Prognostic effect of high-flux hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease

High cut-off membranes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether high cut-off (HCO) membranes are more effective than high-flux (HF) membranes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of HCO membranes regarding the clearance of inflammation-related mediators, β2-microglobulin and urea; albumin loss; and all-cause mortality in patients requiring RRT.

METHODS

We searched all relevant studies on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, with no language or publication year restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Summary estimates of standardized mean differences (SMDs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) were obtained by fixed-effects or random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs involving 710 participants were included in this systematic review. Compared with HF membranes, HCO membranes were more effective in reducing the plasma level of interleukin-6 (IL-6) (SMD -0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.48 to -0.01, P   =  0.04, I2  = 63.8%); however, no difference was observed in the clearance of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.33, P  = 0.84, I2  = 4.3%), IL-10 (SMD 0.22, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.55, P  = 0.21, I2  = 0.0%), or urea (WMD -0.27, 95% CI -2.77 to 2.23, P  = 0.83, I2  = 19.6%). In addition, a more significant reduction ratio of β 2 -microglobulin (WMD 14.8, 95% CI 3.78 to 25.82, P  = 0.01, I2  = 88.3%) and a more obvious loss of albumin (WMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.16, P  < 0.01, I2  = 40.8%) could be observed with the treatment of HCO membranes. For all-cause mortality, there was no difference between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.40, P  = 0.43, I2  = 0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HF membranes, HCO membranes might have additional benefits on the clearance of IL-6 and β 2-microglobulin but not on TNF-α, IL-10, and urea. Albumin loss is more serious with the treatment of HCO membranes. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between HCO and HF membranes. Further larger high-quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the effects of HCO membranes.

Effects of High-Flux Dialysis Combined with Hemoperfusion on Serum GRP78 and miR-495-3p in Renal Failure Patients

Objective

This study was designed to probe into the changes and clinical significance of GRP78 and miR-495-3p in renal failure (RF) patients during high-flux dialysis (HFD) combined with hemoperfusion (HP).

Methods

Sixty-five RF patients and 74 health check-ups who were admitted in our hospital from March 2015 to February 2017 were prospectively selected, and the related characteristics were retrospectively collected for analysis. GRP78 and miR-495-3p were detected in RF patients at admission (before treatment), 12 weeks after treatment (during treatment), 24 weeks after treatment (after treatment), and the control group at admission, and the relationship between the two and the occurrence, efficacy, and recurrence of RF was analyzed.

Results

Before treatment, the GRP78 mRNA level in RF patients was higher than that in health check-ups, while the miR-495-3p level was lower (P < 0.05). GRP78 mRNA in RF patients was lower than that before treatment and was the lowest after treatment. On the contrary, miR-495-3p was higher than that before treatment and was the highest after treatment (P < 0.05). The two had a significant effect on predicting RF before treatment, efficacy of patients, and their recurrence after treatment (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion

GRP78 decreased during the treatment of high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) combined with systemic HP in RF patients, while miR-495-3p increased. Both of them have a good reference value for RF occurrence, treatment results, and recurrence.

Effect of changing treatment to high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) on mortality in patients with long-term low flux hemodialysis (LFHD): a propensity score matched cohort study

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of changing treatment to high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) on mortality rate in patients with long-term low flux hemodialysis (LFHD).

Methods

The patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who underwent LFHD with dialysis age more than 36 months and stable condition in our hospital before December 31, 2014 were included in this study. They were divided into control group and observation group. Propensity score matched method was used to select patients in the control group. The hemodialysis was performed 3 times a week for 4 h. The deadline for follow-up is December 31, 2018. End-point event is all-cause death. The survival rates of the two groups were compared and multivariate Cox regression analysis was carried out.

Results

K-M survival analysis showed that the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 4-year survival rates of HFHD group were 98, 96, 96 and 96%, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 4-year survival rates of LFHD group were 95, 85, 80 and 78%, respectively. Log-rank test showed that the survival rate of HFHD group was significantly higher than that of LFHD group (x²= 7.278, P = 0.007). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that male, age, hemoglobin and low-throughput dialysis were independent predictors of death (P < 0.05). Compared with LFHD, HFHD can significantly reduce the mortality risk ratio of patients, as high as 86%.

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with ESRD who performed long-term LFHD can be significantly improved after changing to HFHD.

Efficacy of different hemodialysis methods on dendritic cell marker CD40 and CD80 and platelet activation marker CD62P and P10 in patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure (CRF) has become a major public health concern, which increases the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism. Therefore, therapeutic strategies are in urgent requirement. This study was conducted for investigating efficacy of hemodialysis (HD), hemodiafiltration (HDF), and hemoperfusion (HP) in patients with CRF and the correlation with the presence of complications following HD therapy.

METHODS

The therapeutic effect, living quality, biochemical indicators, and dry weight were detected before and after the treatment regimens. Flow cytometry was conducted to detect expressions of dendritic cell markers (CD40 and CD80) and platelet activation markers (CD62P and P10), and the relationship between their expression and therapeutic effect as well as the association of these expressions with complications was analyzed.

RESULTS

After HD therapy, patients presented with decreased serum creatinine, serum phosphorus, triglyceride, parathyroid hormone, and β₂ -MG expression; increased hemoglobin, plasma albumin expressions, and dry weight; and enhanced therapeutic effect and living quality. CD62P and P10 expressions decreased, while CD40 and CD80 expressions increased following HD therapy. The therapeutic effect improved in patients with low expressions of CD40 and CD80 and high expressions of CD62P and P10 following HP treatment and complications were lower after treatment of HDF and HP.

CONCLUSION

The aforementioned results indicated that CRF patients treated with HP exhibited higher expression of CD40 and CD80 and lower expression of CD62P and P10, suggesting that HP is conferred to have better efficacy than HDF and HD. Therefore, HP may be a promising clinical regimen for treatment of CRF patients.