Palliative thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer

A narrative review of evolving roles of radiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from palliative care to active player

Radiotherapy, along with other loco-regional interventions, is conventionally utilized as a palliative approach to alleviate symptoms and mitigate oncological emergencies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thanks to the ongoing improvement of medical treatments in the last decade, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC has been considerably prolonged, making it feasible and clinically beneficial for radiotherapy to play a more active role in highly selected subpopulations. In this review, we will focus on the evolving roles of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC. First of all, among patients who are initially unable to tolerate aggressive treatment due to severe symptoms caused by metastases and/or tumor emergencies, timely radiotherapy could significantly improve their performance status (PS) and general condition, thus giving them a chance for intensive treatment and prolonged survival. The efficacy, potential candidates, and optimal dose-fractionation regimens of radiotherapy in this clinical scenario will be discussed. Additionally, radiotherapy can play a curative role as a concurrent therapy, consolidation therapy, and salvage therapy for patients with oligo-metastatic, oligo-residual, and oligo-progressive disease, respectively. Accumulating evidence from recent clinical trials, basic research, and translational investigations regarding the potentially curative roles of radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with oligo-metastatic disease will be summarized. Moreover, with the advent of various small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment efficacy and overall survival of oncogene-addicted NSCLC with brain metastases have been significantly improved, and the clinical value and optimal timing of cranial radiotherapy have become topics of much debate. Finally, synergistic antitumor interactions between radiotherapy and immunotherapy have been repeatedly demonstrated. Thus, the immune sensitizing role of radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC is also highlighted in this review.

Current landscape of palliative radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of advanced stage III and stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite international guidelines, clinical practice remains heterogeneous. Additionally, the advent of stereotactic ablative RT (SABR) and new systemic treatments such as immunotherapy have shaken up dogmas in the approach of these patients. This review will focus on palliative thoracic RT for NSCLC but will also discuss the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB), the interest of concomitant treatments (chemotherapy and immunotherapy), and the role of RT in lung cancer emergencies with palliative intent.

[Non-small cell lung cancer irradiation in elderly]

People over the age of 65 are often excluded from participation in oncological clinical trials. However, more than half of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer are older than 65 years. Any therapeutic strategy must be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings after adapted geriatric assessment. Patients who benefit from the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of Balducci and Extermann are those whose G8 screening tool score is less than or equal to 14. Age itself does not contraindicate a curative therapeutic approach. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for early stages in elderly patients who are medically inoperable or who refuse surgery, because it significantly increases overall survival. Mostly sequential (rarely concomitant) chemoradiotherapy can be proposed to elderly patients with locally advanced stages in good general state of health. For the others, an exclusive palliative radiotherapy, a single or dual agent of chemotherapy, a targeted drug or best supportive care only may be discussed.

Meta-analysis comparing higher and lower dose radiotherapy for palliation in locally advanced lung cancer

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare higher dose (≥30 Gy) and lower dose (<30 Gy) radiotherapy (RT) on palliation of symptoms and survival in patients with locally advanced lung cancer. A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted on 10 June 2013 using combinations of the search terms: radiotherapy, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, palliative, supportive, symptom relief. Inclusion criteria were: (i) palliative thoracic RT; (ii) randomized controlled trial; (iii) English language; and (iv) compared outcomes between higher dose (≥30 Gy) and lower dose (<30 Gy) RT. The primary outcome was palliation of symptoms (cough, chest pain, hemoptysis), and 1- and 2-year overall survival. Tests of heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were performed. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 1730 patients with lung cancer were included in the meta-analysis. There were 925 patients treated with a higher RT dose (≥30 Gy) and 805 treated with a lower RT dose (<30 Gy). The combined odds ratios (ORs) indicated no significant difference in palliation of cough, chest pain, and hemoptysis between the higher dose and lower dose RT groups (combined ORs = 0.88, 1.83, 1.39, respectively). The 1- and 2-year OS rates were similar between the high and low dose RT groups (combined ORs = 1.09 and 1.38, respectively). This meta-analysis indicates that high dose (≥30 Gy) and lower dose (<30 Gy) RT provide similar symptom palliation and 1- and 2-year OS in patients with locally advanced lung cancer.

Effectiveness of radiation therapy alone for elderly patients with unresected stage III non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients, who are often considered unfit for combined chemoradiotherapy, frequently receive radiation therapy (RT) alone. Using population-based data, we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of lone RT in unresected elderly stage III NSCLC patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare records we identified 10,376 cases of unresected stage III NSCLC that were not treated with chemotherapy, diagnosed between 1992 and 2007. We used logistic regression to determine propensity scores for RT treatment using patients' pre-treatment characteristics. We then compared survival of patients who underwent lone RT vs. no treatment using a Cox regression model adjusting for propensity scores. The adjusted odds for toxicity among patients treated with and without RT were also estimated.

RESULTS

Overall, 6468 (62%) patients received lone RT. Adjusted analyses showed that RT was associated with improved overall survival in unresected stage III NCSLC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.79) after controlling for propensity scores. RT treated patients had an increased adjusted risk of hospitalization for pneumonitis (odds ratio [OR]: 89, 95% CI: 12-636), and esophagitis (OR: 8, 95% CI: 3-21).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that use of RT alone may improve the outcomes of elderly patients with unresected stage III NSCLC. Severe toxicity, however, was considerably higher in the RT treated group. The potential risks and benefits of RT should be carefully discussed with eligible elderly NSCLC patients.

Clinical management of pain in advanced lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world and pain is its most common symptom. Pain can be brought about by several different causes including local effects of the tumor, regional or distant spread of the tumor, or from anti-cancer treatment. Patients with lung cancer experience more symptom distress than patients with other types of cancer. Symptoms such as pain may be associated with worsening of other symptoms and may affect quality of life. Pain management adheres to the principles set out by the World Health Organization's analgesic ladder along with adjuvant analgesics. As pain can be caused by multiple factors, its treatment requires pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures from a multidisciplinary team linked in with specialist palliative pain management. This review article examines pain management in lung cancer.

Predicting the need for palliative thoracic radiation after first-line chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this secondary analysis was to identify patients with selected stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and good performance status who were at high risk for requiring subsequent palliative thoracic radiotherapy after initial treatment with first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

The authors conducted a pooled analysis of patients at a single institution who enrolled onto 10 prospective phase 2 and 3 clinical trials that involved first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. Baseline lung-related characteristics before trial enrollment were analyzed as possible prognostic factors for freedom from pulmonary events (defined either as subsequent thoracic radiation or as a new collapsed lung, which is an indication for thoracic radiation).

RESULTS

Of 244 consecutive patients who were reviewed, 42 patients received a palliative course of thoracic radiation, 40 exhibited evidence of new lobar collapse on follow-up chest imaging, and 14 received thoracic radiation for lobar collapse. On univariable analysis, pulmonary symptoms (P = .043) or pneumonia at presentation (P = .0001), increasing size of hilar disease (P < .0001), and evidence of obstruction of major bronchi or vessels (P = .0003) were associated with subsequent pulmonary events. On multivariable analysis, hilar disease measuring >3 cm (hazard ratio, 1.8; P = .003) and prechemotherapy pneumonia (hazard ratio, 2.1; P = .009) were associated with pulmonary events; patients who had both risk factors or hilar disease >5 cm in greatest dimension exhibited a >50% risk of subsequent events.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bulky hilar disease and a history of pneumonia at presentation were at high risk for requiring palliative thoracic radiation. The authors propose studying these patients to determine whether early thoracic radiation may be beneficial by preserving quality of life and performance status.

Palliative thoracic radiotherapy in lung cancer: An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to physicians and patients with regard to the use of external beam radiotherapy, endobronchial brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy in the setting of palliative thoracic treatment for lung cancer, based on available evidence complemented by expert opinion.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Task Force authorized by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Board of Directors synthesized and assessed evidence from 3 systematic reviews on the following topics: (1) dose fractionation in thoracic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT); (2) clinical utility of initial and salvage endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB); and (3) use of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) with palliative thoracic radiotherapy. Practice guideline recommendations were produced and are contained herein.

RESULTS

Studies suggest that higher dose/fractionation palliative EBRT regimens (eg, 30 Gy/10 fraction equivalent or greater) are associated with modest improvements in survival and total symptom score, particularly in patients with good performance status. As these improvements are associated with an increase in esophageal toxicity, various shorter EBRT dose/fractionation schedules (eg, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, 17 Gy in 2 weekly fractions, 10 Gy in 1 fraction), which provide good symptomatic relief with fewer side effects, can be used for patients requesting a shorter treatment course and/or in those with a poor performance status. No defined role for EBB in the routine initial palliative treatment of chest disease has been demonstrated; however, EBB can be a reasonable option for the palliation of endobronchial lesions causing obstructive symptomatology including lung collapse, or for hemoptysis after EBRT failure. The integration of concurrent chemotherapy with palliative intent/fractionated radiotherapy is not currently supported by the medical literature.

CONCLUSION

This Guideline is intended to serve as a guide for the use of EBRT, EBB, and CC in thoracic palliation of lung cancer outside the clinical trial setting. Further prospective clinical investigations with relevant palliative endpoints into the respective roles of EBB and CC/targeted therapy in the thoracic palliation of lung cancer are warranted, given the current state of the medical literature in these areas.