Imaging changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung and liver tumors

Divergent Interpretations of Imaging After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Conflicting information from health care providers contributes to anxiety among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate discordant interpretations of follow-up imaging studies after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between radiologists and radiation oncologists.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2007 to 2018 at Duke University Medical Center were included. Radiology interpretations of follow-up computed tomography (CT) chest or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans and the corresponding radiation oncology interpretations in follow-up notes from the medical record were assessed. Based on language used, interpretations were scored as concerning for progression (Progression), neutral differential listed (Neutral Differential), or favor stability/postradiation changes (Stable). Neutral Differential required that malignancy was specifically listed as a possibility in the differential. Encounters were categorized as discordant when either radiology or radiation oncology interpreted the surveillance imaging as Progression when the other interpreted the imaging study as Stable or Neutral Differential. The incidence of discordant interpretations was the primary endpoint of the study.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2018, 139 patients were treated with SBRT and had available follow-up CT or PET-CT imaging for the analysis. Median follow-up was 61 months and the median number of follow-up encounters per patient was 3. Of 534 encounters evaluated, 25 (4.7%) had overtly discordant interpretations of imaging studies. This most commonly arose when radiology felt the imaging study showed Progression but radiation oncology favored Stable or Neutral Differential (24/25, 96%). No patient or treatment variables were found to be significantly associated with discordant interpretations on univariate analysis including type of scan (CT 22/489, 4.5%; PET-CT 3/45, 7%; P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance imaging after lung SBRT is often interpreted differently by radiologists and radiation oncologists, but overt discordance was relatively low at our institution. Providers should be aware of differences in interpretation patterns that may contribute to increased patient distress.

Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT

PURPOSE

For assessing healthy liver reactions after robotic SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy), we investigated early morphologic alterations on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with respect to patient and treatment plan parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MRI data at 6-17 weeks post-treatment from 22 patients with 42 liver metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy delivered in 3-5 fractions. T2- and T1-weighted MRI were registered to the treatment plan. Absolute doses were converted to EQD2 (Equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) with α/β-ratios of 2 and 3 Gy for healthy, and 8 Gy for modelling pre-damaged liver tissue.

RESULTS

Sharply defined, centroid-shaped morphologic alterations were observed outside the high-dose volume surrounding the GTV. On T2-w MRI, hyperintensity at EQD2 isodoses of 113.3 ± 66.1 Gy₂, 97.5 ± 54.7 Gy₃, and 66.5 ± 32.0 Gy₈ significantly depended on PTV dimension (p = 0.02) and healthy liver EQD2 (p = 0.05). On T1-w non-contrast MRI, hypointensity at EQD2 isodoses of 113.3 ± 49.3 Gy₂, 97.4 ± 41.0 Gy₃, and 65.7 ± 24.2 Gy₈ significantly depended on prior chemotherapy (p = 0.01) and total liver volume (p = 0.05). On T1-w gadolinium-contrast delayed MRI, hypointensity at EQD2 isodoses of 90.6 ± 42.5 Gy₂, 79.3 ± 35.3 Gy₃, and 56.6 ± 20.9 Gy₈ significantly depended on total (p = 0.04) and healthy (p = 0.01) liver EQD2.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-treatment changes in healthy liver tissue after robotic SBRT could spatially be correlated to respective isodoses. Median nominal doses of 10.1-11.3 Gy per fraction (EQD2 79-97 Gy₃) induce characteristic morphologic alterations surrounding the lesions, potentially allowing for dosimetric in-vivo accuracy assessments. Comparison to other techniques and investigations of the short- and long-term clinical impact require further research.

Computed tomography imaging assessment of postexternal beam radiation changes of the liver

Radiation is being used for patients with primary and secondary liver cancers, as a rapidly evolving treatment. However, postradiation imaging changes of the liver are not well understood and therefore challenging to interpret. Distinguishing normal radiation changes from residual or recurrent disease is difficult. Size and contrast enhancement have been used to guide interpretation and clinical recommendations, but normal radiation changes can make interpretation difficult and are not accounted for in available guidelines. Knowledge of dose- and time-dependent changes in addition to imaging findings, such as morphological and enhancement patterns, provides useful differentiating parameters. This paper reviews recent studies using computed tomography that can guide interpretation and help differentiate tumor from benign changes after external beam radiation.

MRI morphologic alterations after liver SBRT : Direct dose correlation with intermodal matching

AIM

CT morphologic and histopathologic alterations have been reported after SBRT. We analyzed the correlation of MRI morphologic alterations with radiation doses to assess the potential for MRI-based dose-effect correlation in healthy liver tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MRI data of 24 patients with liver metastases 7±3 weeks after image-guided SBRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold were retrospectively analyzed. MRI images were intermodally matched to the planning CT and corresponding dose distribution. Absolute doses were converted to EQD2,α/β =x with α/β values of 2, 3 for healthy liver tissue, 8 Gy for modelled predamaged liver tissue and 10 Gy for tumor tissue.

RESULTS

A central nonenhancing area was observed within the isodose lines of nominally 48.2 ± 15.2 Gy, EQD2Gy/α/β =10 92.5 ± 27.7 Gy. Contrast-enhancement around the central nonenhancing area was observed within the isodose lines of nominally 46.9 ± 15.3 Gy, EQD2Gy/α/β =10 90.5 ± 28.3 Gy. Outside the high-dose volume, in the beam path, characteristic sharply defined, nonblurred MRI morphologic alterations were observed that corresponded with the following isodose lines: T1-intensity changes occurred at isodose lines of nominally 21.9 ± 6.7 Gy (EQD2,α/β =2 42.5 ± 8.7 Gy, EQD2,α/β =3 38.5 ± 7.6 Gy, EQD2,α/β =8 30.2 ±6.3 Gy). T2-hyper/hypointensity was observed within isodose lines of nominally 22.4 ± 6.6 Gy (EQD2,α/β=2 42.7 ± 8.1 Gy, EQD2,α/β=3 38.7 ± 7 Gy; EQD2,α/β=8 30.5 ± 5.9 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

Using deformable matching, direct spatial/dosimetric correlation of SBRT-induced changes in liver tissue was possible. In the PTV high-dose region, a central nonenhancing area and peripheral contrast medium accumulation was observed. Beam path doses of 38-42 Gy (EQD2,α/β =2-3) induce characteristic MRI morphologic alterations.

Mechanism and non-mechanism based imaging biomarkers for assessing biological response to treatment in non-small cell lung cancer

Therapeutic options in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have expanded in the past decade to include a palate of targeted interventions such as high dose targeted thermal ablations, radiotherapy and growing platform of antibody and small molecule therapies and immunotherapies. Although these therapies have varied mechanisms of action, they often induce changes in tumour architecture and microenvironment such that response is not always accompanied by early reduction in tumour mass, and evaluation by criteria other than size is needed to report more effectively on response. Functional imaging techniques, which probe the tumour and its microenvironment through novel positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging techniques, offer more detailed insights into and quantitation of tumour response than is available on anatomical imaging alone. Use of these biomarkers, or other rational combinations as readouts of pathological response in NSCLC have potential to provide more accurate predictors of treatment outcomes. In this article, the robustness of the more commonly available positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging biomarker indices is examined and the evidence for their application in NSCLC is reviewed.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the liver: MRI findings along a time continuum

Recent development of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapies provides a concentrated radiation dose to the tumor. To achieve this goal, a complex design of multiple narrow beamlets is used to shape the radiation exposure to conform to the shape of the tumor. Imaging findings after novel radiation therapy techniques differ from those of conventional radiation therapy. This article discusses changes in the liver parenchyma and tumor after conformal radiation therapy focusing on magnetic resonance imaging.

Update on treatment of liver metastases: focus on ablation therapies

There is substantial and growing interest in the use of local therapies to treat patients with metastatic cancer, especially those deemed to have "oligometastatic" disease. Much of the literature to date consists of reports on metastasectomy for liver and lung metastases. Non-surgical minimally or non-invasive treatments including thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation, and high-dose radiation therapy (stereotactic ablative radiation therapy) can also be used in the treatment of primary and secondary tumors, including in the treatment of liver metastases. In this review, we discuss the rationale for using these ablative treatments in the treatment of liver metastases including similarities and differences between them.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases

The role for local ablative therapies in the management paradigm of oligometastatic liver disease is increasing. The evidence base supporting the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases has expanded rapidly over the past decade, showing high rates of local control with low associated toxicity. This review summarises the evidence base to date, discussing optimal patient selection, challenges involved with treatment delivery and optimal dose and fractionation. The reported toxicity associated with liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is presented, together with possible pitfalls in interpreting the response to treatment using standard imaging modalities. Finally, potential avenues for future research in this area are highlighted.

[Radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer]

With the development of radiation technology, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely used in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is not only the standard therapy for medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC, but also one of the therapies for operable early-stage NSCLC. Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is one of the most common adverse effects after SBRT, it may reduce the patients' quality of life, even cause treatment failure. Therefore, in order to improve the patients' quality of life and enhance local control rate of tumor, it is important to reduce the risk of RP. The unique fractionation schemes and the dose distribution of SBRT make it not only different from conventional fraction radiation therapy in treatment outcomes, but also in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. This article reviews the applying of SBRT for early stage NSCLC, the incidence of radiation pneumonitis, radiological appearance after SBRT and predictive factors.

Best of International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Congress 2013: stereotactic body radiation therapy. Part II: nonspinal tumors

The 11th biennial International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Congress represented another historical gathering of professionals in the field of stereotactic radiosurgery. This congress was held on 16-20 June 2013 in Toronto (ON, Canada), and the chairman was Arjun Sahgal, co-chair was Michael Schwartz and president of the society was Jean Regis. The congress attracted 550 attendants from all over the world and over 300 abstracts were presented. Among the abstracts presented, 62 (36 oral) were pertaining to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Exciting new findings were presented by colleagues from North America, Europe and Asia. This short conference scene (part II) provides a summary of the best abstracts on SBRT for nonspinal tumors presented in the congress. A separate conference scene on SBRT for spinal tumors (part I) also appears in this issue of Future Oncology.

Radiotherapy for liver metastases: a review of evidence

Over the past decade, there has been an increasing use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of liver metastases. Most often, ablative doses are delivered to focal liver metastases with the goal of local control and ultimately improving survival. In contrast, low-dose whole-liver RT may be used for the palliation of symptomatic diffuse metastases. This review examines the available clinical data for both approaches. The review found that RT is effective both for local ablation of focal liver metastases and for palliation of patients with symptomatic liver metastases. However, there is a lack of a high level of evidence from randomized clinical trials.