Cognitive assessment in severe dementia and lower levels of education: reducing negligence

Clinical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of the revised Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination (ACE-R) in older adults with a low educational level

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R) as a cognitive screening tool for older adults with low levels of schooling and healthy aging, MCI and dementia in Brazil. Methods: All participants underwent neurological and psychiatric examinations and were administered a validated version of ACE-R. Results: A total of 85 participants were evaluated; most were females (84.7%, n = 72). The post hoc analysis showed statistical differences in ACE-R total scores between older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and controls (p < 0.001) and in subitem scores including verbal fluency, language, visuospatial skills and attention (p < 0.001). The visual-spatial skills subitem was the most strongly correlated with schooling level (r = 0.509, p < 0.001), whereas late, immediate recall and recognition memory were not influenced by schooling. The ACE-R had the best diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between MCI and controls = 0.69 (<57.5; 80/66), MD and controls = 0.98 (<50; 100/96), MCI and MD = 0.86 (<49.5; 100/74). Conclusions: ACE-R and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores for older adults with MCI and controls were significantly lower than those reported in similar studies. These preliminary findings support the need for establishing reliable cut-off scores for cognitive assessment of older Brazilian adults with low schooling at risk for dementia taking into consideration ecological and local variables.

The Brief Cognitive Impairment Scale (BCIS): preliminary investigation of a severe-stage dementia test emphasizing cognitive processing and interpersonal tolerance

We describe the development and validation of The Brief Cognitive Impairment Scale (BCIS), a cognitive screening instrument designed for persons with severe-stage dementia. Psychometric analyses were performed on neuropsychological data from long-term care residents (N = 247) who completed a brief battery of tests, including the BCIS. A principle component analysis yielded three factors that provide insight into how persons with severe dementia cognitively process information and may tolerate specific aspects of social stimulation, such as during personal care. A BCIS cut score can be used to identify severe dementia with a sensitivity of .82, a specificity of .84, and an area under the curve of .89. It may be used by clinicians or caregivers when advanced dementia is suspected, as an alternative to measures with suspected floor effects, when residents cannot tolerate more demanding assessment tools, and as part of non-pharmacologic treatment plans for behavior disturbances associated with dementia.

Validation of the English Version of the Multimodal Assessment of Capacities in Severe Dementia (MAC-SD): A Cognitive and Functional Scale for Use in Severe Dementia

BACKGROUND

Most existing screening instruments that assess cognition and functioning in dementia suffer from floor effects, limiting their utility in severely demented patients. In 2015, the first author devised a new instrument, The Multimodal Assessment of Capacities in Severe Dementia (MAC-SD), to address this need. The MAC-SD Spanish version proved reliable, valid, and useful for evaluating patients with severe dementia.

OBJECTIVE

This report presents the results of a field trial of the English version of the MAC-SD in a U.S. population.

METHODS

The MAC-SD was administered to 40 participants with severe dementia along with gold standard measures of cognition and functioning in dementia (the Severe Mini-Mental State Exam, the Severe Impairment Battery, the Global Deterioration Scale, and the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living). Data analysis was performed to determine floor effects, reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The MAC-SD showed no significant floor effects, acceptable reliability, convergent validity with control measures, internal validity, and known groups validity. Of participants who scored the lowest possible on control measures, MAC-SD scores ranged widely. The MAC-SD was highly sensitive to change, and was able to detect changes not seen on control measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The MAC-SD English version is reliable and valid for use in the cognitive and functional assessment of patients with severe dementia. It gives more detailed information than control instruments about the cognitive and functional abilities of patients with the most severe dementia, and is able to detect changes in these patients not shown by control measures.