Evaluation of the Rede Cegonha: feedback of results for Brazilian maternity hospitals

[Longitudinal care: factors associated with adherence to postpartum follow-up according to data from PMAQ-AB]

The aim was to identify factors of longitudinal care associated with women´s adherence to postpartum consultation in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional study of data from 19,177 postpartum women who participated in the external assessment of the third cycle of the Brazilian National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Basic Care (PMAQ-AB), 2017. The dependent variable was postpartum consultation, and the independent variables, grouped hierarchically, were sociodemographic and economic at the distal level and issues analogous to longitudinal care at the proximal level. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with hierarchical entry of variables, where sociodemographic and economic variables were used to adjust the model. The results showed that 53% of women had undergone postpartum follow-up. The odds of adherence to postpartum follow-up were higher in women who received a home visit by a community health agents in the first week after childbirth (OR = 4.81), those with seven or more prenatal consultations (OR = 2.74), those who had sought care at the health unit in question (OR = 1.21), and those who had been seen by the same physician (OR = 1.14). In conclusion, the proportion of postpartum consultations was low (53%), and adherence to postpartum follow-up was higher when women received visits by community health agents, were accompanied by the same physician, had regular prenatal care, and had a specific healthcare unit as their regular source of care. Consistent longitudinal care was identified as an attribute of primary care that should be strengthened to improve postpartum care.

Labor and childbirth care in maternities participating in the "Rede Cegonha/Brazil": an evaluation of the degree of implementation of the activities

Using a judgment framework, this article analyzes the degree of implementation of the best practices in labor and childbirth care contained in the guidelines of the Rede Cegonha (RC) across Brazil. The study eligibility criteria were public and mixed hospitals located in a health region with a RC action plan in place in 2015, resulting in a total of 606 facilities distributed across the country. Three different data collection methods were used: face-to-face interviews with managers, health professionals and puerperal women; document analysis; and on-site observation. The framework was built around the five guidelines of the Labor and Childbirth component of the RC. Degree of implantation was rated as follows: adequate; partially adequate and inadequate. The performance of maternity facilities was rated as partially adequate for all guidelines except for hospital environment, which was rated as inadequate. A huge variation in degree of implementation was observed across regions, with the South and Southeast being the best-performing regions in most items. The results reinforce the need for an ongoing evaluation of the actions developed by the RC to inform policy-making and the regulation of labor and childbirth care.

Assessment of delivery and childbirth care in the maternity units of Rede Cegonha: the methodological paths

This article describes the methodology used to evaluate delivery and childbirth care practices in maternity hospitals that belong to the Rede Cegonha, according to scientific evidence and rights guarantee. It shows the maternity selection criteria, the evaluated guidelines, their devices and check items, the method used to collect information and the treatment of data to obtain the results. It discusses the chosen guidelines and the strategy of returning results to managers and services and discusses their potential to foster management qualification processes and obstetric and neonatal care. This is a study of delivery and childbirth care practices of 606 maternity hospitals selected for the second evaluation cycle of the Rede Cegonha. The methodological paths stood out for the construction of tripartite co-responsibility for the process and the evaluation results, with an emphasis on its usefulness for the decision-makers and the hospital institutions involved.