[Communicational relations between healthcare professionals and their influence on coordination of care]

[Coordination of clinical management between levels: the views of physicians in primary and specialized care in Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil]

This study analyzed the views of physicians towards coordination of clinical management between different levels of care. This was a cross-sectional quantitative study using data from a survey of 182 physicians in primary healthcare (PHC) and specialized care in Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil, in 2017. The results revealed significant differences in the physicians' experience. Considering referrals, the majority (81.32%) felt that PHC physicians referred patients to specialized care when necessary, and the proportion was higher in PHC physicians themselves (92.73%). As for agreement, two-thirds of PHC physicians (67.27%) reported that they agreed with the treatment prescribed by the specialist, while only 33.86% of the specialists agreed with the PHC physician. Concerning clinical responsibility, 89.09% of PHC physicians reported that they were clinically responsible for the patient, compared to only 43.31% of the specialists. As for recommendations, most of the interviewees (63.19%) felt that the specialists did not issue recommendations, and this proportion was higher among PHC physicians (81.82%). For waiting time, the majority (82.42%) felt that patients waited too long for appointments in specialized care, and the proportion was higher among PHC physicians (98.18%) than among specialists (75.59%). Only 16.36% of PHC physicians felt that waiting time was too long in PHC, compared to 38.58% of the medical specialists. The study's results are consistent with similar studies and highlight the need to strengthen coordination between levels of care to achieve effective integration in healthcare networks.

Capacity Development of Local Service Organizations Through Regional Innovation in Papua, Indonesia After the COVID-19 Pandemic

This study aims to identify and describe the regional innovations produced in Keerom Regency, Papua Province, Indonesia after the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to analyze integrated regional service capacity indicators with a special focus on organizational performance indicators in integrated units that can be measured quantitatively and simply. In addition, to create an understanding of organizational performance in geographic areas. The method approach uses a mixed-methods description to tell the results of the study. Secondary data were analyzed in the form of innovation proposals for as many as 108 regional innovations. The analysis used adopts local service capacity which was developed with additional indicators of innovation. Local Service Indicators used to consist of Leadership and Governance, Structure and System, Human Resources, Financial Management, Program Management, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan, Partnerships, External Relations and Networks, Knowledge Management, and Organizational Innovation. Local services are built using spreadsheet tools to make the process easier to use. The result is that organizational services in regional innovation as a whole still reach a score of 52% on a 100% scale giving the result that organizational services have been carried out amid the limitations of local governments which are characterized by limited knowledge needed, not yet optimally prepared programs, low organizational acceleration. For regional innovation, the harmonization process between planning, evaluation, and monitoring is not yet optimal.

Continuidade da gestão clínica entre níveis assistenciais: experiências dos usuários de uma rede municipal de saúde

Este estudo analisa as experiências dos usuários sobre a continuidade da gestão clínica entre níveis assistenciais. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, quantitativo, que utiliza dados de um inquérito realizado com 407 usuários de uma rede pública de saúde de Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, nos anos de 2017 e 2018. As experiências sobre a continuidade da gestão clínica foram exploradas a partir de duas dimensões: coerência da atenção e acessibilidade entre níveis assistenciais. Os usuários apresentaram opiniões mais positivas sobre a coerência da atenção que sobre a acessibilidade. Quanto à coerência da atenção, a maioria dos usuários referiu que os médicos da atenção primária e da especializada concordam entre si quanto a diagnóstico, tratamento e recomendações, e que o médico da atenção primária encaminha ao especialista quando necessário. Apenas 43% dos usuários relataram existir colaboração entre os médicos para resolução dos seus problemas de saúde. Quanto à acessibilidade, a maioria dos usuários (77,2%) referiu um longo tempo de espera para a consulta com o especialista e menos da metade (48,9%) referiu demora para atendimento na atenção primária. Os resultados deste estudo coincidem com outras investigações e evidenciam a necessidade de fomentar estratégias para alcançar uma integração efetiva das redes assistenciais e assim conferir ao usuário uma maior continuidade dos cuidados em saúde.