da Silva FC, Nascentes GA, Meneses ACO, Correia Filho D. Agreement between diagnostic imaging methods for the evaluation of lymphadenopathies in HIV-infected/AIDS patients.
Radiol Bras 2019;
52:7-11. [PMID:
30804609 PMCID:
PMC6383539 DOI:
10.1590/0100-3984.2017.0176]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective
To assess the percent agreement between diagnostic imaging modalities for the
evaluation of lymphadenopathies in HIV-infected/AIDS patients.
Materials and Methods
This was an open, comparative, prospective study of diagnostic imaging
methods for lymphadenopathy evaluation. We evaluated 30 patients (19 men and
11 women). All underwent ultrasound and computed tomography (CT). Twenty of
the patients also underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We determined
the percent agreement between two examiners using the various imaging
methods to evaluate lymphadenopathies.
Results
CT had the highest percent agreement, at 93.3%, with a kappa coefficient of
0.85, corresponding to 28 of the 30 examinations. When we compared the
percent agreement between the two examiners and between CT and ultrasound,
examiner 1 had an observed rate of 80.0%, with a kappa of 0.49,
corresponding to 24 of the 30 examinations, whereas examiner 2 had a rate of
70.0%, with a kappa of 0.31, corresponding to 21 of the 30 examinations.
Between MRI and CT, the percent agreement for examiner 1 was 50.0%, with a
kappa of −0.18, corresponding to 10 of the 20 examinations, whereas that for
examiner 2 was 85.0%, with a kappa of 0.69, corresponding to 17 of the 20
examinations. For MRI and ultrasound, examiner 1 had a percent agreement of
70.0%, with a kappa of 0.20, corresponding to 14 of the 20 examinations, and
examiner 2 had a percent agreement of 75.0%, with a kappa of 0.38,
corresponding to 15 of the 20 examinations.
Conclusion
This study indicates that intermethod agreement is highly dependent on the
way in which the research is conducted, rather than on the level of
experience of the examiner.
Collapse