Equity in access to facial transplantation

We examine ethical considerations in access to facial transplantation (FT), with implications for promoting health equity. As a form of vascularised composite allotransplantation, FT is still considered innovative with a relatively low volume of procedures performed to date by a small number of active FT programmes worldwide. However, as numbers continue to increase and institutions look to establish new FT programmes, we anticipate that attention will shift from feasibility towards ensuring the benefits of FT are equitably available to those in need. This manuscript assesses barriers to care and their ethical implications across a number of considerations, with the intent of mapping various factors relating to health equity and fair access to FT. Evidence is drawn from an evolving clinical experience as well as published scholarship addressing several dimensions of access to FT. We also explore novel concerns that have yet to be mentioned in the literature.

The association between loss of Medicare, immunosuppressive medication use, and kidney transplant outcomes

Kidney transplant recipients aged <65 years qualify for Medicare coverage, but coverage ends 3 years posttransplant. We determined the association between timing of Medicare loss and immunosuppressive medication fills and kidney allograft loss. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), US Renal Data System, and Symphony pharmacy fill database, we analyzed 78 861 Medicare-covered, kidney-alone recipients aged <65 years, and assessed the timing of Medicare loss posttransplant: early (<3 years), on-time (at 3 years), or late (>3 years). Immunosuppressant use was measured as medication possession ratio (MPR). Allograft loss was assessed using SRTR data. MPR was lower for recipients with early or late Medicare loss compared with no coverage loss for all immunosuppressive medication types. For calcineurin inhibitors, early Medicare loss was associated with a 53% to 86% lower MPR. On-time Medicare loss was not associated with a lower MPR. When recipients were matched by age, posttransplant timing of Medicare loss, and donor risk, the hazard of allograft loss was 990% to 1630% higher after early Medicare loss, and 140% to 740% higher after late Medicare loss, with no difference in the hazard for on-time Medicare loss. Ensuring ongoing Medicare access before and after 3 years posttransplant could affect graft survival.

Assessment of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in the brain-dead organ donor to predict immediate graft function in kidney recipients: a prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function is a major determinant of long-term renal allograft survival. Despite considerable efforts to improve donor selection and matching, incidence of delayed graft function remains close to 25%. As neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been shown to predict acute renal failure, the authors tested the hypothesis that NGAL measurement in brain-dead donors predicts delayed graft function in kidney recipients.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter, observational study, serum NGAL was measured in donors at the time of transfer to operating room. The primary endpoint was the delayed graft function, defined as the need for renal replacement therapy during the first week posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Among 159 included brain-dead donors, 146 were analyzable leading to 243 renal transplantations. Of these, 56 (23%) needed renal replacement therapy. Donors' NGAL values were similar in case of both delayed and normal graft function in recipients. The area under the receiver-operating curve for NGAL to predict the need for renal replacement therapy before day 8 was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.59). The area under curve for NGAL to predict failure to return to a normal graft function at day 8 was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.59). Using multivariate analysis, NGAL was not associated to the need for renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98 to1.00) or failure to return to a normal graft function at day 8 (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

NGAL measurement in brain-dead donors at the time of recovery failed to predict delayed or normal graft function in kidney recipients.

Cost-effective immunosuppressive options for solid organ transplantation: a guide to lower cost for the renal transplant recipient in the USA

Of the numerous risks associated with immunotherapy for the prevention of rejection, cost is perhaps the most universal. In the USA and some other countries, the costs of immunosuppression make transplantation unavailable for some medically viable transplant candidates, and for others who receive a transplant, the long-term costs are economically crippling. Minimization and tapering of immunosuppression, use of generics, manipulation of metabolism, infection surveillance instead of prophylaxis, and advantageous routes of administration are some strategies that can be employed to reduce immunotherapy expense. Using these strategies, we describe an immunosuppression regimen for kidney transplantation that might be only a third of the cost of current 'standard' regimens in the USA. Such a regimen might allow some patients who might not otherwise qualify economically to safely receive a kidney transplant. The purpose of creating an alternative, lower-cost immunotherapy regimen is to give patients a choice. Responsible stewardship of scarce donor organs is the primary, and clearly appropriate, limiting factor.