Effect of Neuro-Development Treatment on motor development in preterm infants

Neurodevelopmental Treatment in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Review of the Literature

This review aimed to explore the current literature on neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It also sought to determine what outcome measures are used to analyze the effect of NDT and whether these parameters are in line with the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The studies published in the English language between 2000 and 2023 were included based on a search of the databases PEDro, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies that examined the effect of NDT on children with CP were included. We found a total of 54 studies describing the effect of NDT in children with CP and these were included in this literature review. NDT in children with CP was found to have positive outcomes in 41 studies, while 13 studies had contradictory conclusions. Based on our findings, NDT is widely used for the rehabilitation of children with CP globally. The parameters used to assess the improvement mostly included gross motor function, balance, and postural control. The outcome measures used in studies are usually linked to body structure and function or activities domain of the ICF model by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, there is a scarcity of studies on the effect of NDT on participation, which should be the outcome of any rehabilitation program. There is scope for future research to demonstrate the effect of NDT on the participation of children with CP. Further studies with larger sample sizes and homogenous groups are recommended.

High Prevalence of Abnormal General Movements in Hospitalized Very Low Birth Weight Infants

OBJECTIVE

Abnormal general movements (GMs) are predictive of later risk of motor impairments in preterm infants. The goals of this study are to (1) describe the implementation of the GM assessment (GMA) in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and (2) investigate the prevalence and evolution of abnormal GMs in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study of GMs in VLBW infants (gestational age [GA] <32 weeks and/or birth weight [BW] <1,500 g) following GMA implementation in a level-IV NICU. All VLBW infants admitted between November 2017 and April 2019 were eligible for the GMA. Infants were excluded if they required high-frequency ventilation or if they could not be unbundled for video acquisition. GMAs were scored weekly by at least 2 GMA-certified providers.

RESULTS

The GMA was performed in 121 VLBW infants with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) GA of 28.3 (2.6) and BW of 1,113 (400 g). Only 28% of infants had normal GMs on initial assessment (32.9 ± 2.7 weeks' GA), while 61 and 11% had poor repertoire and cramped-synchronized GMs, respectively. At NICU discharge (37.6 ± 3.4 weeks corrected GA), 45 and 21% of infants were classified as having poor repertoire and cramped-synchronized GMs, respectively. Most infants with cramped-synchronized GMs on initial assessment had persistent abnormal GMs at discharge. In contrast, only one infant with normal GMs on first assessment developed cramped-synchronized GMs.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal GMs are common in VLBW infants, including a high prevalence of the more concerning cramped-synchronized movement pattern. The GMA can be successfully performed in VLBW infants. The GMA may be helpful in identifying infants at increased risk of later motor impairments, as well as assisting clinicians, in the stratification of infants who may benefit from additional brain imaging and/or an intensive hospital-based interventions.

KEY POINTS

· Abnormal GMs are common in VLBW infants.. · Poor repertoire in the most prevalent pattern observed.. · Infants at risk for abnormal motor outcomes can be identified in the NICU..

Functional movement assessment with the Test of Infant Motor Performance

The purpose of this article is to review research on the Test of Infant Motor Performance, a functional assessment of movement capabilities with age standards for infants from 34 weeks postmenstrual age through 17 weeks post term (corrected age). The Test of Infant Motor Performance was normed on a U.S. population-based sample to support its use as a tool for diagnosing delayed motor development in early infancy. The test is one of the preferred methods for parents of babies in special care nurseries to learn about their infant's development. The test was used in a variety of clinical trials to document effects of early therapy and can be used as a short-term outcome measure for other interventions expected to impact functional motor performance.

Effect of neonatal therapy on the motor, cognitive, and behavioral development of infants born preterm: a systematic review

AIM

To synthesize the existing literature and determine the efficacy of neonatal therapy, starting in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), on the motor, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes of infants born preterm.

METHOD

Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials or quasi-randomized controlled trials of direct therapy early intervention for infants with a gestational age of less than 37 weeks, initiated in the NICU and delivered by a therapist or parent with therapist support. Quality was evaluated using the Cochrane standardized risk of bias assessment tool. Recommendations were made using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were categorized into four intervention categories: (1) parent-delivered motor intervention (PDMI); (2) therapist-delivered postural control intervention (TDPCI); (3) developmental care; and (4) oromotor intervention. Risk of bias varied from low (10 studies) to high (three studies) or was unclear (two studies).

INTERPRETATION

Preliminary support indicates that daily PDMI improves motor and cognitive outcomes in the short-term and possibly long-term. TDPCI is effective in promoting short-term gains in motor development. Developmental care programs designed by a neonatal therapist appear to be effective in improving short-term behavior but are inconclusive for motor and cognitive outcomes or long-term behavioral outcomes. Regarding oromotor interventions, there is insufficient research to be confident in their efficacy on improving developmental outcomes.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Parent-delivered motor interventions (PDMIs) are more effective in improving motor and cognitive outcomes than other interventions. Preliminary support indicates that daily PDMI improves motor and cognitive outcomes in the short- and possibly long-term. Therapist-delivered postural control interventions are effective in promoting short-term gains in motor development. Developmental care programs designed by a neonatal therapist are effective in improving the short-term behavior of infants born preterm. Oral motor interventions were found to have no effect on improving developmental outcomes.