COMO ENFERMEIROS VÊM EXERCENDO A ADVOCACIA DO PACIENTE NO CONTEXTO HOSPITALAR? - UMA PERSPECTIVA FOUCAULTIANA

Development of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses

Background and Purpose: To describe the process of developing and validating the content of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses in Intensive Care (EAPEnf-UTI). Methods: Methodological research. To achieve the elaboration objective, five stages were developed: (a) definition of the theme, (b) generation of the number of items, (c) determination of the measurement format, (d) validation of face and content, and (e) content adjustment. Results: The instrument elaborated from a survey and integrative literature review, and the measurement format chosen was the 5-point Likert scale. The validation of face and content was performed by expert judges and by pretest. The final instrument had 57 items. Conclusion: EAPEnf-UTI is a pioneering instrument built in the Brazilian context, whose future validation will allow the capturing of situations specific to intensive care units and the professional practice of intensive care nurses.

Moral distress among nursing professors: The exercise of parrhesia

BACKGROUND

Mismatch between the perception of one's moral duty and one's real social contribution may trigger moral distress, especially when no specific resistance strategies are used to counteract morally distressing situations. Considering a philosophical-ethical conception, individuals need to first reflect upon themselves to later turn to the world and confront their current situation in order to change it.

OBJECTIVES

To understand moral distress experienced by nursing professors teaching in higher education institutions and the use of parrhesia as a coping strategy.

METHOD

This qualitative exploratory-descriptive study addressed 33 nursing professors working in Brazilian federal public universities using an open-ended question form. Data were collected between June and December 2018 and analyzed using discursive textual analysis.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The Institutional Review Board at the Federal University of Rio Grande approved this study.

FINDINGS

Three categories emerged: performance of nursing professors and potentially distressing situations, the experience of moral distress, and parrhesia as a strategy to deal with moral distress. Nursing professors face situations that cause moral distress in the context of higher education, however, those who adopt parrhesia as a coping strategy find it easier to express their beliefs from the perspective of moral duty, even in the face of conflicts.

CONCLUSION

When the nursing professors in this study acknowledge elements in the power structure that hinder their actions, they express parrhesia, as an essential virtue in an attempt to modify unsymmetrical power relations that can trigger moral distress.

Perceived interpersonal and institutional challenges to patient advocacy in clinical nursing practice: a qualitative study from Ghana / Interpersonelle und institutionelle Herausforderungen für die Rolle als Patientenfürsprecher/-in aus Sicht der Pflege: eine qualitative Studie aus Ghana

Background

Nurses often speak on patients’ behalf and safeguard their safety through their advocacy role. However, some challenges like the negative attitude of team members and lack of institutional support often hamper this role. These challenges have not been well studied in the Ghanaian context.

Aim

This study explores the perceived environmental challenges to patient advocacy among nurses in Ghana.

Setting

The study was conducted at a regional hospital in Ghana.

Participants

Participants were nurses or midwives working in the hospital.

Methods

A qualitative exploratory descriptive design was employed in the study of 15 purposively sampled participants. Participants were interviewed individually and data were analysed using content analysis.

Findings

The study revealed interpersonal challenges and institutional challenges to patient advocacy, such as hierarchical nurse–doctor relationships and ineffective multidisciplinary team, time constraints and lack of institutional support. Nurses often failed to advocate because they did not want to risk conflict with doctors. Limited interprofessional interaction, suspicion and resentment in the multidisciplinary team negatively affected nurses’ role as patient advocates. Inadequate curricular support for patient advocacy and lack of support for training programmes or to undertake further studies were the additional challenges.

Conclusion

Patient advocacy could be a stressful role for nurses; thus, efforts to strengthen teamwork and increase nurse involvement in hospital decision-making are required.

Implications for nursing and health policy

The findings could influence hospital management policies to enhance stronger interprofessional collaboration, increase opportunities for professional advancement for nurses and nurses’ inclusion in decision-making.

Preditores da advocacia em saúde identificados por enfermeiros no contexto hospitalar

Objetivos: identificar los predictores del ejercicio de la abogacía en salud por enfermeros en el contexto hospitalario. Materiales y método: estudio cuantitativo, transversal analítico, realizado con 157 enfermeros de dos instituciones hospitalarias del sur de Brasil, una pública y una filantrópica. Se realizó la recolección de datos entre los meses de septiembre y octubre del 2015. Se utilizó el instrumento Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale — versión brasileña, constituido por 20 ítems, dispuestos en cinco constructos. Para el análisis de los datos, se utilizaron elementos de la estadística descriptiva, la correlación de Pearson y el análisis de regresión lineal. Resultados: los resultados evidenciaron moderada asociación entre facilitadores al ejercicio de la abogacía y percepciones que favorecen su ejercicio. La dimensión “facilitadores al ejercicio de la abogacía” obtuvo el mayor promedio del instrumento y fue el principal predictor jurídico en salud en el contexto hospitalario, capaz de provocar en los enfermeros la sensibilidad y el deseo en abogar. Conclusiones: el sentimiento de responsabilidad por parte de los enfermeros en mantener el buen funcionamiento del equipo y manejar cuestiones conflictivas en ofrecer seguridad a los pacientes, aun ante resistencias oriundas del local de trabajo.

Nursing students facing moral distress: strategies of resistance

ABSTRACT Objective: To understand the resistance strategies adopted by undergraduate students in nursing, faced with situations of moral distress (MD). Method: Qualitative research, developed in three universities in the south of Brazil, two federal and one private, with 21 undergraduate students in nursing from December 2015 to February 2016; the data was submitted to the discursive textual analysis and Foucauldian theoretical reference. Results: Students resisting demonstrate a sense of self-preservation and moral empowerment. Moreover, non-resistance initiatives are related to the fear of possible sanctions. Thus, by resisting or not, students may experience both positive and negative repercussions. Final considerations: By resisting, students aim to defend what they believe to be right, demonstrating their moral empowerment in the face of their moral distress. However, the exercise of disciplinary power seems to contribute to their moral fragilization, making it difficult to implement resistance strategies.

DISCUSSING OBSTETRIC VIOLENCE THROUGH THE VOICES OF WOMEN AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the discourses of women and health professionals regarding care during childbirth, considering the situations experienced and the interactions between them during labor and delivery. Method: this is an interpretative study with a qualitative approach. Discourse Analysis was used as the research method. The research scenarios were seven maternity hospitals, belonging to the public network of the Central-West region of Minas Gerais. Interviews were conducted with 36 laboring mothers, 10 midwives and 14 obstetricians. The collected data were submitted to discourse analysis. Results: the data were organized into three categories: 1) Witnessed obstetric violence described in the discourse of the midwife: which discusses that even acknowledging the presence of this, they talk of the difficulty of guaranteeing the rights of the mother in labor in the scenario of childbirth; 2) Today everything is obstetric violence: it shows the denial of the existence of this phenomenon in the professional-patient relationship; 3) Here we have no voice: obstetric violence is present, but there is a certain consent the part of women who, in the presence of the birth, forget the way they received assistance. Conclusion: hostile treatment is one of the obstacles of the humanization of childbirth care, interfering with the choice of delivery method, and it is necessary to review the concept of obstetric violence, considering all its specifics and nuances.