Is a second cycle of immunoglobulin justified in axonal forms of Guillain-Barré syndrome?

Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin retreatment amongst Guillain-Barré syndrome patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG cycle: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Small cross-sectional studies and case reports observed improvement after administration of second IVIG dose (SID) amongst Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) patients not responsive to initial IVIG cycle. Nevertheless, recent clinical trial and larger observational studies did not find any positive effects of SID. Instead, an increased risk of thromboembolism and mortality was noted. The conclusions of these studies however were not robust as confounding and selection bias were present.

METHODOLOGY

Two neurologists conducted the search process (KBA and MBP) using the following terms in Medline: [(" Guillain-Barré Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] or GBS or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy) AND (Poorly Responsive or Poor Prognosis or Progressive)] AND [("Intravenous Immunoglobulin"[MeSH Terms] or IVIG or IGIV) AND (second dose or retreatment or SID)].

RESULTS

Only 7 articles were included in this review. In terms of primary outcomes, although the cross-sectional study found improvement in GBS DS score at 4 weeks (Median GBS DS: 3 vs 5, p = 0.033) and the 2 case series observed improvement after SID, no significant differences between the control and intervention groups were found in the cohort [Early SIV OR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.16-3.04), Late SIV OR: 0.66 (CI: 0.18-2.5)] and clinical trial studies (Adjusted OR: 1.4 (95% CI:0.6-3.3, p = 0.45). Moreover, 4 patients who died in the clinical trial were from the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Based on studies with research designs of higher quality, SID is not effective in the management of GBS patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG. Nevertheless, an adequately powered, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, using GBS-DS of 3 and above after first IVIG dose should be done to effectively establish the efficacy and safety of SID as intervention for this cohort of patients.

Two unusual cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome after snake bite: the rare immune mediated complication of Elapid venom

In this report, we present a series of two unusual cases of elapid snakebite with acute neuroparalysis, that after initial response to standard anti-snake venom therapy, developed recurrence of disabling quadriparesis with dysautonomia, that on detailed evaluation turned out to be immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy (GB syndrome). Both the cases then responded to therapy with intravenous immunoglobulins. These cases bring out the rare immune-mediated late complication of snake venom, which if recognized and treated in time, can significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality.

Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with chronic hepatitis B: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a postinfectious autoimmune peripheral neuropathy characterized by acute paralysis of the limbs. Clinically, extrahepatic manifestations of neurologic involvement in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are uncommon. Little attention has been paid to the relationship between GBS and CHB viral infection.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We presented a severe case of a 34-year-old man with general fatigue, anorexia, jaundice, numbness, and even muscle atrophy in the limbs, and respiratory failure during an acute exacerbation of CHB.

DIAGNOSES

Serological liver enzymes test confirmed an acute exacerbation of CHB. Nerve conduction studies revealed the features of acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy combined with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed albuminocytologic dissociation. Clinical manifestations and the test results were consistent with a diagnosis of severe CHB-related GBS.

INTERVENTIONS

He was treated with mechanical ventilation, 2 courses of intravenous immunoglobulin, antichronic hepatitis B drugs therapy supplemented by hepatoprotection, acupuncture and rehabilitation.

OUTCOMES

After 29 days of hospitalization, his neurological condition improved. At a 6-month follow-up visit, he was able to walk with the support of another person.

LESSONS

The acute exacerbation of CHB may be a potential predisposing factor for the onset of GBS. This case is a reminder to clinicians that during the acute exacerbation of CHB, patients with neurological symptoms in the limbs should be considered for potential CHB-related GBS.

Second intravenous immunoglobulin dose in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis (SID-GBS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment with one standard dose (2 g/kg) of intravenous immunoglobulin is insufficient in a proportion of patients with severe Guillain-Barré syndrome. Worldwide, around 25% of patients severely affected with the syndrome are given a second intravenous immunoglobulin dose (SID), although it has not been proven effective. We aimed to investigate whether a SID is effective in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with a predicted poor outcome.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (SID-GBS), we included patients (≥12 years) with Guillain-Barré syndrome admitted to one of 59 participating hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were included on the first day of standard intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (2 g/kg over 5 days). Only patients with a poor prognosis (score of ≥6) according to the modified Erasmus Guillain-Barré syndrome Outcome Score were randomly assigned, via block randomisation stratified by centre, to SID (2 g/kg over 5 days) or to placebo, 7-9 days after inclusion. Patients, outcome adjudicators, monitors, and the steering committee were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the Guillain-Barré syndrome disability score 4 weeks after inclusion. All patients in whom allocated trial medication was started were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 2224/NL2107.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 16, 2010, and June 5, 2018, 327 of 339 patients assessed for eligibility were included. 112 had a poor prognosis. Of those, 93 patients with a poor prognosis were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 49 (53%) received SID and 44 (47%) received placebo. The adjusted common odds ratio for improvement on the Guillain-Barré syndrome disability score at 4 weeks was 1·4 (95% CI 0·6-3·3; p=0·45). Patients given SID had more serious adverse events (35% vs 16% in the first 30 days), including thromboembolic events, than those in the placebo group. Four patients died in the intervention group (13-24 weeks after randomisation).

INTERPRETATION

Our study does not provide evidence that patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome with a poor prognosis benefit from a second intravenous immunoglobulin course; moreover, it entails a risk of serious adverse events. Therefore, a second intravenous immunoglobulin course should not be considered for treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome because of a poor prognosis. The results indicate the need for treatment trials with other immune modulators in patients severely affected by Guillain-Barré syndrome.

FUNDING

Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds and Sanquin Plasma Products.

Are Repeated Cycles of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Justified in Patients With Poorly Responsive Guillain-Barré Syndrome?

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a life-threatening form of inflammatory polyneuropathy. Immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been used successfully in the treatment of GBS. In this case report, we present a severe axonal form of GBS that showed improvement after 3 cycles of IVIG. Repeated cycles of IVIG may be an option for treating severe forms of GBS not responding to the first course of such treatment. The recent work suggests that patients who are severely affected and have severe gadolinium enhancement on the magnetic resonance imaging of the spine should be considered for retreatment with IVIG. Although the cost of management was high, the outcome was excellent, which is definitely considered a reasonable approach. This case report is an urgent call for performing large multicenter trials on the use of repeated cycles of IVIG in the management of severe cases of GBS.

Rescue treatment in patients with poorly responsive Guillain-Barre syndrome

Objectives:

To evaluate the effectiveness of rescue treatment (intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange) in patients with Guillain–Barre syndrome who did not respond or deteriorated after the initial management with intravenous immunoglobulin.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who responded poorly or did not respond to intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. The disability parameters of those who received second-line treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange (20 patients) were compared with those who did not receive second-line treatment (19 patients).

Results:

There was a statistically significant improvement in disability scores at 1 month in the patients who received the rescue treatment (p = 0.033). However, there was no significant difference in the disability scores at 3 and 6 months, or in length of intensive care unit stay.

Conclusion:

Our study showed that a second course of treatment to carefully selected patients may be beneficial

Second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients with poor prognosis (SID-GBS trial): Protocol for a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

One course of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) of 2 g/kg is standard treatment in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients unable to walk independently. Despite treatment some patients recover poorly, in part related to rapid consumption of IVIg, indicating that they may benefit from a second course of IVIg. The aim of the study is to determine whether a second course of IVIg, administered 1 week after start of the first course in patients with GBS and predicted poor outcome improves functional outcome on the GBS disability scale after 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include adverse events (AEs), Medical Research Council sumscore and GBS disability score after 8, 12, and 26 weeks, length of hospital and ICU admission, mortality, and changes in serum IgG levels. GBS patients of 12 years and older with a poor prognosis, based on the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score (mEGOS) at 1 week after start of the first IVIg course are eligible for randomization in this double-blind, placebo-controlled (IVIg or albumin) clinical trial. This study will determine if a second course of IVIg administered in the acute phase of the disease is safe, feasible, and effective in patients with GBS and a poor prognosis. This Dutch trial is registered prospectively as NTR 2224 in the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) which is the Primary Registry in the WHO Registry Network for the Netherlands.

Disturbance of Plasma Lipid Metabolic Profile in Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory disease of the peripheral nervous system. Given that plasma metabolic profiles in GBS patients have never been explored, plasma samples of 38 GBS patients, 22 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and 40 healthy controls were analyzed by using untargeted and targeted metabolomics analysis. The untargeted analysis showed that levels of a set of plasma lipid metabolites were significantly decreased in GBS patients compared to the controls. Furthermore, the targeted analysis demonstrated that levels of 41 metabolites in GBS patients were significantly changed compared to either the controls or MS patients. A further metabolic analysis showed that 12 of 41 metabolites were significantly lower in classical GBS patients compared to Miller-Fisher syndrome. Among them, each of PCae C34:0, PCae C42:2, PCae C42:3, and SM C24:0 was inversely correlated with Hughes functional grading scale of GBS patients at both nadir and discharge. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of combination of three metabolites (PCaa C42:2, PCae C36:0 and SM C24:0) showed a good discrimination between the GBS and the controls (area under curve = 0.86). This study has demonstrated disruption of lipid metabolites in GBS may be potential biomarkers to indicate disease severity and prognosis of GBS.