1
|
Tozzo P, Delicati A, Zambello R, Caenazzo L. Chimerism Monitoring Techniques after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Overview of the Last 15 Years of Innovations. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040621. [PMID: 33808342 PMCID: PMC8065704 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Chimerism analysis is a well-established method for monitoring the state of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) over time by analyzing peripheral blood or bone marrow samples of the recipient in several malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases. From a clinical point of view, a continuous monitoring is fundamental for an effective early therapeutic intervention. This paper provides a comparative overview of the main molecular biology techniques which can be used to study chimerism after bone marrow transplantation, focusing on their advantages and disadvantages. According to the examined literature, short tandem repeats (STR) analysis through simple PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis (STR-PCR) is the most powerful method which guarantees a high power of differentiation between different individuals. However, other methods such as real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology were developed to overcome the technical limits of STR-PCR. In particular, these other techniques guarantee a higher sensitivity, which allows for the detection of chimerism at an earlier stage, hence expanding the window for therapeutic intervention. After a comparative evaluation of the various techniques, it seems clear that STR-PCR still remains the gold standard option for chimerism study, even if it is likely that both dPCR and NGS could supplement or even replace the common methods of STR analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Tozzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; (A.D.); (L.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-049-827-2235
| | - Arianna Delicati
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; (A.D.); (L.C.)
| | - Renato Zambello
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), Hematology and Clinical Immunology Section, Padova University School of Medicine, 35121 Padova, Italy;
| | - Luciana Caenazzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy; (A.D.); (L.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Han E, Kim M, Kim Y, Han K, Lim J, Kang D, Lee GD, Kim JR, Lee JW, Chung NG, Cho B, Eom KS, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Lee S, Cho SG, Min CK, Kim DW, Lee J, Min WS. Practical informativeness of short tandem repeat loci for chimerism analysis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Chim Acta 2017; 468:51-59. [PMID: 28192074 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short tandem repeat (STR) loci are most frequently used for chimerism analysis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the practical informativeness of STR chimerism by integrating theoretical and analytical points. METHODS Theoretical and practical informativess of 16 STR loci were evaluated from 1249 pairs of recipients and donors who were prepared for HSCT. RESULTS Theoretical informativeness was influenced by genetic diversity including allele frequency and heterozygosity, and was higher in the unrelated HSCT group (90.5±5.3%) compared to the related HSCT group (66.2±4.4%). Practical informativeness was lower than theoretical (6.1±1.7%) because several STR loci were excluded due to stutter peaks and less reliable results, especially in type II-2 donor-recipient match pattern with no recipient-specific allele. We simulated an efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis. Eight informative STR loci were required to analyze chimerism with at least one practically informative locus in the related HSCT group (D18S51, FGA, D2S1338, D13S317, D8S1179, D21S11, D16S539 and D7S820) while only three loci were needed in the unrelated group (D2S1338, FGA and D18S51). A minimum set of 2, 4 or 7 STR loci were required to provide at least 1, 3 or 5 practically informative loci in 95% of the unrelated HSCT group while 3, 8 or 12 loci were required in the related HSCT group. CONCLUSION We deducted the practical informativeness of STR chimerism, identified the major influencing factors on the practical informativeness of each STR locus, and successfully simulated the efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunhee Han
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myungshin Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yonggoo Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyungja Han
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihyang Lim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dain Kang
- Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gun Dong Lee
- Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Rok Kim
- Catholic Genetic Laboratory Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Wook Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nack-Gyun Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bin Cho
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Seong Eom
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo-Jin Kim
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee-Je Kim
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Lee
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Goo Cho
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Min
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Wook Kim
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JongWook Lee
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Sung Min
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Leukemia Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Odriozola A, Riancho JA, Nozal R, Bermúdez A, Santurtún A, Arozamena J, Zarrabeitia MT. Chimerism analysis in transplant patients: a hypothesis-free approach in the absence of reference genotypes. Clin Chim Acta 2012; 414:85-90. [PMID: 22967948 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2012] [Revised: 08/27/2012] [Accepted: 08/27/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During routine analysis of chimerism in bone marrow transplant patients pre-transplant genotype of the recipient or the donor might lack. We aimed to develop a new method to analyze DNA results suitable when reference genotypes are not available. METHODS The method was based on the balance between heterozygotes. It was implemented in a standard computer spreadsheet, and considered the hypothetical donor-recipient genotype combinations. Hypotheses with peak height ratios and allele sharing tendency above a critical threshold were accepted. The results were compared with those obtained with prior knowledge of reference genotypes. RESULTS The algorithm predicted correctly the proportion of donor/recipient chimerism, even in the absence of reference genotypes. In fact, the predicted values were closely correlated (r(2)>0.98) and free of systematic bias (slope 0.98-1.04), in comparison with the reference values obtained with prior knowledge of the donor and recipient genetic profiles. CONCLUSIONS This study constitutes a proof-of-concept of the application of the heterozygote balance for the quantitative study of chimerism. The algorithm computes post-transplant chimerism in an easy and time-efficient way, even when the donor and recipient reference genotypes are unavailable. Therefore, it can be a useful tool for laboratories involved in chimerism analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Odriozola
- Unit of Legal Medicine, University of Cantabria, Av Herrera Oria s/n, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Odriozola A, Riancho JA, Colorado M, Zarrabeitia MT. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two recently developed STR multiplexes for the analysis of chimerism after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2012; 40:88-92. [PMID: 22594517 DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.2012.01123.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Forensic-oriented kits analysing short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms are widely used to determine the proportions of donor and recipient cells after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The sensitivity of this technology is crucial for the early detection of relapse and, in consequence, the adjustment of the treatment to enhance donor-origin haematopoiesis in transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of two recently developed STR multiplex kits, AmpFℓSTR(®) Identifiler(®) Plus PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems) and Investigator™ IDplex(®) (Qiagen), in the analysis of chimerism. Fifteen STR loci were amplified with both kits in 26 peripheral blood samples of transplantated patients showing chimerism. Peak amplitude threshold, detection limit (%DL), per cent donor chimerism and efficacy of each multiplex and STR were determined, and the results with both kits were compared. The %DL and the estimated per cent donor chimerism were similar with both kits. On the other hand, Identifiler(®) Plus kit allowed chimerism identification only in 24 (92%) of the 26 cases with chimerism detected by using the Investigator™ IDplex(®) when only 'type 5' allelic constellations (i.e. without potential interference by stutter peaks) were taken into account. However, IDplex(®) efficacy was somewhat lower than that of Identifiler Plus when only the most informative loci (D2S1338, D21S11, D18S51 and FGA) were considered. Therefore, although each system had some particular advantages and disadvantages, overall both STR multiplexes showed similar performance in qualitative and quantitative chimerism analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Odriozola
- Unit of Legal Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goh RY, Kim SH, Han JY. Lineage-specific chimerism analysis in nucleated cells, T cells and natural killer cells after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY 2011; 46:18-23. [PMID: 21461299 PMCID: PMC3065621 DOI: 10.5045/kjh.2011.46.1.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2010] [Revised: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/08/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Chimerism analysis is an important tool for assessing the origin of hematopoietic cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and can be used to detect impending graft rejection and the recurrence of underlying malignant or nonmalignant diseases. Methods This study included 24 patients who underwent myeloablative allo-SCT. DNA was extracted from nucleated cells (NCs), T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, and the chimerism status of these cell fractions was determined by STR-PCR performed using an automated fluorescent DNA analyzer. Results Twenty-three out of the 24 patients achieved engraftment. Mixed chimerism (MC) in NCs, but not in T cells and NK cells, was significantly correlated with disease relapse. MC in all cell fractions was correlated with mortality. Ten patients (41.6%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. Six patients had MC in T cells, and 3 of them had chronic GVHD. Four patients with MC and relapse received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and among them, 3 had secondary relapse. Further, the chimerism status differed among different cell lineages in 6 patients with myeloid malignancies. Conclusion The implications of MC in lymphocyte subsets are an important area for future research. Chimerism analysis in lineage-specific cells permits detection of relapse and facilitates the monitoring of therapeutic interventions. These results can provide the basic data for chimerism analysis after myeloablative SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ri-Young Goh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|