Components, Formulations, Deliveries, and Combinations of Tumor Vaccines

Tumor vaccines, an important part of immunotherapy, prevent cancer or kill existing tumor cells by activating or restoring the body's own immune system. Currently, various formulations of tumor vaccines have been developed, including cell vaccines, tumor cell membrane vaccines, tumor DNA vaccines, tumor mRNA vaccines, tumor polypeptide vaccines, virus-vectored tumor vaccines, and tumor-in-situ vaccines. There are also multiple delivery systems for tumor vaccines, such as liposomes, cell membrane vesicles, viruses, exosomes, and emulsions. In addition, to decrease the risk of tumor immune escape and immune tolerance that may exist with a single tumor vaccine, combination therapy of tumor vaccines with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, CAR-T therapy, or photoimmunotherapy is an effective strategy. Given the critical role of tumor vaccines in immunotherapy, here, we look back to the history of tumor vaccines, and we discuss the antigens, adjuvants, formulations, delivery systems, mechanisms, combination therapy, and future directions of tumor vaccines.

Systemic and mucosal antibody response of freshwater cultured Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) to monovalent and bivalent vaccines against Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae

Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer farming in Southeast Asia, encounters serious disease challenges caused by Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae. However, a vaccine for disease prevention is not yet available. In this study, we investigated the mucosal and systemic antibody (IgM) response kinetics of the Asian seabass following primary immunization with oil-based formalin-killed vaccines (FKVs) prepared from S. agalactiae and S. iniae (monovalent Sa, monovalent Si, and bivalent Sa-Si) and secondary booster with the respective water-based FKVs. The efficacy of vaccines was subsequently evaluated by an experimental challenge. The results revealed similar antibody response kinetics in both systemic and mucosal systems. However, the immune response in the fish vaccinated with the monovalent vaccines was superior to those fish received the bivalent vaccine in terms of specific antibody titer. The fish that received monovalent vaccines required 1-2 weeks to raise a significant level of specific antibody titer in both systemic and mucosal systems while those vaccinated with bivalent vaccine required three weeks. Following booster at day 21, both systemic and mucosal antibody titers in all vaccinated groups had reached the peak at day 28 and gradually declined in the following weeks but remained significantly higher than control until the end of the experiment (day 63). In the challenge test, both monovalent and bivalent vaccines were found to be highly efficacious, with the relative percentage survival (RPS) ranging from 75 to 85%. In summary, this study explored the 63-days antibody response kinetics (both mucosal and systemic systems) of Asian seabass to monovalent and bivalent inactivated vaccines and confirmed that the combination of S. agalactiae and S. iniae in a single injectable vaccine is possible.

Humoral Immune Response of Thai Dogs after Oral Vaccination against Rabies with the SPBN GASGAS Vaccine Strain

Applied research is crucial in pushing the boundaries and finding a solution to the age-old problem of dog-mediated rabies. Although oral vaccination of dogs is considered to have great potential in mass dog vaccination campaigns and could have far-reaching benefits, it is perhaps the most ignored of all available tools in efforts to eliminate dog-mediated rabies, not least because of limited data on immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of potential oral rabies vaccine candidates. In this study, the long-term immunogenicity in local Thai dogs after oral administration of the highly attenuated 3rd generation rabies virus vaccine strain SPBN GASGAS was assessed. The oral rabies vaccine was administered to dogs by either direct oral administration (n = 10) or by offering a vaccine loaded intestine bait (n = 15). The humoral immune response was then compared to three groups of dogs; a group that received a parenteral delivered inactivated rabies vaccine (n = 10), a group offered a placebo intestine bait (n = 7), and a control group (n = 4) for an observation period of 365 days. There was no significant difference in the immune response of dogs that received oral and parenteral vaccine in terms of magnitude, kinetics, and persistence of both rabies virus (RABV) neutralizing (RFFIT) and binding (ELISA) antibodies. Although the single parenteral injection of an inactivated rabies vaccine mounted a slightly higher humoral immune response than the orally delivered live vaccine, RABV specific antibodies of both types were still detectable after one year in most animals for all treatment groups and resulted in no difference in seropositivity. Characterization of rabies specific antibodies revealed two main classes of antibodies involved in the immune response of dogs vaccinated. While IgM antibodies were the first to appear, the succeeding IgG response was mainly IgG2 dominated independent of the vaccine type used. The results support the view that SPBN GASGAS induces a sustained detectable immune response in local dogs both after direct oral administration and via bait application.