The benefits and side effects of gadolinium-based contrast agents in multiple sclerosis patients

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots' Understanding of the Risks and Benefits of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scenarios

PURPOSE

Patients may seek online information to better understand medical imaging procedures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of information provided by 2 popular artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots pertaining to common imaging scenarios' risks, benefits, and alternatives.

METHODS

Fourteen imaging-related scenarios pertaining to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used. Factors including the use of intravenous contrast, the presence of renal disease, and whether the patient was pregnant were included in the analysis. For each scenario, 3 prompts for outlining the (1) risks, (2) benefits, and (3) alternative imaging choices or potential implications of not using contrast were inputted into ChatGPT and Bard. A grading rubric and a 5-point Likert scale was used by 2 independent reviewers to grade responses. Prompt variability and chatbot context dependency were also assessed.

RESULTS

ChatGPT's performance was superior to Bard's in accurately responding to prompts per Likert grading (4.36 ± 0.63 vs 3.25 ± 1.03 seconds, P < .0001). There was substantial agreement between independent reviewer grading for ChatGPT (κ = 0.621) and Bard (κ = 0.684). Response text length was not statistically different between ChatGPT and Bard (2087 ± 256 characters vs 2162 ± 369 characters, P = .24). Response time was longer for ChatGPT (34 ± 2 vs 8 ± 1 seconds, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT performed superior to Bard at outlining risks, benefits, and alternatives to common imaging scenarios. Generally, context dependency and prompt variability did not change chatbot response content. Due to the lack of detailed scientific reasoning and inability to provide patient-specific information, both AI chatbots have limitations as a patient information resource.

[Use of Gadolinium in Follow-Up MRI of Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Current Recommendations]

Multiple sclerosis is the most frequent demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and is characterized by early onset and progressive disability. Magnetic resonance imaging, due to its high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of demyelinating lesions, is the most useful diagnostic test for this disease, with the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents being an important contribution to imaging interpretation. Although contrast is essential for diagnostic purposes, its routine use in monitoring disease activity, response to treatment, and related complications is controversial. This article aims to collate current recommendations regarding the use of gadolinium in the imaging follow-up of multiple sclerosis and establish effective and safe guidelines for clinical practice. The literature review was conducted in PubMed, using the terms 'multiple sclerosis', 'magnetic resonance imaging' and 'gadolinium', or 'contrast media'. Articles published between January 2013 and January 2023 concerning the safety of gadolinium and the use of these contrast agents in follow-up scans of adult patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis were selected. Although no biological or clinical consequences have been unequivocally attributed to the retention of gadolinium in the brain, which were mostly reported with linear agents, health authorities have been recommending the restriction of contrast to essential clinical circumstances. In multiple sclerosis, the detection of subclinical contrast-enhancing lesions with no corresponding new/ enlarging T2-WI lesions is rare and has a questionable impact on therapeutic decisions. On the other hand, gadolinium has a higher sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of relapses, in the detection of recent disease activity, before and after treatment initiation, and in patients with a large lesion burden or diffuse/confluent T2-WI lesions. Contrary to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy screening, monitoring of immune restitution inflammatory syndrome also benefits from the administration of gadolinium. It is feasible and safe to exclude gadolinium-based contrast agents from routine follow-up scans of multiple sclerosis, despite their additional contribution in specific clinical circumstances that should be acknowledged by the neurologist and neuroradiologist.