Capecitabine in gastric cancer

SL-scan identifies synthetic lethal interactions in cancer using metabolic networks

Exploiting synthetic lethality is a promising strategy for developing targeted cancer therapies. However, identifying clinically significant synthetic lethal (SL) interactions among a large number of gene combinations is a challenging computational task. In this study, we developed the SL-scan pipeline based on metabolic network modeling to discover SL interaction. The SL-scan pipeline identifies the association between simulated Flux Balance Analysis knockout scores and mutation data across cancer cell lines and predicts putative SL interactions. We assessed the concordance of the SL pairs predicted by SL-scan with those of obtained from analysis of the CRISPR, shRNA, and PRISM datasets. Our results demonstrate that the SL-scan pipeline outperformed existing SL prediction approaches based on metabolic networks in identifying SL pairs in various cancers. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating multiple data sources, particularly mutation data, when identifying SL pairs for targeted cancer therapies. The findings of this study may lead to the development of novel targeted cancer therapies.

Recognition and release of uridine and hCNT3: From multivariate interactions to molecular design

As a vital target for the development of novel anti-cancer drugs, human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 (hCNT3) has been widely concerned. Nevertheless, the lack of a comprehensive understanding of molecular interactions and motion mechanism has greatly hindered the development of novel inhibitors against hCNT3. In this paper, molecular recognition of hCNT3 with uridine was investigated with molecular docking, conventional molecular dynamics (CMD) simulations and adaptive steered molecular dynamics (ASMD) simulations; and then, the uridine derivatives with possibly highly inhibitory activity were designed. The result of CMD showed that more water-mediated H-bonds and lower binding free energy both explained higher recognition ability and transported efficiency of hCNT3. While during the ASMD simulation, nucleoside transport process involved the significant side-chain flip of residues F321 and Q142, a typical substrate-induced conformational change. By considering electronegativity, atomic radius, functional group and key H-bonds factors, 25 novel uridine derivatives were constructed. Subsequently, the receptor-ligand binding free energy was predicted by solvated interaction energy (SIE) method to determine the inhibitor c8 with the best potential performance. This work not only revealed molecular recognition and release mechanism of uridine with hCNT3, but also designed a series of uridine derivatives to obtain lead compounds with potential high activity.

Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal perioperative chemotherapeutic regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy.

METHODS

We did this open-label, phase 3, superiority and non-inferiority, randomised trial at 27 hospitals in China. We recruited antitumour treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with historically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance score of 70 or more. Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, stratified by participating centres and Lauren classification, to receive adjuvant CapOx (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice a day), adjuvant SOX (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day), or perioperative SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day one of each 21 day plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day for three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively followed by three cycles of S-1 monotherapy). The primary endpoint, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, 3-year disease-free survival to assess the superiority of perioperative-SOX compared with adjuvant-SOX and the non-inferiority (hazard ratio non-inferiority margin of 1·33) of adjuvant-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx. Safety analysis were done in patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01534546.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 15, 2012, and Feb 28, 2017, 1094 patients were screened and 1022 (93%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 345 (34%) patients were assigned to the adjuvant-CapOx, 340 (33%) patients to the adjuvant-SOX group, and 337 (33%) patients to the perioperative-SOX group. 3-year disease-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 45·5-56·3) in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56·5% (51·0-61·7) in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59·4% (53·8-64·6) in the perioperative-SOX group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·97; Wald p=0·028) for the perioperative-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group and 0·86 (0·68-1·07; Wald p=0·17) for the adjuvant-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia (32 [12%] of 258 patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 21 [8%] of 249 patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 30 [10%] of 310 patients in the perioperative-SOX group). Serious adverse events were reported in seven (3%) of 258 patients in adjuvant-CapOx group, two of which were related to treatment; eight (3%) of 249 patients in adjuvant-SOX group, two of which were related to treatment; and seven (2%) of 310 patients in perioperative-SOX group, four of which were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Perioperative-SOX showed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with adjuvant-CapOx in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who had D2 gastrectomy; adjuvant-SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant-CapOx in these patients. Perioperative-SOX could be considered a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

FUNDING

National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Scholars Program 2018-2024, Peking University Clinical Scientist Program, Taiho, Sanofi-Aventis, and Hengrui Pharmaceutical.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Long non-coding RNA LUCAT1 promotes proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer by regulating miR-134-5p/YWHAZ axis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to research the function of lncRNA LUCAT1 in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Human gastric cancer tissues and paracancer tissues were obtained from 98 patients undergoing surgical resection in our hospital. The human gastric cancer cell lines (HGC27, BGC823, MGC803, SGC7901 and AGS), and normal gastric mucosal cell line GSE1 were used to research the role of lncRNA LUCAT1. ShRNAs specifically targeting lncRNA LUCAT1, miR-134-5p mimic, miR-134-5p inhibitor and their related controls were transfected into cells. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect the expression of lncRNA LUCAT1, miR-134-5p and YWHAZ. The cell proliferation of SGC7901 cells was determined by CCK8 kit. Colony formation assay was undertaken. Cell apoptosis assay was processed using the Annexin V-FITC / propidium iodide (annxinV/PI) apoptosis detection kit. Migration and invasion were detected by transwell assay. Tumor xenograft model was conducted to calculate the size and weight of the tumors. Luciferase reporter assay was used to confirm the interactions among lncRNA LUCAT1, miR-134-5p and YWHAZ.

RESULTS

LncRNA LUCAT1 was confirmed to be highly expressed in gastric cancer. Patients with high LUCAT1 level displayed short overall survival and disease-free survival periods. LUCAT1 knockdown or miR-134-5p overexpression decreased the proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion of SGC7901 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

LncRNA LUCAT1 could promote proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer by regulating miR-134-5p/YWHAZ axis.

Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer cells through anti-angiogenesis

To evaluate the inhibitory effect and mechanism of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy on gastric cancer cells. In vitro, the effects of 5-fluorouracil (Fu) metronomic chemotherapy on proliferation, apoptosis, tube formation ability, and angiogenesis were detected. In vivo, Ki-67, CD34 and VEGF were detected by immunohistochemical staining (IHC). Flow cytometry was used to detect the percentage of circulating endothelial progenitors (CEPs), and VEGF and PDGF were detected by ELISA in the peripheral blood of nude mice. The proliferation of the SGC-7901 and AGS gastric cancer cell lines in the metronomic 5-Fu group was decreased compared with the control group in vitro. The total length of the small tubes and tubular junction numbers were significantly lower in the metronomic group than the control group. The VEGF and PDGF levels in the cell culture supernatants were lower in the metronomic group than the control group. Compared with the control group, the CEP percentage was decreased in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing nude mice following treatment with metronomic 5-Fu or capecitabine chemotherapy. No significant changes were found in the conventional or control group. In the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing nude mice, the VEGF and PDGF levels were decreased in the metronomic groups. Metronomic 5-Fu inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, and their antitumor effects were non-inferior to those of conventional dose chemotherapy, with mild side effects. Thus, tumor inhibition may be attributed to anti-angiogenesis.

Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine combination chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of docetaxel into the cisplatin and fluorouracil backbone has been demonstrated to be an active combination in metastatic gastric cancer. Nevertheless, this regimen is burdened by nonnegligible toxicity. We hypothesized that replacing cisplatin and fluorouracil with oxaliplatin and capecitabine should be an active and safe option for metastatic gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

In this phase II study, we tested the activity of docetaxel in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (DOC) as a first-line treatment. DOC was administered as follows: docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and capecitabine (500 mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice daily given continuously, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients entered the study. All patients had metastatic disease (stage IV). None of the patients had previously received chemotherapy for advanced disease. Performance status was 0, 1, and 2 in 25, 58, and 17 % of patients, respectively; 13 patients (27 %) had adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction, and 29 patients (60.5 %) had two or more metastatic sites. The overall response rate was 52.1 %. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 12.6 months, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (41 %).

CONCLUSIONS

DOC is an effective and tolerated first-line treatment, and the lower dose of docetaxel and oxaliplatin used in this study compared with other similar regimens does not seem to hamper the antitumor activity.

Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine (DCX) in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO){dagger}

BACKGROUND

This prospective multicentre phase II trial assessed the feasibility and efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and capecitabine (DCX) in patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with curatively resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, the gastro-oesophageal junction or the lower third of the oesophagus were enrolled. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) (day 1), followed by oral capecitabine 1875 mg/m(2) divided into two doses (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. There were three cycles preoperatively and three cycles postoperatively. The primary end point was the R0 resection rate.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were recruited and assessed for feasibility and efficacy. 94.1% of patients received all three planned cycles preoperatively, and 52.9% received three cycles postoperatively. The R0 resection rate was 90.2%. 13.7% of patients showed complete pathological remission (pCR). Toxicity was acceptably tolerable. Without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration, neutropenic fever developed in 21.5% of patients preoperatively (grade 3 or 4) and in 11.1% of patients postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

DCX is a safe and feasible perioperative regimen in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with a high percentage of cycles delivered pre- and postoperatively, compared with standard practice. The high efficacy in terms of R0 resection rate and pCR is very promising.

First-line single-agent chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer with poor performance status

Combination chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach in advanced gastric cancer. However, combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is often associated with severe treatment-related toxicities and most oncologists are reluctant to perform combination chemotherapy in patients with a poor clinical condition. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer with poor performance status (PS). We reviewed advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line single-agent palliative chemotherapy due to poor PS between June 2006 and December 2010. A total of 125 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 2-3, whose general condition did not allow combination chemotherapy, were enrolled. Four single agents were used: TS-1 (n=63), paclitaxel (n=42), irinotecan (n=15) and capecitabine (n=5). The median age was 66 years, with a range of 25-81 years. The percent response rate and rate of stable disease (SD) were 19.2 and 35.2%, respectively, giving a disease control rate of 54.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.73-5.06). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.70-10.56) with a 1-year survival rate of 31.2%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent prognostic factors for OS were chemotherapy regimen (capecitabine) [reference: TS-1, hazard ratio (HR), 5.00; 95% CI, 1.81-13.81; P=0.002], no second-line chemotherapy (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.48-3.57; P=0.001), bone metastasis (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.22-6.09; P=0.014), ECOG PS 3 (HR, 38.10; 95% CI, 13.72-105.78; P=0.001), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) ≥1 (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.24-2.85; P=0.003) and chemotherapy response [SD + progressive disease (PD) + not evaluable (NE); HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.39-4.05; P=0.002)]. First-line single-agent palliative chemotherapy demonstrated a relatively good clinical efficacy for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients with poor PS.