EVALUATION OF A BONE REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUE USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Effect of screw tunnels on proximal femur strength after screw removal: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The presence of screw tunnels in the femoral neck is a problem for patients with proximal femoral fractures after removal of internal fixation. The question of how much does the existence of the screw tunnels affect the strength of the femur and whether the patient needs to be protected with an adjunctive device has been controversial. The objective of this finite element analysis was to determine (1) whether the screw tunnels affects normal weight bearing after removal of internal fixation of a proximal femur fracture, (2) which screw tunnels parameters affect the weight bearing capacity of the entire femur.

HYPOTHESIS

The presence of the screw tunnels reduces the load-bearing capacity of the femur, and the arrangement, diameter and wall thickness of the screw tunnels affect the load-bearing capacity of the femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent surgical treatment for proximal femur fracture at our hospital were included in the study. Computed tomography (CT) values of the screw tunnel wall in the femur after removal of internal fixations were analysed. Mimics v16.0 and Hypermesh v13.0 software programs were used to generate 3-dimensional (3D) tetrahedral finite element models of the proximal femur with different screw tunnel numbers, diameters, thicknesses, and arrangements. An acetabulum exerting a vertical pressure load of 600N on the femoral head was simulated and the force on various parts of the femur in each model was calculated.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the Hounsfield Units of the tunnel walls and cortical bone of the proximal femur (893.48±61.28 vs. 926.34±58.43; p=0.091). In each of the 3D models, the cancellous bone was the first structure to reach maximal stress. The compressive strength of the femur decreased with increasing thickness of the screw tunnel wall and decreased with increasing tunnel diameter. The femoral neck model with the inverted triangle screw tunnel arrangement had the highest compressive strength.

DISCUSSION

The femoral neck with screw tunnels can withstand day-to-day stress without special intervention. For femoral neck fractures fixed with cannulated screws, inverted triangle screws are recommended; For a single screw tunnel in the femoral neck, the larger the diameter of the femoral neck internal screw channel, the weaker the load-bearing capacity of the femur.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; well-designed computational non-experimental study.

Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study

A potential effective treatment for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures is augmentation of the mechanical properties of the femur by injecting it with bone cement. This therapy, however, is only in research stage and can benefit substantially from computational simulations to optimize the pattern of cement injection. Some studies have considered a patient-specific planning paradigm for Osteoporotic Hip Augmentation (OHA). Despite their biomechanical advantages, customized plans require advanced surgical systems for implementation. Other studies, therefore, have suggested a more generalized injection strategy. The goal of this study is to investigate as to whether the additional computational overhead of the patient-specific planning can significantly improve the bone strength as compared to the generalized injection strategies attempted in the literature. For this purpose, numerical models were developed from high resolution CT images (n = 4). Through finite element analysis and hydrodynamic simulations, we compared the biomechanical efficiency of the customized cement-based augmentation along with three generalized injection strategies developed previously. Two series of simulations were studied, one with homogeneous and one with inhomogeneous material properties for the osteoporotic bone. The customized cement-based augmentation inhomogeneous models showed that injection of only 10 ml of bone cement can significantly increase the yield load (79.6%, P < 0.01) and yield energy (199%, P < 0.01) of an osteoporotic femur. This increase is significantly higher than those of the generalized injections proposed previously (23.8% on average). Our findings suggest that OHA can significantly benefit from a patient-specific plan that determines the pattern and volume of the injected cement.