Patient participation in hand hygiene among health professionals

Perception gaps of patient engagement for patient safety between healthcare professionals and the public in Korea

BACKGROUND

To ensure effective patient engagement, patients' efforts, partnerships with healthcare professionals, and the organisation's role in providing safe healthcare settings must be emphasised. Perception gaps regarding patient engagement between the public and healthcare professionals could prevent healthy partnerships from forming and hinder patient engagement activities. This study examined healthcare professionals' perception of patient engagement and compared the findings with that determined for the public in a previous study.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was conducted in February 2020 among 1,007 healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses). The questionnaire comprised five parts regarding the perception of patient engagement. Descriptive analysis and Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests determined the frequency and significant differences among the public from previous study and healthcare professionals in this study.

RESULTS

The perception of the importance of patient safety was high among healthcare professionals and the public. However, statistically significant differences in perceptions were observed among the public and healthcare professionals in all categories. The perception gaps were substantial between the groups in sub-categories of engagement for patient safety during medical treatment; 86% of physicians and 90% of nurses agreed that patients participate in the decision-making for the treatment process. Conversely, 58% of the public agreed. Only 22% of the public agreed with confirming healthcare professionals' hand washing to prevent infection, versus 57% of physicians and 65% of nurses. More than 89% of healthcare professionals positively perceived medical dispute mediation versus only half of the public. In certain areas such as "medical dispute mediation and arbitration programs", "fall prevention", and "infection prevention", there was a statistically significant difference in the perception of patient involvement among healthcare professionals, with nurses' perception being particularly more positive than that of physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The healthcare professionals' perception of patient engagement was more positive than that of the public. To narrow the perception gaps and enhance the public's perception, strategies involving changes in healthcare systems, promotional efforts, and educational initiatives should be developed. Additionally, strategies should be formulated for healthcare professionals to better engage as partners in patient care.

Patient participation in surgical site infection prevention: perceptions of nurses, physicians and patients

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the perception of patients and health professionals regarding patients' participation in surgical site infection prevention.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in two hospitals in the city of São Paulo, with a convenience sample of 123 patients in the postoperative period of elective surgeries and 92 health professionals (physicians and nurses) acting in direct care of surgical patients.

RESULTS

Patients (78.9%) and professionals (79.4%) fully agreed with the importance of patient participation to prevent surgical site infection. The impact of patient participation on infection rates was significant for those undergoing previous surgery (p = 0.021). Patients and professionals disagreed about the best time to prepare the patient about the topic (p<0.001). The participation strategies considered most effective by patients and professionals were, respectively, oral presentation (47.2% and 75%), videos (40.7% and 58.7%) and leaflets (30.9% and 58.7%).

CONCLUSION

Patients and health professionals believe that patient participation in surgical site infection prevention is important.

COMPLIANCE OF PATIENT COMPANIONS AND VISITORS WITH HAND HYGIENE: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene is a simple and low-cost practice to prevent the spread of many microorganisms that cause healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). Compliance with hand hygiene, especially by patient companions and visitors, is very important in order to prevent the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms between the health institutions and the community.

AIM

This is a descriptive study designed to investigate the compliance of patient companions and visitors with hand hygiene.

METHODS

The sample of the study included 209 individuals who were the companions and visitors of the patients who were hospitalized in a University Hospital in the west of Turkey. A questionnaire containing Demographics and Hand Hygiene and the Observation Form to assess Hand Hygiene Practice were used to acquire data. In order to conduct the research, permission was obtained from the ethics committee and the institution, and consent was obtained from the patient companions and visitors. To evaluate the data, the numbers, percentage calculations, mean and independent inter-observer agreement coefficient were used.

FINDINGS

96.2% of the patient companions and visitors stated that they did not receive training on the importance of hand washing during their stay in the hospital, and 74.6% stated that hand washing was very important in the prevention of diseases. The patient families reported that they most often washed their hands after touching bodily fluids (91.7%), and that they rarely washed their hands before touching a patient (34.0%). The rates were decreased in the observations, and the lowest rate for handwashing was before touching a patient (22.4%) and the highest rate for handwashing was after the risk for contamination with body fluids of patient (68.6%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that patient companions and visitors did not receive any training on the importance of hand hygiene during the hospital stay, and the observed rate of compliance with hand hygiene was lower than stated. Recommendations include delivering planned handwashing training to patient companions and visitors using different teaching methods, and to conduct longer observational studies.

Desenvolvimento participativo de tecnologia educacional em busca da segurança do paciente na maternidade

RESUMO Objetivos: desenvolver uma cartilha como tecnologia educacional, juntamente com profissionais de saúde, pacientes e acompanhantes, visando ao envolvimento destes na segurança do paciente na maternidade. Métodos: estudo qualitativo convergente-assistencial, realizado em três etapas em uma maternidade de Belo Horizonte. A construção da cartilha ocorreu entre fevereiro e abril de 2021, com 13 profissionais, 06 acompanhantes e 11 pacientes. Resultados: realizou-se análise de conteúdo dos dados, criando-se três categorias: Saberes e experiências sobre a segurança da paciente e do recém-nascido na maternidade; Desafios para o envolvimento da paciente e acompanhante nas ações de segurança; Avaliação das pacientes, acompanhantes e profissionais sobre o processo de construção da cartilha. A construção da cartilha envolveu a participação profissionais de saúde, usuários e acompanhantes em todas as etapas do processo. Considerações finais: o processo participativo possibilitou a criação da tecnologia educacional para o envolvimento das pacientes e acompanhantes nas ações de segurança do paciente.

Participatory development of educational technology in seeking patient safety in maternity hospitals

ABSTRACT Objectives: to develop a booklet as an educational technology, together with health professionals, patients and companions, aiming at their involvement in patient safety in maternity hospitals. Methods: a qualitative convergent care study, carried out in three stages at a maternity hospital in Belo Horizonte. The booklet construction took place between February and April 2021, with 13 professionals, 06 companions and 11 patients. Results: data content analysis was performed, creating three categories: Knowledge and experiences about patient and newborn safety in maternity hospitals; Challenges for involving patient and companion in safety actions; Assessment of patients, companions and professionals on the booklet construction process. The booklet construction involved the participation of health professionals, users and companions in all stages of the process. Final considerations: the participatory process enabled the creation of educational technology for the involvement of patients and companions in patient safety actions.

Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals

OBJECTIVE

to analyze, in the clinical practice of large hospitals, how the adoption of measures to prevent and control the spread of bacterial resistance has occurred, and to propose a score for the institutions' adherence.

METHOD

a cross-sectional study carried out in 30 large hospitals of Minas Gerais, from February 2018 to April 2019, after approval by the Ethics and Research Committee. Interviews were conducted with hospital managers, with Hospital Infection Control Services coordinators, and with the care coordinators of the Inpatient Units and Intensive Care Center. In addition, observations were made of the adoption of preventive measures by the multidisciplinary team in the care units.

RESULTS

in the 30 participating hospitals, 93.3% (N=28) had protocols for prophylactic antibiotics, and 86.7% (N=26) performed their audit, 86.7% (N=26) for therapeutic antibiotics and 83.3% (N=25) their audit; 93.3% (N=56) used gloves and cloaks for patients in contact precautions, and 78.3% (N=47) of the professionals were unaware of or answered incompletely on the five moments for hand hygiene. In the score to identify the adoption of measures to control bacterial resistance, 83.3% (N=25) of the hospitals were classified as partially compliant, 13.3% (N=04) as deficient, and 3.4% (N=01) as non-adoption.

CONCLUSION

it was found that the recommended measures to contain bacterial resistance are not consolidated in the clinical practice of the hospitals.

Hand hygiene: knowledge and skill of caregivers in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

to identify the knowledge and ability of caregivers on hand hygiene in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHOD

a prospective cross-sectional study. A questionnaire was used to identify the knowledge and it was observed the hygiene technique performance. Data were collected in two units (autologous and allogeneic transplant).

RESULTS

the 37 participants recognized the importance of hand hygiene and 95.5% related to removal of dirt or infection prevention. 91.9% stated that it was important to clean their hands with soap and water when entering and leaving the room, and 64.9% understood that it was necessary to apply alcoholic solution after washing. On average, the caregivers scored 6.16 steps, when demonstrating the washing technique and 3.91 steps in the friction with alcoholic solution.

CONCLUSION

although they recognize the importance of the procedure, there are deficits related to the moment and the correct way of doing it, evidencing the need for strategies aimed at improving this process.

Hand hygiene compliance of patients' family members in India: importance of educating the unofficial 'fourth category' of healthcare personnel

INTRODUCTION

In India, due to manpower constraints, patients' family members are often actively involved in healthcare activities of their near and dear ones. They have significant contact with the patient at all World Health Organization (WHO) 'five moments for hand hygiene'. This study analysed the impact of decade-long awareness campaigns on the hand hygiene compliance (HHC) by our patients' carers.

METHODS

Trained infection control nurses observed the HHC at each of the five moments for patients' attendants in different hospital settings from January 2014 to December 2018. Compliance was calculated as percentage of events divided by total opportunities.

FINDINGS

A total of 7302 opportunities were observed with an overall compliance of 46.1% (35.5% in 2014 to 48.2% in 2018, P < 0.0001). Compliance at WHO moments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 51.0%, 47.4%, 67.6%, 48.8%, and 24.3% respectively. Among family members, mothers of newborns had a much higher HHC (77%) than others (44.5%) (P < 0.0001). Also, the compliance was higher in medical versus surgical wards and in paediatric wards versus adult wards (P < 0.0001 in both).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study on family members' HHC in a hospital setting in a low- and middle-income country. The study shows that family members, once trained, exhibit fairly good HHC while caring for their patients, especially mothers of newborns. It is worthwhile empowering and educating patient attendants about the importance and process of hand hygiene as it is likely to result in immense benefit for patients.

Determinants of patient participation for safer care: A qualitative study of physicians' experiences and perceptions

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of research on physicians' perspectives on involving patients to achieve safer care. This study aims to explore determinants of patient participation for safer care, according to physicians in Swedish health care.

METHODS

We used a deductive descriptive design, applying qualitative content analysis based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour framework. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 physicians in different types of health care units, to achieve a heterogeneous sample. The main outcome measure was barriers and facilitators to patient participation of potential relevance for patient safety.

RESULTS

Analysis of the data yielded 14 determinants (ie, subcategories) functioning as barriers and/or facilitators to patient participation of potential relevance for patient safety. These determinants were mapped to five categories: physicians' capability to involve patients in their care; patients' capability to become involved in their care, as perceived by the physicians; physicians' opportunity to achieve patient participation in their care; physicians' motivation to involve patients in their care; and patients' motivation to become involved in their care, as perceived by the physicians.

CONCLUSION

There are many barriers to patient participation to achieve safer care. There are also facilitators, but these tend to depend on initiatives of individual physicians and patients, because organizational-level support may be lacking. Many of the determinants are interdependent, with physicians' perceived time constraints influencing other barriers.