Reducing complications in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Outcomes of Propofol Sedation During Emergency Endoscopy Performed for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND

Although propofol-based sedation can be used during emergency endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), there is a potential risk of sedation-related adverse events, especially in patients with variceal bleeding.

AIM

We compared adverse events related to propofol-based sedation during emergency endoscopy between patients with non-variceal and variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients who underwent emergency endoscopy for UGIB under sedation were reviewed. Adverse events, including shock, hypoxia, and paradoxical reaction, were compared between the non-variceal and variceal bleeding groups.

RESULTS

Of 703 endoscopies, 539 and 164 were performed for non-variceal and variceal bleeding, respectively. Shock was more common in patients with variceal bleeding compared to those with non-variceal bleeding (12.2 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001). All patients except one recovered from shock after normal saline hydration, and emergency endoscopy could be finished without interruption in most cases. The incidence of hypoxia and paradoxical reaction did not differ based on the source of bleeding (non-variceal bleeding vs. variceal bleeding: hypoxia, 3.5 vs. 1.8%, P = 0.275; paradoxical reaction interfering with the procedure, 4.1 vs. 5.5%, P = 0.442).

CONCLUSIONS

Although shock was more common in patients with variceal bleeding compared to those with non-variceal bleeding, most cases could be controlled without procedure interruption. Paradoxical reaction, rather than shock or hypoxia, was the most common cause of procedure interruption in patients with variceal bleeding, but the rate did not differ between patients with non-variceal and variceal bleeding.

Evidence for neuronal and structural changes in submucous ganglia of patients with functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES

An intact and well-functioning enteric nervous system is necessary to efficiently organize gut function. Functional gastrointestinal disorders are pathological entities in which gut function is impaired without a clearly established pathophysiology. On the basis of the relative ease with which intestinal biopsies can be obtained, and taking advantage of a recently developed optical recording technique, we evaluated whether functional neuronal defects exist in enteric nerves of patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).

METHODS

The submucous plexus isolated from duodenal biopsies taken from FD patients and control subjects was used to functionally and morphologically examine nerves and ganglionic architecture (neurons and glial cells). In light of previous studies reporting eosinophil and mast cell infiltration in the gut mucosa of FD patients, we also examined whether these cells infiltrated the submucous plexus and whether this correlated with neuronal activity and specific clinical symptoms.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that neuronal functioning is impaired in the submucous plexus of FD patients, as shown by decreased calcium responses to depolarization and electrical stimulation. Glial (S100) and neuronal (HuCD) markers show signs of gliosis, altered ganglionic architecture, and neuronal abnormalities in the submucous plexus of FD patients. We found that eosinophils and mast cells infiltrated the submucous layer of FD patients to a much larger extent than in controls. A significant correlation was found between the number of these cells and the calcium transient amplitudes measured in submucous ganglia.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide the first direct evidence that FD is characterized by functional and structural abnormalities within the submucous ganglion plexus, which may be of future predictive and diagnostic value in the treatment of FD patients.