Bleeding risk assessment for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Which Procedures Contribute Most to the System-Wide Burden of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND

While clinical risk assessment models examine patient-level characteristics that portend morbidity, there is a paucity of literature exploring which procedures contribute most to the system-wide burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aimed to identify highly contributory procedures as potential targets for quality improvement.

METHODS

All patients in the 2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Public User File were included. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were analyzed individually and grouped by National Healthcare Safety Network groupings. We counted prevalence of VTE and calculated VTE rate for each CPT and for each grouping.

RESULTS

Of 902,968 included patients, 7501 (.83%) sustained postoperative VTE. Of 2748 unique CPT codes, VTE occurred for 762 (28%). Twenty procedure codes (.7%) contributed 39% of the total VTE. VTE rates of these procedures ranged from high-volume procedures with low VTE rates such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (.25%) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (.32%) to lower volume procedures with high VTE rate such as Hartmann's procedure (4.32%), Whipple procedure (3.85%), and distal pancreatectomy (3.82%). The CPT grouping with the most VTE was colon surgeries (1275/7501).

DISCUSSION

A small number of procedures contributes to the system-wide burden of VTE. High-risk procedures are important targets for standardized prophylaxis protocols. For low-risk procedures, careful attention should be paid to patient-specific factors that may increase VTE risk such as obesity, cancer, or limited mobility, as many common procedures contribute greatly to the systemic burden of VTE. Overall, surveillance can perhaps be targeted on a smaller number of procedures, allowing for more efficient use of quality improvement resources.

Thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome: a single centre experience

PURPOSE

Injuries increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the literature on the management of anticoagulant therapy in pediatric patients with crush injury is limited. In this study, we aimed to share our experience about anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome.

METHODS

This study included patients who were evaluated for VTE risk after the Turkey-Syria earthquake in 2023. Since there is no specific pediatric guideline for the prevention of VTE in trauma patients, risk assessment for VTE and decision for thromboprophylaxis was made by adapting the guideline for the prevention of perioperative VTE in adolescent patients.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients [25 males and 24 females] with earthquake-related crush syndrome had participated in the study. The median age of the patients was 13.5 (8.8-15.5) years. Seven patients (14.6%) who had no risk factors for thrombosis were considered to be at low risk and did not receive thromboprophylaxis. Thirteen patients (27.1%) with one risk factor for thrombosis were considered to be at moderate risk and 28 patients (58.3%) with two or more risk factors for thrombosis were considered to be at high risk. Moderate-risk patients (n = 8) and high-risk patients aged < 13 years (n = 11) received prophylactic enoxaparin if they could not be mobilized early, while all high-risk patients aged ≥ 13 years (n = 13) received prophylactic enoxaparin.

CONCLUSION

With the decision-making algorithm for thyromboprophylaxis we used, we observed a VTE rate of 2.1% in pediatric patients with earthquake-related crush syndrome.

Effects on venous flow of transcutaneous electrical stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, and sham stimulation on soleus muscle: A randomized crossover study in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Activation of venous flow has been shown with different types of electrical stimulation. The aim of this study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and sham stimulation on healthy young people.

METHODS

This randomized crossover study was conducted during June 2018 in the Faculty of Physical Therapy of A Coruña (Spain). Twenty-four university students (50% male) received in a randomized order 5 Hz-TENS, NMES, and sham stimulation on soleus muscle. Flow volume (FV) and peak velocity (PV) from popliteal vein were recorded via Doppler ultrasound, and relative changes from baseline were determined. Discomfort among the 3 stimulations was also compared.

RESULTS

The differences among the 3 stimulations were assessed using the ANOVA for repeated measured, the Friedman test and the Kendall tau test, according to the type of measurement to be compared. FV (mL/min) and PV (cm/s) increased significantly after NMES (percentual increase 37.2 ± 62.0%, P = .002; 264.4 ± 152.2%, P < .001, respectively) and TENS (226.2 ± 190.3%, P < .001; 202.7 ± 144.6%, P < .001, respectively). These percentual changes from basal level in hemodynamics were statistically different to those after placebo, which was ineffective enhancing hemodynamics. The improvements in FV were statistically higher with TENS than with NMES (P < .001), but there was no statistical difference in PV (P = .531). Despite NMES was applied at a significantly lower amplitude than TENS (P < .001), NMES protocol was the worst tolerated, though the differences in discomfort were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Both active electrical protocols but not sham stimulation increased hemodynamics in healthy people. TENS obtained higher flow volume increase from baseline than NMES, considered globally at not only in its on-time.