Ananías J, Vidal C, Ortiz-Muñoz L, Irarrázaval S, Besa P. Use of electromyographic biofeedback in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Physiotherapy 2024;
123:19-29. [PMID:
38244487 DOI:
10.1016/j.physio.2023.12.005]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery is essential to regain functionality and return to previous activity level. Electromyographic biofeedback may be an effective intervention for rehabilitation of patients following ACL surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize the available evidence on the effect of electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of quadriceps strength following ACL surgery.
DESIGN
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Epistemonikos were searched.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomized clinical trials with patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery comparing biofeedback with a standard rehabilitation control group.
DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS
Two authors selected articles and performed data extraction. The analysed outcomes were strength, function, pain, knee extension and balance. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results were combined through random-effects meta-analysis, reporting mean differences.
RESULTS
Eight articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and four articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The interventions lasted between 4 and 12 weeks. Three studies evaluated the effect of biofeedback on quadriceps strength; of these, two studies showed a significant difference in favour of the biofeedback group. In addition, biofeedback was found to improve knee extension [standardized mean difference - 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.74 to -0.86] and balance (one study). There was no significant difference in Lysholm score (mean difference -6.21, 95% CI -17.51 to 5.08; I2 =59%) or pain between the biofeedback group and the control group.
CONCLUSION
Electromyographic biofeedback in knee rehabilitation could be useful following ACL reconstruction surgery.
KEY MESSAGES
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42020193768).
Collapse