PREOPERATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY VOLUMETRY AND GRAFT WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

3-D reconstruction in liver surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the liver offers several advantages to the surgeon before and during liver resection. This review discusses the factors behind the use of liver 3-D reconstruction.

METHODS

Systematic electronic search, according to PRISMA criteria, was performed. A literature search of scientific papers was performed until October 2023. Articles were chosen based on reference to 3-D liver reconstruction and their use in liver surgery. GRADE methodology and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

The research included 47 articles and 7724 patients were analyzed. Preoperative planning was performed with 3-D liver reconstruction in the 87.2% of the studies. Most of preoperative 3-D liver reconstructions were performed in the planning of complex or major hepatectomies. Complex hepatectomies were performed in 64.3% patients. The 55.3% of the studies reported an improved navigation and accuracy during liver resection. Four studies (8.6%) on living donor liver transplant (LDLT) concluded that 3-D liver reconstruction is useful for graft selection and vascular preservation. Nine papers (19.1%) reported an accurate measurement of future liver remnant.

CONCLUSION

Liver 3-D reconstruction helps surgeons in the planning of liver surgery, especially in liver graft and complex liver resections, increasing the accuracy of the surgical resection.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Volumetry and Graft Weight Estimation of Left Lateral Segment in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Liver volumetry based on a computed tomography scan is widely used to estimate liver volume before any liver resection, especially before living donorliver donation. The 1-to-1 conversion rule for liver volume to liver weight has been widely adopted; however, debate continues regarding this approach. Therefore, we analyzed the relationship between the left-lateral lobe liver graft volume and actual graft weight.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively included consecutive donors who underwent left lateral hepatectomy for pediatric living donor liver transplant from December 2008 to September 2020. All donors were healthy adults who met the evaluation criteria for pediatric living donor liver transplant and underwent a preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. Manual segmentation of the leftlateral liverlobe for graft volume estimation and intraoperative measurement of an actual graft weight were performed. The relationship between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight was analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-four living liver donors were included in the study. The mean actual graft weight was ~283.4 ± 68.5 g, and the mean graft volume was 244.9 ± 63.86 mL. A strong correlation was shown between graft volume and actual graft weight (r = 0.804; P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed an interobserver agreement of 38.0 ± 97.25, and intraclass correlation coefficient showed almost perfect agreement(r = 0.840; P < .001). The conversion formula for calculating graft weight based on computed tomography volumetry was determined based on regression analysis: 0.88 × graft volume + 41.63.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimation of left liver graft weight using only the 1-to-1 rule is subject to measurable variability in calculated graft weights and tends to underestimate the true graft weight. Instead, a different, improved conversion formula should be used to calculate graft weight to more accurately determine donor graft weight-to-recipient body weightratio and reduce the risk of underestimation of liver graft weightin the donor selection process before pediatric living donor liver transplant.

Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Hepatectomy in Living Liver Donors: Graft Weight Discrepancy

BACKGROUND Accurate volumetric evaluation of donors' livers before surgery is crucial for successful living-donor liver transplantation. However, there are few studies on the volumetric evaluation in the recently popularized pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy method, in contrast to the number of studies for conventional donor hepatectomy. We aimed to analyze the difference between estimated graft weight and actual graft weight in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The medical records of 612 donors who underwent right hepatectomy in living-donor liver transplantation between January 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The CDRH group targeted patients from January 2014 to October 2015, and the PLDRH group targeted patients from March 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS There were 119 and 376 donors who underwent CDRH and PLDRH, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the estimated graft weights (P=0.994) and actual graft weights (P=0.489) between the groups, the estimated graft weights were significantly higher than the actual graft weights in both groups. However, the estimated graft weight and actual graft weight showed linear correlations in both the CDRH (r=0.81, P<0.001) and PLDRH (r=0.76, P<0.001) groups, with the CDRH group having greater linearity. CONCLUSIONS The estimates of graft weight were similar between the 2 groups. However, since the actual graft weight tended to be smaller in the PLDRH group, this should be considered before surgery.

Comparison Between Pre-operative Radiologic Findings and the Actual Operative Findings of the Graft in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) volumetry and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are mandatory steps for the evaluation of potential donors in living donor liver transplantation. The aim of this study is to compare the preoperative CT volumetry and biliary orifices of the donor graft to the actual operative findings.

METHODS

Between December 2013 and December 2017, 45 donors (27 men and 18 women) with a mean age of 27.3 years (range, 19-41 years) were evaluated preoperatively by CT volumetry and MRCP at the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute in Cairo, Egypt. Of the donors, 43 out of 45 underwent intraoperative cholangiography before and after bile duct division. The right hepatectomies for all donors, as well as the actual weight and apparent biliary orifices in the graft, were documented.

RESULTS

The mean estimated graft volume (EGV) preoperatively by CT volumetry was 894.9 ± 184.2 mL (range, 480-1687 mL), whereas the actual graft weight (AGW) intraoperatively after washout was 862.6 ± 124.4 g (range, 676-1110 g). The correlation coefficient between the EGV and AGW was significantly linear (Y = 0.96X, r² = 0.72, slope: 0.96, P < .001). The accuracy of the MRCP in preoperative biliary mapping was 76.7% whereas the accuracy of the MRCP in predicting the number of graft biliary orifices was 74.4% compared with the intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), which was 95.3% (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The weight of the right lobe of the liver graft in living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) can be accurately predicted preoperatively by multiplying the EGV by 0.96. Also, the IOC is an essential technique for LDLT.