[Awareness and use of mechanism for clinical coordination between levels in two health care networks in Pernambuco State, Brasil]

Do primary and specialized care physicians know and use coordination mechanisms?

OBJECTIVES:

To analyze if primary and specialized care physicians know and use care coordination mechanisms between healthcare levels.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional survey study, with the application of the COORDENA-BR instrument to primary and specialized care physicians in a public heathcare network, medium-sized municipality, from June to October 2019. The questionnaire addresses knowledge, frequency of sending and receiving, purpose, characteristics and difficulties in using feedback or mutual adaptation and standardization mechanisms to promote coordination of care service between healthcare levels.

RESULTS:

Feedback instruments such as referral and reply letters, hospital discharge report and WhatsApp are widely known by professionals of both levels, without significant differences. Clinical sessions and protocols are not well-known, especially in specialized care, which supposes a low usage of standardization mechanisms to a better coordination between the healthcare levels. Despite being well-known and easy, traditional feedback instruments such as referral and reply letters are not widely used. Fewer physicians knew the protocols, mainly in specialized care. They pointed difficulties in their application, such as insufficient exams and unavailable supplies in the healthcare network. Clinical sessions were unknown and registered low participation frequency. Care overload, low institutionalization and time constraints were barriers identified for the incorporation of care coordination mechanisms in the work process in primary and specialized care, in addition to those related to the provision of health services in the network.

CONCLUSION:

We conclude the fragmentation of the system and care can be faced in the complementarity of measures that make it possible to know the mechanisms, develop professional skills, institutionalize and promote organizational conditions for the effective use of coordination mechanisms throughout the healthcare network.

Changes in knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms between care levels in healthcare networks of Colombia

Clinical coordination mechanisms (CCMs) have become key tools in healthcare networks for improving coordination between primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) and are particularly relevant in health systems with highly fragmented healthcare provision. However, their implementation has been little studied to date in Latin America and particularly in Colombia. This study analyses the level of knowledge and use of CCMs between care levels and their changes between 2015 and 2017 in two public healthcare networks in Bogotá, Colombia. Comparison of two cross-sectional studies based on surveys among PC and SC doctors working in their networks (174 doctors per network/year). The COORDENA questionnaire was used for measuring knowledge concerning CCMs and the frequency of use and difficulties involved in using referral/reply letters (R/RLs) and hospital discharge reports (HDRs). Descriptive bivariate analysis and Poisson regression models with robust variance were used for analysing differences between networks and years. The results for both networks and years revealed greater knowledge and use of information coordination mechanisms than those regarding clinical management coordination (though their knowledge increased in 2017). Although widely known and used, significant problems regarding infrequent and late receipt of RLs and HDRs in PC as well as the poor quality of their contents limits their effective use, which may affect the quality of care. Strategies are required to improve CCMs use.

Percepción sobre la coordinación de la atención: el caso de las redes de servicios de salud de Xalapa y Veracruz, México, en el periodo 2014-2016

Una limitada coordinación asistencial impide garantizar una atención integrada, eficiente y de calidad. El objetivo del estudio fue explorar la percepción de profesionales de salud sobre la coordinación entre niveles de atención y los factores que la influyen. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo mediante el análisis de contenido de 54 entrevistas semiestructuradas y 11 grupos focales con personal de dos redes de servicios de salud en Xalapa y Veracruz, México. Los entrevistados refirieron dificultades para el seguimiento de los pacientes, desacuerdos respecto a los criterios de referencia, barreras de acceso a la atención especializada, baja calidad de los formatos de referencia, escasa recepción de los formatos de contrarreferencia y dificultades para seguir los circuitos de referencia. Atribuyeron estos problemas a la insuficiencia de recursos, la cobertura limitada del Seguro Popular, la sobrecarga de trabajo, falta de supervisión, deficiente formación de los médicos generales y limitada comunicación entre profesionales. Estos resultados coinciden con otros estudios en la región, por lo que se señala la necesidad de reforzar los mecanismos basados en la normalización, introducir estrategias basadas en la adaptación mutua y modificar rasgos de la estructura y cultura organizacional para lograr una coordinación de la atención efectiva, que contribuya a la integración de las redes.