Bacteremia in the red blood cells obtained from the cell saver in patients submitted to heart surgery

Intraoperative Cell Savage, Infection and Organ Failure in Infective Endocarditis Patients-A Retrospective Single Center Evaluation

Surgery is indicated in about 50% of infective endocarditis patients, and bleeding or the transfusion of blood a common finding. The intraoperative use of cell salvage may reduce the perioperative transfusion requirement, but its use is limited in the underlying disease. In this retrospective study, we therefore evaluated n = 335 patients fulfilling the modified Duke criteria for infective endocarditis characterized by the use of intraoperative cell salvage with autologous blood retransfusion. Inflammation markers and organ dysfunction, including catecholamine dependency, were evaluated by using linear regression analysis. Between 2015 and 2020, 335 patients underwent surgery for left-sided heart valve endocarditis. Intraoperative cell salvage was used in 40.3% of the cases, especially in complex scenarios and reoperation. Intraoperative cell salvage significantly altered the white blood cell count after surgery. On average, leucocytes were 3.0 Gpt/L higher in patients with intraoperative cell salvage compared to patients without after adjustment for confounders (95% CI: 0.39-5.54). Although the difference in WBC was statistically significant, i.e., higher in the ICS group compared to the no-ICS group, this difference may be clinically unimportant. Organ dysfunction, including hemodynamic instability and lactate values, were comparable between groups. In conclusion, intraoperative cell salvage enhanced the re-transfusion of autologous blood, with minor effects on the postoperative course of inflammatory markers, but was not associated with increased hemodynamic instability or organ dysfunction in general. The restriction of intraoperative cell salvage in surgery for infective endocarditis should be re-evaluated, and more prospective data in this topic are needed.

Risk factors associated with positive bacterial culture in salvaged red blood cells during cardiac surgery and postoperative infection incidence: A prospective cohort study

Background

This study was designed to explore factors associated with the incidence of positive bacterial culture of salvaged red blood cells (sRBCs) recovered with a Cell Saver instrument during cardiac surgery and the impact of such positive outcomes on postoperative infection-related morbidity.

Methods

The cohort study enrolled 204 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with intraoperative blood cell salvage and retransfusion from July 2021 to July 2022. These patients were stratified into two groups based on intraoperative sRBCs bacterial culture results: culture (+) and culture (-) groups. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were compared between these groups aim to detect possible predictors of positive culture in sRBCs. In addition, differences in postoperative infection-related morbidity and other clinical outcomes were compared between these groups.

Results

Of these patients, 49% were sRBCs culture (+), with Staphylococcus epidermidis as the most commonly identified pathogen. Risk factors independently associated with the risk of positive culture in sRBCs included BMI ≥25 kg/m², a history of smoking, an operative duration ≥277.5 min, the higher number of staff in the operating room and higher surgical case order. Patients in the sRBCs culture (+) group exhibited a longer average ICU stay [3.5 days (2.0-6.0) vs. 2 days (1.0-4.0), P < 0.01], a longer duration of ventilation [20.45 h (12.0-17.8) vs. 13 h (11.0-17.0, P = 0.02)], underwent more allogeneic blood transfusions, exhibited higher transfusion-related costs [2,962 (1,683.0-5,608.8) vs. 2,525 (1,532.3-3,595.0), P = 0.01], and had higher rates of postoperative infections (22 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.02) as compared to patients in the sRBCs culture (-) group. In addition, culture (+) in sRBCs was an independent risk factor for postoperative infection (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.16-5.90, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common pathogen detected in sRBCs in the culture (+) group in this study, identifying it as a potential driver of postoperative infection. Positive sRBCs culture may contribute to postoperative infection and its incidence was significantly associated with patient BMI, history of smoking, operative duration, the number of staff in the operating room and surgical case order.

Cell Saver Blood Reinfusion Up to 24 Hours Post Collection in Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Patients Does Not Increase Incidence of Hospital-Acquired Infections or Mortality

Cell saver blood reinfusion, a blood conservation technique recently available for pediatric use, is typically limited to 6 hours post processing to guard against bacterial contamination. We hypothesize that reinfusion of cell saver blood up to 24 hours post collection in children after cardiac surgery will not increase the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (HAI). The primary aim is to compare incidence of HAI between children receiving cell saver blood ≤6 hours vs. >6 to ≤24 hours from its collection. The secondary aim is to compare mortality and clinical outcomes. Retrospective chart review of children ≤18 years undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from 2013 to 2018 when cell saver collection and bedside temperature controlled storage became standard of care. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 48 hours postoperatively and those who did not receive cell saver were excluded. The primary outcome was HAI incidence postoperative days 0-6. Demographic data included diagnosis, surgical severity score, and clinical outcomes. 466 patients, 45% female. No significant between-group differences identified. There was no significant difference in HAI (control 8.5% vs. treatment 8.0%, p = .80) and death (control 7.9% vs. treatment 4.9%, p = .20). Noninferiority testing indicated the treatment group was not statistically inferior to the control group (p = .0028). Kaplan-Meier curve depicted similar status between-group rates of no infection or death; 92% treatment vs. 91% control. Total volume allogeneic red blood cell transfusion (allogeneic blood transfusion [ABT]) up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly less in the treatment group, p < .0001. Incidence of HAI or mortality was not increased in patients receiving cell saver blood reinfusion >6 to ≤24 hours post collection. Treatment subjects received significantly less volume of ABT. Considering the risks of ABT, these findings support cell saver blood reinfusion up to 24 hours post collection.