1
|
Haas JW, Fortner MO, Woodham TJ, Harrison DE. Reducing Chronic Spine Pain in an Adult Male by Decreasing Lumbar Scoliosis and Increasing Cervical Lordosis Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Protocols: A 26-Month Follow-Up Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e68393. [PMID: 39224496 PMCID: PMC11366306 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
We present a case report of a patient suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), both of which were caused and complicated by a physically demanding occupation, a history of mixed martial arts, and lumbar scoliosis. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic findings were observed following conservative spine rehabilitation. The patient, a 34-year-old male, had experienced chronic spine pain, particularly CLBP and CNSNP, for several years. He reported severe pain and increasing disability after a recent neck injury sustained while practicing jiu-jitsu. Radicular pain, along with numbness and tingling, was noted in the right upper extremity, extending to the first three digits, and there were also altered sensations and temperature changes in both feet. He described sharp, pinching mid-back pain and worsening disability due to the persistent pain, which led him to seek manual manipulative chiropractic spine therapy, though he reported little benefit from it. The patient had relied on over-the-counter pain medications for many years without achieving long-term pain and disability relief, and these medications were no longer used following treatment. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to improve coronal and sagittal balance, as well as paraspinal muscular strength, addressing posture, mobility, and related aspects. These protocols include postural exercises, postural Mirror Image® traction, and postural spinal manipulative therapy. All PROs improved, with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of chronic spine pain. Outcomes measured included disability indices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators. Radiographic parameter improvements were significant, demonstrating improved coronal and sagittal balance as a result of the treatment. Following 30 in-office treatments, administered three times per week for 10 weeks, initial outcomes were reassessed. The patient then received 13 in-office treatments periodically over one year, and all initial outcomes were repeated. The improvements remained stable over time. A 26-month follow-up found that the improvements were sustained over a very long period without additional treatment after the 13-month examination. Chronic spine pain, specifically CLBP and CNSNP, is a significant source of suffering and contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Improvement in HRQoLs, PROs, and objective spine parameters are desirable clinical outcomes. Our case report documents objective improvement in lumbar scoliosis and spine pain, which is rare in conservative studies. This successful treatment of chronic pain with long-term follow-up contributes to the growing evidence supporting conservative, non-surgical treatments for CNSNP and CLBP. Successful management of chronic spine pain was observed in a patient undergoing CBP® treatment. The treatment was designed to address abnormal sagittal and coronal postural balance and radiographic abnormalities indicating spinal misalignment and reassess progress in PROs, as well as objective and subjective HRQoL measures, both following treatment and 13 months later. However, larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason W Haas
- Research, Chiropractic BioPhysics (CBP) NonProfit, Eagle, USA
| | - Miles O Fortner
- Chiropractic Biophysics, Western Plains Chiropractic, Gillette, USA
| | - Thomas J Woodham
- Chiropractic Biophysics, Western Plains Chiropractic, Gillette, USA
| | - Deed E Harrison
- Research, Chiropractic BioPhysics (CBP) NonProfit, Eagle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fortner MO, Woodham TJ, Haas JW, Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Failed back surgery syndrome successfully ameliorated with Chiropractic Biophysics ® structural rehabilitation improving pain, disability as well as sagittal and coronal balance: a Chiropractic Biophysics ® case report with a 6 year follow-up. J Phys Ther Sci 2024; 36:44-50. [PMID: 38186967 PMCID: PMC10766406 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] To present the case of the amelioration of chronic pain and disability in a patient suffering from failed back surgery syndrome. [Participant and Methods] A 27-year-old male with chronic low back pain was treated with a Coflex® intra-spinous instrument, however, it was removed shortly after due to poor outcome including worsening pain and disability. Radiographic assessment revealed significant posterior translation of the thorax complicated by significant loss of the normal lumbar lordosis and a left lateral translated thoracic cage posture. Chiropractic Biophysics® technique was applied over a 5.5-month period leading to structural spine improvements as well as improved pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and quality of life (QOL). [Results] There was a 21 mm reduction in posterior thoracic translation, a 6.2° improvement in lumbar lordosis and a 16 mm reduction in lateral thoracic translation corresponding with improved ODI and QOL scores. A 6 year follow-up showed successful outcome despite some degenerative changes in the spine at the prior surgical level. [Conclusion] This case adds to the growing literature showing the efficacy of non-surgical spinal rehabilitative methods in improving outcomes in patients with spinal deformity and associated disabilities. This case also demonstrates necessity of the continued criterion standard of spinal radiography for biomechanical assessment.
Collapse
|
3
|
Villa JJ, Zhao Z, Pan W, Guo Y. Reduction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Improved Z-Axis Alignment of the Entire Spine When Treating a Symptomatic Patient Using a Multidisciplinary Approach: A Case Report. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:917519. [PMID: 36188902 PMCID: PMC9397792 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.917519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background This study presents findings on improvements of both the X-axis and Z-axis posture in a young female with adolescent idiopathic, scoliosis suffering from pain complaints who was treated with a multidisciplinary approach. Case Presentation The 15-year-old patient reported low back pain for several months. Full spine radiographic assessment revealed a cervical kyphosis, forward head translation, a right ribcage translation, a left higher shoulder, and a dextroconvex lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of 23°. The patient was treated with novel ASPINE Systems treatment protocols incorporating posture exercises, muscle balancing exercises, spinal 3D traction, and spinal manipulation. Results Assessment after 50 treatment sessions over 32 weeks revealed a dramatic improvement in postural distortions. The cervical kyphosis was reduced by 9° and was accompanied by a reduction in forward head posture, centering of the thoracic spine, leveling off her shoulders, and a reduction in the dextroconvex scoliosis by 10°. The lower back pain was relieved. Conclusion A reduction of postural distortions including idiopathic adolescent scoliosis resulted from a multidisciplinary approach utilizing ASPINE Systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Jesus Villa
- Xuyang Doctor Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Juan Jesus Villa
| | - Zhiyang Zhao
- ASPINE Health Group, Inc., Union City, CA, United States
| | - Weicheng Pan
- Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongfei Guo
- Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oakley PA, Kallan SZ, Harrison DE. The reduction of high thoracic scoliosis in adults by mirror image<sup>®</sup> blocking: a Chiropractic BioPhysics<sup>®</sup> case series. J Phys Ther Sci 2022; 34:467-472. [PMID: 35698559 PMCID: PMC9170485 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] A case series is featured demonstrating reduction of curvature in three adult
patients who presented with a mild to moderate severity of a uniquely high thoracic
curvature clinical presentation. [Participants and Methods] Three adult patients who
presented with an upper thoracic scoliosis deformity of mild to moderate severity
underwent Chiropractic BioPhysics® treatment protocols to treat their
deformity. Radiographic stress imaging was performed to correctly position and ascertain
potential treatment effect of the Denneroll spinal orthotic device. Patients performed
spinal traction for 10–20 minutes daily with intermittent spinal manipulative therapy.
[Results] There was a 4.5° average reduction in computerized Cobb angle measurement after
treatment. All patients reported reductions in spinal pain and also reported subjective
improvements in sleep quality and quality of life. [Conclusion] Mild reductions in
uniquely high thoracic curves can be reduced in adult scoliosis patients with mild to
moderate (17°–26°) curve magnitudes by CBP treatment protocols. Stress X-ray images are
recommended to properly place the fulcrum and assess correction potential.
Collapse
|
5
|
Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Radiophobic Fear-Mongering, Misappropriation of Medical References and Dismissing Relevant Data Forms the False Stance for Advocating Against the Use of Routine and Repeat Radiography in Chiropractic and Manual Therapy. Dose Response 2021; 19:1559325820984626. [PMID: 33628151 PMCID: PMC7883173 DOI: 10.1177/1559325820984626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a faction within the chiropractic profession passionately advocating against the routine use of X-rays in the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with spinal disorders (aka subluxation). These activists reiterate common false statements such as "there is no evidence" for biomechanical spine assessment by X-ray, "there are no guidelines" supporting routine imaging, and also promulgate the reiterating narrative that "X-rays are dangerous." These arguments come in the form of recycled allopathic "red flag only" medical guidelines for spine care, opinion pieces and consensus statements. Herein, we review these common arguments and present compelling data refuting such claims. It quickly becomes evident that these statements are false. They are based on cherry-picked medical references and, most importantly, expansive evidence against this narrative continues to be ignored. Factually, there is considerable evidential support for routine use of radiological imaging in chiropractic and manual therapies for 3 main purposes: 1. To assess spinopelvic biomechanical parameters; 2. To screen for relative and absolute contraindications; 3. To reassess a patient's progress from some forms of spine altering treatments. Finally, and most importantly, we summarize why the long-held notion of carcinogenicity from X-rays is not a valid argument.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pu Chu EC, Chakkaravarthy DM, Huang KHK, Ho VWK, Lo FS, Bhaumik A. Changes in radiographic parameters following chiropractic treatment in 10 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective chart review. Clin Pract 2020; 10:1258. [PMID: 32952984 PMCID: PMC7482186 DOI: 10.4081/cp.2020.1258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective chart review was undertaken to investigate the role of chiropractic intervention for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Ten cases of patients with AIS, mean age 13.3 years, undergoing chiropractic adjustment were retrospectively evaluated. Chart review was performed to extract age, medical history and treatment intervention. The magnitude of scoliosis was quantified using the Cobb method on standing radiographs. A comparison of the measurements from pre- and post-treatment radiographs revealed that Cobb angle reduced from average 29.7° down to average 23.4° (average 21.2% correction). Improvements in spinal morphologies were observed in most curves (64%, n=9/14) and curve stabilization in the rest (36%, n=5/14). A better correction was obtained in cases of mild and moderate AIS. In terms of stabilizing progression (≤5o curve progression) or correcting curvatures (≥6° reduction), radiological changes were observed in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chun Pu Chu
- New York Chiropractic and Physiotherapy Centre, Mongkok, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | - Vicky Wei Kye Ho
- New York Chiropractic and Physiotherapy Centre, Mongkok, Hong Kong, China
| | - Fa-Sain Lo
- New York Chiropractic and Physiotherapy Centre, Mongkok, Hong Kong, China
| | - Amiya Bhaumik
- Lincoln University College, Jalan Kota Bharu-Pengkalan Kubor, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Are Restrictive Medical Radiation Imaging Campaigns Misguided? It Seems So: A Case Example of the American Chiropractic Association's Adoption of "Choosing Wisely". Dose Response 2020; 18:1559325820919321. [PMID: 32425722 PMCID: PMC7218311 DOI: 10.1177/1559325820919321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the 1980s, increased utilization of medical radiology, primarily computed tomography, has doubled medically sourced radiation exposures. Ensuing fear-mongering media headlines of iatrogenic cancers from these essential medical diagnostic tools has led the public and medical professionals alike to display escalating radiophobia. Problematically, several campaigns including Image Gently, Image Wisely, and facets of Choosing Wisely propagate fears of all medical radiation, which is necessary for the delivery of effective and efficient health care. Since there are no sound data supporting the alleged risks from low-dose radiation and since there is abundant evidence of health benefits from low-doses, these imaging campaigns seem misguided. Further, thresholds for cancer are 100 to 1000-fold greater than X-rays, which are within the realm of natural background radiation where no harm has ever been validated. Here, we focus on radiographic imaging for use in spinal rehabilitation by manual therapists, chiropractors, and physiotherapists as spinal X-rays represent the lowest levels of radiation imaging and are critical in the diagnosis and management of spine-related disorders. Using a case example of a chiropractic association adopting "Choosing Wisely," we argue that these campaigns only fuel the pervasive radiophobia and continue to constrain medical professionals, attempting to deliver quality care to patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Oakley PA, Ehsani NN, Harrison DE. The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful? Dose Response 2019; 17:1559325819852810. [PMID: 31217755 PMCID: PMC6560808 DOI: 10.1177/1559325819852810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concerns that repeated radiographs given to patients are carcinogenic. Some studies have used the linear no-threshold model to derive cancer-risk estimates; however, it is invalid for low-dose irradiation (ie, X-rays); these estimates are untrue. Other studies have calculated cancer-risk ratios from long-term health data of historic scoliosis cohorts. Since data indicate reduced cancer rates in a cohort receiving a total radiation dose between 50 and 300 mGy, it is unlikely that scoliosis patients would get cancer from repeated X-rays. Moreover, since the threshold for leukemia is about 1100 mGy, scoliosis patients will not likely develop cancers from spinal X-rays. Scoliosis patients likely have long-term health consequences, including cancers, from the actual disease entity itself and not from protracted X-ray radiation exposures that are essential and indeed safe.
Collapse
|
9
|
Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Radiophobia: 7 Reasons Why Radiography Used in Spine and Posture Rehabilitation Should Not Be Feared or Avoided. Dose Response 2018; 16:1559325818781445. [PMID: 30013456 PMCID: PMC6043928 DOI: 10.1177/1559325818781445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based contemporary spinal rehabilitation often requires radiography. Use of radiography (X-rays or computed tomography scans) should not be feared, avoided, or have their exposures lessened to decrease patient dose possibly jeopardizing image quality. This is because all fears of radiation exposures from medical diagnostic imaging are based on complete fabrication of health risks based on an outdated, invalid linear model that has simply been propagated for decades. We present 7 main arguments for continued use of radiography for routine use in spinal rehabilitation: (1) the linear no-threshold model for radiation risk estimates is invalid for low-dose exposures; (2) low-dose radiation enhances health via the body's adaptive response mechanisms (ie, radiation hormesis); (3) an X-ray with low-dose radiation only induces 1 one-millionth the amount of cellular damage as compared to breathing air for a day; (4) radiography is below inescapable natural annual background radiation levels; (5) radiophobia stems from unwarranted fears and false beliefs; (6) radiography use leads to better patient outcomes; (7) the risk to benefit ratio is always beneficial for routine radiography. Radiography is a safe imaging method for routine use in patient assessment, screening, diagnosis, and biomechanical analysis and for monitoring treatment progress in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Haggard JS, Haggard JB, Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Reduction of progressive thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by chiropractic biophysics ® (CBP ®) mirror image ® methods following failed traditional chiropractic treatment: a case report. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29:2062-2067. [PMID: 29200657 PMCID: PMC5702847 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.2062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] To present a case demonstrating the reduction of progressive thoracolumbar
scoliosis by incorporating Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®)
technique’s mirror image® exercises, traction and blocking procedures based on
the ‘non-commutative properties of finite rotation angles under addition’ engineering law.
[Subject and Methods] A 15-year-old female presented with a right thoracolumbar scoliosis
having a Cobb angle from T5–L3 of 27° and suffering from headaches and lower back pains.
Her curve had progressed over the last two years despite being under traditional
chiropractic care. [Results] The patient was treated using CBP structural rehabilitation
protocols incorporating mirror image traction, home blocking, corrective exercises and
spinal manipulation. The patient was treated 24 times (including 45 home self-treatment
blocking sessions) over the course of 15-weeks. Her thoracolumbar curve reduced from 27°
to 8° and her headache and low back pain disability improved significantly. [Conclusion]
CBP mirror image exercises and traction are consistent with other successful non-surgical
approaches and show promise in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul A Oakley
- Private Practice: 11A-1100 Gorham Street, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 8Y8, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|