Defects in the DNA mismatch repair system do not contribute to the development of childhood wilms tumors

Wilms tumor is the most common childhood renal malignancy. Most Wilms tumors occur sporadically, whereas a genetic predisposition is described in 9-19% of the Wilms tumor patients. In addition to constitutional aberrations, somatic aberrations in multiple genetic loci such as WT1, WT2 or locus 11p15.5, CTNNB1, WTX, TP53, FBXW7, and MYCN have also been linked to Wilms tumorigenesis. In sporadic Wilms tumors, however, the driving somatic genetic aberrations need to be further unraveled. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain more insight into other underlying mechanisms. Little is known about the role of defects in the DNA mismatch repair system in the etiology of Wilms tumors. To detect mismatch repair deficiency in a full cohort of Wilms tumor patients, we combined immunohistochemistry for the expression of mismatch repair proteins and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis by a fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based assay. Of the 121 Wilms tumor patients treated between 1987 and 2010 in our institution, 100 samples from 97 patients were available for analysis. Nuclear staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 proteins was present in all 100 Wilms tumor samples. No pattern of MSI was found in any of the 100 investigated Wilms tumor samples. The matching results of normal expression of the mismatch repair proteins detected by immunohistochemistry and the absence of MSI by DNA analysis in 100 Wilms tumor samples lead us to conclude that defects in the DNA mismatch repair system do not play a significant role in the development of Wilms tumors.

Microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer

CONTEXT

About 15% of colorectal cancers are characterized by genomic microsatellite instability, and of these, about 1 in 5 (2%-4% overall) are due to Lynch syndrome, a dominantly inherited condition predisposing the patient to cancers of multiple organ systems, including the gastrointestinal tract. Identification of individuals with Lynch syndrome allows for increased surveillance of the affected individual and of potentially affected family members.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer and current laboratory diagnostic testing strategies for the detection of Lynch syndrome.

DATA SOURCES

This review is based on peer-reviewed literature, published guidelines from professional organizations (Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group, National Comprehensive Cancer Network), and information from clinical laboratories performing microsatellite instability testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in all individuals affected with colorectal cancer has been recommended by the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group. Preliminary screening tests can identify individuals unlikely to be affected by Lynch syndrome, thereby reducing the need for full gene analysis. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction-based tests for microsatellite instability have similar clinical sensitivity and specificity, and each method has advantages and limitations. BRAF and MLH1 methylation testing are useful reflex tests for those with a defect in MLH1 identified by immunohistochemistry. Emerging technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing, may substantially affect diagnostic algorithms in the future.

Lynch syndrome screening in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer in general pathology practice: from the revised Bethesda guidelines to a universal approach

OBJECTIVE

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC). The revised 2004 Bethesda guidelines were developed to identify potential LS patients. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate utilization and adequacy of the guidelines in general pathology practice and to determine if a universal LS screening approach increased the potential LS detection rate in newly diagnosed CRCs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Included were 445 primary CRCs surgically resected from November 2006 to March 2009, when reflex microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was based on histomorphology and age as well as 145 CRCs resected from July 2009 to July 2010 when a universal LS testing paradigm was used. Reflex MSI testing rates and MSI testing results were determined.

RESULTS

The overall LS screening rate from November 2006 to March 2009 was 34.8%, and the extrapolated microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) rate was 8.5% (38/445). Strict adherence to the revised Bethesda guidelines, that is, without testing CRC diagnosed in patients ‡60 years, would have missed 26 (68.4%) MSI-H CRCs. The overall LS screening rate from July 2009 to July 2010 was 76.3% and the MSI-H rate was 20.6% (30/145). Compared with the MSI tested group, the untested group had more CRCs removed by local excision (22.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.00035).

CONCLUSION

The revised Bethesda guidelines are inadequate for LS screening when personal and family cancer history is not available to the pathologist, a universal screening paradigm greatly increased the rate of MSI testing and MSI-H CRC detection and CRCs less likely to be screened for LS were those diagnosed in locally excised specimens.