Non-invasive messenger RNA transcriptional evaluation in human kidney allograft dysfunction

Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Dysfunction: Current and Future Applications in the Era of Precision Medicine

Kidney transplantation stands as the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, significantly improving both the quality and longevity of life compared to dialysis. In recent years, the survival rates for patients and grafts have markedly increased thanks to innovative strategies in desensitization protocols for incompatible transplants and advancements in immunosuppressive therapies. For kidney transplant recipients, preventing allograft rejection is of paramount importance, necessitating the use of immunosuppressive medications. Regular follow-up appointments are essential, as monitoring the function of the kidney allograft is critical. Currently, established biomarkers such as serum creatinine, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), proteinuria, and albuminuria are commonly employed to assess allograft function. However, these biomarkers have limitations, as elevated levels often indicate significant allograft damage only after it has occurred, thereby constraining treatment options and the potential for restoring graft function. Additionally, kidney biopsies, while considered the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, are invasive and carry associated risks. Consequently, the identification and development of new, sensitive, and specific biomarkers like dd-cfDNA, microRNAs (e.g., miR-21, miR-155), and sCD30 for allograft rejection are crucial. To tackle this challenge, intensive ongoing research employing cutting-edge technologies, including "omics" approaches, like genomic techniques, proteomics, or metabolomics, is uncovering a variety of promising new biomarkers.

Decreased expression of ADAM10 on monocytes is associated with chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) is a common cause of allograft loss in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Our previous study found that elevated serum soluble T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (sTim-3) was positively associated with the severity of CAD in KTRs. sTim-3 was reported to be generated from ADAM10/ADAM17-mediated ectodomain shedding of membrane Tim-3 (mTim-3) in humans. However, whether mTim-3 shedding-related molecules participate in the progression of CAD remains unknown. Here, we explored the relationships between different forms of Tim-3, including mTim-3 on different peripheral blood cell subsets, serum and urine sTim-3, and ADAM10/17 expression and active status to investigate their roles in CAD.

METHODS

63 KTRs with stable grafts, 91 KTRs with CAD and 42 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Total Tim-3, pADAM10/17 and mADAM10/17 proteins were semiquantified by western blot. Serum and urine sTim-3 concentrations were determined by ELISA. mTim-3 and ADAM10/17 expression on leukocyte subpopulations was determined by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The KTR groups displayed significantly higher levels of urine sTim-3 pg/μmol creatinine than the HC group, while no difference was found between the two KTR groups. KTRs with CAD presented reduced nonactive pADAM10 protein but unaltered active mADAM10 when compared to the Stable group; no difference was found between the KTR groups regarding total Tim-3 and p/m ADAM17 protein levels. In addition, the CAD group showed lower mTim-3 expression on BDCA3⁺ DC than the Stable group; no other difference was observed in its expression on B, T, NK, NKT, monocyte subsets and other DC subsets among groups. With the deterioration of allograft function, ADAM10 expression densities on classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocytes were significantly decreased. Correlation analyses revealed that eGFR and serum sTim-3 exhibited weak to modest correlations with ADAM10 on monocyte and DC subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated that ADAM10, especially its decreased expression on monocytes, may play an important role in the progression of CAD in KTRs. However, whether there is an interaction between ADAM10 and mTim-3 in the pathogenesis of CAD in KTRs needs to be further studied.

Biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the literature on the use of new biomarkers of rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The kidney allograft biopsy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection. However, the kidney biopsy is invasive and could be indeterminate. A significant progress has been made in discovery of new biomarkers of rejection, and some of them have been introduced recently for potential use in clinical practice including measurement of serum donor-derived cell free DNA, allo-specific CD154 + T-cytotoxic memory cells, and gene-expression 'signatures'. The literature supports that these biomarkers provide fair and reliable diagnostic accuracy and may be helpful in clinical decision-making when the kidney biopsy is contraindicated or is inconclusive.

SUMMARY

The new biomarkers provide a promising approach to detect acute rejections in a noninvasive way.