Intra- and inter-rater reliability of isometric shoulder extensor and internal rotator strength measurements performed using a hand-held dynamometer

Concordance of shoulder strength assessments using a spring balance and isometric dynamometer in patients before and after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Background

Shoulder strength is an essential assessment to monitor the outcome of treatment interventions. Isometric strength assessment in the Constant Score (CS) was initially measured with a cable tensiometer or spring balance (SB). Some authors have questioned the validity of this strength assessment and the resulting CS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the concordance of strength measurements using an unsecured SB vs. isometric dynamometer and outline the impact of these methods on the CS.

Methods

In the context of routine clinical examination as well as participation in a Swiss national cohort study, shoulder strength was measured to calculate baseline (before surgery) and 6-month postoperative CS in adult rotator cuff tear patients who had undergone primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Measurements of each of the operated and contralateral shoulders were made per patient routinely using an unsecured SB and study-specific using an isometric dynamometer in patients with the shoulder at 90° abduction in the scapular plane. Absolute and change values of strength and CS data were presented in scatter plots and assessed using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

Between June 2020 and October 2021, baseline strength measurements from the operated shoulder of 78 patients ranged from 0.0 to 13.6 kg with a CCC of 0.64 (P < .001) and a mean difference of 0.81 kg between the SB and dynamometer methods. There were 89 measurements of the contralateral healthy shoulder that ranged from 3.6 to 15.6 kg; CCC and mean strength difference were 0.76 (P < .001) and 0.70 kg, respectively. At 6 months postsurgery, strength measurements of the operated shoulder ranged from 1.4 to 12.0 kg with a CCC of 0.66 (P < .001) and mean strength difference of 0.9 kg (n = 68). Respective 6-month measurements of the contralateral side (n = 52) ranged from 2.0 to 15.9 kg with a CCC of 0.73 (P < .001) and mean strength difference of 0.03 kg.

Conclusion

Absolute and change values in shoulder strength assessments using an unsecured SB and isometric dynamometer are fairly concordant with mean differences of less than 1 kg between methods. With the variability of strength differences among patients, interpretation of these values for individual patients may be challenging. Nonetheless, unsecured SB and dynamometer methods share only slight and clinically unimportant differences that can provide similar group mean values for use in research along with the calculation of the CS.

Normative Values of Isometric Shoulder Strength Among Healthy Adults

Background

Normative data is useful for comparing measured values of strength with population norms and can avoid the issues associated with limb symmetry index. The available normative shoulder strength values are limited by constraints on research designs and variability in subject groups which prevents this data being successfully extrapolated to the greater population.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish normative isometric strength values for various movements of the shoulder that are specific to function and rotator cuff strength. A secondary goal of this study was to analyze the effect of age, gender, weight, height, activity level and arm dominance on shoulder strength.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Methods

Subjects in four age groups (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59) were included in this study-200 males (40.0 ± 11.6 years, 179.1 ± 6.5 cm, 81 ± 13.0 kg) and 200 females (40.1 ± 11.5 years, 165.3 ± 7.4sm, 64.4 ± 11.6 kg). Bilateral isometric strength measurements were taken with a handheld dynamometer testing seven shoulder movements. Tables of normative strength data were constructed. Multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the effects of age, gender, weight, height and activity level on isometric shoulder strength.

Results

Men were stronger than women (p<0.001). Age was not associated with most strength measures with the exception of dominant arm abduction (p<0.004), non-dominant arm abduction (p<0.028) and non-dominant arm scapular plane abduction (p<0.004) which had a negative association with strength. Weight was positively associated with strength (p<0.001). Activity level was positively associated with all strength measures (p<0.05) except dominant sided abduction (p=0.056). There were no statistically significant differences between dominant and non-dominant sides.

Conclusion

This normative data may be useful to the clinician, as it permits a standard against which to compare shoulder strength for various age groups. Clinicians can have confidence that the uninvolved limb, if symptom free, can be used as an adequate benchmark for strength measures.

Levels of Evidence

Level 3©The Author(s).

Psychometric properties of a standardized protocol of muscle strength assessment by hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults: a reliability study

BACKGROUND

Maximal isometric muscle strength (MIMS) assessment is a key component of physiotherapists' work. Hand-held dynamometry (HHD) is a simple and quick method to obtain quantified MIMS values that have been shown to be valid, reliable, and more responsive than manual muscle testing. However, the lack of MIMS reference values for several muscle groups in healthy adults with well-known psychometric properties limits the use and the interpretation of these measures obtained with HHD in clinic.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of MIMS torque values obtained with HHD.

METHODS

Intra and Inter-rater Reliability Study. The MIMS torque of 17 muscle groups was assessed by two independent raters at three different times in 30 healthy adults using a standardized HHD protocol using the MEDup™ (Atlas Medic, Québec, Canada). Participants were excluded if they presented any of the following criteria: 1) participation in sport at a competitive level; 2) degenerative or neuromusculoskeletal disease that could affect torque measurements; 3) traumatic experience or disease in the previous years that could affect their muscle function; and 4) use of medication that could impact muscle strength (e.g., muscle relaxants, analgesics, opioids) at the time of the evaluation. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined using two-way mixed (intra) and random effects (inter) absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC: 95% confidence interval) models. SEM and MDC were calculated from these data.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-rater reliability were excellent with ICC (95% confidence interval) varying from 0.90 to 0.99 (0.85-0.99) and 0.89 to 0.99 (0.55-0.995), respectively. Absolute SEM and MDC for intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.14 to 3.20 Nm and 0.38 to 8.87 Nm, respectively, and from 0.17 to 5.80 Nm and 0.47 to 16.06 Nm for inter-rater reliability, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent reliability obtained in this study suggest that the use of such a standardized HHD protocol is a method of choice for MIMS torque measurements in both clinical and research settings. And the identification of the now known metrological qualities of such a protocol should encourage and promote the optimal use of manual dynamometry.

Intra- and interrater reliability of belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer in scapular protraction strength tests in individuals with shoulder pain

PURPOSE

Scapular protraction strength can be evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer (HHD). However, it is necessary to measure the reliability of HHD in individuals with shoulder pain and to minimize the limitations related to the evaluator and the low methodological quality cited in previous studies. This study assessed, with methodological enhancement, the intra- and interrater reliability of belt-stabilized HHD in the assessment of scapular protraction strength in individuals with shoulder pain.

METHOD

Fifty individuals with unilateral symptoms of subacromial pain syndrome (20 men, aged 40.5 ± 15.3 years) were evaluated in two sessions using the belt-stabilized HHD for maximum isometric strength of scapular protraction with the individual in the sitting and supine positions. Reliability values were obtained using the intraclass correlation coefficient with the standard error of measurement (SEM and %SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC).

RESULTS

The intra- and interrater HHD reliability were excellent for all measurements ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 (SEM = 2.0-4.0 kg; %SEM 12 to 17; MDC = 6-11 kg).

CONCLUSION

Belt-stabilized HHD is reliable for the assessment of scapular protraction strength in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome in both the sitting and supine positions.

Assessment of muscle strength in para-athletes: A systematic review of observational studies

Accurate and reliable evaluation of muscle strength in para-athletes is essential for monitoring the effectiveness of strength training and/or rehabilitation programmes, and sport classification. Our aim is to synthesise evidence related to assessing muscle strength in para-athletes. Four databases were searched from January 1990 to July 2021 for observational studies focusing on strength assessment. Independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. A total of 1764 potential studies were identified. Thirty met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The mean age of participants was 30.7 years (standard deviation [SD]: 2.4). The majority were men (88%) participating in wheelchair sports, including basketball, rugby, and tennis (23/30: 76%). Overall quality varied, with more than half of the studies failing to identify strategies for dealing with confounding variables. Despite manual muscle testing being a standard component of para-sport classification systems, evidence examining strength characteristics in para-athletes is derived primarily from isometric and isokinetic testing. In studies that included comparative strength data, findings were mixed. Some studies found strength values were similar to or lower than able-bodied athletic controls. However, an important observation was that others reported higher shoulder strength in para-athletes taking part in wheelchair sports than both able-bodied and disabled non-athletes. Studies need to develop accessible, standardised strength testing methods that account for training influence and establish normative strength values in para-athletes. There is also a need for additional studies that include female para-athletes and para-athletes with greater functional impairments.

Function, strength, and muscle activation of the shoulder complex in Crossfit practitioners with and without pain: a cross-sectional observational study

BACKGROUND

The shoulder joint is the most commonly injured joint in CrossFit practitioners, because of the high intensity and loads associated with this sport. Despite the large number of clinical cases, there is a shortage of studies that investigate influence of biomechanical aspects of upper limbs' injuries on CrossFit practitioners. This study hypothesized that there would be a difference in function, strength, and muscle activation between Crossfit practitioners with and without shoulder pain.

METHODS

We divided 79 Crossfit practitioners into two groups according to whether they reported pain (n = 29) or no pain (n = 50) in the shoulder during Crossfit training. Muscle function, strength, and activation were assessed using the Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand function questionnaire, Upper Quarter Y Balance Test and Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test shoulder tests, isometric muscle strength assessment by manual dynamometry and muscle activation by surface electromyography and pain report.

RESULTS

The function based on questionnaire was associated with pain (p = 0.004). We observed a statistically significant difference between the two groups only in the surface electromyography activity of the lower trapezius, and in the variables of shoulder pain and function (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Crossfit practitioners with shoulder pain occurring during training showed good function and stability of the shoulder joint, but there was a reduction in the activation of stabilizing muscles, especially the lower trapezius. Trial registration Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinico (Brasilian National Registry) with the ID: RBR-2gycyv.

What is Known About Muscle Strength Reference Values for Adults Measured by Hand-Held Dynamometry: A Scoping Review

•

Existing literature regarding handheld dynamometer (HHD) strength reference values is scarce.

•

The current literature includes gaps relating to strength units used and well-described protocols.

•

There is a critical need to develop HHD reference values in adults.

•

Considering the increased availability of high quality HHD, this issue is urgent.

Objective

Data Sources

Study Selection

Data Extraction

Data Synthesis

Conclusion

Grip and shoulder strength correlation with validated outcome instruments in patients with rotator cuff tears

HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND

The ability to better define preoperatively the extent of rotator cuff (RC) dysfunction is desired. The study's purpose was to prospectively examine the relationships between absolute and percentage loss (affected compared to unaffected) of grip and shoulder strength, and RC dysfunction.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients with proven RC tears participated in this study. Prior to surgery, bilateral strengths of grip, shoulder abduction, and shoulder external rotation (ER) were measured with a handheld dynamometer, and subjective outcome measures were gathered. RC tear size was determined via arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcomes were gathered on the day of the examination or via e-mail following initial evaluation. Descriptive statistics, difference analysis, and correlation coefficients (reported as either direct or negative) were used to analyze data. Grip, abduction and ER strengths, and percentage loss of grip, abduction, and ER strengths (percentage loss affected vs. unaffected), and tear size were analyzed in relation to all of the scores on selected subjective outcome measurement tools. The P value was set at .05.

RESULTS

Fair direct correlations were found between grip strength and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) mental health scores, ER strength and Simple Shoulder Test (SST), abduction strength, and both the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) function score and SST score. Abduction and ER strengths were also found to possess a fair direct correlation. Fair negative correlations were found between the ASES function score and each of the following: percentage loss of abduction strength, percentage loss of ER strength, and tear size in centimeters. Another fair negative correlation was found between the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score and tear size in centimeters.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that as shoulder strength decreases, ipsilateral shoulder RC dysfunction increases. Grip strength was not related to shoulder RC dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Grip strength was not found to correlate with RC tears. Those with decreased abduction and ER strengths and low ASES scores should be considered more likely to have an RC tear.

Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometer for assessing Isometric Lumbar Muscles Strength in Asymptomatic Healthy Population

Objective:

To determine intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer for assessing isometric lumbar muscle strength in asymptomatic healthy population.

Methods:

It was a cross-sectional study conducted at the department of physiotherapy, University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from July 2020 to August 2020 through non probability-purposive sampling technique. Thirty healthy subjects were tested at thirty-degree lumbar flexion and zero-degree lumbar extension positions. Two raters assessed isometric strength of lumbar flexor and extensor muscles, by a hand-held dynamometer. Strength was measured and recorded by each of the two raters and re-assessed after a week. Correlation and pairwise comparison were done between readings. ICC values were calculated for the assessment of isometric lumbar muscle strength using handheld dynamometer.

Results:

A total of 30 healthy subjects had participated with mean age of 22.84±1.21 years, height 174.33±6.83 cm, weight 68.58±5.08 kg and BMI 22.52±0.35. Findings showed an excellent intra-rater (ICC 2, k = 0.95 to 0.97) and inter-rater (ICC 2, k = 0.94 to 0.95) reliability.

Conclusions:

Hand held dynamometer demonstrated an excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for assessment of isometric lumbar muscles strength of healthy subject at clinical setting as it is simple to use, portable and cost-effective for the precise measurement of lumbar muscles strength.

Measurement properties of handheld dynamometry for assessment of shoulder muscle strength: A systematic review

Like any assessment tool, handheld dynamometry (HHD) must be valid and reliable in order to be meaningful in clinical practice and research. To summarize the evidence of measurement properties of HHD for the assessment of shoulder muscle strength. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro were searched up to February 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies (a) evaluating HHD used on the glenohumeral joint, (b) evaluating measurement properties, and (c) included individuals ≥ 18 years old with or without shoulder symptoms. Exclusion criteria were studies (a) including patients with neurologic, neuromuscular, systemic diseases, or critical illness or bed-side patients and (b) that did not report the results separately for each movement. In total, 28 studies with 963 participants were included. The reliability results showed that 98% of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were ≥0.70. The measurement error showed that the minimal detectable change in percent varied from 0% to 51.0%. The quality of evidence was high or moderate for the majority of movements and type of reliability examined. Based on the evidence of low or very low quality of evidence, the convergent validity and discriminative validity of HHD were either sufficient, indeterminate, or insufficient. The reliability of HHD was overall sufficient, and HHD can be used to distinguish between individuals on the group level. The measurement error was not sufficient, and evaluation of treatment effect on the individual level should be interpreted with caution.

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING UPPER LIMB STRENGTH BY HAND-HELD DYNAMOMETRY

ABSTRACT Introduction The upper limbs are segments of the human body responsible for primary activities of daily life, and the muscles are essential structures for performing these activities. There have been few studies on intra- and inter-examiner reliability of the hand-held dynamometer (HHD) in healthy subjects, and none have been published that compare dynamometric evaluation methods in the main muscles in this segment. Objective Evaluate intra-examiner and inter-examiner assessment reliability of the hand-held dynamometry of upper limb muscles in healthy individuals, as well as comparing the assessment reliability between fixed and non-fixed methods. Methods Healthy subjects aged over 18 years were recruited for the study. The isometric contraction for ten muscle groups of the dominant upper limb was tested. For the fixed method, we used a system of suction cups, connected to the HHD by an inelastic belt. For the non-fixed method, the examiner supported the device by hand. The isometric contraction was sustained for three seconds. Each measurement was repeated three times, considering the highest value obtained. The reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The dispersion between measurements was expressed by a Bland-Altman plot. Results The sample consisted of 25 volunteers, all right-handed. The intra-examiner ICC was 0.89-0.99 for the non-fixed method, and 0.43 to 0.85 for the fixed method. Inter-examiner reliability showed equivalent behavior. This study showed that evaluation of upper limb muscle strength using an isometric dynamometer has excellent intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability. The supine position was chosen due to the need to propose a feasible protocol for clinical practice that could be replicated for the majority of publics and in different environments. The non-fixed method showed better reliability overall, demonstrating the feasibility of this tool without the need for adaptations, additional devices, or increased operating costs for this evaluation. Conclusion Comparison between the fixed and non-fixed HHD methods demonstrated superiority of the non-fixed method in terms of reliability. Level of evidence II; Investigation of a diagnostic exam - Development of diagnostic criteria with consecutive patients.

Reliability and validity of a return to sports testing battery for the shoulder

OBJECTIVE

To determine the validity, intra- and inter-rater, and absolute reliability of a return to sport testing battery for the shoulder in a healthy cohort.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional design. All participants completed a battery of strength (isokinetic, isometric, and repetition to failure) and functional assessments on two occasions. Concurrent validity to isokinetic testing was assessed, and intra-rater, inter-rater, and absolute reliability were established for all assessments.

SETTING

Controlled clinical environment.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty healthy adults active in recreational sports participated, mean age 24.0 ± 1.6 years; MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations (Pearson's r), reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient), Standard error of the measurement, Minimal detectable change.

RESULTS

Correlations to isokinetic assessments at 60° & 180°/second were moderate to strong for isometric (r: 0.68-0.80) and functional testing (r: 0.55-0.83) and weak for repetition to failure testing (r: 0.37-0.74). All isokinetic (ICC: 0.88-0.94), isometric (ICC: 0.83-0.94), and functional assessments (ICC: 0.80-0.92) had good to excellent intra-rater reliability, while repetition to failure testing had poor to moderate reliability (ICC: 0.48-0.57). The inter-rater reliability of the isometric assessments was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.71-0.92) across movements. Expressed as a percentage of the mean, the standard error of the measurement ranged from 7% to 25% and the minimal detectable change ranged from 20% to 69% across all assessment methods.

CONCLUSION

The isokinetic, isometric, and functional assessments used in this return to sports testing battery demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability. Further refinement to the methods used to assess muscular endurance is needed to improve reliability. This study offers clinicians information that can be utilized in clinical decision-making as it relates the testing battery's psychometric properties.

Clinical method to assess shoulder strength related to front crawl swimming power in male collegiate swimmers

[Purpose] Although a correlation has been reported between shoulder strength and maximum swimming power during arm-only swimming, the correlation between shoulder strength and maximum swimming power during front crawl swimming remains unclear. This study aimed to confirm the validity of a clinical assessment method for shoulder strength related to front crawl swimming power. [Participants and Methods] Study participants included 9 healthy male collegiate swimmers. Shoulder strength, including extension and internal rotation torque and swimming power, were measured. [Results] Maximum swimming power was significantly correlated with extension torque in the position of maximum shoulder abduction on the dominant side (r=0.844). No significant correlations were observed between the swimming velocity-to-swimming power ratio and the rate of bilateral differences in extension torque in the position of maximum shoulder abduction. [Conclusion] The extensor strength in the position of maximum shoulder abduction was significantly correlated with the maximum swimming power, suggesting that this assessment method is useful for front crawl swimmers. Notably, measurements on the dominant side may provide useful data that are essential in training to improve front crawl swimming propulsion.

The Athletic Shoulder (ASH) test: reliability of a novel upper body isometric strength test in elite rugby players

Objectives

Lower limb isometric tests are used to assess strength and strength asymmetries and monitor reductions in muscle force that may contribute to loss of performance and increase injury risk. Isometric tests in the upper body may be appropriate to monitor neuromuscular performance of the shoulder joint in sports involving contact and overhead actions. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of a novel upper body isometric strength test.

Methods

Eighteen elite rugby players (age 22.4±4.6 years; body mass 95.5±13.4 kg) were tested on consecutive days. Maximal isometric contractions using both limbs against a force platform were assessed at three angles of abduction (180°, ‘I’; 135°, ‘Y’ and 90°, ‘T’), in a prone lying position. To evaluate interday reliability, intraclass coefficients (ICC) were calculated for mean net peak force (NPF) and highest NPF achieved in any trial (peak NPF). Intratrial variability was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV), and the standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to calculate minimal detectable change (MDC).

Results

Interday reliability for NPF was excellent in all test positions (ICC 0.94–0.98). The test demonstrated high absolute reliability values (SEM 4.8–10.8) and interday measurement error was below 10% in all test positions (CV 5.0–9.9%) except for the non-dominant arm I-position (CV 11.3%). Minimum detectable change was between 13.2 and 25.9 N.

Conclusion

The Athletic Shoulder test demonstrated excellent reliability for each test position supporting its use as a reliable tool to quantify the ability to produce and transfer force across the shoulder girdle.

Correlation between isometric shoulder strength and racket velocity during badminton forehand smash movements: study of valid clinical assessment methods

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to confirm the correlation between racket velocity during the forehand smash movements with shoulder extensor strength and internal rotator strength in the neutral and abducted positions. [Subjects and Methods] Fourteen collegiate badminton players participated in the study. Measurements were performed shoulder strength, using torque calculated from the upper extremity length and the isometric force, and racket velocity during the forehand smash movements. The shoulder extensor strength and internal rotator strength were measured in the neutral and abducted positions. [Results] The extension torque and internal rotation torque of the shoulder in the neutral position were not significantly correlated with racket velocity. Additionally, correlations between extension torque of the shoulder in the maximum abducted position and racket velocity were insignificant. However, the internal rotation torque of the shoulder in the abducted external rotated position was significantly correlated with racket velocity (r=0.652). [Conclusion] The shoulder internal rotator strength in the abducted external rotated position are suitable measurements for evaluating badminton players.

Relationship between isometric shoulder strength and arms-only swimming power among male collegiate swimmers: study of valid clinical assessment methods

[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to confirm the relationships between shoulder strength (extensor strength and internal rotator strength) of the abducted position and swimming power during arm-only swimming. [Subjects and Methods] Fourteen healthy male collegiate swimmers participated in the study. Main measures were shoulder strength (strength using torque that was calculated from the upper extremity length and the isometric force of the abducted position) and swimming power. [Results] Internal rotation torque of the dominant side in the abducted external rotated position (r=0.85) was significantly correlated with maximum swimming power. The rate of bilateral difference in extension torque in the maximum abducted position (r=−0.728) was significantly correlated with the swimming velocity-to-swimming power ratio. [Conclusion] The results of this study suggest that internal rotator strength measurement in the abducted external rotated position and extensor strength measurement in the maximum abducted position are valid assessment methods for swimmers.