Indirect Restoration Thickness and Time after Light-Activation Effects on Degree of Conversion of Resin Cement

Effect of light attenuation through veneers on bond strength of adhesives with photoinitiator combinations

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of light attenuation through ceramic veneers and resin cement on degree of conversion (DC), cohesive strength (CS), and microshear bond strength (μSBS) of experimental adhesive systems. Experimental etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives were combined with different ratios of camphorquinone (CQ) and diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (TPO) photoinitiators: CQ-only; 3CQ:1TPO; 1CQ:1TPO; 1CQ:3TPO and TPO-only. Square-shaped ceramic veneer (IPS Empress Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent) (n = 10; 10mm long x 10mm wide x 0.5mm thick) and resin cement specimens (Variolink Esthetic LC, Ivoclar Vivadent) (n = 10; 10 mm long x 10 mm wide and 0.3 mm thick) were prepared. Light transmittance of a multiple-peak LED (Bluephase G2, Ivoclar Vivadent) was measured through restorative materials using a spectrometer (n = 5). Adhesive specimens were analyzed for DC, CS, and μSBS by light-curing the adhesive with or without (control) ceramic veneer, and with resin cement fixed to output region of the light-curing tip (n = 10). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Total light transmittance through the restorative materials was attenuated, and this attenuation was more evident for the violet spectrum. The DC for the TPO groups in ratios up to 1CQ:1TPO was similar to the control. 1CQ:3TPO showed lower values for CS. μSBS was reduced for all groups with light attenuation, but lower values were observed for 1CQ:3TPO and TPO-only. In conclusion, light transmission was reduced with interposed restorative materials. Adhesives combined with CQ and TPO up to 1CQ:1TPO showed greater cure efficiency and mechanical properties compared with a higher amount of TPO.

Synthesis, characterization, and incorporation of upconverting nanoparticles into a dental adhesive

The purpose of this study was to describe the synthesis, characterization, and functionalization of b-NaYF4:30%Yb/0.5%Tm upconverting nanocrystals for use as nanofillers in a dental adhesive and microscopically evaluate the interface between the particles and a commercial adhesive. The upconverting nanoparticles were synthesized and purified by thermal decomposition, and their chemical composition determined by energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy. The crystalline structure was characterized using X-Ray diffraction and morphology and size were observed with scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Upconverting emission was evaluated by spectrophotometry irradiating the particles with a 975 nm diode laser. Particles were functionalized with polyacrylic acid and the success was confirmed by measurement of Zeta Potential and transmission electron microscopy. The results of X-ray diffraction found a pure hexagonal phase crystalline pattern. Scanning electron microscopy showed uniform dispersion of hexagonal-shaped particles of approximately 150 nm. Upconversion emission was observed in 344 nm, 361 nm, 450 nm, 474nm, 646 nm, 803 nm. Functionalization success was confirmed by formation of a stable aqueous colloid with a Zeta potential of -29.5mV and the absence of voids in the particle-adhesive interface on the transmission electron microscopy images. The reported synthesis and functionalization process produced upconverting nanoparticles emitting photons within the blue spectral region (450 nm and 474 nm).

Influence of the composition and shades of ceramics on light transmission and degree of conversion of dual-cured resin cements

Objective

Since the transmittance of ceramics can influence the degree of conversion (DC) of resin cements, ceramics composition and shade should be considered in the selection of resin cement. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of the transmittance of different composition, opacities and shades of ceramics on the degree of conversion of two dual-cured resin cements.

Methodology

Sixty discs were prepared from low translucency (LT) and medium opacity (MO) lithium disilicate ceramic, and zirconia ceramic (Z). Each group was subdivided into 5 subgroups (n=4) in shades A2, A3.5, B2, C2 and D3. The transmittance measurement was performed in a spectrophotometer. The Variolink II and Rely X U200 resin cements were photoactivated by LED (1400 mW/cm2) for 40 s through the ceramic discs and without the discs (control group). The DC was measured with infrared FTIR spectroscopy, immediately after light activation. Data were analyzed with Kruskall-Wallis and one-way ANOVA, following post-hoc comparisons by Tukey test and Pearson’s correlation test (P<0.05).

Results

LT ceramic exhibited higher transmittance values compared to MO and Z ceramics. LTA2 and LTB2 showed statistically higher transmittance values compared to MOA2, MOA3.5 and ZA3.5. For Variolink II, the ceramic interposition did not influence the DC, since there were no statistical differences between groups with ceramic interposition and the control group. For Rely X U200 cement, the interposition of some ceramics types/shades (LTA3.5, MOA2, MOA3.5 and ZA3.5) significantly decreased the DC values compared to control group. A positive correlation was found between the ceramic transmittance and DC values of both tested cements. Conclusions. The transmittance and DC values of the cements were influenced by composition and shades of the ceramics. The higher the transmittance of ceramics, the higher the DC values for both cements.

Effect of various polymerization protocols on the cytotoxicity of conventional and self-adhesive resin-based luting cements

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of resin-based luting cements on fibroblast cells using different polymerization protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two conventional dual-polymerized (RelyX ARC, VariolinkN) and two self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem, Multilink Speed) specimens were polymerized using four different polymerization protocols: (a) photo-polymerization with direct light application, (b) photo-polymerization over ceramic and (c) resin nano-ceramic discs and (d) auto-polymerization. The specimens were then assigned to four groups to test cytotoxicity at 0, 1, 2 and 7 preincubation days (n = 5). MTT test was performed using NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells. Data were analysed using three- and one-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made using Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The highest cytotoxic values were recorded at day 2 for conventional resin cements and at day 0 for self-adhesive resin cements. Self-adhesive resin cements showed the most cytotoxic effect at the second day, while conventional resin cements presented immediate cytotoxicity. Auto-polymerized resin specimens and especially Multilink Speed demonstrated the most cytotoxic effect regardless of the preincubation time. Cytotoxicity of cements tested reached the lowest level at day 7. Interposition of ceramic or nano-ceramic restorative material did not significantly affect the cytotoxicity of tested luting cements (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cytotoxicity of dual-polymerized resin cements was material-dependent and decreased gradually up to 7 days. Photo-polymerization plays an important role in reducing the cytotoxic effects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When luting ceramic or resin nano-ceramic restorations of which thickness does not exceed 2 mm, the level of cytotoxicity with the tested materials is not significant. Luting of restorative materials that do not allow for light transmission such as metal-fused porcelain, clinicians should be cautious in the use of dual-polymerized conventional resin cements as only auto-polymerization of resin cements takes place under such materials.

Physico-mechanical properties of resin cement light cured through different ceramic spacers

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the micro hardness, color stability/ΔE, and degree of conversion/DC of a resin cement light cured through different ceramic spacers. Lithium-disilicate ceramic samples were obtained from IPS E-max CAD blocks (HT A1) and IPS in-Ceram (transparent neutral); and divided in 7 groups (n = 8 for each test): CTR/control group; 06 M/0.6 mm monolithic; 12 M/1.2 mm monolithic; 20 M/2.0 mm monolithic; 06B/0.4 + 0.2 mm bilayered; 12B/1.0 + 0.2 mm bilayered; 20B/1.8 + 0.2 mm bilayered. The resin cement (Variolink veneer) was light cured through the ceramic spacers. The resin cement samples were evaluated for ΔE using a spectrophotometer after 24 h, 7days and after aging (24 h in water at 60 °C). Knoop microhardness and DC tests were conducted immediately after light curing, after 24 h and 7days. All experimental groups showed similar microhardness values, although being lower than CTR group. Similar results were observed after 7days. ΔE was similar between all groups after 24 h (except for 12B and 20B), and increased for all groups after 7days and after artificial aging, especially for thicker and bilayer groups. Only 06 M showed values similar to CTR group. DC values were similar to all groups immediately after light curing, increasing after 24 h and 7days. After 7days, only group 20B showed lower DC than CTR group. A tendency of higher DC could be observed for monolithic and thinner ceramics. All test results showed strong correlation (0.9987). Ceramic interposition can reduce mechanical and physical properties of resin cements, especially with thicker and bilayered ceramics. Group 06 M showed the best ΔE overtime.

Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review

Contemporary dentistry literally cannot be performed without use of resin-based restorative materials. With the success of bonding resin materials to tooth structures, an even wider scope of clinical applications has arisen for these lines of products. Understanding of the basic events occurring in any dental polymerization mechanism, regardless of the mode of activating the process, will allow clinicians to both better appreciate the tremendous improvements that have been made over the years, and will also provide valuable information on differences among strategies manufacturers use to optimize product performance, as well as factors under the control of the clinician, whereby they can influence the long-term outcome of their restorative procedures.