Ecological study on mortality from influenza and pneumonia before and after influenza vaccination in the Northeast and South of Brazil

Global Influenza Hospital-based Surveillance Network (GIHSN): results of surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses in hospitalised patients in Brazil, 2015

BACKGROUND

Influenza-like illness occurs annually worldwide, with peak timing and severity varying seasonally, resulting in significant annual mortality.

OBJECTIVES

There were three objectives: (1) to describe the epidemiological and clinical features of hospitalised patients with severe acute respiratory infection caused by influenza and other respiratory viruses (ORVs); (2) to report the influenza seasonality in the region and (3) to correlate findings of influenza circulation and immunisation time in Brazil.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This study took place in three Brazilian hospitals located in cities with different climatic conditions (Curitiba (south), Rio de Janeiro (south-east) and Fortaleza (north-east)). Patients presenting with an acute process with indication for admission consisting of a predefined set of conditions potentially associated with recent influenza infection were enrolled.

RESULTS

We screened 1666 patients, with 595 meeting the inclusion criteria. Influenza viruses and ORVs were detected in 6.5% and 59% of patients, respectively. Influenza-positive cases fell into the severe spectrum as compared with those with ORVs (30% vs 11%), but without any difference in mortality rates. Epidemiological results revealed variations in the peak time of influenza infections between north-east (Fortaleza) and south (Curitiba) Brazil, basically following the rain period of each region. In north-east Brazil, viral circulation was prevalent in the first 4 months of the year, indicating that the vaccination campaign occurred in a postseasonal period, possibly explaining the low effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The active-surveillance model is a valuable tool for investigating respiratory virus impact on hospitalised patients, with influenza-infection monitoring enabling implementation of adequate preventive measures.

Methods and challenges for the health impact assessment of vaccination programs in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

To describe methods and challenges faced in the health impact assessment of vaccination programs, focusing on the pneumococcal conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean.

METHODS

For this narrative review, we searched for the terms “rotavirus”, “pneumococcal”, “conjugate vaccine”, “vaccination”, “program”, and “impact” in the databases Medline and LILACS. The search was extended to the grey literature in Google Scholar. No limits were defined for publication year. Original articles on the health impact assessment of pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccination programs in Latin America and the Caribbean in English, Spanish or Portuguese were included.

RESULTS

We identified 207 articles. After removing duplicates and assessing eligibility, we reviewed 33 studies, 25 focusing on rotavirus and eight on pneumococcal vaccination programs. The most frequent studies were ecological, with time series analysis or comparing pre- and post-vaccination periods. The main data sources were: health information systems; population-, sentinel- or laboratory-based surveillance systems; statistics reports; and medical records from one or few health care services. Few studies used primary data. Hospitalization and death were the main outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last years, a significant number of health impact assessments of pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccination programs have been conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean. These studies were carried out few years after the programs were implemented, meet the basic methodological requirements and suggest positive health impact. Future assessments should consider methodological issues and challenges arisen in these first studies conducted in the region.

Patterns of influenza B circulation in Brazil and its relevance to seasonal vaccine composition

Data on the burden of disease and circulation patterns of influenza B lineages for Brazil are limited. This review aims to describe the pattern of influenza B occurrence in Brazil to have a better understanding of its epidemiology and its relevance when considering seasonal influenza vaccine composition. A review of the data including analysis of international and local surveillance data as well as information from online search of databases using Medical Subject Headings terms in conjunction with screening of abstracts from scientific events was performed. Based on international epidemiologic surveillance data, moderate levels of influenza B disease (19%; 2006-2014) were observed. Of these nine years, it was possible to compare data from three years (2007, 2008 and 2013) which have information on the circulating influenza B lineage. Co-circulation of influenza B lineages was observed in all these three influenza seasons, of which, during one season, a high degree of mismatch between the vaccine lineage and the predominant circulating lineage (91.4% [2013]) was observed. Local surveillance data reveal a distinct and dynamic distribution of respiratory viruses over the years. Data from published literature and abstracts show that influenza B is a significant cause of disease with an unpredictable circulation pattern and showing trends indicating reemergence of the B/Victoria lineage. The abstracts report notable levels of co-circulation of both influenza B lineages (2000-2013). Mismatch between the Southern hemisphere vaccine and the most prevalent circulating viruses in Brazil were observed in five influenza seasons. The evidence on co-circulation of two influenza B lineages and mismatched seasons in Brazil indicates the benefit of quadrivalent influenza vaccines in conferring broader seasonal influenza protection. Additionally, improving influenza surveillance platforms in Brazil is important for monitoring disease trends and the impact of introducing seasonal influenza vaccination.

Influenza Burden and Transmission in the Tropics

Each year, influenza causes substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide. It is important to understand influenza in the tropics because of the significant burden in the region and its relevance to global influenza circulation. In this review, influenza burden, transmission dynamics, and their determinants in the tropics are discussed. Environmental, cultural, and social conditions in the tropics are very diverse and often differ from those of temperate regions. Theories that account for and predict influenza dynamics in temperate regions do not fully explain influenza epidemic patterns observed in the tropics. Routine surveillance and household studies have been useful in understanding influenza dynamics in the tropics, but these studies have been limited to only some regions; there is still a lack of information regarding influenza burden and transmission dynamics in many tropical countries. Further studies in the tropics will provide useful insight on many questions that remain.

Are influenza-associated morbidity and mortality estimates for those ≥ 65 in statistical databases accurate, and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?

PURPOSES

To assess the accuracy of estimates using statistical databases of influenza-associated morbidity and mortality, and precisely measure influenza vaccine effectiveness.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

Laboratory testing of influenza is incomplete. Death certificates under-report influenza. Statistical database models are used as an alternative to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess influenza vaccine effectiveness. Evidence of the accuracy of influenza morbidity and mortality estimates was sought from: (1) Studies comparing statistical models. For four studies Poisson and ARIMA models produced higher estimates than Serfling, and Serfling higher than GLM. Which model is more accurate is unknown. (2) Studies controlling confounders. Fourteen studies mostly controlled one confounder (one controlled comorbidities), and limited control of confounders limits accuracy.

EVIDENCE FOR VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS WAS SOUGHT FROM

(1) Studies of regions with increasing vaccination rates. Of five studies two controlled for confounders and one found a positive vaccination effect. Three studies did not control confounders and two found no effect of vaccination. (2) Studies controlling multiple confounders. Of thirteen studies only two found a positive vaccine effect and no mortality differences between vaccinees and non-vaccinees in non-influenza seasons, showing confounders were controlled. Key problems are insufficient testing for influenza, using influenza-like illness, heterogeneity of seasonal and pandemic influenza, population aging, and incomplete confounder control (co-morbidities, frailty, vaccination history) and failure to demonstrate control of confounders by proving no mortality differences between vaccinees and non-vaccinees in non-influenza seasons.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Improving model accuracy requires proof of no mortality differences in pre-influenza periods between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups, and reduction in influenza morbidity and mortality in seasons with a good vaccine match, more virulent strains, in the younger elderly with less immune senescence, and specific outcomes (laboratory-confirmed outcomes, pneumonia deaths). Proving influenza vaccine effectiveness requires appropriately powered RCTs, testing participants with RT-PCR tests, and comprehensively monitoring morbidity and mortality.