Serrated polyps: critical precursors to colorectal cancer

The combination of SHP099 inhibits the malignant biological behavior of L-OHP/5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer cells by regulating energy metabolism reprogramming

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in China. At present, there is a problem that the CRC treatment drugs SHP099, L-OHP and 5-FU are insensitive to tumor cells. Combination medication is an important means to solve the insensitivity of medication alone. The purpose of this project was to explore the effect and molecular mechanism of SHP099 combination on the malignant biological behavior of L-OHP/5-FU resistant strains of CRC.

METHODS

HT29 and SW480 cells were cultured in media supplemented with L-OHP or 5-FU to establish drug-resistant strains. HT29 and SW480 drug-resistant cells were subcutaneously injected into the ventral nerves of nude mice at a dose of 5 × 106 to establish CRC drug-resistant animal models. CCK-8, Western blot, flow cytometry, Transwell and kit detection were used to detect the regulatory mechanism of energy metabolism reprogramming in drug-resistant CRC cells.

RESULTS

Compared with nonresistant strains, L-OHP/5-FU-resistant strains exhibited greater metabolic reprogramming. Functionally, SHP099 can restrain the metabolic reprogramming of L-OHP/5-FU-resistant strains and subsequently restrain the proliferation, colony formation, migration and spheroid formation of L-OHP/5-FU-resistant strains. Downstream mechanistic studies have shown that SHP099 interferes with the metabolic reprogramming of L-OHP/5-FU drug-resistant strains by suppressing the PI3K/AKT pathway, thereby restraining the malignant biological behavior of L-OHP/5-FU drug-resistant strains and alleviating CRC.

CONCLUSION

The combination of SHP099 can restrain the malignant biological behavior of L-OHP/5-FU-resistant CRC cells and alleviate the progression of CRC by interfering with the reprogramming of energy metabolism. This study explored the effect of SHP099 combination on dual-resistant CRC cells for the first time, and provided a new therapeutic idea for solving the problem of SHP099 insensitivity to CRC cells.

Unveiling Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: Harnessing Biosensor Technology for Volatile Organic Compound Detection

Conventional screening options for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection are mainly direct visualization and invasive methods including colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, which must be performed in a clinical setting and may be linked to adverse effects for some patients. Non-invasive CRC diagnostic tests such as computed tomography colonography and stool tests are either too costly or less reliable than invasive ones. On the other hand, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are potentially ideal non-invasive biomarkers for CRC detection and monitoring. The present review is a comprehensive presentation of the current state-of-the-art VOC-based CRC diagnostics, with a specific focus on recent advancements in biosensor design and application. Among them, breath-based chromatography pattern analysis and sampling techniques are overviewed, along with nanoparticle-based optical and electrochemical biosensor approaches. Limitations of the currently available technologies are also discussed with an outlook for improvement in combination with big data analytics and advanced instrumentation, as well as expanding the scope and specificity of CRC-related volatile biomarkers.

Risk of colorectal neoplasia after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps: a comprehensive evaluation of risk factors and surveillance use

BACKGROUND

Surveillance colonoscopy after polyp removal is recommended to prevent subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC). It is known that advanced adenomas have a substantially higher risk than non-advanced ones, but optimal intervals for surveillance remain unclear.

DESIGN

We prospectively followed 156 699 participants who had undergone a colonoscopy from 2007 to 2017 in a large integrated healthcare system. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression we estimated the subsequent risk of CRC and high-risk polyps, respectively, according to index colonoscopy polyps, colonoscopy quality measures, patient characteristics and the use of surveillance colonoscopy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, we documented 309 CRC and 3053 high-risk polyp cases. Compared with participants with no polyps at index colonoscopy, those with high-risk adenomas and high-risk serrated polyps had a consistently higher risk of CRC during follow-up, with the highest risk observed at 3 years after polypectomy (multivariable HR 5.44 (95% CI 3.56 to 8.29) and 8.35 (95% CI 4.20 to 16.59), respectively). Recurrence of high-risk polyps showed a similar risk distribution. The use of surveillance colonoscopy was associated with lower risk of CRC, with an HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.98) among patients with high-risk polyps and 0.57 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.92) among low-risk polyps. Among 1548 patients who had high-risk polyps at both index and surveillance colonoscopies, 65% had their index polyps in the proximal colon and 30% had index and interval polyps in the same segments.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high-risk polyp findings were at higher risk of subsequent CRC and high-risk polyps and may benefit from early surveillance within 3 years. The subsite distribution of the index and recurrent high-risk polyps suggests the contribution of incomplete resection and missed lesions to the development of interval neoplasia.

Tribbles Pseudokinases in Colorectal Cancer

The Tribbles family of pseudokinases controls a wide number of processes during cancer on-set and progression. However, the exact contribution of each of the three family members is still to be defined. Their function appears to be context-dependent as they can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. They act as scaffolds modulating the activity of several signaling pathways involved in different cellular processes. In this review, we discuss the state-of-knowledge for TRIB1, TRIB2 and TRIB3 in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. We take a perspective look at the role of Tribbles proteins as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Specifically, we chronologically systematized all available articles since 2003 until 2020, for which Tribbles were associated with colorectal cancer human samples or cell lines. Herein, we discuss: (1) Tribbles amplification and overexpression; (2) the clinical significance of Tribbles overexpression; (3) upstream Tribbles gene and protein expression regulation; (4) Tribbles pharmacological modulation; (5) genetic modulation of Tribbles; and (6) downstream mechanisms regulated by Tribbles; establishing a comprehensive timeline, essential to better consolidate the current knowledge of Tribbles' role in colorectal cancer.

Traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) and the company they keep: TSA presence predicts advanced neoplasm states

BACKGROUND

The association of TSAs with metachronous neoplasms is well established and suggests that TSAs would also have an association with synchronous neoplasms.

METHODS

We compared odds ratios and rates of synchronous neoplasms found in colonoscopies with and without TSAs.

RESULTS

There was a mean of 2.44 neoplasms among TSA cases in comparison with 1.72 in non-TSA cases. The odds ratio for advanced neoplasia was highest among cases with one or more TSAs relative to cases with one or more HPs (7.54 [CI, 4.23-13.44]) when compared with adenomas (1.95 [CI, 1.75-2.17]) and SSPs (2.98 [CI, 2.54-3.5]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study population, there is a 7-fold higher risk of synchronous advanced neoplasms among cases with one or more TSAs.

Serrated Lesions of the Colon-Rectum: A Focus on New Diagnostic Tools and Current Management

Prompt diagnosis and correct management of the so called "serrated lesions" (SLs) of the colon-rectum are generally considered of crucial importance in the past years, mainly due to their histological heterogeneity and peculiar clinical and molecular patterns; sometimes, they are missed at conventional endoscopy and are possibly implicated in the genesis of interval cancers. The aim of this review is to focus on the diagnostic challenges of serrated lesions, underlying the role of both conventional endoscopy and novel technologies. We will show how an accurate and precise diagnosis should immediately prompt the most appropriate therapy other than defining a proper follow-up program. It will be emphasized how novel endoscopic techniques may provide better visualization of mucosal microsurface structures other than enhancing the microvascular architecture, in order to better define and characterize specific patterns of mucosal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Standard therapy of SLs of the colon-rectum is still very debated, also due to the relatively lack of studies focusing on treatment issues. The high risk of incomplete resection, together with the high rate of postcolonoscopy interval cancers, suggests the need of an extra care when facing this kind of lesions. Given this background, we will outline useful technical tips and tricks in the resection of SLs, taking aspects such as the size and location of the lesions, as well as novel available techniques and technologies, other than future perspectives, including confocal laser endomicroscopy into consideration. Follow-up of SLs is another hot topic, also considering that their clinical impact has been misunderstood for a long time. The incidence of the so called interval colorectal cancer underlines how some weaknesses exist in current screening and follow-up programs. Considering the lack of wide consensus for the management of some SLs, we will try to summarize and clarify the best strategies for their optimal management.

Clinical outcomes of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with sessile serrated adenoma

Background/Aims

Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are known to be precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC). The proper interval of follow-up colonoscopy for SSAs is still being debated. We sought to determine the proper interval of colonoscopy surveillance in patients diagnosed with SSAs in South Korea.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with SSAs who received 1 or more follow-up colonoscopies. The information reviewed included patient baseline characteristics, SSA characteristics, and colonoscopy information.

Results

From January 2007 to December 2011, 152 SSAs and 8 synchronous adenocarcinomas were identified in 138 patients. The mean age of the patients was 62.2 years and 60.1% patients were men. SSAs were located in the right colon (i.e., from the cecum to the hepatic flexure) in 68.4% patients. At the first follow-up, 27 SSAs were identified in 138 patients (right colon, 66.7%). At the second follow-up, 6 SSAs were identified in 65 patients (right colon, 66.7%). At the 3rd and 4th follow-up, 21 and 11 patients underwent colonoscopy, respectively, and no SSAs were detected. The total mean follow-up duration was 33.9 months. The mean size of SSAs was 8.1±5.0 mm. SSAs were most commonly found in the right colon (126/185, 68.1%). During annual follow-up colonoscopy surveillance, no cancer was detected.

Conclusions

Annual colonoscopy surveillance is not necessary for identifying new CRCs in all patients diagnosed with SSAs. In addition, the right colon should be examined more carefully because SSAs occur more frequently in the right colon during initial and follow-up colonoscopies.

Could Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis cause Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis…and colorectal cancer?

Infectious agents are known causes of human cancers. Schistosoma japonicum and Schistosoma mansoni cause a percentage of colorectal cancers in countries where the respective Schistosoma species are prevalent. Colorectal cancer is a complication of ulcerative colitis and colonic Crohn’s disease, the two main forms of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IIBD). Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), the cause of a chronic intestinal disease in domestic and wild ruminants, is one suspected cause of IIBD. MAP may therefore be involved in the pathogenesis of IIBD-associated colorectal cancer as well as colorectal cancer in individuals without IIBD (sporadic colorectal cancer) in countries where MAP infection of domestic livestock is prevalent and MAP’s presence in soil and water is extensive. MAP organisms have been identified in the intestines of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer and IIBD when high magnification, oil immersion light microscopy (×1000 total magnification rather than the usual ×400 total magnification) is used. Research has demonstrated MAP’s ability to invade intestinal goblet cells and cause acute and chronic goblet cell hyperplasia. Goblet cell hyperplasia is the little-recognized initial pathologic lesion of sporadic colorectal cancer, referred to as transitional mucosa, aberrant crypt foci, goblet cell hyperplastic polyps or transitional polyps. It is the even lesser-recognized initial pathologic feature of IIBD, referred to as hypermucinous mucosa, hyperplastic-like mucosal change, serrated epithelial changes, flat serrated changes, goblet cell rich mucosa or epithelial hyperplasia. Goblet cell hyperplasia is the precursor lesion of adenomas and dysplasia in the classical colorectal cancer pathway, of sessile serrated adenomas and serrated dysplasia in the serrated colorectal cancer pathway, and of flat and elevated dysplasia and dysplasia-associated lesions or masses in IIBD-associated intestinal cancers. MAP’s invasion of intestinal goblet cells may result in the initial pathologic lesion of IIBD and sporadic colorectal cancer. MAP’s persistence in infected intestines may result in the eventual development of both IIBD-associated and sporadic colorectal cancer.

Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis in Fatty Liver Disease Linked to Hyperplastic Colonic Polyp

Aim. Our study aims to determine possible association between biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hyperplastic polyps (HP) of the colon. Methods. A retrospective cohort observational study. All subjects underwent screening colonoscopy within two years. Data were extracted from the patient charts including demographic, anthropometric measurement, vital signs, underlying diseases, medical therapy, laboratory data, results of the liver biopsy with degree of fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity, the colonoscopy report, and the pathological report of the extracted polyp. Results. A total of 223 patients were included in our study, 123 patients with biopsy-proven NASH and 100 patients without NASH who served as the control group matched for age. 14 colonic adenomas (11% of patients) were found in the NASH group compared with 16 adenomas (16% of patients) found in the control group (P = 0.9). 28 HPs were found in the NASH group (22.7%) compared with only 8 HPs in the control group (8%) (P < 0.05). 21 from the 28 (75%) HPs diagnosed in the NASH group were observed in the high degree fibrosis patients (Fibrosis Stages 3 and 4), 6 HPs (21%) were associated with Fibrosis Stages 1 and 2, and single HP (4%) was associated with Fibrosis Stage 0. Conclusions. Our study showed an association between biopsy-proven steatohepatitis and the burden of hyperplastic polyp. The severity of hepatic fibrosis may play important role in the increased occurrence of HPs.

Metachronous colorectal cancers result from missed lesions and non-compliance with surveillance

BACKGROUND

Several studies examined the rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) developed during colonoscopy surveillance after CRC resection (ie, metachronous CRC [mCRC]), yet the underlying etiology is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rate and likely etiology of mCRCs.

DESIGN

Population-based, multicenter study. Review of clinical and histopathologic records, including data of the national pathology database and The Netherlands Cancer Registry.

SETTING

National cancer databases reviewed at 3 hospitals in South-Limburg, The Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Total CRC population diagnosed in South-Limburg from January 2001 to December 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

We defined an mCRC as a second primary CRC, diagnosed >6 months after the primary CRC. By using a modified algorithm to ascribe likely etiology, we classified the mCRCs into cancers caused by non-compliance with surveillance recommendations, inadequate examination, incomplete resection of precursor lesions (CRC in same segment as previous advanced adenoma), missed lesions, or newly developed cancers.

RESULTS

We included a total of 5157 patients with CRC, of whom 93 (1.8%) had mCRCs, which were diagnosed on an average of 81 months (range 7-356 months) after the initial CRC diagnosis. Of all mCRCs, 43.0% were attributable to non-compliance with surveillance advice, 43.0% to missed lesions, 5.4% to incompletely resected lesions, 5.4% to newly developed cancers, and 3.2% to inadequate examination. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that mCRCs were significantly smaller in size (odds ratio [OR] 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-0.9) and more often poorly differentiated (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8) than were solitary CRCs.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective evaluation of clinical data.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 1.8% of all patients with CRC developed mCRCs, and the vast majority were attributable to missed lesions or non-compliance with surveillance advice. Our findings underscore the importance of high-quality colonoscopy to maximize the benefit of post-CRC surveillance.

Progress in research of colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia and adenoma

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor in the digestive system, and the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer has been the focus of its prevention and control. Colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia and adenoma are considered to be the most important precancerous lesions of colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the development of biological medicine, genetics,

and other disciplines, many studies have explored the relationship between intraepithelial neoplasia and adenoma and colorectal cancer, and some new research progress has been achieved to provide some guidance for the future clinical screening, regular follow-up and chemical prevention. However, it remains to be studied how colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia and adenoma form and evolve to colorectal cancer.

Prevalence and characteristics of serrated lesions of the colorectum in Italy: A multicentre prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Serrated lesions are recognized as important contributors to colorectal cancer incidence. We aimed to prospectively assess the prevalence of serrated lesions and identify potential predictors of these lesions during colonoscopy in an Italian population.

METHODS

Prospective cross sectional study involving 8 endoscopy units from February 1st to July 31st 2012.

RESULTS

Out of 2468 colonoscopies, 886 precancerous lesions were detected in 567 patients. Of these, 173 SELs were diagnosed in 148 patients (140 serrated/hyperplastic polyps and 33 serrated adenomas). Prevalence was 7% (173/2468). Serrated lesions accounted for 19.5% of all precancerous lesions. Serrated polyps were prevalent in the left colon (42.1%) and serrated adenomas in the proximal colon (54.5%). Independent clinical predictors of serrated lesions were patient age (OR 0.98 [0.97-1.00]) and post-polypectomy surveillance (OR 1.87 [1.24-2.82]). Endoscopic predictors were right colon location (OR 2.65 [1.63-4.30] vs. rectum; and 1.53 [1.03-2.26] vs. left colon), polypoid shape (OR 0.41 [027-0.64]) and size <6 mm (OR 0.49 [0.33-0.72] vs. 6-10 mm; and 0.14 [0.07-0.28] vs. >10 mm). There was no independent predictor of serrated adenoma.

CONCLUSION

In our Italian study population, the prevalence of colorectal serrated lesions was 7%. Their diagnosis is associated with younger age and surveillance colonoscopy, right-sided colorectal location, non-polypoid shape and size <6 mm.

Expression of EphB2/EphrinB2 in canceration of serrated polyps

AIM: To explore the role of EphB2 and its ligand EphrinB2 in colorectal tumorigenesis.

METHODS: The expression of EphB2 and EphrinB2 in 72 colorectal cancer, 64 serrated polyp and 33 normal colon tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: The area of EphB2 positive signal was located in the crypt base and the lower 2/3 region, while the positive area of EphrinB2 was mainly located throughout the crypt. EphB2 was expressed in the majority of normal colonic mucosa tissues, but showed a decreasing trend in serrated polyps and colorectal cancer. The positive rate of EphrinB2 in the normal mucosa was significantly lower than those in colorectal cancer and serrated polyps (P < 0.05). The expression rate of EphrinB2 in the normal colonic mucosa was significantly higher than those in serrated polyps and colorectal cancer (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: EphB2 may inhibit the occurrence of colorectal cancer. EphrinB2 may promote intestinal tumor growth.

Interval colorectal cancers: what and why

An increasing number of studies now indicate that colonoscopic examination is not perfect in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC), especially of the proximal colon. Several factors can be implicated in the occurrence of interval CRCs--further referred to as postcolonoscopy CRCs-, such as missed, incompletely resected lesions and newly developed cancers. Missed lesions represent by far the dominant cause of postcolonoscopy CRCs, with nonpolypoid (flat or depressed) neoplasms and sessile serrated polyps playing a significant role. Molecular events underlying progression of such lesions may further augment the cancer risk. In this article, we review the literature about postcolonoscopy CRC risk and the most common explanations. We discuss potential implications, paying special attention to improvements required in education and training.

Serrated polyps detected during screening colonoscopies

AIM OF THE STUDY

It is estimated that between 15% and 35% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) developing from adenomas come from serrated polyps. Currently, the most effective method used to prevent CRC is the removal of adenomas, including serrated polyps, during colonoscopy. The aim of this paper is to analyze the changes characterized as serrated polyps and detected during screening colonoscopies performed as part of the Screening Program for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection (SPED).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In our center, as part of the nationwide SPED between 2000 and 2009, 1,442 screening colonoscopies were performed.

RESULTS

Serrated polyps were found in 11.9% of all patients and in 45.8% of patients who had polyps removed by endoscopy. In screening colonoscopy of the large intestine, the following polyps were found most frequently: hyperplastic, < 1 cm, without a stalk, multiple, located in the distal part of the large intestine, in men and in patients with a first-degree relative with a history of abdominal cancer. Detecting and removing polyps was facilitated by the fact that the cecum was intubated and the bowel preparation had been performed either very well or well. The detection rate of serrated polyps was not influenced by patients' place of residence or their age.

CONCLUSIONS

Serrated polyps constitute a frequent, and very frequent among removed polyps, abnormality detected during screening colonoscopy.

Simple clinical risk score identifies patients with serrated polyps in routine practice

Large, proximal, or dysplastic (LPD) serrated polyps (SP) need accurate endoscopic recognition and removal as these might progress to colorectal cancer. Herewith, we examined the risk factors for having ≥1 LPD SP. We developed and validated a simple SP risk score as a potential tool for improving their detection. We reviewed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features of serrated polyps in a study of patients undergoing elective colonoscopy (derivation cohort). A self-administered questionnaire was obtained. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for having ≥1 LPD SP and incorporated significant variables into a clinical score. We subsequently tested the performance of the SP score in a validation cohort. We examined 2,244 patients in the derivation and 2,402 patients in the validation cohort; 6.3% and 8.2% had ≥1 LPD SP, respectively. Independent risk factors for LPD SPs were age of more than 50 years [OR 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-3.8; P = 0.004], personal history of serrated polyps (OR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-4.9; P = 0.005), current smoking (OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6; P = 0.001), and nondaily/no aspirin use (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0; P = 0.016). In the validation cohort, a SP score ≥5 points was associated with a 3.0-fold increased odds for LPD SPs, compared with patients with a score <5 points. In the present study, age of more than 50 years, a personal history of serrated polyps, current smoking, and nondaily/no aspirin use were independent risk factors for having LPD SPs. The SP score might aid the endoscopist in the detection of such lesions.

Colorectal cancers occurring after colonoscopy with polyp detection: sites of polyps and sites of cancers

Colonoscopy with detection and removal of neoplasms strongly reduces risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nevertheless, CRCs occur after colonoscopic polypectomy. We assessed agreement beyond chance of location of polyps detected at colonoscopy and of subsequent CRCs to estimate the share of cancers that might be due to field effects or neoplasm recrudescence. In a population-based case-control study conducted in Germany (3,148 cases), detailed history and results of colonoscopies conducted within 10 years before cancer diagnosis were obtained by interview and from medical records. We determined the observed proportion of cancers for which a polyp had been detected at the same colorectal subsite at the preceding colonoscopy and compared it to the proportion expected by chance. A total of 155 cases with physician validated polyp detection at the preceding colonoscopy were identified. Among 148 cases with cancer restricted to a single subsite, 43 (29.1%) had a polyp detected in the same colorectal subsite at the preceding colonoscopy. Agreement of location of cancer occurrence and preceding polyp detection would have been expected by chance for 27 cases, and agreement beyond chance was estimated to account for 16 cases (10.8%, 95% confidence interval 2.7%-19.3%). Our study suggests that less than one of nine CRCs occurring within 10 years after colonoscopy with polyp detection may be due to field effects or polyp recrudescence.

Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations

Several studies have raised warnings about the limited effectiveness of colonoscopy for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC), especially of the proximal colon. Two major categories of factors might be responsible for the development of interval cancers, namely technical, endoscopist-dependent factors and biological characteristics of the cancer that lead to more rapid tumour progression. Recognition of endoscopist-dependent factors is critical, as these factors are probably amenable to correction through improved awareness and education of endoscopists, using quality metrics (such as adenoma detection rates and cecal intubation rates) for objective evaluation and feedback. In this article, the current literature regarding the incidence of, and potential explanations for, interval CRCs is outlined. Although there is probably an interaction between technical and biology-related factors--and an attempt to dissect the biology from the technology might be fraught with difficulties--a structured analysis of individual cases of interval cancer might help in the continuous monitoring of the quality of colonoscopy, and ultimately might reduce the number of interval CRCs.

Association between colorectal cancer and tumor suppressor genes: recent research progress

Colorectal cancer is a common high-risk gastrointestinal cancer, and approximately 1.2 million new cases are diagnosed each year worldwide. In recent years, due to the improvement of people's living standards and changes in dietary habits and structure, the incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer increase rapidly in China. Moreover, patients have a significantly earlier age of onset. At present, the median age of colorectal cancer onset in China is 58 years old, 12 to 18 years earlier than other countries in Europe and America. The development of colorectal cancer is a complex multi-stage process involving multiple genetic alterations. Many studies have shown that colorectal carcinogenesis involves activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Tumor suppressor genes associated with colorectal carcinogenesis include p53, APC, DCC, and MMR, and proto-oncogenes include K-ras and c-myc. In this paper, we discuss the association between tumor suppressor genes and colorectal carcinogenesis.

Outcomes of a 5-year follow-up of patients with sessile serrated adenomas

OBJECTIVE

Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study is to determine the occurrence of new polyps and CRC in patients with an SSA over a 5-year follow-up interval.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients with SSAs diagnosed at colonoscopy in 2005. Abstracted information included patient demographics, colonoscopy information, and polyp characteristics.

RESULTS

During 2005, 34 SSAs and 5 mixed SSAs were identified in 33 patients. The mean patient age was 66 years and 58% were female. There was a family history of CRC in 45%, prior polyps in 33%, and previous CRC in 15%. The mean SSA size was 11 mm. SSAs were located proximal to the splenic flexure in 70%. Low-grade dysplasia was present in 3% of SSAs and 80% mixed SSAs. Synchronous adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps occurred respectively in 45% and 21%. High-grade dysplasia was present in 12% of the adenomas. Twenty-two patients underwent subsequent colonoscopies with 20 new SSAs and 1 mixed SSA identified. In SSAs low-grade dysplasia occurred in 10% and high-grade dysplasia in 5%. Low-grade dysplasia was present in the mixed SSA. Synchronous adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps occurred respectively in 45% and 37%. High-grade dysplasia was present in 10% of adenomas and CRC occurred in 1 (5%) patient.

CONCLUSIONS

SSAs occurred more frequently in females and in the right colon. Dysplasia occurred in a small subset of SSAs. There was a high rate of prior and subsequent CRC in patients with SSAs.