Effects of individualized versus group task-oriented circuit training on balance ability and gait endurance in chronic stroke inpatients

Functional Training for Lower Extremities in Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review

Engaging in meaningful and repetitive goal-oriented functional tasks can effectively enhance neuroplasticity and facilitate recovery following a stroke. This particular approach has primarily been studied in relation to functional outcomes and has predominantly focused on late subacute and chronic stroke patients. However, there is a lack of information regarding the standardized protocol of lower extremity functional training, its constituent elements, and its impact on motor recovery during the early subacute phase of stroke. The aim of this study was to examine the available evidence related to the intervention protocol of lower extremity functional training in order to identify common training elements and assess their impact on motor and functional outcomes in stroke survivors. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus, covering the period from 2000 to 2022. A total of 1786 articles were retrieved and screened based on predefined inclusion criteria. A total of 36 articles were included in this review. The primary findings were classified into categories such as intervention protocols for functional training and their constituent elements, outcome measures utilized, minimal clinically important differences (MCID) reported, and the conclusions drawn by the respective studies. Only a limited quantity of studies reported on the intervention protocol of lower extremity functional training. The majority of these studies focused on the efficacy of functional training for enhancing gait and balance, as evaluated through functional outcome assessments, particularly in the context of chronic stroke patients. In most studies, the evaluation of outcomes was typically based on statistical significance rather than clinical significance. In light of these findings, it is recommended that future studies be conducted during the early subacute phase of stroke to further investigate the impact of functional training on motor outcomes. This will contribute to a broader understanding of the benefits of functional training in facilitating motor recovery in the lower extremities and its clinical significance in stroke survivors.

Progressive task-oriented circuit training for cognition, physical functioning and societal participation in individuals with dementia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dementia is commonly associated with cognitive deficit, functional decline and societal participation restriction across multiple domains of functioning. The decline impacts not only on the individual, but also on their informal caregivers, healthcare and the social system. This clinical random controlled study investigated the efficacy of 12-week Progressive Task-oriented circuit training on cognition, physical functioning and societal participation of individuals with dementia.

METHODS

This study involved 31 individuals living with dementia recruited from a tertiary health institution in Lagos Nigeria. They were randomized into two groups: Progressive Task-oriented circuit training (involved in 12-week circuit training, two times a week for 70 min per session consisting of six workstations) and Control group (training with conventional treatment and home programmes). They were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention and post-intervention using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog), Bristol ADLs, Community integration Questionnaire, 6-min walk test. Data analysed using the independent-samples t tests, paired t tests, Friedman two-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U test (p ≤ .05).

RESULTS

Participants were aged 69.61 ± 3.44 years. There was significant improvement from baseline to post-intervention in cognition (30.77 ± 1.02 vs. 28.77 ± 3.30), physical functioning (28.19 ± 3.90 vs. 25.84 ± 6.26) and societal participation (3.64 ± 0.73 vs. 5.59 ± 2.76). However, the progressive Task-oriented circuit training had more significant improvement than the control group within the group in cognition (p = .000), physical functioning (p = .000), and societal participation (p = .000). There was no statistical difference within the Control group with cognition (p = .097), Physical functioning (p = 1.000). Meanwhile there was statistically significant effect between both groups on cognition, physical functioning and societal participation post-intervention (p < .005).

CONCLUSION

Although both Task-oriented Circuit Training and conventional treatment with home exercise programmes are efficacious, Progressive Task-oriented Circuit Training is more efficacious in enhancing and developing therapeutic strategies to train cognition, improve functional performance and societal participation in the rehabilitation of individuals with dementia.

Effect of task specific circuit training on Gait parameters and mobility in stroke survivors

Objective of the study was to investigate effects of task specific circuit gait training to improve gait parameters and mobility among sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. A randomized control trial was conducted on stroke survivors of either gender being capable of standing 10 seconds and having 2-4 score on Rankin Modified Scale. Sample comprised of 30 participants randomly assigned into two groups. Training was given for a session of 40-50 minutes for 3-4 days/week for six weeks. Timed get up and go test (TUG), Cadence, Step Length and Step Width assessed measures of concern. The sample included 16 males and 14 females with mean age of 54.10 ± 10.10 years. After six weeks, significant improvement was recorded in TUG (p=0.014). Cadence (p=0.001), step length (p<0.001) and step width (p=0.009) were also significantly improved. Circuit gait training improves mobility and gait in stroke patients.

Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke

BACKGROUND

Circuit class therapy (CCT) offers a supervised group forum for people after stroke to practise tasks, enabling increased practice time without increasing staffing. This is an update of the original review published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness and safety of CCT on mobility in adults with stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched January 2017), CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, Issue 12, 2016), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2017), Embase (1980 to January 2017), CINAHL (1982 to January 2017), and 14 other electronic databases (to January 2017). We also searched proceedings from relevant conferences, reference lists, and unpublished theses; contacted authors of published trials and other experts in the field; and searched relevant clinical trials and research registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including people over 18 years old, diagnosed with stroke of any severity, at any stage, or in any setting, receiving CCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias in all included studies, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 RCTs involving 1297 participants. Participants were stroke survivors living in the community or receiving inpatient rehabilitation. Most could walk 10 metres without assistance. Ten studies (835 participants) measured walking capacity (measuring how far the participant could walk in six minutes) demonstrating that CCT was superior to the comparison intervention (Six-Minute Walk Test: mean difference (MD), fixed-effect, 60.86 m, 95% confidence interval (CI) 44.55 to 77.17, GRADE: moderate). Eight studies (744 participants) measured gait speed, again finding in favour of CCT compared with other interventions (MD 0.15 m/s, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.19, GRADE: moderate). Both of these effects are considered clinically meaningful. We were able to pool other measures to demonstrate the superior effects of CCT for aspects of walking and balance (Timed Up and Go: five studies, 488 participants, MD -3.62 seconds, 95% CI -6.09 to -1.16; Activities of Balance Confidence scale: two studies, 103 participants, MD 7.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 14.87). Two other pooled balance measures failed to demonstrate superior effects (Berg Blance Scale and Step Test). Independent mobility, as measured by the Stroke Impact Scale, Functional Ambulation Classification and the Rivermead Mobility Index, also improved more in CCT interventions compared with others. Length of stay showed a non-significant effect in favour of CCT (two trials, 217 participants, MD -16.35, 95% CI -37.69 to 4.99). Eight trials (815 participants) measured adverse events (falls during therapy): there was a non-significant effect of greater risk of falls in the CCT groups (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08, GRADE: very low). Time after stroke did not make a difference to the positive outcomes, nor did the quality or size of the trials. Heterogeneity was generally low; risk of bias was variable across the studies with poor reporting of study conduct in several of the trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate evidence that CCT is effective in improving mobility for people after stroke - they may be able to walk further, faster, with more independence and confidence in their balance. The effects may be greater later after the stroke, and are of clinical significance. Further high-quality research is required, investigating quality of life, participation and cost-benefits, that compares CCT with standard care and that also investigates the influence of factors such as stroke severity and age. The potential risk of increased falls during CCT needs to be monitored.