Single-Center Experience with Trabectedin for the Treatment of Non-L-sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of trabectedin for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (commonly referred to as L-sarcomas) has been widely evidenced in clinical trials and real-world studies. Nevertheless, available literature on non-L-sarcomas is less abundant. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trabectedin in a cohort of patients with non-L-sarcomas in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 34 patients who received trabectedin in the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) between October 2013 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The most frequent histologic subtypes were undifferentiated spindle cell/pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 11, 32.4%), synovial sarcoma (n = 6, 17.7%), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 5, 14.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n = 4, 11.8%). The mean number of cycles with trabectedin was 5.5 (range 2-28). Three patients achieved partial response (8.8%) and eight patients showed stable disease (23.5%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95% CI 1.9-23.7) and 32.4% (95% CI 17.4-50.5), respectively. Overall, progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4). The overall survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7-12.8). The most common trabectedin-related grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 patients (26.5%), mostly being neutropenia (14.7%) and elevated transaminases (5.9%), whereas one patient (2.9%) reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this real-life study consistently support that trabectedin is an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with non-L-sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or in patients who are unsuited to receive these agents.

Marine-Derived Anticancer Agents: Clinical Benefits, Innovative Mechanisms, and New Targets

The role of the marine environment in the development of anticancer drugs has been widely reviewed, particularly in recent years. However, the innovation in terms of clinical benefits has not been duly emphasized, although there are important breakthroughs associated with the use of marine-derived anticancer agents that have altered the current paradigm in chemotherapy. In addition, the discovery and development of marine drugs has been extremely rewarding with significant scientific gains, such as the discovery of new anticancer mechanisms of action as well as novel molecular targets. Approximately 50 years since the approval of cytarabine, the marine-derived anticancer pharmaceutical pipeline includes four approved drugs and eighteen agents in clinical trials, six of which are in late development. Thus, the dynamic pharmaceutical pipeline consisting of approved and developmental marine-derived anticancer agents offers new hopes and new tools in the treatment of patients afflicted with previously intractable types of cancer.

Optimizing the use of trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in daily clinical practice

SUMMARY 

Compared with conventional chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, trabectedin has several distinguishing characteristics which, when optimized, may maximize clinical benefits for patients. In this review, evidence is examined with the aim of answering some vital questions about the use of trabectedin in clinical practice. Who should be treated? When should patients be treated? For how long should patients be treated? What is the safety profile of trabectedin? How should trabectedin be administered?

In brief, trabectedin has shown activity and clinical benefit in nearly all subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma. Improved efficacy outcomes are observed when trabectedin is administered as second-line therapy compared with later-line use. In line with this observation, the European Society for Medical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma recommend use of trabectedin in the second-line setting. Trabectedin has a role for treatment of elderly patients in whom alternatives are lacking, and can be administered for prolonged periods without cumulative toxicity. A statistically significant improvement in median progression-free survival has been observed when trabectedin is administered uninterrupted until disease progression. The flexibility of trabectedin administration in terms of dose, interval and duration allows for patient-tailored treatment optimization.

Trabectedin clinical cases: use according to indication in diverse clinical scenarios

SUMMARY 

Background: Key distinguishing characteristics of trabectedin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma are its prolonged tumor control activity in multiple histological subtypes, positive outcomes in translocation-related sarcomas, maintenance of response, option to rechallenge after treatment interruption and lack of cumulative toxicity. Trabectedin is indicated for use in advanced soft tissue sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or as front-line treatment in patients unsuited to receive these agents. Methods: In this review, cases studies are presented in which trabectedin was used according to its indication but in diverse clinical settings. Results: As second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma, trabectedin produced prolonged tumor control with good quality of life. In treatment of recurrent synovial sarcoma, the best objective response (partial response) and longest disease control (37 months) was achieved under treatment with trabectedin. As neoadjuvant treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in a patient unsuited to receive doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, trabectedin induced a pathological response with 85% of necrosis. Conclusion: These cases illustrate the broad range of indications for trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma and highlight how its unique characteristics can be optimized to achieve maximum clinical benefit.

Trabectedin monotherapy after standard chemotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with advanced, translocation-related sarcoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Trabectedin binds to the minor groove of DNA and blocks DNA repair machinery. Preclinical data have shown that trabectedin also modulates the transcription of the oncogenic fusion proteins of translocation-related sarcomas. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin as second-line therapy or later for patients with advanced translocation-related sarcoma.

METHODS

We did a multicentre randomised open-label study in Japan. Eligible patients had pathological diagnosis of translocation-related sarcoma, were aged 19 years or older, were unresponsive or intolerant to standard chemotherapy regimens, no more than four previous chemotherapy regimens, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, adequate bone marrow reserve, renal and liver functions, and had measurable lesions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by the minimisation method to receive either trabectedin (1·2 mg/m(2) given via a central venous line over 24 h on day 1 of a 21 day treatment cycle) or best supportive care, which was adjusted centrally by pathological subtype. Investigators, patients, and the sponsor were unmasked to the treatment assignment. Progression-free survival and objective responses were assessed by a masked central radiology imaging review. Efficacy was assessed by masked central radiology imaging review. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for the full analysis set population. Follow-up is ongoing for the patients under study treatment. The study is registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-121850.

FINDINGS

Between July 11, 2012, and Jan 20, 2014, 76 patients were enrolled and allocated to receive either trabectedin (n=39) or best supportive care (n=37). After central review to confirm pathological subtypes, 73 patients (37 in the trabectedin group and 36 in the best supportive care group) were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Median progression-free survival of the trabectedin group was 5·6 months (95% CI 4·1-7·5) and the best supportive care group was 0·9 months (0·7-1·0). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival of trabectedin versus best supportive care was 0·07 (90% CI 0·03-0·14 and 95% CI 0·03-0·16) by a Cox proportional hazards model (p<0·0001). The most common drug-related adverse events for patients treated with trabectedin were nausea (32 [89%] of 36), decreased appetite (21 [58%]), decreased neutrophil count (30 [83%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (24 [67%]), and decreased white blood cell count (20 [56%]).

INTERPRETATION

Trabectedin significantly reduced the risk of disease progression and death in patients with advanced translocation-related sarcoma after standard chemotherapy such as doxorubicin, and should be considered as a new therapeutic treatment option for this patient population.

FUNDING

Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Statistical research on the bioactivity of new marine natural products discovered during the 28 years from 1985 to 2012

Every year, hundreds of new compounds are discovered from the metabolites of marine organisms. Finding new and useful compounds is one of the crucial drivers for this field of research. Here we describe the statistics of bioactive compounds discovered from marine organisms from 1985 to 2012. This work is based on our database, which contains information on more than 15,000 chemical substances including 4196 bioactive marine natural products. We performed a comprehensive statistical analysis to understand the characteristics of the novel bioactive compounds and detail temporal trends, chemical structures, species distribution, and research progress. We hope this meta-analysis will provide useful information for research into the bioactivity of marine natural products and drug development.

Going further in the knowledge of Yondelis®; what's new in clinical trials?

Trabectedin is indicated for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after failure of standard therapy with anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or as first-line therapy for patients who are unsuited to receive these agents. Since trabectedin first became available for clinical investigation in 1995, numerous retrospective analyses and Phase II studies have documented its activity and provided useful insights into its unique clinical profile. An extensive research program of randomized studies was subsequently undertaken to identify methods of optimizing the use of trabectedin in clinical practice. Some main areas of interest involved its use in the first-line setting, its use in combination regimens and its activity in specific sarcoma subtypes. In this article, clinical trial results are reviewed with the aim of continually refining trabectedin's place in the therapy of advanced STS.

Trabectedin, a drug acting on both cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment

Trabectedin is the first marine-derived anti-neoplastic drug approved for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma and, in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, for the treatment of patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. From the beginning of its development, trabectedin showed some peculiar properties that clearly distinguished it from other anti-cancer drugs. In this mini-review, we will outline the current state of knowledge regarding the mode of action of trabectedin, which appears to represent a new class of anti-neoplastic drugs acting both on cancer cells and on the tumour microenvironment.

Safety evaluation of trabectedin in treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Trabectedin gained the approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2007 for the treatment of patients affected by soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Its safety and activity profiles have been assessed in many clinical trials as well as in standard clinical practice for > 10 years.

AREAS COVERED

This article extensively reviews the most common and specific adverse events associated with trabectedin. Moreover, we compare these toxicity data with other drugs active in STS such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Also, we provide a comprehensive view of the special mechanism of action of this drug and its clinical applications. Additionally, we discuss the current role of trabectedin in the treatment of STS and give a future perspective with the review of ongoing clinical trials and potential new indications.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin is, in general, a well-tolerated drug with a favorable toxicity profile. The majority of its side effects are mild and easily manageable. Specific adverse events such as liver toxicity and rhabdomyolysis do not usually have a significant clinical impact. Overall, trabectedin is a safe and active treatment option in STS.