Why is deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression a needed treatment option?

Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights From Tractography-Based Targeting

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch's 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9-15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.

RESULTS

Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

A narrative review on invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression

While most patients with depression respond to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, about one-third will present treatment resistance to these interventions. For patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), invasive neurostimulation therapies such as vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and epidural cortical stimulation may be considered. We performed a narrative review of the published literature to identify papers discussing clinical studies with invasive neurostimulation therapies for TRD. After a database search and title and abstract screening, relevant English-language articles were analyzed. Vagus nerve stimulation, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a TRD treatment, may take several months to show therapeutic benefits, and the average response rate varies from 15.2-83%. Deep brain stimulation studies have shown encouraging results, including rapid response rates (> 30%), despite conflicting findings from randomized controlled trials. Several brain regions, such as the subcallosal-cingulate gyrus, nucleus accumbens, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, anterior limb of the internal capsule, medial-forebrain bundle, lateral habenula, inferior-thalamic peduncle, and the bed-nucleus of the stria terminalis have been identified as key targets for TRD management. Epidural cortical stimulation, an invasive intervention with few reported cases, showed positive results (40-60% response), although more extensive trials are needed to confirm its potential in patients with TRD.

Deep brain stimulation in the management of paediatric neuropsychiatric conditions: Current evidence and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Neurosurgery has provided an alternative option for patients with refractory psychiatric indications. Lesion procedures were the initial techniques used, but deep brain stimulation (DBS) has the advantage of relative reversibility and adjustability. This review sets out to delineate the current evidence for DBS use in psychiatric conditions, with an emphasis on the paediatric population, highlighting pitfalls and opportunities.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on studies reporting the use of DBS in the management of psychiatric disorders. The PRISMA guidelines were employed to structure the review of the literature. Data was discussed focusing on the indications for DBS management of psychiatric conditions in the paediatric age group.

RESULTS

A total of seventy-three full-text papers reported the use of DBS surgery for the management of psychiatric conditions matching the inclusion criteria. The main indications were Tourette Syndrome (GTS) (15 studies), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (20), Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) (27), Eating Disorders (ED) (7) and Aggressive Behaviour and self-harm (AB) (4). Out of these, only 11 studies included patients in the paediatric age group (≤18 years-old). Among the paediatric patients, the indications for surgery included GTS, AB and ED.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of deep brain stimulation for psychiatric indications has progressed at a steady pace in the adult population and at a much slower pace in the paediatric population. Future studies in children should be done in a trial setting with strict and robust criteria. A move towards personalising DBS therapy with new stimulation paradigms will provide new frontiers and possibilities in this growing field.