Stress, coping and adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplantation: a comparative study

A narrative review on the impact of sarcopenic obesity and its psychological consequence in quality of life

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sarcopenia is a multifactorial metabolic-mediated complication that affects most of the geriatric population physically and mentally. In this study, we intended to study the association between sarcopenia and psychologically related symptoms. Primary objective of the study is to explore the interplay between sarcopenic obesity, psychological consequences and Quality of life in the affected population. The secondary objective is to discuss the diagnostic, treatment approaches and also the role of clinical pharmacist.

METHOD

The psychology-related complication and sarcopenia association was enumerated in this study based on previous clinical research findings.

RESULT

The clinical evidence shows a strong correlation between sarcopenia and Mental health and its health consequences and reflection on the quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia induced mental disturbance has been affirmed in many studies. We believe effective right pharmacological therapy and non-pharmacological therapies with respective lifestyle modification advice could be potential vital factors that can reduce further complications in geriatric populations.

The Influence of Selected Psychological Factors on Medication Adherence in Patients with Chronic Diseases

Background: Insufficient adherence to treatment is a relevant problem. This study aims to determine the impact of health locus of control, stress coping style and level of mindfulness on medication adherence in patients with a chronic illness. Methods: The study included 768 people. The diagnostic survey involved the use of: Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ), Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLC), The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Results: Participants were divided into two subgroups, i.e., adherent (n = 219) and non-adherent (n = 549). We observed significant differences between the subgroups in age, BMI, sex, place of residence, education, and for all MHLC subscales, two CISS subscales and MAAS. The identified medication adherence variables were: female gender (OR = 1.55), BMI (OR = 0.95), MHLC/Internal (OR = 0.95), CISS/Emotional (OR = 1.03), MAAS (OR = 0.97). Conclusions: A strong internal health locus of control, a higher level of mindfulness and a lower level of emotional-stress coping style increase the likelihood of adherence with medication recommendations in patients with chronic diseases.

Measuring the effectiveness of psychoeducation on adherence, depression, anxiety and stress among patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia. a control trial

Despite evidence of the impact of depression and stress on attitudes towards medication in general medical pathology regimens, little is known of the effects of depression and stress on attitudes towards medication in schizophrenia. This study explores the effects of a hope-based psychoeducation on attitudes towards medication, depression, anxiety and stress, and predictors of attitudes towards medication. The participants in the study (n = 29) were randomly allocated to either the psychoeducation group or the control group. Results from the psychoeducation group revealed that attitudes towards medication were significantly improved and anxiety was significantly reduced. Given the small sample, which was recruited from among patients of a day mental health centre, findings should be interpreted tentatively. Being longer in pharmacotherapy, having experienced fewer occurrences of hospitalisation, and being less depressed predicted positivity towards medication. Patients in the control group did not exhibit significant change in any of the studied variables. Findings were interpreted in the light of research on stigma and insight into illness, and add modestly to literature arguing for the importance of patients’ retention of hope, empowerment and sense of control over illness. This study proposed that psychoeducation is an appropriate intervention to address a wide range of factors that compound adherence to medication and patients’ symptoms, such as patients’ interpretations of causal models, their sense of hope and control over the illness, and their insight into illness and self-stigma.

Selected psychological predictors of medication adherence in the older adults with chronic diseases

Aim

The main goal of the study was to assess the significance of selected psychological factors related to the adherence to medication recommendations among the older adults with chronic diseases.

Design

It was designed as a cross-sectional study, aimed at assessing the importance of selected psychological factors in complying with medication recommendations among older adults.

Methods

The study involved 345 older adults with chronic diseases, assessed the importance of selected psychological factors, such as: health locus of control, stress coping and mindfulness in adhering to medication recommendations older persons. To answer the research questions, we performed frequency analyses, basic descriptive statistics analyses together with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Student's t tests for independent samples, monofactorial analysis of variance in the intergroup diagram, analysis correlation with the Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearman's rank correlation ρ analysis and stepwise linear regression analysis.

Results

The study identified psychological predictors of medication adherence, which explained 12% of the variability. An emotion-oriented coping proved to be the most important factor. Additionally, powerful other health locus of control and mindful attention were shown to have a positive effect.

Multilevel Correlates of Immunosuppressive Nonadherence in Kidney Transplant Patients: The Multicenter ADHERE BRAZIL Study

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive nonadherence is a risk factor for worse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). Brazil, having the world's largest public, fully covered transplantation system and the second-highest KT volume worldwide, provides a unique setting for studying multilevel correlates of nonadherence (patient, healthcare provider, transplant center, and healthcare system levels) independent of patients' financial burden.

METHODS

By applying a multistage sampling approach, we included 1105 patients from 20 KT centers. Nonadherence to immunosuppressives (implementation phase) was defined as any deviation in taking or timing adherence and dose reduction assessed by the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale. Based on Bronfenbrenner's ecological model, we assessed multilevel factors using established instruments and measures specifically developed for this study and analyzed their independent contribution to nonadherence by performing sequential logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The nonadherence prevalence rate was 39.7%. The following factors were independently associated with nonadherence: Patient level-having a stable partner (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.97), nonadherence to appointments (OR: 2.98; CI: 2.03-4.39), and nonadherence to physical activity recommendations (OR: 1.84; CI: 1.38-2.46); and transplant center level-satisfaction with the waiting room structure (OR: 0.54; CI: 0.42-0.71), consultation >30 minutes (OR: 1.60; CI: 1.19-2.14), adequacy of the consultation frequency (OR: 0.62; CI: 0.43-0.90), and centers with >500 beds (OR: 0.58; CI: 0.46-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

As the first multicenter study assessing multilevel correlates of nonadherence in KT, our findings point to the need for multilevel interventions beyond the patient level, targeting transplant center practice patterns as an approach to tackle nonadherence.

Quality of Life, Adherence Behavior, and Social Support Among Renal Transplant Recipients in China: A Descriptive Correlational Study

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) is an important indicator for evaluating therapeutic outcomes and mortality in renal transplant recipients, but there is scarce information regarding QoL, adherence behavior, social support and their relationships. This study assessed these factors among renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using a descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional design, this study included a convenience sample of 253 kidney transplant recipients. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data.

RESULTS

The scores on QoL domains (except the social functioning domain [P = .909]) were lower in our recipients than in the general Chinese population norm (P = .0000001). Time since transplantation (P = .041) and education (P = .013) were factors affecting QoL scores. The mean total adherence behavior score was 60.64 ± 7.71. Occupation and time since transplantation affected the total adherence behavior score. There was an alarming percentage of nonadherence in our transplant recipients (27.5%-72.3%). The mean total social support score was 40.76 ± 9.51. The total social support score (P = .0000087) was lower than the general Chinese population norm. Occupation (P = .0000087) education (P = .010), marital status (P = .013), payment method (P = .028) and monthly income (P = .007) affected the total social support score; there were significant relationships between physical health, psychological health, adherence behavior (r = .145, P = .022; r = .153, P = .016), and social support (r = .211, P = .001; r = .301, P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate somewhat deficient QoL among renal transplant recipients compared with the general population. Social support, adherence behavior, time since transplantation and education significantly influenced QoL for our recipients, and social support had the most significant influence on adherence behavior and QoL.

Influence of Major Coping Strategies on Treatment Non-adherence and Severity of Comorbid Conditions in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence and comorbidities are prevalent among hemodialysis patients and are associated with increased mortality and financial burden. We aimed to investigate the influence of major coping strategies (CSs) on non-adherence and comorbidities in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients were enrolled. We collected participant data including CS measured by a Korean version of the ways of coping questionnaire (K-WCQ), comorbidities measured by age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and adherence measured by the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8).

RESULTS

Regarding major CS, 61.2% of participants reported use of support-seeking CS (SUP group), 14.3% reported use of problem-focused CS (PRO group), and 24.5% reported use of hopeful-thinking CS (HOP group). The mean MMAS-8 score was higher in the PRO group than in the HOP group (P = 0.024). The mean CCI score was lower in the PRO group than in the HOP group (P = 0.017). In the HOP group, the severity of somatic symptoms was positively correlated with the scores for the emotion-focused CS subscale (r = 0.39, P = 0.029) and the hopeful-thinking CS subscale (r = 0.38, P = 0.036) of the K-WCQ. The level of life satisfaction positively correlated with the score for the problem-focused CS subscale in the HOP group (r = 0.40, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

We should pay more attention to the CSs of hemodialysis patients and provide interventions that promote problem-focused CSs, especially for nonadherent patients with high comorbidity rates who mainly use a hopeful-thinking CS.

Prevalence and correlates of non-adherence to immunosuppressants and to health behaviours in patients after kidney transplantation in Brazil - the ADHERE BRAZIL multicentre study: a cross-sectional study protocol

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent risk factor for poor clinical and after kidney transplantation (KT), and has contributed to the lack of improvement in long-term graft survival over the past decade. Understanding the multilevel correlates and risk factors of non-adherence is crucial to determine the optimal level for planning interventions, namely at the patient, health care provider, KT centre, and health care system level. Brazil, having the largest public transplantation program in the world and with regional differences regarding access to health services and service implementation, is in a unique position to study this multilevel approach. Therefore, the Adhere Brazil Study (ADHERE BRAZIL) was designed to assess the prevalence and variability of non-adherence to immunosuppressants and to health behaviours among adult KT recipients in Brazil, and to assess the multilevel correlates of non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication. We describe the rationale, design, and methodology of the ADHERE BRAZIL study.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study that includes 20 Brazilian KT centres. A stratified sampling approach is used, based on strata, with the following characteristics considered: geographical region and transplant activity (number of KTs per year). A random sample of patients (proportional to the size of the centre within each stratum) is selected from each centre. The prevalence of different health behaviours is assessed through self-report. The assessment of multilevel correlates of non-adherence is guided by the ecological model that considers factors at the level of the patient, health-care professional, and transplant centre, using established instruments or instruments developed for this study. Data will be collected over an 18-month period, with information obtained during the regular follow-up visits to the transplant outpatient clinic and directly entered into the Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) system. Data entry is performed by a trained professional who is part of the transplant team. The data collection began in December 2015.

DISCUSSION

This multicentre study is the first to evaluate multilevel correlates of non-adherence in KT patients and will provide a reliable estimate of non-adherence in Brazilian KT patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov on 10/10/2013, NCT02066935 .

Mensuração da adesão aos medicamentos imunossupressores em receptores de transplante renal

Resumo Objetivo: Mensurar a adesão aos medicamentos imunossupressores em receptores de transplante renal, utilizando a Basel Assessment of Adherence with Immunosuppressive Medication Scale - BAASIS® e descrever as características sociodemográficas, os fatores clínicos em relação aos imunossupressores e os níveis de creatinina. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, transversal, realizado no período de 2014 a 2015, no Ambulatório Pós-Transplante do Hospital do Rim (complexo hospitalar da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)). Resultados: Dos 181 participantes, 53,6% eram homens e a idade dos receptores variou de 18 a 74 anos. A Hipertensão Arterial Sistêmica foi o diagnóstico inicial de Insuficiência Renal Crônica em 38,7% dos receptores. Aproximadamente 95% dos receptores relataram que nunca se esqueceram de tomar o medicamento; 58,6% dos pacientes relataram ter aderido totalmente aos imunossupressores e 41,4% não aderiram a uma ou mais das quatro situações avaliadas pelos itens da BAASIS®. Não foi encontrada correlação significativa pelos itens da BAASIS® entre os níveis de creatinina e o escore total. Conclusão: Foi identificado um alto índice de pacientes que não aderiram ao tratamento imunossupressor (41,4%). Não houve correlação significativa entre o nível de creatinina e a idade do receptor no momento do TxR, bem como o tempo após TxR, tempo de separação do imunossupressor e escore total, e escores dos itens individuais da BAASIS®. Esse estudo mostrou que os receptores negros, do sexo masculino, sem uma rede de apoio familiar, obesos e autônomos são mais propensos a não aderir à terapia imunossupressora. A avaliação da adesão do receptor de transplante renal deve ser considerada durante todas as fases das ações do processo de enfermagem que compõem o plano terapêutico após o transplante renal.

Non-adherence to immunosuppressants following renal transplantation: a protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to immunosuppressant medication is essential for renal transplant recipients. This review aims to summarise what is known about non-adherence, with a view to providing comprehensive evidence to inform strategies aimed at advancing adherent behaviour.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review of quantitative studies that report adherence to immunosuppressants in adult (over 18 years) renal transplant recipients. The review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines; study quality will be assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Systematic searches will be completed across relevant databases. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a predefined data extraction form. We will summarise the operationalisation of adherence across studies and use narrative synthesis to identify factors associated with non-adherence. A meta-analysis will be conducted if there is sufficient homogeneity, and available data, across studies to estimate the prevalence of non-adherence in renal transplant recipients. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I² test. Survival analysis will be conducted to estimate hazard ratios to explore the impact of non-adherence on graft survival, graft failure and patient survival.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at conferences for professionals and researchers. Review outcomes will help support clinical practice by highlighting the extent of non-adherence among adults, and in doing so, signpost the need for suitable intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number (CRD42016038751).