Changes in exercise tolerance and quality of life are unrelated in lung cancer survivors who undergo video-assisted thoracic surgery

The impact of lung surgery, with or without (neo-)adjuvant therapy, on physical functioning in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patients with early stage (I-IIIA) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are typically treated via surgery, often accompanied by (neo-)adjuvant therapy. These interventions impose a significant burden on patients and potentially impact their physical functioning (PF). The impact on PF remains uncertain and existing evidence has not yet been systematically outlined.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence concerning the effects of lung surgery, with or without (neo-)adjuvant therapy, on the PF of patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 July 2023. A comprehensive framework based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health was used to define various aspects of PF. Longitudinal studies, reporting PF prior to and after NSCLC treatment, and cross-sectional studies reporting PF after treatment were included.

RESULTS

85 included studies assessed the effects of surgery with (n=7) or without (n=78) (neo-) adjuvant therapy on body function (n=29), activity (n=67) and/or participation (n=15). 98% of reported outcomes within the longitudinal studies indicate a decline in PF, with 52% demonstrating significant deteriorations, with follow-up times ranging from immediately post-operative up to 1 year after treatment. Cross-sectional studies show impaired PF in 71% of reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

PF of patients with NSCLC tends to deteriorate following lung surgery, irrespective of additional (neo-)adjuvant therapy. While the negative impact of lung surgery on ICF categories of "body function" and "activity" have been described to some depth, insights into the impact on "participation" are lacking.

Factors Related to Functional Capacity Deterioration in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A decline in functional capacity is anticipated after lung resection. However, the factors related to functional capacity deterioration in surgical lung cancer patients have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors related to functional capacity deterioration and the trajectory of functional capacity after lung cancer surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus were searched between January 2010 and July 2022. Two reviewers conducted a critical appraisal of individual sources. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

This review presents evidence for risk factors related to functional capacity deterioration after lung cancer surgery, including patient characteristics (age), preoperative clinical factors (vital capacity, quadriceps force, B-type natriuretic peptide level), surgery-related factors (surgical procedure, duration of chest tube drainage, postoperative complications), and postoperative clinical factor (C-reactive protein level). Most patients had a significant decline in functional capacity in the short term (≤1 month from surgery). In the medium term (1 to ≤6 months from surgery), although the functional capacity did not return to the preoperative level, the decline became insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to review factors related to functional capacity in lung cancer patients. The findings can help clinicians to better identify patients at risk of functional capacity decline and allocate clinical resources more efficiently.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The risk factors related to the functional capacity decline in surgical lung cancer patients should be evaluated routinely during perioperative nursing assessments. Preoperative and postoperative nursing interventions can potentially improve modifiable risk factors and prevent functional capacity deterioration.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation-clinical outcomes: impact of leg muscle strength

OBJECTIVES

Muscle strength decline is reported to predict mortality in many cancers. However, there is little knowledge of the relation between muscle strength decline and clinical outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study aimed to determine the impact of pre-transplant lower extremity muscle strength (LEMS) on post-transplant overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 97 adult patients underwent allo-HSCT during 2012-2020. LEMS was defined as knee extension force divided by patient's body weight. The patients were divided into low and high LEMS groups based on pre-transplant LEMS. OS was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. The cumulative incidence of NRM was evaluated using the Fine and Gray method, with relapse considered as a competing risk event.

RESULTS

Probability of OS was significantly lower in the low LEMS groups (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.12, p=0.014) than in the high LEMS group on multivariate analysis. Five-year OS was 25.8% and 66.4% in the low and high LEMS groups, respectively. Risk of NRM was significantly higher in the low LEMS group (HR 4.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 15.68, p=0.019) than in the high LEMS group. The cumulative incidence of NRM was 41.4% and 11.1% in the low and high LEMS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant LEMS was a significant factor in predicting OS and NRM.

Quality of life and lung function after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES

Impact of pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) on quality of life (QOL) is not widely reported. We investigated QOL and lung function after P/D.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed among patients who underwent P/D for malignant mesothelioma between June 2014 and June 2018 at Hyogo College of Medicine. Data at 4 points before and 3, 6 and 12 months on QOL and lung function were evaluated with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and pulmonary function tests.

RESULTS

Forty-five out of 65 patients completed SF-36. Physical function and role physical decreased from 78 to 65 and 69 to 41 and did not recover. Body pain decreased from 74 to 52. It increased to 62 at 12 months but was lower than before. General health perceptions, vitality and social function decreased from 56 to 49, 50 to 47 and 63 to 50, respectively, but returned to baseline. Role emotional decreased from 75 to 54, then once increased to 63, but decreased again to 58. Mental health tended to improve from 58 to 70. Thirty-eight patients out of 45 completed pulmonary function tests. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s decreased from 98% to 61% and 93% to 67% and did not increase. Right-sided surgery or complications was the risk factors of poor lung function but no significant risk factors in QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that P/D had an impact on QOL. Despite the lack of recovery in lung function QOL in mental aspects tended to improve, suggesting that pulmonary function tests alone are limited in assessing QOL.

Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Early stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Is there Enough Data to Make a Recommendation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Health reported quality of life test (HRQOLT) in oncologic patients has become a major concern. Early stage in non-small cell lung cancer has two options for treatment in fragile population: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Which option should be recommended in daily clinical practice remains a challenging question. The current review is addressing this concern. Among 1256 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria and 2034 patients were analyzed treated either with VATS or SBRT. Eleven manuscripts in SBRT, five VATS studies, and three reviews were summarized in the present review. In fragile population, SBRT seems to be a valuable option of treatment with minor or no changes in HRQOLT. However, baseline quality of life status or geriatric assessment tools before treatment could be a good strategy to select appropriate population for undergoing SBRT or surgery.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

In this paper, we present a systematic review where we compare the current evidence of two options for treatment in fragile population: SBRT and VATS.