Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Co-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles decrease the cytotoxicity of experimental hydrogen peroxide gels for in-office tooth bleaching

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and cytotoxicity of experimental 6% and 35% hydrogen peroxide gels (HP6 or HP35) incorporated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (NP) co-doped with nitrogen and fluorine and irradiated with a violet LED light (LT).

METHODS

Bovine enamel-dentin disks adapted to artificial pulp chambers were randomly assigned to bleaching (n = 8/group): NC (negative control), NP, HP6, HP6 + LT, HP6 + NP, HP6 + NP + LT, HP35, HP35 + LT, HP35 + NP, HP35 + NP + LT, and commercial HP35 (COM). Color (ΔE00) and whiteness index (ΔWID) changes were measured before and 14 days after bleaching. The extracts (culture medium + diffused gel components) collected after the first session were applied to odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells, which were assessed concerning their viability, oxidative stress, and morphology. The amount of HP diffused through the disks was determined. Data were analyzed by generalized linear models or Kruskal Wallis Tests (α = 5%).  RESULTS: HP6 + NP + LT exhibited ΔE00 and ΔWID higher than HP6 (p < 0.05) and similar to all HP35 groups. HP6 + NP + LT showed the lowest HP diffusion, and the highest cell viability (%) among bleached groups, preserving cell morphology and number of living cells similar to NC and NP. HP6 + LT, HP6 + NP, and HP6 + NP + LT exhibited the lowest cell oxidative stress among bleached groups (p < 0.05). HP35, HP35 + LT, and HP35 (COM) displayed the lowest cell viability.

CONCLUSION

HP6 achieved significantly higher color and whiteness index changes when incorporated with nanoparticles and light-irradiated and caused lower cytotoxicity than HP35 gels. The nanoparticles significantly increased cell viability and reduced the hydrogen peroxide diffusion and oxidative stress, regardless of HP concentration.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Incorporation of co-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles combined with violet irradiation within the HP6 gel could promote a higher perceivable and acceptable efficacy than HP6 alone, potentially reaching the optimal esthetic outcomes rendered by HP35. This approach also holds the promise of reducing cytotoxic damages and, consequently, tooth sensitivity.

Enhanced tooth bleaching with a hydrogen peroxide/titanium dioxide gel

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effects of the titanium dioxide (TiO2) concentration and particle size in hydrogen peroxide (HP) on tooth bleaching effectiveness and enamel surface properties.

METHODS

TiO2 at different concentrations and particle sizes was incorporated into 40% HP gel to form an HP/TiO2 gel. The specimens were randomly divided into 8 groups: C1P20: HP + 1% TiO2 (20 nm); C3P20: HP + 3% TiO2 (20 nm); C5P20: HP + 5% TiO2 (20 nm); C1P100: HP + 1% TiO2 (100 nm); C3P100: HP + 3% TiO2 (100 nm); C5P100: HP + 5% TiO2 (100 nm); C0: HP with LED; and C0-woL: HP without LED. Bleaching was conducted over 2 sessions, each lasting 40 min with a 7-day interval. The color differences (ΔE00), whiteness index for dentistry (WID), surface microhardness, roughness, microstructure, and composition were assessed.

RESULTS

The concentration and particle size of TiO2 significantly affected ΔE00 and ΔWID values, with the C1P100 group showing the greatest ΔE00 values and C1P100, C3P100, and C5P100 groups showing the greatest ΔWID values (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in surface microhardness, roughness, microstructure or composition (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating 1% TiO2 with a particle size of 100 nm into HP constitutes an effective bleaching strategy to achieve desirable outcomes.

In-office Bleaching Activated With Violet LED: Effect on Pulpal and Tooth Temperature and Pulp Viability

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the influence of hydrogen peroxide (HP) with or without titanium dioxide nanotubes (TiO2) associated with violet LED (VL) regarding: a) the temperature change in the pulp chamber and facial surface; b) the decomposition of HP; and c) the cytotoxicity of the gels on pulp cells.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The experimental groups were: HP35 (35% HP/Whiteness HP, FGM); HP35+VL; HP35T (HP35+TiO2); HP35T+VL; HP7 (7.5% HP/White Class 7.5%, FGM); HP7+VL; HP7T (HP7+TiO2); and HP7T+VL. TiO2 was incorporated into the bleaching gels at 1%. Eighty bovine incisors were evaluated to determine temperature change in 8 experimental groups (n=10/group). A k-type thermocouple was used to evaluate the temperatures of the facial surface and in the pulp chamber, achieved by enabling endodontic access to the palatal surface, throughout the 30-minute session. HP decomposition (n=3) of gels was evaluated by using an automatic potentiometric titrator at the initial and 30-minute time points. Trans-enamel and trans-dentinal cell viability were assessed with a pulp chamber device as well as enamel and dentin discs (n=6), and the treatment extracts (culture medium + diffused components) were collected and applied to MDPC-23 odontoblast cells to evaluate cell viability according to the MTT test.

RESULTS

A temperature increase in the pulp chamber was observed in the presence of VL at 30 minutes (p<0.05) (Mann-Whitney test). Also at 30 minutes, HP35 showed greater decomposition in the presence of VL rather than in its absence (p<0.05) (mixed linear models and the Tukey-Kramer test). HP7 provided greater cell viability than the groups treated with HP35 (p<0.05) (generalized linear models test). Cell viability was significantly lower for HP7 in the presence of VL (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pulpal temperature increased with VL (maximum of 1.9°C), but did not exceed the critical limit to cause pulp damage. Less concentrated HP resulted in higher cell viability, even when associated with VL.

Low and high hydrogen peroxide concentrations of in-office dental bleaching associated with violet light: an in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess hydrogen peroxide (HP) penetration within the pulp chamber, color change (CC), physical-chemical properties, and temperature using in-office different concentration bleaching gels with or without violet light.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty teeth were divided into five groups (n = 10) based on the HP concentration bleaching gels used (6% and 35%) and the used violet light (with or without). HP penetration within the pulp chamber was measured using UV-Vis. The CC was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer. Initial and final concentration, and pH were measured through titration, and a Digital pHmeter, respectively. Temperature analyses were measured through a thermocouple. Statistical analysis included two-way ANOVA, Tukey's, and Dunnett's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The presence of violet light did not affect the amount of HP within the pulp chamber, or the CC (p > 0.05). Greater penetration of HP was observed within the pulp chamber, as well as CC when using 35% HP (p < 0.05). The final concentration of both gels was lower than the initial concentration, regardless of the use of violet light (p < 0.05). The initial and final pH levels remained neutral and stable (p > 0.05). The pulp temperature increased when the gels were used in conjunction with violet light (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using violet light in conjunction with 6% or 35% HP does not alter the physical properties of the bleaching agents, the penetration of HP or enhance color change. However, an increase in temperature was observed when violet light was applied associated with bleaching gels.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

While the simultaneous use of violet light with hydrogen peroxide 6% or 35% does not alter the material's properties, it also does not bring benefits in reducing hydrogen peroxide penetration and improving color change. Furthermore, the use of violet light increases pulp temperature.

Catalysis-based approaches with biopolymers and violet LED to improve in-office dental bleaching

This in vitro experimental investigation aimed to evaluate the impact of the combined application of a nanofiber scaffold (NS), a polymeric catalyst primer (PCP) containing 10 mg/mL of heme peroxidase enzyme, and violet LED (LEDv) on the esthetic efficacy (EE), trans-amelodentinal cytotoxicity (TC), and procedural duration of conventional in-office bleaching therapy. To achieve this, 96 standardized enamel/dentin discs were individually placed in artificial pulp chambers. A 35% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) bleaching gel was administered for 45, 30, or 15 min to the enamel, either previously coated with NS + PCP or left uncoated, followed by irradiation with LEDv for 15 min or no irradiation. The established groups were as follows: G1, negative control (no treatment); G2, 35% H2O2/45 min; G3, NS + PCP + LEDv; G4, NS + PCP + 35%H2O2/45 min + LEDv; G5, NS + PCP + 35%H2O2/30 min + LEDv; and G6, NS + PCP + 35%H2O2/15 min + LEDv. Extracts (culture medium + gel components diffused through the discs) were collected and applied to odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells. EE (ΔE00 and ΔWI) and TC were assessed using ANOVA/Tukey analysis (p < 0.05). The EE analysis revealed no statistical differences between G6 and G2 (p > 0.05). Cells in G6 exhibited higher viability and lower oxidative stress compared to other bleached groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, employing NS + PCP + LEDv to catalyze a 35%H2O2 bleaching gel applied for 15 min to the enamel resulted in successful esthetic improvements and reduced the cytotoxicity commonly linked with traditional in-office bleaching procedures.

Chemical, morphological and microhardness analysis of coronary dentin submitted to internal bleaching with hydrogen peroxide and violet LED

BACKGROUND

Violet LED has been used for internal bleaching, however its implications on coronary dentin composition are unclear. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of bleaching with violet LED, either associated with 35 % hydrogen peroxide or not, on microhardness, chemical composition, and morphological characteristics of coronal dentin.

METHODS

Thirty maxillary canines were selected to obtain 30 blocks of coronal dentin, distributed in 3 groups (n = 10): 35 % hydrogen peroxide (HP); violet LED (LED); HP 35 % + LED, (HP+LED). The chemical analysis was performed by FTIR and the morphological evaluation of the dentin structure by confocal laser scanning microscopy before (T0) and after treatment (T1). The microhardness analysis was performed by microdurometer after bleaching. The data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA test (P> 0.05).

RESULTS

The intensity of the inorganic peaks decreased after bleaching for all groups (P = 0.003). There was an increase in the organic peak intensity after bleaching with HP, a decrease for LED, while HP+LED did not change the intensity (P = 0.044). Moreover, the inorganic/organic ratio decreased for HP (P = 0.022), while for LED and HP+LED there was no significant changes (P>0.05). HP and HP+LED showed lower microhardness values compared to LED (P< 0.05). Regarding morphological changes, an increase in the perimeter of the dentinal tubules was found for all groups, with the smallest increase being observed for LED.

CONCLUSION

HP bleaching decreased the chemical stability and microhardness of the coronal dentin, while the violet LED treatments had no significant impact on dentin stability. In all groups, there was an increase in exposure of the dentinal tubules after bleaching, which was less pronounced with the violet LED bleaching.

Effectiveness of changing the color of darker teeth is potentiated by association with violet LED light

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of in-office bleaching protocols performed with violet LED light either combined with a bleaching agent containing 37% carbamide peroxide, or not, was determined by comparing teeth with different degrees of darkening.

METHODOLOGY

Eighty bovine incisors were separated into groups of "light" teeth (luminosity greater than or equal to B3) and "dark" teeth (less than or equal to A3.5) to receive the protocols: HP - 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP), CP - 37% carbamide peroxide (Whiteness SuperEndo), LED - violet LED light (Bright Max Whitening), CPLED - CP associated with the LED. For color analysis the CIEL*a*b* e WID, ΔEab, ΔE00 e ΔWID parameters were used. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman or Nemenyi tests (α = 5%).

RESULTS

HP and CP resulted in similar color change values (ΔEab, ΔE00 e ΔWID) for light and dark teeth (p > 0.05). Dark teeth showed better bleaching effectiveness (ΔEab, ΔE00 e ΔWID) than light teeth when CPLED was used (p < 0.05). LED showed color change that were below the limits of acceptability and perceptibility for ΔWID.

CONCLUSION

light teeth are effectively bleached with the use of HP or CP, whereas dark teeth respond better to treatment with the CPLED protocol. Violet LED used alone did not show a satisfactory result.

Hybrid light applied with 37% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent with or without titanium dioxide potentializes color change effectiveness

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of dental color change was assessed by incorporating titanium dioxide (TiO2) into 37% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent associated with hybrid light.

METHODOLOGY

Fifty bovine incisors were selected to receive the bleaching treatment, and separated into five groups (n = 10): 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (Whiteness HP, FGM/HP); 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) (Whiteness SuperEndo, FGM/CP); CP + hybrid light (HL) (CP HL); CP + 1% TiO2 (CP TiO2); CP TiO2 + hybrid light (CP TiO2 HL). The bleaching gels were applied to the dental surface for 30 min. Hybrid light (Whitening Plus, DMC/infrared laser diodes + blue LEDs +violet LEDs) was applied with 1 min of active light, alternating with 1 min of pause. A spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade® Advance, Vita) was used to determine the color of the dental elements at baseline and time points after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd bleaching sessions. Color change effectiveness was evaluated using Vita Classical, CIEL*a*b*, WID and ΔEab, ΔE00 and ΔWID parameters.

RESULTS

Generalized mixed linear models for repeated measures (α = 5%) showed significant decrease in Vita Classical scores and a* and b* values, as well as an increase in L* and ∆WID values for all the groups. Higher color change values for ΔEab were observed for CP HL and CP TiO2 HL, while those of ΔE00 and ΔWID were higher for CP TiO2 HL at the end of the bleaching treatment.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid light applied with TiO2 incorporated into CP potentiated the effectiveness of the color change in the tooth structure.

Effect of whitening toothpastes and activated charcoal powder on enamel wear and surface roughness

This study aimed to evaluate surface roughness (Sa), roughness profile (Rv), and enamel wear after brushing with different whitening toothpastes and charcoal powders. Sixty (n = 10) bovine enamel blocks (6 × 6 × 3 mm) were randomly distributed into six groups according to toothpaste type: regular toothpaste (CONT), toothpaste containing 2% hydrogen peroxide (HP), toothpaste containing titanium dioxide (TiO2), toothpaste containing charcoal (COAL), toothpaste containing charcoal and TiO2 (COAL+TiO2), and activated charcoal powder (COAL_PWD). Each block was subjected to 30,000 reciprocal cycles at a 1:3 proportion slurry. After brushing, the blocks were analyzed using an optical profilometer to determine Sa, Rv, and enamel wear. In addition, representative 3D images of each group and wear profiles were obtained. Sa was analyzed using generalized linear models followed by Bonferroni correction, whereas Rv was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. After brushing, COAL and COAL+TiO2 showed higher Sa values than COAL_PWD. However, no significant difference was observed in Sa between whitening toothpaste and COAL_PWD, and CONT (p > 0.05). In addition, no differences were observed among the groups in Rv (p > 0.05). Conversely, enamel wear was higher for TiO2, COAL, COAL+TiO2, and COAL_PWD than for CONT. CONT showed the least enamel wear, whereas HP showed intermediate values. Representative 3D images and line profiles showed lower step-height and lower mean surface losses for the CONT and HP groups than for the other groups. Whitening toothpastes and COAL_PWD did not increase Sa or Rv compared with CONT, while CONT demonstrated lower enamel wear.

Effects of experimental bleaching gels containing co-doped titanium dioxide and niobium pentoxide combined with violet light

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to evaluate the bleaching potential of 6% hydrogen peroxide (6% HP) gels containing NF_TiO2 or Nb2O5 irradiated with a violet LED light and the effects on enamel mineral content and surface morphology.

METHODS

Particles were synthesized, and experimental gels were chemically analyzed by preliminary and accelerated stability tests, pH, and HP decomposition rate. Bovine enamel blocks were treated with 6% HP gels containing (n = 10): 5% NF_TiO2, 5% Nb2O5, 2.5% NF_TiO2 + 2.5% Nb2O5 or without particles (6% HP), irradiated or not with LED, and the control was treated with 35% HP. Color (∆E00) and whitening index (∆WID) variations, surface microhardness (SH), average roughness (∆Ra), Ca-P concentration (EDS), and enamel morphology (SEM) were assessed. Bleaching was performed in 3 sessions of 30 min and 7-day intervals. Data were submitted to two- (pH, decomposition rate, ∆E00, and ∆WID) or three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni (SH), Kruskal-Wallis (∆Ra), and Dunnet tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

No changes in the gel's color, odor, or translucency were observed. The pH (6 to 6.5) remained stable over time, and light irradiation boosted the HP decomposition rate. NF_TiO2 and Nb2O5-containing gels displayed higher ∆E00 and ΔWID when light-irradiated (p < 0.05). Nb2O5 and Nb2O5 + NF_TiO2 decreased enamel SH (p < 0.05), but no SH changes were found among groups (p > 0.05). No differences among groups were noted in ∆Ra, Ca-P content, and enamel morphology after treatments (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Experimental light-irradiated 6% HP gels containing NF_TiO2 or Nb2O5 were chemically stable and exhibited bleaching potential comparable with 35% HP.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Low-concentrated HP gels containing NF_TiO2 or Nb2O5 and light-irradiated stand as a possible alternative to in-office bleaching.

Continuous vs fractionated violet LED light protocols for dental bleaching: evaluations of color change and temperature of the dental pulp and buccal surface

BACKGROUND

Dental color change and the temperature of the pulp chamber and of the buccal surface were evaluated during bleaching with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) with continuous vs fractionated violet LED light protocols.

METHODOLOGY

Bovine incisors received in-office bleaching for 30 minutes using different light protocols (Bright Max Whitening, MMOptics). Teeth were separated into groups (n=10): HP) 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP, FGM)/no light; CP) 37% carbamide peroxide (Whiteness SuperEndo, FGM)/no light; CP10) CP+10 min of continuous light; CP20) CP+20 min of continuous light; CP30) CP+30 min of continuous light; CPF) CP+20 cycles of 60 s light / 30 s no light (fractionated). Color evaluations were performed at different times. Evaluations of pulp and buccal surface temperatures were performed before and throughout the 30 minutes of bleaching.

RESULTS

Generalized linear models for repeated measures over time were applied to the data (α=5%). After the 1st session, CP20 and CP30 had significantly lower b* values ​​than CP and CP10 (p=0.0071). For ΔE_ab and ΔE₀₀, CPF, CP20 and CP30 showed the highest color change among the treatments after the third bleaching (p<0.05). For temperature evaluations, CP30 showed higher pulp and buccal surface temperatures than the other protocols (p<0.0001) after 20 min.

CONCLUSION

Fractionated or continuous application of violet LED for 20 or 30 min leads to greater effectiveness of color change. All protocols with the application of LED led to an increase in pulp and buccal surface temperatures during bleaching, although the fractionated application appeared to be safer than the use of continuous light.

Influence of violet LED and fluoride-containing carbamide peroxide bleaching gels on early-stage eroded/abraded teeth

PURPOSE

This study evaluated enamel with early-stage erosion/abrasion following bleaching with 20% and 45% carbamide peroxide (CP) gels containing fluoride (F) and irradiated with violet LED (LED).

METHODS

Enamel blocks were immersed in 1% citric acid (5 min) and artificial saliva (120 min) three times to produce early-stage enamel erosion. Simulated toothbrushing was performed only after the first saliva immersion, to provoke enamel abrasion. The erosive/abraded enamel samples were submitted to (n=10): LED/CP20, CP20, LED/CP20_F, CP20_F, LED/CP45, CP45, LED/CP45_F, CP45_F, LED, and control (without treatment). The pH of the gels was assessed, and color (ΔE₀₀) and whiteness index (ΔWI_D) changes were calculated after cycling (T₁), and 7 days from bleaching (T₂). Enamel surface roughness average (Ra) and Knoop microhardness (kg/mm², %SHR) were evaluated at baseline (T₀) at T₁ and T_2. Scanning electron microscopy evaluated the enamel surface morphology at T₂.

RESULTS

The gels' pH was neutral and CP20 and CP45 exhibited no differences in ΔE₀₀ and ΔWI_D (p>0.05) but LED increased these parameters for CP20_F and CP45. Erosion/abrasion significantly decreased mean kg/mm², and the LED group was the only one not increasing microhardness after bleaching (p>0.05). None of the groups fully recovered the initial microhardness. All groups exhibited %SHR similar to the control (p>0.05) and the increase in Ra was detected only after erosion/abrasion. CP20_F groups exhibited a more preserved enamel morphology.

CONCLUSION

Light irradiation combined with low-concentrated CP gel promoted a bleaching effect comparable to the high-concentrated CP. The bleaching protocols did not adversely impact the surface of early-stage eroded/abraded enamel.

Effectiveness and color stability of non-vital dental bleaching photoactivated by violet LED on blood-stained teeth

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the effect of violet LED irradiation associated or not with bleaching agents on blood-stained teeth. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the whitening efficacy and color stability of non-vital dental bleaching using 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) photoactivated with violet LED (VL) compared to 35% HP alone and 35% HP photoactivated with blue LED (BL).

METHODS

Fifty bovine dental crowns were used to obtain specimens of 5 × 5 × 2 mm. After selection based on a previous colorimetric analysis, the specimens were blood-stained and randomly assigned into five groups (n = 10): control (no treatment); 35% HP, 35% HP/BL; 35% HP/VL; and VL. Three bleaching sessions were performed and the colorimetric analysis (∆E_ab, ∆L, and ∆WI_D) was recorded after 7 days, 30 days, and 9 months of the last bleaching session. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test was used at a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

35% HP, 35% HP/BL, and 35% HP/VL showed higher values of ∆E_ab, ∆L, e ∆WI_D (P < 0.05), without intra- and intergroup differences (P > 0.05). C and VL were similar in all the evaluation times (P > 0.05), showing lower values of ∆E_ab, ∆L, and ∆WI_D (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

35% HP/VL can be a viable alternative for dental bleaching in endodontically-treated teeth, showing bleaching efficacy similar to 35% HP solely used, even after a 9-month follow-up. VL used alone was not effective to bleach blood-stained teeth.

Physicochemical evaluation of hydrogen peroxide bleaching gels containing titanium dioxide catalytic agent, and their influence on dental color change associated with violet LED

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was: 1) to analyze the physical-chemical properties of hydrogen peroxide (HP) agents at 7.5% (HP7) and 35% (HP35), and the association with or without TiO₂ nanotubes; 2) to evaluate dental bleaching effectiveness by using HP7 and HP35 together with or without TiO₂ nanotubes, and applied with or without violet LED (VL).

METHODOLOGY

80 bovine incisors were treated according to groups (n = 10): HP35; HP35 + VL; HP35T (HP35 + TiO₂); HP35T + VL; HP7; HP7 + VL; HP7T (HP7 + TiO₂); HP7T + VL. Bleaching effectiveness was measured at 4 time points according to the Vita Classical, CIEL*a*b*, CIEDE2000, and WI_D parameters. HP35, HP35T, HP7, and HP7T were evaluated for mass change, pH, mean particle size (P), polydispersity (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP), over 6 months of storage.

RESULTS

The pH of HP35 thickener was higher when associated to TiO₂. At baseline, both of the bleaching gels containing TiO₂ had lower P, PDI, and PZ (p < 0.05). All groups showed a significant decrease in Vita Classical color scores (p = 0.0037). There was a higher L* value, and lower b* values for HP7 when associated to VL after the 3rd session. (p < 0.05). HP35T showed higher color change (ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀), and lower a* value in the presence of VL (p < 0.05). ΔWI_D presented lower values for both gels, when TiO₂ was incorporated (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of TiO₂ to the bleaching gel showed good stability with minimal variations in physical-chemical properties. The color change in HP35 was more effective than in HP7, but the VL boosted the bleaching effectiveness of HP7, whereas TiO₂ did not increase bleaching effectiveness.

Improved esthetic efficacy and reduced cytotoxicity are achieved with a violet LED irradiation of manganese oxide-enriched bleaching gels

Gels with high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been associated with cytotoxicity and consequent post-bleaching tooth sensitivity. This study assessed the bleaching efficacy (BE) and cytotoxicity (CT) of bleaching gels with low concentrations of H2O2 containing manganese oxide (MnO2) and photocatalyzed with violet LED (LEDv). The following groups were established: G1: no treatment (negative control, NC); G2: 35% H2O2 (positive control, PC); G3: LEDv; G4: 10% H2O2; G5: 6% H2O2; G6: 10% H2O2 + MnO2 + LEDv; G7: 6% H2O2 + MnO2 + LEDv. To analyze BE, standardized enamel/dentin discs (E/DDs) were subjected to the bleaching procedures for 45 min (1 session). The color change was determined before and after performing the bleaching protocols (ΔE00; ΔWI). To analyze CT, the E/DDs were adapted to artificial pulp chambers, and the extracts (culture medium + diffused gel components) were applied to cultured odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells. Then, the cells were assessed concerning their viability (VB), oxidative stress (OxS), and Live/Dead. The amount of H2O2 diffused was also determined (ANOVA/Tukey; p < 0.05). Cell viability decreased in all bleached groups compared to G1 (NC; p < 0.05). The cells in G6 and G7 presented higher viability than in G2, G4, and G5 (p < 0.05). The BE in G7 was similar to G2 (PC; p < 0.05). The lowest OxS and H2O2 diffusion values were found in G6 and G7, compared to the other bleached groups (G2, G4, and G5; p < 0.05). The 6% H2O2 bleaching gel (G7) submitted to both methods of catalysis (MnO2 + LEDv) caused only a mild cytotoxicity and maintained the excellent esthetic outcome promoted by in-office conventional tooth bleaching.

Evaluation of the efficacy of the use of violet LED light in the bleaching of damaged primary incisors darkened by trauma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of violet LED light for the bleaching treatment of primary incisors darkened by trauma.

METHODS

Twenty deciduous incisors with color change were selected, divided into two groups: control - no bleaching protocol was applied, and VL- treated with violet LED. The change color analysis was taken in each tooth, by spectrophotometer. In three different time: baseline - before treatment, after 4 treatment sessions and after 8 treatment sessions.

RESULTS

The color change data were analyzed using ANOVA and a post- hoc Tukey tests (α=0.05). After 4 and 8 sessions no differences were observed between the groups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, it can be concluded that violet LED light was not effective in bleaching primary incisors darkened by trauma after 8 sessions.

Violet LED associated with high concentration hydrogen peroxide: Effects on bleaching efficacy, pH, and temperature

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the bleaching efficacy, pH, and temperature of 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) gel used alone or associated with violet LED.

METHODS

Sixty bovine crowns were sectioned (5 × 5 × 2mm). After staining with black tea, the specimens were randomized into four groups (n = 10) according to the bleaching protocol: HP35R: 3 × 15 min 35% HP; HP35: 1 × 45 min 35% HP; HP35VR: 3 × 8min 35% HP + Violet LED; HP35V: 1 × 24 min + Violet LED. Two bleaching sessions were performed for all the groups. Color change was evaluated before, 24h after each session, 7 days and 15 days after the last session. The variables ∆E₀₀ [CIEDE2000] and W_ID were used for color analysis. The pH variation (initial and final) and the temperature of the gel were recorded (n = 5). ANOVA two-way for repeated measures and Bonferroni post-test was used at a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

HP35VR and HP35V the most noticeable color change(p < 0.05). The final values of pH were lower than the initial ones, but with no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Groups HP35VR and HP35V showed an increase in temperature in relation to HP35R (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Violet LED improved the bleaching efficacy of 35% HP in a time-saving manner without negatively affecting the pH and temperature of 35% HP. The renewal of HP did not influence the outcomes.

The influence of violet LED application time on the esthetic efficacy and cytotoxicity of a 35% H2O2 bleaching gel

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential influence of violet LED (V-LED) application time on the esthetic efficacy and cytotoxicity of a 35% H₂O₂ bleaching gel.

METHODOLOGY

Stained and standardized enamel/dentin discs were subjected to one in-office tooth bleaching session (45 min), and the gel was either irradiated or not with V-LED. Thus, the following groups were established (n = 8): G1: No treatment (negative control, NC); G2: 35% H₂O₂ (positive control, PC); G3: 35%H₂O₂ + V-LED/15 min; G4: 35%H₂O₂ + V-LED/30 min; G5: 35%H₂O₂ + V-LED/45 min. First, esthetic efficacy was assessed (ΔE₀₀ and ΔWI). Discs assembled in artificial pulp chambers were subjected to the same bleaching treatments. Then, the extracts (culture medium + diffused bleaching gel components) were collected and applied to MDPC-23 pulp cells, which were analyzed for viability (Live/Dead, MTT) and oxidative stress (OxS). The amount of H₂O₂ in the extracts was also determined (leuco crystal-violet/peroxidase). The data were subjected to ANOVA/Tukey at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Although esthetic efficacy did not differ among the irradiated groups (G3, G4, and G5) (p > 0.05), their results were higher than in G2 (PC; p < 0.05). In the irradiated groups, the cell viability and OxS as well as the amount of H₂O₂ in the extracts were statistically similar to G2 (PC), regardless of irradiation time (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although V-LED improves the esthetic outcome of in-office tooth bleaching, increasing irradiation time does not effect the color changes and cytotoxicity of this professional therapy.

Effects of black tea tooth staining previously to 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching

Aim: To determine if the artificial staining with black tea (BT) influences the enamel microhardness before in-office bleaching and if BT staining is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide Methods: Enamel/dentin blocks were randomized into groups according to the staining protocol (n=5/group): (CO) control – maintained in artificial saliva solution (AS); (BT4) immersed in black tea solution for 4 h; (BT24) immersed in black tea solution for 24 h. After the staining protocols, all specimens were kept in AS for one week, followed by bleaching (three sessions of HP application for 40 min). Knoop surface microhardness (kgF/mm2) was determined at baseline (T0), after staining (T1), after 7 days of storage in AS (T2), and after bleaching (T3). The color (ΔE00) and coordinate changes (ΔL, Δa, Δb) were measured using a digital spectrophotometer at T0 and T3. Data were submitted to one-way (ΔE00, ΔL, Δa, Δb) or two-way ANOVA repeated measures (kgF/mm2) and Tukey’s test (a=5%). Results: The staining protocols (BT4 and BT24) promoted significantly lower microhardness (T1 and T2, p<0.05) than CO, whereas CO was the only group to maintain microhardness values over time. Bleaching promoted perceptible ΔE00 without a significant difference among the groups regardless of the staining protocol (p=0.122). CO and BT4 showed no differences in terms of ΔL and Δa (p>0.05), but BT4 displayed a higher Δb than CO. Conclusion: The artificial staining with BT negatively affected the enamel surface microhardness and was not essential to evaluate the efficacy of 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching.

Whitening efficacy of low concentration hydrogen peroxide photoactivated with blue or violet LED

BACKGROUND

Bleaching protocols using low concentration hydrogen peroxide (HP) photoactivated with LED sources have been widely discussed. We evaluated the whitening efficacy of 15% HP photoactivated with blue or violet LED compared to 35% HP.

METHODS

Thirty bovine crowns were sectioned into 5 × 5 × 2mm specimens. After staining in black tea, the specimens were randomized into three groups (n=10): 35% HP, 15% HP + blue LED and 15% HP + violet LED. Two bleaching sessions were performed and the color assessment (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, ∆E_ab [CIELab], ∆E₀₀ [CIEDE2000] and WI_D) was performed before, 24h after each session, 7 days and 1 month after the last session. Data were evaluated by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test at a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

All groups showed effective and similar results over 1 month of follow-up (p > 0.05), with only intragroup differences among the time intervals (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 15% HP photoactivated with blue or violet LED showed similar whitening efficacy compared to 35% HP. Thus, the association of low concentration bleaching gels with LED sources can provide a successful and less aggressive treatment in terms of color change.

VIOLET LED DENTAL WHITENING: EFFECTIVENESS AND BIOLOGICAL SAFETY: AN IN VITRO STUDY

INTRODUCTION

The light-emitting diode (Led) in the violet spectrum associated or not with hydrogen peroxide (HP) has been suggested as a promising technique for dental bleaching. Violet led has a wavelength of 405-410 nm, which is very close to that of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and this has raised biological safety concerns.

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of the violet led dental bleaching technique by evaluating color parameters, enamel surface microhardness, and biological safety analysis.

METHODS

One hundred bovine dental blocks were divided into groups according to the bleaching technique (G1 - only HP; G2 - HP associated with blue led; G3 - only blue led; G4 - HP associated with a violet led; and G5 - only violet led). The color analysis (ΔE, ΔL, and WID) and enamel surface microhardness were assessed before and after bleaching (immediately, 5, 14, and 30 days). The biological safety of the violet led irradiation was assessed by measuring the number of micronuclei formed in human cells in culture in response to irradiation. Data analysis included Kruskal-Wallis test, Friedman test, and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

In groups G4 and G5 there was the formation of precipitates on the enamel surface. At the time of 14 days, it was observed that the G2 group had lower values of microhardness than G5. ΔL and ΔE showed differences between groups in experimental times. Mean percentages of micronuclei occurrence were similar in the control group and the violet led group.

CONCLUSION

The violet led irradiation can be applied for dental bleaching because this approach produces significant color changes preserving tooth enamel integrity and causes no genotoxic effects on vital cells.

Influence of violet LED associated or not with peroxide gel on inflammation, mineralization, and collagen fiber maturation in dentin and pulp tissue

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of violet LED, associated or not with a 17.5% hydrogen peroxide (HP) bleaching gel, on inflammation, mineralization in pulp tissue, and collagen fiber maturation in dentin and pulp tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The maxillary molars of eighty Wistar rats were distributed into four groups (n = 10): CONT - without treatment; HP - 30-minute application of 17.5% HP; LED - 20-minute application of violet LED; and HP+LED - application of PH and violet LED. Rats were euthanized and jaws were processed for histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation (IL-17, IL-23, and osteocalcin) and picrosirius red immediately after (T0), and at 7 (T1), 15 (T2), and 30 days (T3) post-treatment, with Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, paired T-test, and T-test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

HP and HP+LED presented necrosis and severe inflammatory infiltrate. When compared to CONT group, LED presented severe osteocalcin (OCN) immunostaining in T2 and less immature fibers in T2 and T3.

CONCLUSION

The violet LED caused no severe damage to the pulp tissue, increased IL-17 and IL-23 expression in T0 when associated with HP, and had no influence on pulp tissue mineralization, besides accelerating the maturation of collagen fibers of dentin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Violet LED therapy induced no inflammation in the pulp tissue of rats and played no role in pulp tissue fibrosis, besides accelerating the maturation of dentin collagen fibers.

Effects of tooth bleaching protocols with violet LED and hydrogen peroxide on enamel properties

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the color change, enamel surface roughness and microhardness after different tooth bleaching protocols, using hydrogen peroxide (HP) and/or violet LED.

METHODS

Forty bovine specimens (7 × 7 × 2 mm) were randomly distributed into 4 groups: 35% HP, 6% HP, 6% HP + violet LED and violet LED alone. First, the specimens were stained with black tea and then submitted to two bleaching sessions of 30 min with an interval of 7 days. Color change (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b* and ∆E00) after 24 h of each session and 1 week after the last session was evaluated. Enamel roughness and microhardness were evaluated immediately before the sessions, 24 h and 1 week after the last session. Data were evaluated by ANOVA for repeated measures and Bonferroni post-test or Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Representative specimens from each group were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP showed the highest color change, while violet LED alone had the lowest results. Enamel roughness analyses showed that 6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP showed changes after two bleaching sessions. No differences were observed regarding enamel microhardness.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 6% HP + violet LED showed enhanced bleaching efficacy compared to 35% HP. However, violet LED used alone exhibited the lowest color change. 6% HP + violet LED and 35% HP promoted changes on enamel roughness, while no microhardness changes was observed for any group.

Innovative strategy for in-office tooth bleaching using violet LED and biopolymers as H2O2 catalysts

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of coating the enamel with a nanofiber scaffold (NS) and a polymeric catalyst primer (PCP) on the esthetic efficacy, degradation kinetics of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and trans-amelodentinal cytotoxicity of bleaching gels subjected or not to violet-LED irradiation.

METHODOLOGY

The following groups were established (n=8): G1- No treatment (negative control); G2- NS+PCP; G3- LED; G4- NS+PCP+LED; G5- 35% H₂O₂ (positive control); G6- NS+PCP+35% H₂O₂+LED; G7- 20% H₂O₂; G8- NS+PCP+20% H₂O₂+LED; G9- 10% H₂O₂; G10- NS+PCP+10% H₂O₂+LED. For esthetic efficacy analysis, enamel/dentin discs were stained and exposed for 45 minutes to the bleaching protocols. To assess the cytotoxicity, the stained enamel/dentin discs were adapted to artificial pulp chambers, and the extracts (culture medium + components diffused through the discs) were collected and applied to MDPC-23 cells, which had their viability, oxidative stress, and morphology (SEM) evaluated. The amount of H₂O₂ diffused and hydroxyl radical (OH^•) production were also determined (two-way ANOVA/Tukey/paired Student t-test; p<0.05).

RESULTS

G6 had the highest esthetic efficacy compared to the other groups (p<0.05). Besides the esthetic efficacy similar to conventional in-office bleaching (G5; p>0.05), G10 also showed the lowest toxic effect and oxidative stress to MDPC-23 cells compared to all bleached groups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Coating the enamel with a nanofiber scaffold and a polymeric catalyst primer, followed by the application of 10%, 20%, or 35% H₂O₂ bleaching gels irradiated with a violet LED, stimulates H₂O₂ degradation, increasing esthetic efficacy and reducing the trans-amelodentinal toxicity of the treatment.

Effectiveness of Violet LED alone or in association with bleaching gel during dental photobleaching: A Systematic Review

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy of violet led in promoting dental bleaching itself or accelerating dental bleaching when associated with peroxides.

METHODS

Clinical and in vitro studies were identified by a search on November 27th 2020 in the PubMed and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) studies related to bleaching; 2) studies related to violet LED Light (405-410nm); and 3) studies that analyzed efficacy. The authors assessed the studies for risk of bias independently. Authors extracted outcomes including color change evaluation and pain assessment independently.

RESULTS

During the search process, 895 articles were found in the previously cited databases. After the first screening consisting of title and abstract evaluations, 18 articles were selected. Finally, 13 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review, being 5 clinical trial/case series and 8 in vitro studies. In vitro studies showed a high risk of bias and interventional studies showed a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The violet Led seems to have the potential to bleach teeth without peroxides, with a clinical perceptible color alteration. However, the effect is small in comparison to bleaching using peroxides. When Violet Led is used in association with peroxides, it seems to potentialize the bleaching result. However, due to the high heterogeneity between studies, a small number of clinical studies, and the high risk of bias of the in vitro included studies, the results are not definitive, and further well-designed studies are needed to reach safe evidence.

Blinded, Parallel and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of In-office Dental Bleaching with Violet LED (405-410 nm)

This clinical study evaluated the effect of bleaching performed with violet LED light (405-410 nm), either combined with hydrogen peroxide (HP) gel, or not, on color change, dental sensitivity, participants' satisfaction and impact on their quality of life. A hundred participants were divided into one of the groups (n = 25): G1 - 35% HP (4 sessions, 1x/week); G2 - violet LED (4 sessions, 1x/week); G3 - violet LED (4 sessions, 2x/week); G4 - hybrid technique (violet LED + 35% HP; 4 sessions, 1x/week). Color evaluation was performed with colorimetric tests (objective and subjective), before, 14 days and 3 months after completion. Additionally, satisfaction with treatment, impact on quality of life (OHIP-14) and dental sensitivity were recorded. The data were submitted to statistical analysis, considering a significance level of 5%, with the exception of the data from the questionnaire on satisfaction (descriptive analysis). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests showed that there was no difference between color variation resulting from techniques used in G1 and G4; those used in G2 and G3 did not differ and were less effective for bleaching than those of the other groups, in both subjective and objective evaluations. Regarding tooth sensitivity, subjects in G2 and G3 experienced no sensitivity, ​​while those in G4 showed lower sensitivity values than those in G1. With respect to quality of life, only subjects in G1 and G2 showed a significant positive impact. Among the evaluated techniques, the hybrid type seemed to be a good alternative, showing effective bleaching with less tooth sensitivity.

Characterization and effectiveness of a violet LED light for in-office whitening

OBJECTIVES

This study characterized a violet LED light (V-LED; bright max whitening) tooth whitening device and evaluated its efficacy on stained enamel compared to hydrogen peroxide (HP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Characterization of the V-LED beam profile was performed using a laser beam-profiler. The irradiance was measured throughout an exposure cycle at 0- and 8-mm distances using an integrating sphere and a spectral radiometer. Bovine enamel/dentin blocks stained with black tea (BT), cigarette smoke (CS), or without staining (CONT) were subjected to V-LED or 40% HP (n = 10/group). Color parameters (ΔL, Δa, Δb, and ΔE₀₀) were measured using a digital spectrophotometer. Light transmission was estimated through 1-mm-thick bovine enamel slices (n = 5). ΔL, Δb, ΔE₀₀, and irradiance were analyzed by two-way ANOVAs and Tukey's tests, Δa by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, and light transmission by t-test (α = 5%).

RESULTS

Heterogeneous beam distribution was observed for the emitting V-LED chips. After 20 sequential exposures, irradiance levels were reduced 25-50%, regardless of the distance from V-LED. Localized irradiance values were statistically different between beam locations and different distances from the target. V-LED produced lower ΔE_00, ΔL, Δa, and Δb values than HP for CONT and BT, with no differences for CS. Light transmittance decreased approximately 98% through 1-mm thick enamel.

CONCLUSIONS

V-LED irradiance was heterogeneous and decreased throughout the exposure cycles and was also greatly reduced with increasing tip distance. V-LED produced a significantly lower whitening effect on BT and control teeth.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study contributes to the knowledge of V-LED and its clinical use.

In-office dental bleaching with violet-LED: bleaching efficacy and pulpal temperature rise

Objectives

This study evaluated the bleaching efficacy of different in-office protocols associated with violet light emitting diode (V-LED), and measured the pulpal temperature rise caused by V-LED with or without gel application.

Materials and Methods

Bovine incisors were distributed in 4 groups (n = 10): VL – V-LED; HP – 35% hydrogen peroxide (control); HYB – hybrid protocol, V-LED applied without gel for 10 irradiation cycles followed by V-LED applied with gel for another 10 irradiation cycles; and HPVL – gel and V-LED applied for 20 irradiation cycles. Three bleaching sessions were performed with 7-day intervals. Bleaching efficacy was evaluated with ΔEab*, ΔE₀₀ and ΔWI_D. Data were recorded at baseline, 7, 14, 21 and 70 days. For pulpal temperature rise, thermocouples were placed inside the pulp chamber of human incisors. To determine intrapulpal temperature, the teeth were irradiated with V-LED with or without application of bleaching gel. Color difference data were analyzed by 2-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Pulpal temperature was analyzed by t-test (α = 5%).

Results

VL exhibited lower color (ΔEab* and ΔE₀₀) and whiteness changes (ΔWI_D) than the other groups. HPVL presented higher color change values than HYB. HYB and HPVL showed not different ΔWI_D values; and HP showed the highest whiteness changes at all times. There were significant differences comparing ΔT with gel (8.9°C) and without gel application (7.2°C).

Conclusions

HPLV was more efficient than HYB. The 2 protocols with VL showed similar results to control. Gel application combined with VL promoted higher pulpal temperature than to the no gel group.

The effectiveness of in-office dental bleaching with and without sonic activation: A randomized, split-mouth, double-blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at comparing the bleaching efficacy and bleaching sensitivity (BS) of two higher-concentration in-office bleaching gels (37% carbamide peroxide [CP] and 38% hydrogen peroxide [HP]) applied under two conditions: alone or in association with sonic activation.

METHODS

Fifty-six volunteers were randomly assigned in the split-mouth design into the following groups: CP, CP with sonic activation (CPS), HP, and HP with sonic activation (HPS). Two in-office bleaching sessions were performed. Color was evaluated using Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide, and digital spectrophotometer at baseline and at 30 days post-bleaching. Absolute risk and intensity of BS were recorded using two pain scales. All data were evaluated statistically (color changes [t test], BS [Chi-square and McNemar test], and BS intensity [VAS; t test; NRS; Wilcoxon; α = 0.05]).

RESULTS

Significant and higher whitening was observed for HP when compared with CP (p < 0.04). However, higher BS intensity was observed in the former (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in whitening effect or BS when the HP or CP bleaching gels were agitated (sonic application) compared with when they were not (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 37% CP gel demonstrated lower bleaching efficacy and lower BS compared with the 38% HP bleaching gel. The whitening effect was not influenced by the use of sonic activation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of 37% CP gel did not achieve the same whitening effect when compared to 38% HP gel used for in-office bleaching. The use of sonic activation offers no benefit for in-office bleaching.

Clinical performance of 6% hydrogen peroxide containing TiO2N nanoparticles activated by LED in varying wavelengths-a randomized clinical trial

This randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of dental bleaching performed with 6% hydrogen peroxide containing TiO₂-N nanoparticles exposed to blue and violet activation lights. Forty volunteers, selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were randomly distributed into four experimental groups (n = 10): 35% hydrogen peroxide (PH35)-control; 6% hydrogen peroxide (PH6) containing TiO₂-N nanoparticles without light activation; PH6 activated with a blue LED (PH6A); and PH6 activated with a violet LED (PH6V). The three bleaching sessions consisted of 3 consecutive 16-min applications of the bleaching agent described for each group. The groups receiving LED activation were exposed to light intermittently every 1 min, with a total exposure time of 8 min in each application. Efficacy was determined by the color variation in the upper central incisors and canines, using reflectance spectroscopy analysis performed by a calibrated evaluator (ICC = 0.83). Tooth sensitivity was characterized according to the presence and intensity (SI) self-recorded in specific forms. The group treated with PH6V was as effective as the control group (PH35), whereas the groups PH6A and PH6 showed lower efficacy. Regardless of the activation, all groups treated with 6% hydrogen peroxide were less likely to cause sensitivity compared to the control group (PH35). The use pf PH6 activated by LED violet resulted in an effective and safe clinical protocol for in-office dental bleaching.Trial registration number: RBR-8pbydg; registration date: 08/29/2017.

The influence of the renewal or the single application of the peroxide gel on the efficacy and tooth sensitivity outcomes of in-office bleaching-A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To answer the question: "Does the peroxide gel application regimen (single application vs. renewal) influence the efficacy and the tooth sensitivity outcomes of in-office tooth bleaching?"

METHODS

The search was done in Pubmed, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE in February 2021 (updated in July 2021). Randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the single application vs. the renewal protocols of HP were included. The meta-analyses were performed for the objective (ΔE_ab ), subjective (ΔSGU) color changes, and absolute risk of tooth sensitivity (TS). Heterogeneity was evaluated using Q test (I² ). Cochrane Collaboration tool assessed the risk of bias (RoB). The GRADE evaluated the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Five RCT studies remained. Two studies showed high RoB, and three presented some concerns. No significant differences were observed between the protocols in terms of the ΔE_ab , ΔSGU, and TS. ΔE_ab exhibited substantial heterogeneity (I²  = 87%), while ΔSGU (I²  = 60%) and the TS (I²  = 62%) presented a moderate one. The certainty of evidence was considered low or very low, depending on the variable response and the evaluation time.

CONCLUSION

The application regimen (single vs. renewal of HP) did not impact color change or the absolute risk of TS.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The renewal of bleaching gel during the in-office appointment may not be necessary. However, there is at least a low certainty of evidence. Because of this, further randomized clinical trials with appropriate methodology on this topic are encouraged.

LED/laser photoactivation enhances the whitening efficacy of low concentration hydrogen peroxide without microstructural enamel changes

BACKGROUND

The association of low concentration hydrogen peroxide (HP) and a light source has been widely used to achieve efficient bleaching. We investigated the colorimetric and microstructural changes of bovine enamel bleached with 6% HP associated or not with a hybrid light source system of violet light and laser (LED/laser).

METHODS

Twenty bovine crowns were used to obtain specimens of 7 × 7 × 2 mm. Then, they were randomized in two groups (n=10): 6% HP and 6% HP + LED/laser. After staining with dark tea solution, three bleaching sessions were performed. Colorimetric evaluation (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, ∆E₀₀ [CIEDE2000] and WI_D) after 24 hours of each session and 7 days after the final bleaching session was performed. Enamel Vickers microhardness at baseline, 24 hours and 7 days after the last bleaching session were also evaluated. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test was used at a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

6% HP and 6% + HP LED/laser showed satisfactory bleaching results. The group photoactivated showed higher WI_D values (p<0.05). Differences between groups were observed for ∆E₀₀, ∆L* and ∆a* (p<0.05), except for ∆b* (p>0.05). Intra-group differences were also found (p<0.05). Regarding microhardness, no inter or intra-group differences were observed (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The photoactivation with LED/laser enhanced the whitening efficacy of 6% HP compared to the group without photoactivation. Thus, the LED/laser activation appears to be a good option when using low concentration HP-based agents. In addition, both bleaching protocols did not cause changes on enamel microhardness.

Influence of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel renewal on color change during in-office dental photobleaching with violet LED: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To clinically evaluate the effect of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel renewal in association with violet LED (405-410nm) through a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

METHODS

The treatment consisted in 3 bleaching sessions of 15 min each, with an interval of 7 days between them, using 35% hydrogen peroxide combined to violet LED irradiation. Selected patients had two experimental segments for the split-mouth design: No change of the bleaching gel during each session (NBGR) and 3 changes of the bleaching gel every 5 min for each session (BGR). During the 3 bleaching sessions, the selected quadrant received the same treatment. Patients had their upper canines and central incisors teeth color measured with a subjective (color scale - VITA Classical) and an objective (spectrophotometer - VITA Easyshade) method and their teeth sensitivity measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before, immediately after each bleaching session, and 14 days and 2 months (60 days) after the end of the treatment.

RESULTS

The protocol adopted in the present study reached satisfactory results regarding color change. No statistical difference between groups was observed immediately after the end of the treatment and in the follow-up analysis for both subjective and objective color evaluation. No difference in tooth sensitivity between segments was observed.

CONCLUSION

There is no need for bleaching gel renewal when following the clinical protocol of 3 sessions of 15 min in a bleaching protocol of 35% hydrogen peroxide combined with violet LED.

Colorimetric evaluation after in-office tooth bleaching with violet LED: 6- and 12-month follow-ups of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of in-office bleaching with violet LED light (LED) alone or combined with carbamide (CP) or hydrogen (HP) peroxides.

METHODS

Volunteers of a previous short-term study were recalled for 6- and 12-month follow-ups, according to the following interventions (n = 18/group): LED, CP, LED/CP, HP, and LED/HP. The objective color (ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀) and whiteness index (ΔWI_D) changes were calculated applying the CIELab coordinates' values obtained using a spectrophotometer. A visual shade guide determined the tooth's subjective color change (ΔSGU). Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA or Welch's ANOVA, following appropriate post hoc tests (α = 5%).

RESULTS

The LED and CP groups exhibited the lowest ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀, and ΔSGU (p < 0.05), but the LED group displayed a significantly lower ΔWI_D. After 12 months, the LED/CP group presented a higher ΔE_ab and ΔE₀₀ than the CP group (p < 0.05). ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀, ΔSGU, or ΔWI_D means did not differ statistically between the LED/CP and HP groups. The LED/HP group presented a higher ΔE₀₀ than the HP group, regardless of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The bleaching efficacy of LED alone was significantly lower compared to the LED/CP and HP-containing protocols. After 12 months, the LED/CP and HP groups did not differ in bleaching efficacy. LED irradiation only increased the objective color change of bleaching gels.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

LED alone promoted a long-term perceptible bleaching, but not compatible with that of high-concentrated HP. The bleaching outcomes of violet irradiation to 37% CP were maintained over time, with LED/CP demonstrating comparable results to HP even after 12 months.

NATIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY (REBEC)

RBR-5t6bd9.

Clinical evaluation of in-office tooth whitening with violet LED (405 nm): A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although there is little evidence showing the effectiveness of violet LED on in-office tooth whitening, there are some studies which have reported satisfactory results. This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effect of a violet light emission diode (LED) (405 nm) system, used in-office, on tooth whitening, sensitivity, use of medication after whitening and quality of life.

METHODS

Eight patients were randomized into 4 groups (n = 20): G1 - violet LED, G2 - 35% carbamide peroxide (CP) and violet LED, G3 only CP 35% and G4 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). The color was measured using a spectrophotometer at the following times: baseline, 15 and 180days. The colorimetric changes were analyzed using measurements from the CieLab System ΔE (ΔL, Δa and Δb) and the WID (Whiteness Index for Dentistry) for the 4 groups. Tooth sensitivity was recorded via a visual analog scale (VAS). Additionally, the Psychosocial Impact of Dental. Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) was used to evaluate quality of life.

RESULTS

For the analysis of ΔL, G4 and G2 presented more brightness than G1 and G3 (p<0.05), implying that G2 is at least as good as G4 (p>0.05). For measure of Δa, G4 presented better results, standing out from the other groups. (p<0.05). For Δb, both G4 and G2 showed a greater tendency for blue color than groups G1 and G3 (p <0.05). When analyzing ∆E at the 180-day follow up, G4 produced the highest ∆E, while G3 showed the lowest ∆E. The other 2 whitening groups produced intermediate ∆E values. For ∆W, G1 and G3 significantly differed from G2 and G3. When analyzing the 180-day follow up, G2 produced the highest ∆W, while G3 showed the lowest ∆W. The other two whitening treatments produced intermediate ∆W values. As for sensitivity, only G4 patients showed dental sensitivity within 24 h of the bleaching, with pain ceasing after 48 h. For G4, 33% of the patients needed to take analgesics within the first 24 h after the first 3 whitening sessions. For PIDAQ, there was no overall decrease in score over time for any of the groups and there was no difference between them (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that violet LED was not able to whiten teeth at the same intensity, when used alone, as it was when associated with 35% CP, contrary to our initial hypothesis. However, given that pain was not consistently reported in G2, one could suggest that treatment with LED + 35% CP is quite similar to that of 35% HP when used for tooth whitening, but with better pain outcomes. All treatments suggested an improvement in quality of life.Clinical Trial Registry: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; the registration number is NCT03192852 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03192852.

Bleaching and microstructural effects of low concentration hydrogen peroxide photoactivated with LED/laser system on bovine enamel

BACKGROUND

Tooth whitening protocols with low concentration hydrogen peroxide (HP) appear to minimize the microstructural effect on teeth. In addition, light sources have been used to enhance bleaching efficiency. This study evaluated the color change and microhardness of a protocol with 6% HP photoactivated by LED/laser in comparison with 35% HP.

METHODS

Twenty bovine incisors were randomized in two groups: 6% HP + LED/laser and 35% HP (n=10). Teeth were submitted to staining using dark tea. Three whitening sessions were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enamel microhardness (VHN) and color change evaluation (∆L*, ∆a*, ∆b*, ∆E₀₀ [CIEDE2000], and WI_D) before 24 hours and 7 days after the last whitening session were performed. Two-way repeated ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test was used (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Both groups showed perceptible color changes, being more pronounce for 35% HP. Differences were observed for ∆a*, ∆b* and ∆E₀₀ (p≤0.027), except for ∆L* (p>0.05). Differences were also found in the comparison among the evaluation times within the same group (p≤0.027), except for ∆a* results (p>0.05). WI_D showed that 35% HP exhibited high whiteness values. Regarding microhardness, the groups did not show significant differences (p>0.05). However, 35% HP showed decreased values after 7 days of the last whitening session compared to the baseline (p≤0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

6% HP + LED/laser promoted perceptible color change, but not comparable with 35% HP. No differences on enamel microhardness were observed between the whitening protocols. However, 35% HP showed decreased hardness after 7 days of whitening compared to baseline.

Effects of dental bleaching protocols with violet radiation on the color and chemical composition of stained bovine enamel

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the bleaching efficacy of a violet radiation (VR) combined or not with bleaching gels on the color and mineral content of stained teeth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Enamel/dentin blocks were obtained and stained (n = 50) with coffee, red wine, tobacco smoke, or were left non-stained. The stained or not-stained blocks (n = 10) were distributed into five bleaching groups (n = 10): VR, CP (37 % carbamide peroxide), VR/CP, HP (35 % hydrogen peroxide), and VR/HP. Color (ΔE_00, ΔL, Δa, and Δb) and whiteness index (ΔWI_D) changes were evaluated after staining and after bleaching using a spectrophotometer. Calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), and Ca/P contents (in wt%) were measured after bleaching using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Data was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05) using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (ΔE_00, ΔWI_D, ΔL, Δb, wt%) or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (Δa).

RESULTS

VR alone caused higher colorimetric changes on coffee, tobacco and red wine-stained groups compared to non-stained enamel (p < 0.05). VR/CP exhibited higher colorimetric changes compared to CP in coffee and non-stained groups. The VR/CP, HP and VR/HP groups exhibited no change differences (p > 0.05). No differences were observed for the wt% of Ca, P and Ca/P between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The violet radiation was more effective in bleaching stained rather than non-stained teeth. VR combined with 37 % carbamide peroxide was as effective as the HP agent. Besides, no adverse effects could be observed in the enamel mineral content, regardless of the bleaching protocol tested, according to the EDS semi-quantitative analysis.

Color stability of dental enamel bleached with violet LED associated with or without Low concentration peroxide gels

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro color of dental enamel bleached with the violet LED, associated with or without low-concentration of peroxide; analyzed in two time intervals: 24 h later and 6 months after the treatment.

METHODS

Ninety fragments of bovine teeth (6 × 6 mm and 3 mm thick) were randomly divided into 6 groups according to bleaching treatment: NB - no bleaching, VL - Violet LED, HP- 7.5 % hydrogen peroxide, HP + VL - 7.5 % hydrogen peroxide + violet LED, CP - 22 % carbamide peroxide, CP + VL - 22 % carbamide peroxide + violet LED. The color change was analyzed by using a spectrophotometer, at time intervals of 24 h and 6 months after performing the bleaching techniques (n = 12). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to verify the enamel surface morphology after treatment (n = 3).

RESULTS

The color change data were analyzed using ANOVA and a post-hoc Tukey tests (α = 0.05). The VL group showed chromatic changes after 24 h of treatment, however the groups submitted to bleaching gel treatments associated with or without violet LED (CP + VL, CP, HP, HP + VL) showed the highest color change values at all time intervals analyzed, with color stability after 6 months of treatment for the CP + VL group. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed the greatest change in enamel surface for Groups CP and HP.

CONCLUSIONS

It could be concluded that violet LED had immediate bleaching effect without promoting significant changes in enamel morphology, however the association with carbamide peroxide 22 % showed color stability and greater bleaching efficacy than the use of violet LED alone, after 6 months.