The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire

Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Introduction

Precise prediction of hospital stay duration is essential for maximizing resource utilization during surgery. Existing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery prediction models lack accuracy and generalizability. Machine learning can improve accuracy by considering preoperative factors. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for estimating hospital stay duration following decompression surgery for LSS.

Methods

Data from 848 patients who underwent decompression surgery for LSS at three hospitals were examined. Twelve prediction models, using 79 preoperative variables, were developed for postoperative hospital stay estimation. The top five models were chosen. Fourteen models predicted prolonged hospital stay (≥14 days), and the most accurate model was chosen. Models were validated using a randomly divided training sample (70%) and testing cohort (30%).

Results

The top five models showed moderate linear correlations (0.576-0.624) between predicted and measured values in the testing sample. The ensemble of these models had moderate prediction accuracy for final length of stay (linear correlation 0.626, absolute mean error 2.26 days, standard deviation 3.45 days). The c5.0 decision tree model was the top predictor for prolonged hospital stay, with accuracies of 89.63% (training) and 87.2% (testing). Key predictors for longer stay included JOABPEQ social life domain, facility, history of vertebral fracture, diagnosis, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of low back pain.

Conclusions

A machine learning-based model was developed to predict postoperative hospital stay after LSS decompression surgery, using data from multiple hospital settings. Numerical prediction of length of stay was not very accurate, although favorable prediction of prolonged stay was accomplished using preoperative factors. The JOABPEQ social life domain score was the most important predictor.

Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) as an indirect decompression technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and concomitant degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) patients. We utilized the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to assess treatment success and its impact on patient's quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

We included 124 patients who underwent LLIF. Pre- and postoperative JOABPEQ evaluations indicated treatment success. Subgroup analysis categorized patients' perceptions of surgery as beneficial or non-beneficial.

RESULTS

89% of patients (110/124) reported satisfaction with LLIF. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion achieved successful indirect decompression, increasing canal diameter and central canal area. Significant improvements occurred across all JOABPEQ domains, notably for low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health. Patients who perceived the surgery as beneficial experienced fewer postoperative complications, lower numeric rating scale scores for pain relief, and greater functional outcome improvements compared to non-beneficial patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the utility of JOABPEQ as a valuable and sensitive tool for assessing treatment effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes in DS and concomitant DLSS patients. Patients undergoing LLIF. The results affirm the favorable outcomes of LLIF as a surgical option for DLSS patients and emphasize the importance of considering patient perspectives when evaluating overall treatment success. The study provides valuable insights into the impact of indirect decompression on patients' QOL, supporting the effectiveness of LLIF as a minimally invasive technique for DLSS and DS management.

Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is a reliable and sensitive measure of disability to determine functional status and evaluate curative effects in low back pain, it has now been cross-cultural translated into many other languages and adapted for use in different countries. We aim to evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the JOABPEQ.

METHODS

Studies related to cross-cultural adaptation of the JOABPEQ in a specific language/culture were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, SinoMed, and Web of Science from their inception to March 2022. The Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments guideline were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

Nine different versions of cross-cultural JOABPEQ adaptations in 8 different languages/cultures were included. The adaptation process was not strictly performed, such as standard forward translation and expert committee review were rarely reported. Content validity (8/9), floor and ceiling effects (3/9), reliability (4/9), and interpretability (6/9) were assessed in most of the adaptations, while agreement (2/9), responsiveness (2/9), and the internal consistency (2/9) were not. JOABPEQ can replace functional and quality of life score to reduce the burden of scientific research.

CONCLUSION

We recommend Persian-Iranian, simplified Chinese-Chinese Mandarin, Thai and Gunaydin G's Turkish adaptations for application. The numerical pain rating scale/visual analogue scale in low back pain and lower extremities, as well as numbness in lower extremities could not be neglected in JOABPEQ adaptations.

Development and validation of machine learning-based predictive model for clinical outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although the results of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) are favorable, it is still difficult to predict the postoperative health-related quality of life of patients before surgery.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict the postoperative outcome of decompression surgery for patients with LSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A multicentered retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 848 patients who underwent decompression surgery for LSS at an academic hospital, tertiary center, and private hospital were included (age 71±9 years, 68% male, 91% LSS, level treated 1.8±0.8, operation time 69±37 minutes, blood loss 48±113 mL, and length of hospital stay 12±5 days).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline and 2 years postoperative health-related quality of life.

METHODS

The subjects were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to a model building cohort and a testing cohort to test the models' accuracy. Twelve predictive algorithms using 68 preoperative factors were used to predict each domain of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and visual analog scale scores at 2 years postoperatively. The final predictive values were generated using an ensemble of the top five algorithms in prediction accuracy.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients of the top algorithms for each domain established using the preoperative factors were excellent (correlation coefficient: 0.95-0.97 [relative error: 0.06-0.14]). The performance evaluation of each Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire domain and visual analog scale score by the ensemble of the top five algorithms in the testing cohort was favorable (mean absolute error [MAE] 8.9-17.4, median difference [MD] 8.1-15.6/100 points), with the highest accuracy for mental status (MAE 8.9, MD 8.1) and the lowest for buttock and leg numbness (MAE 1.7, MD 1.6/10 points). A strong linear correlation was observed between the predicted and measured values (linear correlation 0.82-0.89), while 4% to 6% of the subjects had predicted values of greater than±3 standard deviations of the MAE.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a machine learning model to predict the postoperative outcomes of decompression surgery for patients with LSS using patient data from three different institutions in three different settings. Thorough analyses for the subjects with deviations from the actual measured values may further improve the predictive probability of this model.

How Decompression Surgery Improves the Lower Back Pain in Patient with Lumbar Degenerative Stenosis: A Propensity-score-matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective case series of patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

OBJECTIVE

We investigated how laminectomy improves lower back pain (LBP) and the factors associated with poor improvement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar laminectomy is effective for alleviating neurological symptoms caused by LSS, whereas its effect on LBP is still controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 436 patients (age 72 yrs, 69% males) who underwent laminectomy for LSS with 2 years of follow-up. We analyzed the following risk factors for residual LBP by uni- and multivariate analyses: age, sex, smoking, occupation, comorbidities, frailty, joint replacement, vertebral fracture, DISH, HRQOL, complications, and the presence of spinal instability. The LBP of male and female patients was analyzed after propensity score matching of known confounders. Patient-reported outcomes (JOABPEQ and VAS scores) were obtained at baseline and the 2-year postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

LBP was significantly improved at 2 years post operation (VAS change 2.3 [95% CI 2.0-2.6], P < 0.01). Fifty-five percent of the patients achieved an MCID, with 67% having no or mild LBP. In the multivariate analysis, sex and baseline LBP were independent risk factors (female: OR 1.9 [1.2-3.0], baseline LBP [VAS≥7.5]: OR 1.9 [1.2-3.1]). Furthermore, the independent risk factors for severe baseline LBP were sex and mental status (female: OR 1.7 [1.1-2.7], P = 0.03, mental status: OR 3.8 [2.4-6.0], P < 0.01). However, an analysis of 102 pairs of propensity-score-matched male and female patients showed no difference in the improvement of LBP (male vs. female: VAS 3.8 ± 2.8 vs. 4.0 ± 2.9, P = 0.61, VAS change 3.1 ± 2.9 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0, P = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Decompression surgery for LSS significantly improved LBP. Sex and baseline LBP were risk factors for residual LBP. However, when males and females were matched by confounders, no difference was found in the LBP after surgery. Patients with severe baseline LBP may need further evaluation for their mental status because these patients are likely to have mental problems that potentially contribute to persistent LBP.Level of Evidence: 4.

How Preoperative Motor Weakness Affects the Extent of Recovery After Elective Spine Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine how baseline motor weakness (MW) affects elective spine surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Favorable clinical outcomes have been described for elective spine surgery in patients with LSS. However, the way preoperative MW affects the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgery is not well understood.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 305 surgically treated patients with LSS who had 2-year follow-up was performed (age 71 ± 9 yrs, male 62%). Demographic, radiographic, and clinical outcomes were analyzed at baseline and at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year postoperation. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoLs. The HRQoLs were compared between those with or without preop MW. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether MW affected HRQoLs.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients (38%) were categorized as MW+. The patient background including age, sex, presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis, type of surgery, and presence of neurological claudication were similar between the two groups. However, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year postoperative visual analogue scale of back pain, leg pain, leg numbness, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire lumbar function, social life, mental health, and walking ability were all inferior in the MW+ group, whereas a similar percentage of patients achieved a minimum clinically important difference in all subdomains at 3 years. The adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that having ≥2 muscles with MW, and severity of MW (manual motor test grade) were independent risk factors for both difficulty climbing stairs and walking >15 minutes. (muscles with MW≥2; stair climbing: OR 6.4[2.3-17.4], walking: OR 3.2[1.4-7.3], severity of MW; stair climbing: OR 2.5[1.4-4.4], walking: OR 2.2[1.3-3.7]).

CONCLUSION

The patients with baseline MW had inferior HRQoL for up to 3 years compared with that of those without MW; however, the amount of improvement in HRQoL was comparable. Timely follow-up is important to find out the deterioration of motor function.Level of Evidence: 4.

Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).

METHODS

Individuals with chronic low back pain were included. The data collection of the study occurred by means of online platform. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The theoretical version proposed for the JOABPEQ with five domains was tested. The following indices were considered to verify the fit of the model: comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF).

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 175 volunteers, mostly women (68%), adults (mean age of 28.98 years), lean (mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2), with incomplete higher education, single, with mean of pain chronicity of 61.50 months and mean of pain intensity of 6.78 points on the Numeric Pain Scale. Regarding the structure of the JOABPEQ, the original version with five domains was adequate: chi-square/DF=1.52, CFI=0.954, TLI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.055. The factorial load ranges from 0.41 to 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the structure of JOABPEQ with 5 domains (low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health) and 25 items in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Effect of Combined Traditional Acupuncture, Pharmacopuncture and Applied Kinesiology on Lumbar Diseases of Resident Patients

Objectives

Recently several Korean medical doctors have begun practicing applied kinesiology (AK). Although the efficacy of combining traditional acupuncture (TA) and pharmacopuncture (PP) on lumbar diseases such as lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar herniation of intervertebral disk (LHID) has been examined, the possible benefits of combining TA, PP and AK approaches have not been examined. Therefore the aim of this study was to develop effective treatment for lumbar disorders by combining TA, PP, and AK treatments.

Methods

Twenty-four patients hospitalized at Samse Korean Traditional Medicine Hospital between March and September 2018 with L5 or S1 root radiculopathy associated with LSS and LHID were included in this study. They were treated for 10 days with TA, PP and AK approaches that included category block, manipulation and strain/counterstrain treatments. The primary outcomes were mainly assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association lumbar scores (JOALS). JOALS were determined before the start of treatment as well as five and 10 days after treatment started.

Results

The treatments improved the lumbar condition of the patients based on JOA pain score.

Conclusion

The combined TA, PP and AK treatments were effective in treating spinal diseases of resident patients. Prospective, controlled, and relevant protocols using multimodal strategies to define the role of TA, PP and AK are needed.

Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Introduced in 2007, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) has been widely used, but its psychometric properties have not been well studied.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the JOABPEQ in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred three consecutive patients underwent lumbar surgeries between July 2013 and November 2015 in a single hospital. Of the 203 patients, 181 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Before and after surgery, the patients were asked to complete the questionnaire, including JOABPEQ, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The participants were divided into five anchoring groups, ranging from "much better" to "much worse," according to reports from both physicians and patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The responsiveness of measures was compared among five domains of the JOABPEQ ("low back pain," "walking ability," "lumbar function," "social function," and "mental health"), two domains of the SF-8 (the physical component summary [PCS] and the mental component summary [MCS]), and the EQ-5D. The responsiveness was assessed by the paired t test, the effect size, and the standardized response mean. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were assessed using the five anchoring groups as external criteria. The clinically important differences, based on the ROC curve, were assessed.

RESULTS

Walking ability was most responsive, followed by low back pain and the PCS. The MCS was least responsive, followed by mental health and lumbar function. Social function and the EQ-5D had intermediate-level responsiveness. The substantial clinically important differences occurred at 20 points for low back pain and lumbar function, 23 points for walking ability, 14 points for social function, and 8 points for mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The JOABPEQ domains are responsive measures in patients who undergo lumbar surgery. For physical function, the threshold for substantial clinically important differences was approximately 20 points for the JOABPEQ.